Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Prioritising animals for Yirralka Ranger management and research collaborations in the Laynhapuy Indigenous Protected Area, northern Australia

Bridget Campbell https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-9471 A * , Shaina Russell A , Gabrielle Brennan A , Yirralka Rangers B , Bec Condon B , Yinimala Gumana B , Frances Morphy C and Emilie Ens A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

B Yirralka Rangers, Yirrkala, NT, Australia.

C Centre for Indigenous Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

* Correspondence to: bridget.campbell@mq.edu.au

Handling Editor: Hannah Cliff

Wildlife Research 51, WR24071 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24071
Submitted: 1 May 2024  Accepted: 4 September 2024  Published: 1 October 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Amidst growing international calls for inclusive conservation and a backdrop of declining species and cultural diversity, Indigenous-led approaches that offer opportunities for biocultural benefits are of growing interest. Species prioritisation is one area that can be decolonised, shifting from quantitative, large-scale threatened species metrics to pluralistic, place-based approaches that include culturally significant species.

Aim

This study aimed to establish a list of priority animals of concern to Ŋaḻapaḻmi (senior knowledge holders) in the Laynhapuy Indigenous Protected Area, north-eastern Arnhem Land, Australia. This list could focus the research and management efforts of the Yirralka Rangers and collaborators.

Methods

Adhering to local governance structures, through six group-elicitation sessions, Ŋaḻapaḻmi were asked to identify animals of concern and describe reasons for concern. Existing occurrence records and threat status of these species were compiled to assess baseline data and guide next steps.

Results

The Ŋaḻapaḻmi-defined Laynhapuy Priority Animal List contained 30 animals (species/groups), with the highest-ranked animals including Marrtjinyami wäyin (walking animals), Rupu (possums), and Djanda (goannas), all mammals and varanid lizards. The list of 30 animals included 43 species from a Western-science perspective, of which 12 were also listed as threatened through Western conservation frameworks. Some animals were considered high priority locally, such as the waṉ’kurra (northern brown bandicoot, Isoodon macrourus), although not a concern from a Western-science perspective, demonstrating mismatch between local and larger-scale approaches. To help disentangle whether this mismatch is due to cultural significance and/or localised decline not captured at larger-scale assessments, we provide the animal’s publicly known Yolŋu clan connections and reasons for concern alongside existing baseline occurrence data. Recent collaborative surveys have substantially increased data for Laynhapuy Priority Animals, demonstrating the benefits of community engaged wildlife research.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary research collaborations can produce Indigenous-led ‘working’ lists of priority animals to guide culturally attuned on-ground action. Approaches that draw on different cultural knowledge systems require interrogation of how knowledge is created and conveyed to ensure mutual comprehension and practical use.

Implications

Indigenous-led approaches offer possibilities for enhanced management of species by local groups, with anticipated co-benefits to species and cultural knowledge.

Keywords: Arnhem Land, biocultural conservation, cross-cultural ecology, culturally significant species, Indigenous-led conservation, right-way science, species prioritisation, Yolŋu.

References

Austin BJ, Robinson CJ, Fitzsimons JA, Sandford M, Ens EJ, Macdonald JM, Hockings M, Hinchley DG, McDonald FB, Corrigan C, Kennett R, Hunter-Xenie H, Garnett ST (2018) Integrated measures of indigenous land and sea management effectiveness, challenges and opportunities for improved conservation partnerships in Australia. Conservation and Society 16, 372-384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Baker L, Woenne-Green S, Mutitjulu Community (1992) The role of Aboriginal ecological knowledge in ecosystem management. In ‘Aboriginal involvement in parks and protected areas’. (Eds J Birckhead, T De Lacy, L Smith) pp. 65–74. (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies: Canberra, ACT Australia)

Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10, 1251-1262.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boll V (2006) Following Garkman, the frog, in north eastern Arnhem Land (Australia). Australian Zoologist 33, 436-445.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Campbell BL (2020) Biocultural assessment of critical weight range mammals in north-east Arnhem Land, Australia. Masters thesis, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.

Campbell BL, Yirralka Rangers, Yolŋu Knowledge Custodians, Gallagher RV, Ens EJ (2022) Expanding the biocultural benefits of species distribution modelling with Indigenous collaborators: case study from northern Australia. Biological Conservation 274, 109656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

CBD (2021) Report of the second global thematic dialogue for Indigenous peoples and local communities on the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.

Christie M (2007) Knowledge management and Natural Resource Management. In ‘Investing in indigenous natural resource management’. (Eds M Luckert, B Campbell, J Gorman, S Garnett) pp. 86–90. (Charles Darwin University Press: Darwin, NT, Australia)

Cochrane MA, Vigilante T, Murphy BP, Bowman DM (2009) Aboriginal fire use in Australian tropical savannas: ecological effects and management lessons. In ‘Tropical fire ecology: climate change, land use, and ecosystem dynamics’. (Ed. MA Cochrane) pp. 143–167. (Praxis Publishing: Chichester, UK)

Coe MA, Gaoue OG (2020) Cultural keystone species revisited: are we asking the right questions? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 16, 70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cross R, Doornbos S, Cooney R, Wong P, Mead A, Lindeman K, Kanagavel A, Parvathy S, Tomasini S, Montanari B (2017) Guidance for integrating indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in IUCN Red List assessments. International Union for Conservation of Nature, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

DCCEEW (2022) Threatened species strategy action plan 2022–2032. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Dickson GF (2015) Marra and Kriol: the loss and maintenance of knowledge across a language shift boundary. PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available at https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/items/0d2443ab-ebe4-47e3-a08b-b3ee86df98b8

Ens EJ, Pert P, Clarke PA, Budden M, Clubb L, Doran B, Douras C, Gaikwad J, Gott B, Leonard S, Locke J, Packer J, Turpin G, Wason S (2015) Indigenous biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management: review and insight from Australia. Biological Conservation 181, 133-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ens E, Scott ML, Yugul Mangi Rangers, Moritz C, Pirzl R (2016) Putting indigenous conservation policy into practice delivers biodiversity and cultural benefits. Biodiversity and Conservation 25, 2889-2906.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ens EJ, Rossetto M, Costello O (2023) Recognising Indigenous plant-use histories for inclusive biocultural restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 38(10), 896-898.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Fijn N (2014) Sugarbag dreaming: the significance of bees to Yolngu in Arnhem Land, Australia. Humanimalia 6, 41-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fitzsimons J, Russell-Smith J, James G, Vigilante T, Lipsett-Moore G, Morrison J, Looker M (2012) Insights into the biodiversity and social benchmarking components of the northern Australian fire management and carbon abatement programmes. Ecological Management & Restoration 13, 51-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Freitas CT, Lopes PFM, Campos-Silva JV, Noble MM, Dyball R, Peres CA (2020) Co-management of culturally important species: a tool to promote biodiversity conservation and human well-being. People and Nature 2, 61-81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Game ET, Kareiva P, Possingham HP (2013) Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology 27, 480-485.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Garibaldi A, Turner N (2004) Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9(3), 1.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garnett ST, Burgess ND, Fa JE, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Molnár Z, Robinson CJ, Watson JEM, Zander KK, Austin B, Brondizio ES, Collier NF, Duncan T, Ellis E, Geyle H, Jackson MV, Jonas H, Malmer P, McGowan B, Sivongxay A, Leiper I (2018) A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability 1, 369-374.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Goolmeer T, van Leeuwen S (2023) Indigenous knowledge is saving our iconic species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 38, 591-594.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Goolmeer T, Skroblin A, Grant C, van Leeuwen S, Archer R, Gore-Birch C, Wintle BA (2022a) Recognizing culturally significant species and Indigenous-led management is key to meeting international biodiversity obligations. Conservation Letters 15, e12899.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Goolmeer T, Skroblin A, Wintle BA (2022b) Getting our Act together to improve Indigenous leadership and recognition in biodiversity management. Ecological Management & Restoration 23, 33-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Goolmeer T, Costello O, Culturally Significant Entities workshop participants, Skroblin A, Rumpff L, Wintle BA (2024) Indigenous-led designation and management of Culturally Significant Species. Nature Ecology & Evolution 8, 1623-1631.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gore-Birch C, Costello O, Goolmeer T, Moggridge BJ, van Leeuwen S (2020) A submission from the Indigenous reference group of the national environmental science program’s threatened species recovery hub for the independent review of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: a case for culturally significant species. (Indigenous Working Group of the Threatened Species Recovery Hub and the Threatened Species Recovery Hub)

Hill R, Walsh FJ, Davies J, Sparrow A, Mooney M, Wise RM, Tengö M (2020) Knowledge co-production for Indigenous adaptation pathways: transform post-colonial articulation complexes to empower local decision-making. Global Environmental Change 65, 102161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Howitt R, Suchet-Pearson S (2006) Rethinking the building blocks: ontological pluralism and the idea of ‘management’. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88, 323-335.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

IPBES (2019) IPBES 2030 Work Program: Strengthening the knowledge foundations: Indigenous and local knowledge. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany.

Keith DA, Rodríguez JP, Brooks TM, Burgman MA, Barrow EG, Bland L, Comer PJ, Franklin J, Link J, McCarthy MA, Miller RM, Murray NJ, Nel J, Nicholson E, Oliveira-Miranda MA, Regan TJ, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Rouget M, Spalding MD (2015) The IUCN red list of ecosystems: motivations, challenges, and applications. Conservation Letters 8, 214-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Law EA, Bennett NJ, Ives CD, Friedman R, Davis KJ, Archibald C, Wilson KA (2018) Equity trade-offs in conservation decision making. Conservation Biology 32, 294-303.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

LHAC (2017) Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation (LHAC). Available at https://www.laynhapuy.com.au [accessed 1 February 2024]

Maffi L (2001) ‘On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment.’ (Smithsonian Institution Press: MD, USA)

Maffi L, Woodley E (2012) ‘Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook.’ (Routledge: London, UK)

Marmion D, Obata K, Troy J (2014) Community, identity, wellbeing: the report of the Second National Indigenous Languages Survey. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

McDonald JA, Carwardine J, Joseph LN, Klein CJ, Rout TM, Watson JEM, Garnett ST, McCarthy MA, Possingham HP (2015) Improving policy efficiency and effectiveness to save more species: a case study of the megadiverse country Australia. Biological Conservation 182, 102-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McKemey MB, Patterson M, Banbai Rangers, Ens EJ, Reid NCH, Hunter JT, Costello O, Ridges M, Miller C (2019) Cross-cultural monitoring of a cultural keystone species informs revival of indigenous burning of country in South-Eastern Australia. Human Ecology 47, 893-904.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moorcroft H (2016) Paradigms, paradoxes and a propitious niche: conservation and Indigenous social justice policy in Australia. Local Environment 21, 591-614.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morphy H (1991) ‘Ancestral connections; art and an aboriginal system of knowledge.’ (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA)

Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 219-252.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Paltridge R, Skroblin A (2018) Threatened species monitoring on Aboriginal land: Finding the common ground between Kuka, Jukurrpa, Ranger work and science. In ‘Monitoring threatened species and ecological communities’. (Eds S Legge, D Lindenmayer, N Robinson, B Scheele, D Southwell, B Wintle) pp. 321–332. (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic, Australia)

Petheram L, Zander KK, Campbell BM, High C, Stacey N (2010) ‘Strange changes’: Indigenous perspectives of climate change and adaptation in NE Arnhem Land (Australia). Global Environmental Change 20, 681-692.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellı́n RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 503-507.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Reyes-García V, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Benyei P, Bussmann RW, Diamond SK, García-Del-Amo D, Guadilla-Sáez S, Hanazaki N, Kosoy N, Lavides M, Luz AC, McElwee P, Meretsky VJ, Newberry T, Molnár Z, Ruiz-Mallén I, Salpeteur M, Wyndham FS, Zorondo-Rodriguez F, Brondizio ES (2022) Recognizing Indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ rights and agency in the post-2020 Biodiversity Agenda. Ambio 51, 84-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Reyes-García V, Cámara-Leret R, Halpern BS, O’Hara C, Renard D, Zafra-Calvo N, Díaz S (2023) Biocultural vulnerability exposes threats of culturally important species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2217303120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 71-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rudder J (1977) ‘Introduction to Yolngu science.’ (Galiwinku Adult Education Centre: Galiwinku, NT)

Rudder J (1999) ‘The natural world of the Aboriginal people of north east Arnhem Land, the “Yolŋu”.’ (Restoration House)

