Understanding conflict and consensus regarding wood bison management in Alaska, USA
E. D. Doney A C , A. J. Bath A and J. J. Vaske B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Geography Department, Memorial University, 230 Elizabeth Avenue, SN-2012, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, Canada.
B Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: edd433@mun.ca
Wildlife Research 45(3) 229-236 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17056
Submitted: 22 April 2017 Accepted: 11 March 2018 Published: 20 June 2018
Abstract
Context: Wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) have been absent from Alaska for over 170 years. In the spring and summer of 2015, however, 130 animals were reintroduced to the state. These wood bison were restored through a consensus-based planning process, but it remains unknown how the animals will be managed.
Aims: To survey urban and rural Alaska residents to understand the effect of proximity to the resource on residents’ preferences for management of wood bison in different scenarios.
Methods: Data were collected in urban areas using a mail-back questionnaire (n = 515) and by on-site interviews with rural residents (n = 31), between June and September 2015. Respondents were asked to state their preferred wood bison management strategies under specific situations of potential human–bison conflict.
Key results: Residents from urban and rural study areas differed in their preference of bison management, particularly in more severe situations (i.e. damage to property, causing injury to people).
Conclusions: Urban and rural residents were reluctant to use lethal management of wood bison, even under situations that threaten human property.
Implications: Backlash from urban residents could occur if managers use lethal management. Rural residents, however, favour lethal management when human injury occurs.
Additional keywords: behaviour, conservation, human dimensions, policy development, visual communication, wildlife management.
References
Alaska Census (2010). Demographic Profile for Alaska. Department of Labor and Workforce Development: Research and Analysis, Juneau, Alaska. Available at http://live.laborstats.alaska.gov/cen/dp.cfm [verified April 2018]Alaska Communications (2014a). Telephone Directory: Anchorage & Vicinity. (White Pages: Anchorage, Alaska.)
Alaska Communications (2014b). Telephone Directory: Fairbanks & Vicinity. (White Pages: Anchorage, Alaska.)
Alaska Wood Bison Management Planning Team (2015). Wood bison management plan for lower Innoko/Yukon River in Westcentral Alaska, 2015–2020. Report no. ADF&G/DWC/WMP-2015–1. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, Fairbanks, Alaska.
Ambarlı, H. (2016). Rural and urban students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward brown bears in Turkey. Anthrozoos 29, 489–502.
| Rural and urban students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward brown bears in Turkey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aumiller, L. D., and Matt, C. A. (1994). Management of McNeil River State Game Sanctuary for viewing of brown bears. Bears: Their Biology and Management 9, 51–61.
| Management of McNeil River State Game Sanctuary for viewing of brown bears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
AWCC (Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center) (2017). Wood bison restoration. Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center, Portage. Available at https://www.alaskawildlife.org/wood-bison-restoration/ [verified April 2018]
Bandara, R., and Tisdell, C. (2003). Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidence. Biological Conservation 110, 327–342.
| Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bath, A. J. (2009). Working with people to achieve wolf conservation in Europe and North America. In ‘A New Era for Wolves and People: Wolf Recovery, Human Attitudes, and Policy’. (Eds M. Musiani, L. Boitani and P. C. Paquet.) pp. 173–199. (University of Calgary Press: Calgary, Alberta.)
Bath, A. J., and Enck, J. W. (2003). Wildlife–human interactions in National Parks in Canada and the USA. National Parks Social Science Research Review 4, 1–32.
Beardmore, B., Hunt, L. M., Haider, W., Dorow, M., and Arlinghaus, R. (2014). Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 72, 500–513.
| Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Curran, D., Durbin, T. J., Epstein, G., Greenberg, A., Nelson, M. P., Sandlos, J., Stedman, R., Teel, T. L., Thomas, R., Verissimo, D., and Wyborn, C. (2016). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation 205, 93–108.
| Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bhattacharjee, A., and Parthasarathy, N. (2013). Coexisting with large carnivores: a case study from Western Duars, India. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 18, 20–31.
| Coexisting with large carnivores: a case study from Western Duars, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dandy, N., Ballantyne, S., Moseley, D., Gill, R., Quine, C., and Van Der Wal, R. (2012). Exploring beliefs behind support for and opposition to wildlife management methods: a qualitative study. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 695–706.
| Exploring beliefs behind support for and opposition to wildlife management methods: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Decker, D. J., and Connelly, N. A. (1989). Motivations for deer hunting: implications for antlerless deer harvest as a management tool. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17, 455–463.
Demer, L. (2017). A wood bison from a herd released in Southwest Alaska has been killed illegally. Alaska Dispatch News, 31 January, 2017. Available at https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/rural-alaska/2017/01/31/released-into-the-wild-wandering-alaska-wood-bison-poached-near- quinhagak/ [verified April 2018]
Don Carlos, A. W., Bright, A. D., Teel, T. L., and Vaske, J. J. (2009). Human–black bear conflict in urban areas: an integrated approach to management response. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14, 174–184.
Engel, M. T., Vaske, J. J., Bath, A. J., and Marchini, S. (2017). Attitudes toward jaguars and pumas and the acceptability of killing big cats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: An application of the Potential for Conflict Index2. Ambio 46, 604–612.
Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: an introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources 29, 738–743.
| Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: an introductory comment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frank, B., Monaco, A., and Bath, A. J. (2015). Beyond standard wildlife management: a pathway to encompass human dimension findings in wild boar management. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61, 723–730.
| Beyond standard wildlife management: a pathway to encompass human dimension findings in wild boar management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Groulx, M., Lemieux, C., Dawson, J., Stewart, E., and Yudina, O. (2016). Motivations to engage in last chance tourism in the Churchill Wildlife Management Area and Wapusk National Park: the role of place identity and nature relatedness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 24, 1523–1540.
| Motivations to engage in last chance tourism in the Churchill Wildlife Management Area and Wapusk National Park: the role of place identity and nature relatedness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heberlein, T. A. (2004). “Fire in the Sistine Chapel”: how Wisconsin responded to chronic wasting disease. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9, 165–179.
Higham, J. E. S., Lusseau, D., and Hendry, W. (2008). Wildlife viewing: the significance of the viewing platforms. Journal of Ecotourism 7, 137–146.
Hill, C. M. (2015). Perspectives of “conflict” at the wildlife–agriculture boundary: 10 years on. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 20, 296–301.
Johansson, M., and Karlsson, J. (2011). Subjective experience of fear and the cognitive interpretation of large carnivores. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16, 15–29.
| Subjective experience of fear and the cognitive interpretation of large carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaczensky, P., Jerina, K., Jonozovič, M., Krofel, M., Skrbinšek, T., Rauer, G., Koss, I., and Gutleb, B. (2011). Illegal killings may hamper brown bear recovery in the Eastern Alps. Ursus 22, 37–46.
| Illegal killings may hamper brown bear recovery in the Eastern Alps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaltenborn, B. P., Bjerke, T., Nyahongo, J. W., and Williams, D. R. (2006). Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 15, 4633–4649.
| Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koichi, K., Cottrell, A., Sangha, K. K., and Gordon, I. J. (2013). What determines the acceptability of wildlife control methods? A case of feral pig management in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 18, 97–108.
Kretser, H. E., Curtis, P. D., Francis, J. D., Pendall, R. J., and Knuth, B. A. (2009). Factors affecting perceptions of human–wildlife interactions in residential areas of northern New York and implications for conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14, 102–118.
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Georgari, M., Baltzi, K., and Baltzi, I. (2017). Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. The Science of the Total Environment 579, 685–693.
Loyd, K. A. T., and Miller, C. A. (2010). Influence of demographics, experience and value orientations on preferences for lethal management of feral cats. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15, 262–273.
Manfredo, M. J. (2008). ‘Who Cares about Wildlife?’ (Springer: New York.)
Manfredo, M., Vaske, J., and Teel, T. (2003). The potential for conflict index: a graphic approach to practical significance of human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8, 219–228.
Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., and Henry, K. L. (2009). Linking society and environment: a multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western United States. Social Science Quarterly 90, 407–427.
Marcoux, A., and Riley, S. J. (2010). Driver knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about deer–vehicle collisions in southern Michigan. Human–Wildlife Interactions 4, 47–55.
Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2006). Public attitudes toward lethal coyote control. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11, 89–100.
Messmer, T. A. (2000). The emergence of human–wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 45, 97–102.
National Research Council (1997). ‘Wolves, Bears, and their Prey in Alaska: Biological and Social Challenges in Wildlife Management.’ (National Academies Press: Washington, DC.)
Navrud, S., and Mungatana, E. D. (1994). Environmental valuation in developing countries: the recreational value of wildlife viewing. Ecological Economics 11, 135–151.
Rentfrow, P. J. (2010). Statewide differences in personality: toward a psychological geography of the United States. The American Psychologist 65, 548–558.
Riley, S. J., and Decker, D. J. (2000). Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5, 50–62.
| Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sanborn, W. A., and Schmidt, R. H. (1995). Gender effects on views of wildlife professionals about wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 583–587.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative Sociology 5, 137–182.
| A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinha, B. C., Qureshi, Q., Uniyal, V. K., and Sen, S. (2012). Economics of wildlife tourism–contribution to livelihoods of communities around Kanha tiger reserve, India. Journal of Ecotourism 11, 207–218.
Skibins, J. C., Hallo, J. C., Sharp, J. L., and Manning, R. E. (2012). Quantifying the role of viewing the Denali “Big 5” in visitor satisfaction and awareness: conservation implications for flagship recognition and resource management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17, 112–128.
Sponarski, C. C., Semeniuk, C., Glikman, J. A., Bath, A. J., and Musiani, M. (2013). Heterogeneity among rural resident attitudes toward wolves. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 18, 239–248.
Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., Bath, A. J., and Musiani, M. M. (2014). Salient values, social trust, and attitudes toward wolf management in south-western Alberta, Canada. Environmental Conservation 41, 303–310.
Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., and Bath, A. J. (2015a). Differences in management action acceptability for coyotes in a National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 239–247.
Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., and Bath, A. J. (2015b). Attitudinal differences among residents, park staff, and visitors toward coyotes in Cape Breton Highlands National Park of Canada. Society & Natural Resources 28, 720–732.
Sponarski, C. C., Miller, C. A., Vaske, J. J., and Spacapan, M. R. (2016). Modeling perceived risk from coyotes among Chicago residents. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21, 1–15.
Suryawanshi, K. R., Bhatnagar, Y. V., Redpath, S., and Mishra, C. (2013). People, predators and perceptions: patterns of livestock depredation by snow leopards and wolves. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 550–560.
Tarrant, M. A., and Cordell, H. K. (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude–behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior 29, 618–637.
| The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude–behavior correspondence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Teel, T. L., and Manfredo, M. J. (2010). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 24, 128–139.
| Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L., and Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11, 383–396.
| Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., and White, S. (2009). Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts. Conservation Biology 23, 1577–1587.
| Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
U.S. Census Bureau (2015). Alaska population estimates. Available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/AGE275210/02/ [verified April 2018]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2014). Endangered species: wood bison (Bison bison athabascae). Available at https://www.fws.gov/alaska/fisheries/endangered/species/wood_bison.htm [verified April 2018]
Van Wijk, J., Van der Duim, R., Lamers, M., and Sumba, D. (2015). The emergence of institutional innovations in tourism: the evolution of the African Wildlife Foundation’s tourism conservation enterprises. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 23, 104–125.
| The emergence of institutional innovations in tourism: the evolution of the African Wildlife Foundation’s tourism conservation enterprises.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaske, J. J. (2008). ‘Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation and Human Dimensions.’ (Venture: State College, PA.)
Vaske, J. J. (2018). Visualizing consensus in human dimensions data: the Potential for Conflict Index2. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 23, 83–89.
| Visualizing consensus in human dimensions data: the Potential for Conflict Index2.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaske, J. J., Shelby, L. B., and Needham, M. D. (2009). Preparing for the next disease: the human–wildlife connection. In ‘Wildlife and Society: The Science of Human Dimensions’. (Eds M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, P. J. Brown, D. J. Decker and E. A. Duke.) pp. 244–261. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., Barreto, H., and Shelby, L. B. (2010). An extension and further validation of the Potential for Conflict Index. Leisure Sciences 32, 240–254.
Weise, T. F., Robinson, W. L., Hook, R. A., and Mech, L. D. (1975). An experimental translocation of the eastern timber wolf. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Audubon Conservation Report 5, 1–28.
White, L. A., and Gehrt, S. D. (2009). Coyote attacks on humans in the United States and Canada. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14, 419–432.
Whittaker, D. (1997). Capacity norms on bear viewing platforms. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2, 37–49.
Wittmann, K., Vaske, J. J., Manfredo, M. J., and Zinn, H. C. (1998). Standards for lethal response to problem urban wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 3, 29–48.
Zedrosser, A., Gerstl, N., and Rauer, G. (1999). ‘Brown Bears in Austria: 10 Years of Conservation and Actions for the Future. (Federal Environment Agency Austria: Vienna.)
