Raccoon abundance indexing and removal: implications for Blanding’s turtle nest success
Andrew U. Rutter A D , John P. Vanek B E , Gary A. Glowacki A , Callie K. Golba B , Richard B. King
B * , Craig K. Pullins C F and Wesley E. Smith C G
A
B
C
D Present address:
E Present address:
F Present address:
G Present address:
Abstract
Elevated mesopredator populations can pose a threat to species of conservation concern.
We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of raccoon removal on their abundance and on Blanding’s turtle nest success.
We used an index of raccoon abundance generated from camera-trap data and information on the success of Blanding’s turtle nests to compare adjacent control and raccoon-removal sites.
Raccoon detections were more frequent and abundance index values were higher at control sites than at the removal site. However, Blanding’s turtle nest success did not differ between control and removal sites, likely because of differences in nest location and camera proximity.
The efficacy of raccoon removal for Blanding’s turtle conservation may vary with nest habitat characteristics and can benefit from a priori knowledge of nesting areas.
Mesopredator removal can be beneficial to species of conservation concern, provided it occurs in areas of greatest impact.
Keywords: Blanding’s turtle, Emydoidea blandingii, endangered, Illinois, mesopredator, nest success, Procyon lotor, raccoon.
References
Barton BT, Roth JD (2008) Implications of intraguild predation for sea turtle nest protection. Biological Conservation 141, 2139-2145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bauder JM, Allen ML, Benson TJ, Miller CA, Stodola KW (2021) An approach for using multiple indices for monitoring long-term trends of mesopredators at broad spatial scales. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 3529-3547.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beaudry F, Demaynadier PG, Hunter ML, Jr. (2010) Nesting movements and the use of anthropogenic nesting sites by spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata) and Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 5, 1-8.
| Google Scholar |
Bengsen AJ, Leung LK-P, Lapidge SJ, Gordon IJ (2011) Using a general index approach to analyze camera-trap abundance indices. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1222-1227.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brown LD, Cat TT, DasGupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 16, 101-133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Christiansen JL, Gallaway BJ (1984) Raccoon removal, nesting success, and hatchling emergence in Iowa turtles with special reference to Kinosternon flavescens (Kinosternidae). The Southwestern Naturalist 29, 343-348.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (2016) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Blanding’s turtle Emydoidea blandingii, Nova Scotia population and Great Lakes/St Lawrence population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Quebec, Canada. Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html [accessed 4 May 2023]
Congdon JD, Dunham AE, van Loben Sels RC (1993) Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7, 826-833.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Congdon JD, Nagle RD, Kinney OM, Osenioski M, Avery HW, van Loben Sels RC, Tinkle DW (2000) Nesting ecology and embryo mortality: implications for hatchling success and demography of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3, 569-579.
| Google Scholar |
Dowling Z, Hartwig T, Kiviat E, Keesing F (2010) Experimental management of nesting habitat for the Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii). Ecological Restoration 28, 154-159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Duchesne T, Graitson E, Lourdais O, Ursenbacher S, Dufrêne M (2022) Fine-scale vegetation complexity and habitat structure influence predation pressure on a declining snake. Journal of Zoology 318, 205-217.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Engeman RM (2005) Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations. Wildlife Research 32, 203-210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Engeman RM, Erik Martin R, Constantin B, Noel R, Woolard J (2003) Monitoring predators to optimize their management for marine turtle nest protection. Biological Conservation 113, 171-178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Engeman RM, Martin RE, Smith HT, Woolard J, Crady CK, Shwiff SA, Constantin B, Stahl M, Griner J (2005) Dramatic reduction in predation on marine turtle nests through improved predator monitoring and management. Oryx 39, 318-326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Engeman RM, Martin RE, Smith HT, Woolard J, Crady CK, Constantin B, Stahl M, Groninger NP (2006) Impact on predation of sea turtle nests when predator control was removed midway through the nesting season. Wildlife Research 33, 187-192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Evangelista P, Engeman R, Tallents L (2009) Testing a passive tracking index for monitoring the endangered Ethiopian wolf. Integrative Zoology 4, 172-178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Evans BE, Mosby CE, Mortelliti A (2019) Assessing arrays of multiple trail cameras to detect North American mammals. PLoS ONE 14, e0217543.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Feinberg JA, Burke RL (2003) Nesting ecology and predation of diamondback Terrapins, Malaclemys terrapin, at Gateway National Recreation Area, New York. Journal of Herpetology 37, 517-526.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Garmestani AS, Percival HF (2005) Raccoon removal reduces sea turtle nest depredation in the Ten Thousand Islands of Florida. Southeastern Naturalist 4, 469-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Geller GA (2012) Reducing predation of freshwater turtle nests with a simple electric fence. Herpetological Review 43, 398-403.
| Google Scholar |
Golba CK, Glowacki GA, King RB (2022) Growth and survival of wild and head-started Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Ichthyology & Herpetology 110, 378-387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gompper ME, Kays RW, Ray JC, LaPoint SD, Bogan DA, Cryan JR (2006) A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1142-1151.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Karson A, Angoh SYJ, Davy CM (2018) Depredation of gravid freshwater turtles by raccoons (Procyon lotor). Canadian Field-Naturalist 132, 122-125.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
King RB, Golba CK, Glowacki GA, Kuhns AR (2021) Blanding’s turtle demography and population viability. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 12, 112-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kristan WB, III, Boarman WI (2003) Spatial pattern of risk of common raven predation on desert tortoises. Ecology 84, 2432-2443.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248-2255.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Munscher EC, Kuhns EH, Cox CA, Butler JA (2012) Decreased nest mortality for the Carolina diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin centrata) following removal of raccoons (Procyon lotor) from a nesting beach in northeastern Florida. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 7, 176-184.
| Google Scholar |
Naeger CE (2021) Using predator vocalizations to deter raccoon predation on nests of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin). Master’s thesis, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA. Available at https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/etd/135 [accessed 4 May 2023]
Platt SG, Measures EA, Rohr DM, Wint KTZ, Rainwater TR (2022) Chelydra serpentina (Snapping Turtle) and Chrysemys picta (Painted Turtle) nesting habitat. Herpetological Review 53, 112-114.
| Google Scholar |
Prange S, Gehrt SD, Wiggers EP (2003) Demographic factors contributing to high raccoon densities in urban landscapes. The Journal of Wildlife Management 67, 324-333.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Prange S, Gehrt SD, Wiggers EP (2004) Influences of anthropogenic resources on raccoon (Procyon lotor) movements and spatial distribution. Journal of Mammalogy 85, 483-490.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria). Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Reid BN, Thiel RP, Peery MZ (2016) Population dynamics of endangered Blanding’s turtles in a restored area. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80, 553-562.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Riley JL, Litzgus JD (2014) Cues used by predators to detect freshwater turtle nests may persist late into incubation. Canadian Field-Naturalist 128, 179-188.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Riley SPD, Hadidian J, Manski DA (1998) Population density, survival, and rabies in raccoons in an urban national park. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1153-1164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schielzeth H, Dingemanse NJ, Nakagawa S, Westneat DF, Allegue H, Teplitsky C, Réale D, Dochtermann NA, Garamszegi LZ, Araya-Ajoy YG (2020) Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11, 1141-1152.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schneider MF (2001) Habitat loss, fragmentation and predator impact: spatial implications for prey conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 720-735.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Standing KL, Herman TB, Morrison IP (1999) Nesting ecology of Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) in Nova Scotia, the northeastern limit of the species’ range. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1609-1614.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tabak MA, Norouzzadeh MS, Wolfson DW, Sweeney SJ, Vercauteren KC, Snow NP, Halseth JM, Di Salvo PA, Lewis JS, White MD, Teton B, Beasley JC, Schlichting PE, Boughton RK, Wight B, Newkirk ES, Ivan JS, Odell EA, Brook RK, Lukacs PM, Moeller AK, Mandeville EG, Clune J, Miller RS (2019) Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: applications in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 585-590.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thompson DR (1958) Field techniques for sexing and aging game animals. Wisconsin Conservation Department Special Wildlife Report #1. Available at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=nebgamepubs [accessed 4 May 2023]
Thompson D, Glowacki G, Ludwig D, Reklau R, Kuhns AR, Golba CK, King R (2020) Benefits of head-starting for Blanding’s turtle size distributions and recruitment. Wildlife Society Bulletin 44, 57-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Urbanek RE, Glowacki GA, Nielsen CK (2016) Effect of raccoon (Procyon lotor) reduction on Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) nest success. Journal of North American Herpetology 2016, 39-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van Dijk PP, Rhodin AGJ (2011) Emydoidea blandingii (errata version published in 2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011, e.T7709A155088836. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T7709A155088836.en [accessed 4 May 2023]
Vollset KW, Dohoo I, Lennox RJ (2023) The paradox of predation studies. Biology Letters 19, 20230354.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wauson M, Rogers W (2021) A test of the use of gray wolf (Canis lupus) urine to reduce coyote (Canis latrans) depredation rates on loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) nests. Journal for Nature Conservation 63, 126050.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Homer C, Gass L, Bender SM, Case A, Costello C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Funk M, Granneman B, Liknes GC, Rigge M, Xian G (2018) A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146, 108-123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