Russell SR, Sultana R, Ngukurr Yangbala Rangers, Ens EJ (2023) Mepimbat tedul proujek: Indigenous knowledge of culturally significant freshwater turtles addresses species knowledge gaps in northern Australia. Austral Ecology 48, 1306-1327.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Samuel G (2021) Independent review of the EPBC Act – Final Report. Department of Agriculture, Water, and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Seton KA, Bradley JJ (2004) ‘When you have no law you are nothing’: cane toads, social consequences and management issues. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5, 205-225.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Si A (2020) Patterns in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge: a case study from Arnhem Land, Australia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 16, 52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Skroblin A, Carboon T, Bidu G, Taylor M, Bidu N, Taylor W, Taylor K, Miller M, Robinson L, Williams C, Chapman N, Marney M, Marney C, Biljabu J, Biljabu L, Jeffries P, Samson H, Charles P, Game ET, Wintle B (2022) Developing a two-way learning monitoring program for Mankarr (Greater Bilby) in the Western Desert, Western Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 23, 129-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sterling EJ, Filardi C, Toomey A, Sigouin A, Betley E, Gazit N, Newell J, Albert S, Alvira D, Bergamini N, et al. (2017) Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 1798-1806.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Tengö M, Brondizio ES, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M (2014) Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43, 579-591.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Threatened Species Scientific Committee (2015) Threatened species scientific committee guidelines. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Toner PG (2001) When the echoes are gone: a Yolngu musical anthropology. PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Ward MS, Simmonds JS, Reside AE, Watson JEM, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Trezise J, Fletcher R, File L, Taylor M (2019) Lots of loss with little scrutiny: the attrition of habitat critical for threatened species in Australia. Conservation Science and Practice 1, e117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Watson V (2016) Bringing economics back into assimilation: the select committee of inquiry into the grievances of the Yirrkala Aborigines 1963. Australian Journal of Politics & History 62, 388-403.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Watson J E, Bottrill MC, Walsh JC, Joseph LN, Possingham HP (2010) Evaluating threatened species recovery planning in Australia. Prepared on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts by the Spatial Ecology Laboratory, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

White N (2003) Meaning and metaphor in Yolngu landscapes. In ‘Disputed territories: Land, culture and identities in settler societies’. (Eds D Trigger, G Griffith) pp. 187–206. (Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong)

Williams N (1986) ‘The Yolŋu and their land: A system of land tenure and fight for its recognition.’ (Stanford University Press: Stanford, California).

Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Possingham HP (2009) Setting conservation priorities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162, 237-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Winderlich S, O’Dea A (2014) The views and knowledge of Bininj/Mungguy on Kakadu National Park’s threatened species. In ‘Kakadu National Park Landscape Symposia Series 7: conservation ofthreatened species’. (Eds S Winderlich, J Woinarski) pp. 3–30. (Supervising Scientist: Darwin)

Wintle BA, Cadenhead NCR, Morgain RA, Legge SM, Bekessy SA, Cantele M, Possingham HP, Watson JEM, Maron M, Keith DA, Garnett ST, Woinarski JCZ, Lindenmayer DB (2019) Spending to save: what will it cost to halt Australia’s extinction crisis? Conservation Letters 12, e12682.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wohling M (2009) The problem of scale in indigenous knowledge: a perspective from northern Australia. Ecology and Society 14, 1.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Woinarski JCZ (2015) Critical-weight-range marsupials in northern Australia are declining: a commentary on Fisher et al. (2014) ‘The current decline of tropical marsupials in Australia: is history repeating?’. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24, 118-122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Woinarski J, Mackey B, Nix H, Traill B (2007) ‘The nature of northern Australia: its natural values, ecological processes and future prospects.’ (ANU Press: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Woinarski JCZ, Legge S, Fitzsimons JA, Traill BJ, Burbidge AA, Fisher A, Firth RSC, Gordon IJ, Griffiths AD, Johnson CN, McKenzie NL, Palmer C, Radford I, Rankmore B, Ritchie EG, Ward S, Ziembicki M (2011) The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response. Conservation Letters 4, 192-201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wong P (2016) Traditional ecological knowledge and practice and Red List assessments: guidelines and considerations for integration. IUCN, Washington, DC, USA.

Yirralka Rangers (2017) Laynhapuy Indigenous Protected Area Management Plan (2017–2022). Laynhapuy Aboriginal Corporation, Yirrkala, NT, Australia.

Zurba M, Beazley KF, English E, Buchmann-Duck J (2019) Indigenous protected and conserved areas (IPCAs), Aichi Target 11 and Canada’s pathway to target 1: focusing conservation on reconciliation. Land 8, 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |