Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The scientific, financial and ethical implications of three common wildlife-trapping designs

Helen P. Waudby https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-9827 A C D , Sophie Petit https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-5123 A and Matthew J. Gill B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A SCARCE Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.

B Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

C Present address: Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: hpwaudby@gmail.com

Wildlife Research 46(8) 690-700 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19084
Submitted: 14 May 2019  Accepted: 1 August 2019   Published: 4 December 2019

Abstract

Context: Trapping design influences information collected about wildlife populations and biodiversity. Trapping is also resource-intensive and has animal welfare implications.

Aims: The scientific, financial and ethical performances of three trap designs were compared for estimating diversity and sampling small vertebrates.

Methods: Small vertebrates were trapped over 16 trapping sessions, from April 2009 to May 2011, with aluminium box-style (Elliott) traps and two pitfall trap designs (shallow–wide and deep–narrow), in an arid environment.

Key results: Shallow pitfalls recorded highest overall species richness (S = 22) and diversity (qD = 10.622), reptile diversity (qD = 8.112) and reptile capture rates (13.600 individuals per 100 trap nights). Shallow and deep pitfalls sampled ~79.0% and 85.0% (respectively) more small mammals than did Elliott traps. Deep pitfalls sampled the greatest diversity (qD = 6.017) and number (29.700 individuals per 100 trap nights) of small mammals, and captured the greatest number of small mammal species (0.003) and individuals (0.106) per dollar. Shallow pitfalls were the most cost-efficient trap type for sampling reptile species (0.003) and individuals (0.044) per dollar. Between-session recapture rates were greatest in Elliott traps, indicating an increased likelihood of biased capture rates for certain small mammal species over time. Elliott traps were the least efficient traps on most scientific and cost measures, and recorded the greatest overall recapture rates, particularly for Sminthopsis crassicaudata and S. macroura. Body size of one species only, the nationally threatened Pseudomys australis, influenced its capture rate, with larger individuals more likely to be caught in deep pitfalls. Mortality was highest in pitfalls and mostly related to interactions between animals caught in the same trap.

Key conclusions: Shallow pitfalls are suitable for studies focused on estimating species richness, and reptile diversity and abundance. Deep pitfalls are cost-effective for sampling small mammals. Ethical issues associated with pitfalls could be managed by checking traps more often at night, and/or including materials that provide increased protection from predators caught in the same trap, particularly during periods of high abundance.

Implications: Trap design profoundly influences cost-effectiveness and welfare outcomes of wildlife research. We provide a tool to assist cost-benefit related decisions.

Additional keywords: biodiversity indices, cost-effectiveness, death rates, ethics, live traps, species accumulation curves, trap deaths, trap happiness.


References

Andrzejewski, R., and Raska, E. (1972). Trappability of bank voles in pitfalls and live traps. Acta Theriologica 17, 41–56.
Trappability of bank voles in pitfalls and live traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anthony, N. M., Ribic, C. A., Bautz, R., and Garland, T. (2005). Comparative effectiveness of Longworth and Sherman live traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 1018–1026.
Comparative effectiveness of Longworth and Sherman live traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arid Recovery (2019). ‘Annual Trapping 2018.’ (Arid Recovery: Roxby Downs, SA.) Available at https://aridrecovery.org.au/annual-trapping-2018/ [verified 21 July 2019].

Beacham, T. D., and Krebs, C. J. (1980). Pitfall versus live-trap enumeration of fluctuating populations of Microtus townsendii. Journal of Mammalogy 61, 486–499.
Pitfall versus live-trap enumeration of fluctuating populations of Microtus townsendii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beauvais, G. P., and Buskirk, S. W. (1999). Modifying estimates of sampling effort to account for sprung traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 39–43.

Boonstra, R., and Krebs, C. J. (1976). The effects of odour on trap response in Microtus townsendii. Journal of Zoology 180, 467–476.

Bosson, C. O., Islam, Z., and Boonstra, R. (2012). The impact of live trapping and trap model on the stress profiles of North American red squirrels. Journal of Zoology 288, 159–169.

Byrne, A. W., O’Keeffe, J., Green, S., Sleeman, D. P., Corner, L. A. L., Gormley, E., Murphy, D., Martin, S. W., and Davenport, J. (2012). Population estimation and trappability of the European badger (Meles meles): implications for tuberculosis management. PLoS One 7, e50807.
Population estimation and trappability of the European badger (Meles meles): implications for tuberculosis management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23227211PubMed |

Carter, A. J., Heinsohn, R., Goldizen, A. W., and Biro, A. P. (2012). Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. Animal Behaviour 83, 1051–1058.
Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carthew, S. M., and Keynes, T. (2000). Small mammals in a semi-arid community with particular reference to Ningaui yvonneae. Australian Mammalogy 22, 103–109.
Small mammals in a semi-arid community with particular reference to Ningaui yvonneae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Catling, P. C., Burt, R. J., and Kooyman, R. (1997). A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 24, 417–432.
A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cogger, H. G. (2000). ‘Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Crowcroft, P., and Jeffers, J. N. R. (1961). Variability in behaviour of wild house mice (Mus musculus L.) towards live traps. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 137, 573–582.
Variability in behaviour of wild house mice (Mus musculus L.) towards live traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DeSa, M. A., Zweig, C. L., Percival, H. F., Kitchens, W. M., and Kasbohm, J. W. (2012). Comparison of small-mammal sampling techniques in tidal salt marshes of the Central Gulf Coast of Florida. Southeastern Naturalist 11, 89–100.
Comparison of small-mammal sampling techniques in tidal salt marshes of the Central Gulf Coast of Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dice, L. R. (1931). Methods of indicating the abundance of animals. Journal of Mammalogy 12, 376–381.
Methods of indicating the abundance of animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dickman, C. R., Letnic, M., and Mahon, P. S. (1999). Population dynamics of two species of dragon lizards in arid Australia: the effects of rainfall. Oecologia 119, 357–366.
Population dynamics of two species of dragon lizards in arid Australia: the effects of rainfall.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28307758PubMed |

Dizney, L., Jones, P. D., and Ruedas, L. A. (2008). Efficacy of three types of live traps used for surveying small mammals in the Pacific Northwest. Northwestern Naturalist (Olympia, Wash.) 89, 171–180.
Efficacy of three types of live traps used for surveying small mammals in the Pacific Northwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drickamer, L. C., and Paine, C. R. (1992). Sex, age, nest construction and trap mortality for six species of rodents. American Midland Naturalist 128, 360–365.
Sex, age, nest construction and trap mortality for six species of rodents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duffield, G. A., and Bull, C. M. (2002). Stable social aggregations in an Australian lizard, Egernia stokesii. Naturwissenschaften 89, 424–427.
Stable social aggregations in an Australian lizard, Egernia stokesii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12435097PubMed |

Dundas, S. J., Ruthrof, K. X., Hardy, G. E. S. J., and Fleming, P. A. (2019). Pits or pictures: a comparative study of camera traps and pitfall trapping to survey small mammals and reptiles. Wildlife Research 46, 104–113.
Pits or pictures: a comparative study of camera traps and pitfall trapping to survey small mammals and reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fletcher, Q. E., and Boonstra, R. (2006). Impact of live trapping on the stress response of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Journal of Zoology 270, 473–478.
Impact of live trapping on the stress response of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Friend, G. R., Smith, G. T., Mitchell, D. S., and Dickman, C. R. (1989). Influence of pitfall and drift fence design on capture rates of small vertebrates in semi-arid habitats of Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 1–10.
Influence of pitfall and drift fence design on capture rates of small vertebrates in semi-arid habitats of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garden, J. G., McAlpine, C. A., Possingham, H. P., and Jones, D. N. (2007). Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations? Wildlife Research 34, 218–227.
Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greenville, A. C., Wardle, G. M., and Dickman, C. R. (2013). Extreme rainfall events predict irruptions of rat plagues in central Australia. Austral Ecology 38, 754–764.
Extreme rainfall events predict irruptions of rat plagues in central Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hamasaki, D. I., and Dodt, E. (1969). Light sensitivity of the lizard’s epiphysis cerebri. Pflügers Archiv 313, 19–29.
Light sensitivity of the lizard’s epiphysis cerebri.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5389968PubMed |

Hohnen, R. P., Murphy, B. A., Gates, J., Legge, S. R., Dickman, C., and Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2019). Detecting and protecting the threatened Kangaroo Island dunnart (Sminthopsis fuliginosus aitkeni). Conservation Science and Practice 1, e4.

Honkavaara, J., Koivula, M., Korpimäki, E., Siitari, H., and Viitala, J. (2002). Ultraviolet vision and foraging in terrestrial vertebrates. Oikos 98, 505–511.
Ultraviolet vision and foraging in terrestrial vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hutchinson, M. (2010). Reptiles. In ‘Census of South Australian Vertebrates’. (Eds H. Owens and A. Graham.) pp. 5–13. (Department of Environment and Natural Resources and South Australian Museum: Adelaide.)

Jacob, J., Ylönen, H., and Hodkinson, C. G. (2002). Trapping efficiency of Ugglan traps and Longworth traps for house mice in south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 29, 101–103.
Trapping efficiency of Ugglan traps and Longworth traps for house mice in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jolly, G. M., and Dickson, J. M. (1983). The problem of unequal catchability in mark–recapture estimation of small mammal populations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 922–927.
The problem of unequal catchability in mark–recapture estimation of small mammal populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375.

Karraker, N. E. (2001). String theory: reducing mortality of mammals in pitfall traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1158–1162.

Kemper, C., Reardon, T., and Queale, L. (2000). Mammals. In ‘A List of the Vertebrates of South Australia’. (Eds A. C. Robinson, M. N. Hutchinson and K. D. Casperson.) pp. 13–35. (Department for Environment and Heritage: Adelaide.)

Korn, H. (1987). Effects of live-trapping and toe-clipping on body weight of European and African rodents species. Oecologia 71, 597–600.
Effects of live-trapping and toe-clipping on body weight of European and African rodents species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28312234PubMed |

Krebs, C. J., and Boonstra, R. (1984). Trappability estimates for mark–recapture data. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62, 2440–2444.
Trappability estimates for mark–recapture data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lemckert, F., Brassil, T., Kavanagh, R., and Law, B. (2006). Trapping small mammals for research and management: how many die and why? Australian Mammalogy 28, 201–207.
Trapping small mammals for research and management: how many die and why?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lima, M., Julliard, R., Stenseth, N. C., and Jaksic, F. M. (2001). Demographic dynamics of a Neotropical small rodent (Phyllotis darwini): feedback structure, predation and climatic factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 761–775.
Demographic dynamics of a Neotropical small rodent (Phyllotis darwini): feedback structure, predation and climatic factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maritz, B., Masterson, G., Mackay, D., and Alexander, G. (2007). The effect of funnel trap type and size of pitfall trap on trap success: implications for ecological field studies. Amphibia-Reptilia 28, 321–328.
The effect of funnel trap type and size of pitfall trap on trap success: implications for ecological field studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Merrick, M. J., and Koprowski, J. L. (2017). Should we consider individual behavior differences in applied wildlife conservation studies? Biological Conservation 209, 34–44.
Should we consider individual behavior differences in applied wildlife conservation studies?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morrant, D. S., and Petit, S. (2011). Nest use of western pygmy-possums (Cercartetus concinnus) (Marsupialia: Burramyidae) at Innes National Park, South Australia. Australian Mammalogy 33, 28–32.
Nest use of western pygmy-possums (Cercartetus concinnus) (Marsupialia: Burramyidae) at Innes National Park, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morton, S. R., Gillam, M. W., Jones, K. R., and Fleming, M. R. (1988). Relative efficiency of different pit-trap systems for sampling reptiles in spinifex grasslands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 571–577.
Relative efficiency of different pit-trap systems for sampling reptiles in spinifex grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moseby, K. E., Brandle, R., and Adams, M. (1999). Distribution, habitat and conservation status of the rare dusky hopping-mouse (Notomys fuscus) (Rodentia: Muridae). Wildlife Research 26, 479–494.
Distribution, habitat and conservation status of the rare dusky hopping-mouse (Notomys fuscus) (Rodentia: Muridae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nimmo, D. G., James, S. G., Kelly, L. T., Watson, S. J., and Bennett, A. F. (2011). The decoupling of abundance and species richness in lizard communities. Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 650–656.
The decoupling of abundance and species richness in lizard communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21250989PubMed |

O’Farrell, M. J., Clark, W. A., Emmerson, F. H., Juarez, S. M., Kay, F. R., O’Farrell, T. M., and Goodlett, T. Y. (1994). Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals: are results from Sherman live traps deceptive? Journal of Mammalogy 75, 692–699.
Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals: are results from Sherman live traps deceptive?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pearson, D. E., Ortega, Y. K., and Ruggiero, L. F. (2003). Trap-induced mass declines in small mammals: mass as a population index. The Journal of Wildlife Management 67, 684–691.
Trap-induced mass declines in small mammals: mass as a population index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pestell, A. J. L., and Petit, S. (2007). Methods and ethical considerations of pitfall trapping for the western pygmy possum (Cercartetus concinnus Gould) (Marsupialia: Burramyidae), with observations on capture patterns and nest sites. Wildlife Research 34, 296–305.
Methods and ethical considerations of pitfall trapping for the western pygmy possum (Cercartetus concinnus Gould) (Marsupialia: Burramyidae), with observations on capture patterns and nest sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petit, S., and Waudby, H. P. (2012). Standard operating procedures for aluminium box, wire cage, and pitfall trapping, handling, and temporary housing of small wild rodents and marsupials. Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 392–401.
Standard operating procedures for aluminium box, wire cage, and pitfall trapping, handling, and temporary housing of small wild rodents and marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petit, S., Waudby, H. P., Walker, A. T., Zanker, R., and Gau, G. (2012). A non-mutilating method for marking small wild mammals and reptiles. Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 64–71.
A non-mutilating method for marking small wild mammals and reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Powell, R. A., and Proulx, G. (2003). Trapping and marking terrestrial mammals for research: integrating ethics, performance criteria, techniques, and common sense. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research 44, 259–276.
Trapping and marking terrestrial mammals for research: integrating ethics, performance criteria, techniques, and common sense.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prevedello, J., Forero-Medina, G., and Vieira, M. (2010). Movement behaviour within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass. Journal of Animal Ecology 79, 1315–1323.
Movement behaviour within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20707824PubMed |

Putman, R. J. (1995). Ethical considerations and animal welfare in ecological field studies. Biodiversity and Conservation 4, 903–915.
Ethical considerations and animal welfare in ecological field studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, J. L., and Kearney, M. R. (2016). Too hot to handle? Balancing increased trapability with capture mortality in hot weather pitfall trapping. Austral Ecology , .
Too hot to handle? Balancing increased trapability with capture mortality in hot weather pitfall trapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, J. L., and Moseby, K. E. (2001). Factors affecting pitfall capture rates of small ground vertebrates in arid South Australia. I. The influence of weather and moon phase on capture rates of reptiles. Wildlife Research 28, 53–60.
Factors affecting pitfall capture rates of small ground vertebrates in arid South Australia. I. The influence of weather and moon phase on capture rates of reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, J. L., Ward, M. J., and Moseby, K. E. (2015). Factors that influence trap success of sandhill dunnarts (Sminthopsis psammophila) and other small mammals in Triodia dunefields of South Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 212–218.
Factors that influence trap success of sandhill dunnarts (Sminthopsis psammophila) and other small mammals in Triodia dunefields of South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, J. L., Pedler, R. D., and Kearney, M. R. (2018). Too much hot air? Informing ethical trapping in hot, dry environments. Wildlife Research 45, 16–30.
Too much hot air? Informing ethical trapping in hot, dry environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richardson, E., Nimmo, D. G., Avitabile, S., Tworkowski, L., Watson, S. J., Welbourne, D., and Leonard, S. W. J. (2017). Camera traps and pitfalls: an evaluation of two methods for surveying reptiles in a semiarid ecosystem. Wildlife Research 44, 637–647.
Camera traps and pitfalls: an evaluation of two methods for surveying reptiles in a semiarid ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sealander, J. A., and James, D. (1958). Relative efficiency of different small mammal traps. Journal of Mammalogy 39, 215–223.
Relative efficiency of different small mammal traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stow, A. J., Sunnucks, P., Briscoe, D. A., and Gardner, M. G. (2001). The impact of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami): evidence from allelic and genotypic analyses of microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 10, 867–878.
The impact of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami): evidence from allelic and genotypic analyses of microsatellites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11348496PubMed |

Thompson, G. G., and Thompson, S. A. (2007). Usefulness of funnel traps in catching small reptiles and mammals, with comments on the effectiveness of the alternatives. Wildlife Research 34, 491–497.
Usefulness of funnel traps in catching small reptiles and mammals, with comments on the effectiveness of the alternatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson, G. G., Withers, P. C., Pianka, E. R., and Thompson, S. A. (2003). Assessing biodiversity with species accumulation curves; inventories of small reptiles by pit-trapping in Western Australia. Austral Ecology 28, 361–383.
Assessing biodiversity with species accumulation curves; inventories of small reptiles by pit-trapping in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson, S. A., Thompson, G. G., and Withers, P. C. (2005). Influence of pit-trap type on the interpretation of fauna diversity. Wildlife Research 32, 131–137.
Influence of pit-trap type on the interpretation of fauna diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Timonin, M. E., Carrière, C. J., Dudych, A. D., Latimer, J. G. W., Unruh, S. T., and Willis, C. K. R. (2011). Individual differences in the behavioural responses of meadow voles to an unfamiliar environment are not correlated with variation in resting metabolic rate. Journal of Zoology 284, 198–205.
Individual differences in the behavioural responses of meadow voles to an unfamiliar environment are not correlated with variation in resting metabolic rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waudby, H. P. (2009). Population characteristics of house mice (Mus musculus) on southern Yorke Peninsula, South Australia. Australian Mammalogy 31, 111–115.
Population characteristics of house mice (Mus musculus) on southern Yorke Peninsula, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waudby, H. P. (2013). ‘Effects of Cattle Grazing on the Biodiversity of Cracking-clay Gibber–gilgai Systems in the Arid South Australian Rangelands.’ (University of South Australia: Adelaide.)

Waudby, H. P., and Petit, S. (2015). Small Australian desert vertebrate responses to grazing intensity during La Niña. Ecological Research 30, 715–722.
Small Australian desert vertebrate responses to grazing intensity during La Niña.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waudby, H. P., and Petit, S. (2017). Thermoregulatory value of cracking-clay shelters for small vertebrates during extreme desert conditions. Integrative Zoology 12, 237–249.
Thermoregulatory value of cracking-clay shelters for small vertebrates during extreme desert conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27580346PubMed |

Williams, D. F., and Braun, S. E. (1983). Comparison of pitfall and conventional traps for sampling small mammal populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 841–845.
Comparison of pitfall and conventional traps for sampling small mammal populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |