Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR04076
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(4)

The sociogenetic structure of a controlled feral pig population

Peter B. S. Spencer A C , Steve J. Lapidge B , Jordan O. Hampton A and John R. Pluske A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150 Australia.

B Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia and Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, PO Box 318, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: P.Spencer@murdoch.edu.au

Wildlife Research 32(4) 297-304 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04076
Submitted: 8 September 2004  Accepted: 24 May 2005   Published: 5 July 2005

Abstract

In Australia, the feral pig (Sus scrofa) is a significant vertebrate pest that has an impact on agricultural production, public health and ecosystem integrity. Although feral pigs are controlled throughout much of their range, little is known about the impact that these control programs have had on the social biology, structure and the dispersal of pigs. To begin to address this, we collected demographic data and genetic samples from 123 feral pigs culled during a regional aerial shooting program over 33 pastoral properties in the semi-arid rangelands of southern Queensland, Australia. Sampling was carried out after two years of extensive control efforts (aerial 1080-baiting) and the samples therefore represented a controlled, persecuted population with a bias towards young animals. The analysis of 13 microsatellite loci suggested that females will accept multiple matings, females form loose mobs that appear to be highly dynamic social groups, and males will travel large distances between mobs. These data indicate that feral pigs in this population had a high level of social contact and form a single open population with no evidence of genetic (population) structuring. Such information may be important to integrate into management strategies, particularly the development of contingency plans regarding the spread of wildlife diseases.


Acknowledgments

We thank M. Derrick, C. Hunter, J. Farrell, M. Wingett, R. Cobon and J. Kennedy (MI Helicopters) for assisting in organisation and collection of samples. L. E. Twigg, three reviewers and the editor made valuable comments on earlier versions. We are also grateful for the USA Department of Agriculture support from the USA Pig Genome Coordination Project (M. Rothschild). This research was supported by the Noorama Bestprac Group, the Australian Government National Feral Animal Control Program, Murdoch University, Macquarie Bank and the WA Department of Conservation and Land Management. This project was approved by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines Pest Animal Ethics Committee.


References

Agrawal, A. A. (2001). Phenotypic plasticity and the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294, 321–326.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Braysher M. , and Saunders G. (2003). PESTPLAN – a guide for setting priorities and developing a management plan for pest animals. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

Caley, P. (1997). Movements, activity patterns and habitat use of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical habitat. Wildlife Research 24, 77–87.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Caughley G. , and Sinclair A. R. (Eds.) (1994). ‘Wildlife Ecology and Management.’ (Blackwell Science: Cambridge.)

Choquenot, D. , Kilgour, R. J. , and Lukins, B. S. (1993). An evaluation of feral pig trapping. Wildlife Research 20, 15–22.
Choquenot D. , McIlroy J. C. , and Korn T. (Eds) (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Bureau of Resource Sciences: Canberra.)

Crooks, J. A. (2002). Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers Oikos 97, 153–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Giles J. R. (1980). The ecology of feral pigs in western New South Wales. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney.

Goudet J. (2001). FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html.

Hampton, J. O. , Spencer, P. B. S. , Alpers, D. L. , Twigg, L. E. , Woolnough, A. P. , Doust, J. , Higgs, T. , and Pluske, J. (2004a). Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: a case study with feral pigs. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 735–743.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Long J. L. (2003). ‘Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution and Influence.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Marshall, T. C. , Slate, J. , Kruuk, L. E. B. , and Pemberton, J. M. (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7, 639–655.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Olsen P. (1998). ‘Australia’s Pest Animals. New Solutions to Old Problems.’ (Bureau of Resource Sciences: Canberra.)

Pech, R. P. , and Hone, J. (1988). A model of the dynamics and control of an outbreak of foot-and mouth disease in feral pigs in Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 63–77.
Saunders G. , Bunn C. , Eggleston C. , Garner G. , and Henzell R. (2002). ‘AUSVETPLAN, Wild Animal Management Manual – Strategic and Operational Guidelines.’ (Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand.)

Spencer, P. B. S. , and Hampton, J. (2005). Illegal translocation and genetic structure of feral pigs in Western Australia. The Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 377–384.
Wilson D. , and Choquenot D. (1996). Review of feral pigs and exotic disease preparedness. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Canberra.

Zenger, K. R. , Eldridge, M. D. B. , and Cooper, D. W. (2003). Intraspecific variation, sex-biased dispersal and phylogeography of the eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus). Heredity 91, 153–162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |