Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Importance of diurnal refugia to a hare-wallaby reintroduction in Western Australia

Blair Hardman A C and Dorian Moro A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University, 100 Joondalup Drive, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.

B NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Bangor, Deiniol Road, LL57 2UP, Gwynedd, UK.

C Corresponding author. Email: bhardman@hotmail.com

Wildlife Research 33(5) 355-359 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR05088
Submitted: 9 October 2005  Accepted: 4 July 2006   Published: 14 August 2006

Abstract

In an effort to learn more about the potential for reintroduction of hare-wallabies to sites in Australia, 34 captive-bred hare-wallabies were released onto Peron Peninsula within the Shark Bay World Heritage Property in 2001 as part of an experimental reintroduction program. One objective of this experiment was to characterise their behaviour and daytime refugia to identify suitable habitat for future releases. The mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus) and merrnine (Lagostrophus fasciatus) were fitted with radio-transmitters and tracked daily. Merrnine were more faithful to a previously occupied shelter than mala. Mala maintained a solitary daytime habit at all times. Within the study area, mala preferentially sought low-lying vegetation primarily comprising the species Lamarchea hakeifolia, which provided dense cover up to 1 m in height, under which they constructed scrapes. L. hakeifolia was preferred as shelter vegetation instead of Triodia (spinifex) hummocks, despite Triodia hummock habitat being preferred by mala in central Australia. Merrnine occupied taller vegetation with an open understorey to 1.5 m, although the extremity of the understorey remained dense at this height. Individual merrnine sometimes sheltered with conspecifics of the opposite sex. Since both species utilised floristically and structurally variable vegetation, we suggest that they have the ability to cope with vegetation that has been altered by changes in fire regimes and introduced herbivores. This is particularly important for future reintroduction exercises as the results suggest that vegetation characteristics required to support these species, particularly mala, may be variable rather than limited to perceived necessary habitat types in central Australia or on islands. These results should allow future reintroduction projects to consider a wider range of release-site options during their planning phase.


Acknowledgments

This project has been possible by the cooperation of the Department of Conservation and Land Management and Edith Cowan University. Further financial assistance was provided by Australian Geographic. The use of animals in this study was approved by Department of Conservation and Land Management and Edith Cowan University Animals Ethics Committees. We thank Colleen Sims, Peter Mawson and Keith Morris for assisting with the initial logistical aspects of this project and seeing it through to fruition. In particular, we thank Kathy Himbeck and many other CALM Denham staff for their knowledge and assistance during the data-collection stage of this study. Thanks go to Peter Mawson for valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.


References

Baynes A. (1990). The mammals of Shark Bay, Western Australia. In ‘Research in Shark Bay. Report of the France–Australe Bicentenary Expedition Committee’. (Eds P. F. Berry, S. D. Bradshaw and B. R. Wilson.) pp. 313–325. (Western Australian Museum: Perth.)

Burbidge A. A. (1971). The flora and fauna of the Monte Bello Islands, Report No. 9. Department of Fisheries and Fauna, Western Australia, Perth.

Carter, K. , and Goldizen, A. W. (2003). Habitat choice and vigilance behaviour of brush-tailed rock-wallabies (Petrogale penicillata) within their nocturnal foraging ranges. Wildlife Research 30, 355–364.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gibson D. F., Johnson K. A., Langford D. G., Cole J. R., Clarke D. E., and Community W. (1994). The rufous hare-wallaby Lagorchestes hirsutus: a history of experimental reintroduction in the Tanami Desert, Northern Territory. In ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Ed. M. Serena.) pp. 171–176. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Hanski, I. K. , Stevens, P. C. , Ihalempia, P. , and Selonen, V. (2000). Home-range size, movements, and nest-site use in the Siberian flying squirrel, Pteromys volans. Journal of Mammalogy 81, 798–809.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | IUCN (2004). ‘2004 Red List of Threatened Species.’ <www.iucnredlist.org>[accessed on 10 March 2006].

Lundie-Jenkins, G. W. (1993). Ecology of the rufous hare-wallaby, Lagorchestes hirsutus Gould, (Marsupialia: Macropodidae), in the Tanami Desert, Northern Territory. 1. Patterns of habitat use. Wildlife Research 20, 457–476.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Morris K. (2000). Fauna translocations in Western Australia 1971–1999: an overview. In ‘Biodiversity and the Reintroduction of Native Fauna at Uluru–Kata Tjuta National Park’. (Eds J. J. Gillen, R. Hamilton, W. A. Low and C. Creagh.) pp. 64–74. (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra.)

Morris, K. , Sims, C. , Himbeck, K. , Christensen, P. E. S. , Sercombe, N. , Ward, B. , and Noakes, N. (2004). Project Eden – fauna recovery on Peron Peninsula, Shark Bay: Western Shield review – February 2003. Conservation Science Western Australia 5, 202–234.
Sims C., and Himbeck K. (2001). Translocation of mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus (undescribed central Australian subspecies NTM U2430)). In ‘The Peron Threatened Fauna Breeding Centre to Francois Peron National Park’. p. 11. (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Denham, WA.)

Taylor, R. J. (1993). Home range, nest use and activity of the Tasmanian bettong, Bettongia gaimardi. Wildlife Research 20, 87–95.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wallis I. R., Jarman P. J., Johnson B. E., and Liddle R. W. (1989). Nest site and use of nests by rufous bettongs Aepyprymnus rufescens. In ‘Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-kangaroos’. (Eds G. Grigg, P. J. Jarman and I. D. Hume.) pp. 619–623. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)