A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of suburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots
Sean I. FitzGibbon A C and Darryl N. Jones BA School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia.
B Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Qld 4111, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: s.fitzgibbon@uq.edu.au
Wildlife Research 33(3) 233-241 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04029
Submitted: 22 April 2004 Accepted: 20 March 2006 Published: 31 May 2006
Abstract
Within the expanding city of Brisbane in south-east Queensland, numerous fragments of native and regrowth vegetation are scattered across the largely urbanised landscape. These fragments provide refuge to a great diversity of native wildlife, and provide residents with the opportunity to experience nature on their doorstep. To assess the diversity and abundance of this wildlife, recent changes in these parameters, and the value of wildlife and bushland fragments to residents of Brisbane, a questionnaire survey was distributed to 300 households each located adjacent to one of 38 urban bushland fragments. A total of 172 surveys (57%) were returned, producing 768 records of 83 fauna species, dominated by birds and mammals; bandicoots were widely reported from the 38 fragments. Several historical records provided evidence of recent local extinctions within fragments, highlighting the continuing declines in various species of native wildlife within Brisbane. Several human–wildlife conflicts were identified, but overall residents were tolerant of such conflicts. Bandicoots were disliked by a small minority (3%) of residents owing to the holes they dig in lawns and gardens in search of food, and their potential as vectors of ticks. Most respondents expressed an appreciation for the presence of native wildlife (96%) and bushland fragments (97%) in their local area, emphasising the importance of incorporating human dimension values into the management of this urban biodiversity.
Acknowledgments
We thank The University of Queensland, Griffith University, and the Brisbane City Council for extensive financial and in-kind support of the project, as well as the Australian Geographic Society and the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales for additional funding. The advice and assistance of Anne Goldizen, Steve Van Dyke, Robbie Wilson, Caralyn Kenyon and Stacey McLean was also greatly appreciated.
Ash, S. J. , and Adams, C. E. (2003). Public preferences for free-ranging domestic cat (Felis catus) management options. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 334–339.
Brown, G. W. , and Triggs, B. E. (1990). Diets of wild canids and foxes in East Gippsland 1983–1987, using predator scat analysis. Australian Mammalogy 13, 209–213.
Collins, G. H. , and Ingwersen, K. (2000). Paralysis tick research. Australian Veterinary Journal 78, 311.
| PubMed |
Decker, D. J. , and Chase, L. C. (1997). Human dimensions of living with wildlife – a management challenge for the 21st century. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 788–795.
Dique, D. S. , Thompson, J. , Preece, H. J. , de Villiers, D. L. , and Carrick, F. N. (2003). Dispersal patterns in a regional koala population in south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research 30, 281–290.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald, B. M. (1990). Is cat control needed to protect urban wildlife? Environmental Conservation 17, 168–169.
Hutchings, S. (2003). The diet of feral house cats (Felis catus) at a regional rubbish tip, Victoria. Wildlife Research 30, 103–110.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, D. N. , and Everding, S. E. (1991). Australian brush-turkeys in a suburban environment – implications for conflict and conservation. Wildlife Research 18, 285–297.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lunney, D. , and Matthews, A. (2001). The contribution of the community to defining the distribution of a vulnerable species, the spotted-tailed quoll, Dasyurus maculatus. Wildlife Research 28, 537–545.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
May, S. A. , and Norton, T. W. (1996). Influence of fragmentation and disturbance on the potential impact of feral predators on native fauna in Australian forest ecosystems. Wildlife Research 23, 387–400.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 430–434.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newell, G. R. (1999). Responses of Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) to loss of habitat within a tropical rainforest fragment. Biological Conservation 91, 181–189.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Proulx, G. (1988). Control of urban wildlife predation by cats through public education. Environmental Conservation 15, 358–359.
Scott, L. K. , Hume, I. D. , and Dickman, C. R. (1999). Ecology and population biology of long-nosed bandicoots (Perameles nasuta) at North Head, Sydney Harbour National Park. Wildlife Research 26, 805–821.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tilman, D. , May, R. M. , Lehman, C. L. , and Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Dyck, S. (2001). Sex to die for. Nature Australia 27, 20–21.