Environmental DNA as a detection tool for small-bodied, cryptic, threatened fish in a highly turbid freshwater lake system
D. J. Stoessel
A * , T. A. Raadik A , M. Adams B C , J. J. Shelley A , T. J. Hately D , D. Iervasi E , P. Rose F , A. Russell F and N. Murphy D
A
B
C
D
E
F
Abstract
Where conservation efforts are undertaken to decrease downward trends in fish populations, comparatively few resources are directed to small-bodied cryptic species. The true extent of the decline of many of these species is therefore often unknown. Where surveys have occurred, they are frequently limited by budget and hence effort. Consequently, there is a risk that rare species may not be physically captured despite their presence at a site. Such an outcome has dire consequences for the conservation of remnant populations of threatened fish. To counter possible false negative detections, environmental DNA is increasingly being used in conjunction with, or as a precursor to, physical surveys. The Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon (Mogurnda adspersa) is a small, threatened freshwater fish native to Australia. Recent surveys captured M. adspersa in two highly turbid waterbodies in north-central Victoria. This capture represented the first detection of the species in the state in more than 20 years. Because these waterbodies are part of a network of hydrologically connected systems, it was suspected that the species likely had a broader distribution in the region.
To develop a probe-based eDNA assay for M. adspersa and compare its sensitivity against a physical sampling program.
Detection (presence/absence) between eDNA and traditional surveys was compared across multiple sites.
eDNA presents an effective tool for determining the presence of M. adspersa. The eDNA survey demonstrated significant clustering of eDNA detections towards the outlets of lakes sampled, suggesting concentrated eDNA at this point, or that, due to the channels being shallower, the eDNA of resident individuals may be less diluted.
Based on these results, future survey of rare, cryptic species in highly turbid lake systems should in the first instance include a broad scale eDNA survey, with sampling concentrated at outlet channels.
The likely most cost-effective approach to determining the presence/absence of rare species in lake systems is the collection of eDNA samples at outlet channels.
Keywords: conservation, conservation management, endangered species, geographical range, native, population distribution.
References
Allan EA, Zhang WG, Lavery AC, Govindarajan AF (2021) Environmental DNA shedding and decay rates from diverse animal forms and thermal regimes. Environmental DNA 3(2), 492-514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bailey LL, Simons TR, Pollock KH (2004) Estimating detection probability parameters for plethodon salamanders using the robust capture–recapture design. Journal of Wildlife Management 68(1), 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Balasingham KD, Walter RP, Mandrak NE, Heath DD (2018) Environmental DNA detection of rare and invasive fish species in two Great Lakes tributaries. Molecular Ecology 27, 112-127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Barnes MA, Turner CR (2016) The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 17(1), 1-17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Barnes MA, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Renshaw MA, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2014) Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environmental Science & Technology 48(3), 1819-1827.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bedwell ME, Goldberg CS (2020) Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems. Ecology and Evolution 10(3), 1602-1612.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Beng KC, Corlett RT (2020) Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodiversity and Conservation 29(7), 2089-2121.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bessey C, Jarman SN, Berry O, Olsen YS, Bunce M, Simpson T, Power M, McLaughlin J, Edgar GJ, Keesing J (2020) Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding. Environmental DNA 2(4), 493-504.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Boakes EH, Fuller RA, McGowan PJK, Mace GM (2016) Uncertainty in identifying local extinctions: the distribution of missing data and its effects on biodiversity measures. Biology Letters 12(3), 20150824.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Boxall GD, Sandberg JJ, Kroon FJ (2002) Population structure, movement and habitat preferences of the purple-spotted gudgeon, Mogurnda adspersa. Marine and Freshwater Research 53(5), 909-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bylemans J, Furlan EM, Gleeson DM, Hardy CM, Duncan RP (2018) Does size matter? An experimental evaluation of the relative abundance and decay rates of aquatic environmental DNA. Environmental Science & Technology 52(11), 6408-6416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Campbell SP, Clark JA, Crampton LH, Guerry AD, Hatch LT, Hosseini PR, Lawler JJ, O’Connor RJ (2002) An assessment of monitoring efforts in endangered species recovery plans. Ecological Applications 12(3), 674-681.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dejean T, Valentini A, Duparc A, Pellier-Cuit S, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, Miaud C (2011) Persistence of environmental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLoS ONE 6, e23398.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Eichmiller JJ, Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2014) The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake. PLoS ONE 9(11), e112611.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ellis IM, Stoessel D, Hammer MP, Wedderburn SD, Suitor L, Hall A (2013) Conservation of an inauspicious endangered freshwater fish, Murray hardyhead (Craterocephalus fluviatilis), during drought and competing water demands in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 64, 792-806.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Goldberg CS, Turner CR, Deiner K, Klymus KE, Thomsen PF, Murphy MA, Spear SF, et al. (2016) Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(11), 1299-1307.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hammer MP, Goodman TS, Adams M, Faulks LF, Unmack PJ, Whiterod NS, Walker KF (2015) Regional extinction, rediscovery and rescue of a freshwater fish from a highly modified environment: the need for rapid response. Biological Conservation 192, 91-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harris JH, Gehrke PC (1997) ‘Fish and rivers in stress: the New South Wales rivers survey.’ (New South Wales Fisheries Office of Conservation and the Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, in association with New South Wales Resource and Conservation Assessment Council: Sydney, NSW, Australia)
Li J, Lawson Handley LJ, Harper LR, Brys R, Watson HV, Di Muri C, Zhang X, Hänfling B (2019) Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding. Environmental DNA 1(3), 238-250.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lintermans M, Geyle HM, Beatty S, Brown C, Ebner BC, Freeman R, Hammer MP, Humphreys WF, Kennard MJ, Kern P, Martin K, Morgan DL, Raadik TA, Unmack PJ, Wager R, Woinarski JCZ, Garnett ST (2020) Big trouble for little fish: identifying Australian freshwater fishes in imminent risk of extinction. Pacific Conservation Biology 26(4), 365-377.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Minett JF, Garcia de Leaniz C, Brickle P, Consuegra S (2021) A new high-resolution melt curve eDNA assay to monitor the simultaneous presence of invasive brown trout (Salmo trutta) and endangered galaxiids. Environmental DNA 3(3), 561-572.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moyer GR, Díaz-Ferguson E, Hill JE, Shea C (2014) Assessing environmental DNA detection in controlled lentic systems. PLoS ONE 9(7), e103767.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Murakami H, Yoon S, Kasai A, Minamoto T, Yamamoto S, Sakata MK, Horiuchi T, Sawada H, Kondoh M, Yamashita Y, Masuda R (2019) Dispersion and degradation of environmental DNA from caged fish in a marine environment. Fisheries Science 85, 327-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2014) Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Molecular Ecology Resources 14(1), 109-116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Pope KL, Goldberg CS, Nelson NL, Cummings AK, Seaborn T, Piovia-Scott J (2020) Designing environmental DNA surveys in complex aquatic systems: backpack sampling for rare amphibians in Sierra Nevada meadows. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 30(10), 1975-1987.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Reynolds JD, Webb TJ, Hawkins LA (2005) Life history and ecological correlates of extinction risk in European freshwater fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62, 854-862.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saddlier S, Koehn JD, Hammer MP (2013) Let’s not forget the small fishes–conservation of two threatened species of pygmy perch in south-eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 64(9), 874-886.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sales NG, Wangensteen OS, Carvalho DC, Mariani S (2019) Influence of preservation methods, sample medium and sampling time on eDNA recovery in a neotropical river. Environmental DNA 1(2), 119-130.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sasaki M, Hammer MP, Unmack PJ, Adams M, Beheregaray LB (2016) Population genetics of a widely distributed small freshwater fish with varying conservation concerns: the southern purple-spotted gudgeon, Mogurnda adspersa. Conservation Genetics 17(4), 875-889.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Spens J, Evans AR, Halfmaerten D, Knudsen SW, Sengupta ME, Mak SST, Sigsgaard EE, Hellström M (2017) Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8(5), 635-645.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stoessel D (2020) Survey for Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon (Mogurnda adspersa) in the Reedy Lakes complex, Kerang. Unpublished Client Report for Loddon-Mallee Fire, Forestry and Regions, and Water and Catchment Group, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.
Strickler KM, Fremier AK, Goldberg CS (2015) Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms. Biological Conservation 183, 85-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation 183, 4-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tillotson MD, Kelly RP, Duda JJ, Hoy M, Kralj J, Quinn TP (2018) Concentrations of environmental DNA (eDNA) reflect spawning salmon abundance at fine spatial and temporal scales. Biological Conservation 220, 1-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tingley R, Coleman R, Gecse N, van Rooyen A, Weeks AR (2021) Accounting for false positive detections in occupancy studies based on environmental DNA: a case study of a threatened freshwater fish (Galaxiella pusilla). Environmental DNA 3(2), 388-397.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Turner CR, Uy KL, Everhart RC (2015) Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in aquatic sediments than surface water. Biological Conservation 183, 93-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK, Jane SF, Lowe WH, Whiteley AR, Schwartz MK (2013) Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity. PLoS ONE 8(3), e59520.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wintle BA, Kavanagh RP, McCarthy MA, Burgman MA (2005) Estimating and dealing with detectability in occupancy surveys for forest owls and arboreal marsupials. Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 905-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
World Wildlife Fund (2021) The World’s forgotten fishes. WWF International. Available at https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/the-world-s-forgotten-fishes [accessed 16 January 2023]
