Spatiotemporal responses of ungulates to hunting in a fenced multi-use area
Koen M. van Roekel A , Lysanne Snijders A and Darcy R. Visscher
B C D *
A
B
C
D
Abstract
Human activities, such as tourism and hunting, affect the spatiotemporal behaviour of wildlife. For example, it is well documented that ungulates change their spatiotemporal behaviour as a response to hunting pressure, but less is known about ungulate responses to hunting in areas where human activity is common throughout the year and ungulates are constrained by fences.
In this camera-trap study, we analysed the change in spatiotemporal behaviour of wild ungulates (elk, Cervus canadensis (3519 events), moose, Alces alces (1153 events), and white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus (2708 events)) in response to the hunting period in a recreational and fenced park, the Cooking Lake–Blackfoot Provincial Area, Canada.
We used general linear models to compare species-specific patterns of intensity of use, calculated as events per week, in response to changes in the nature of human disturbance, namely a shift from recreation to hunting activity. In particular, we compared intensity of use in and out of the hunting season to determine whether species engaged in spatial patterns of avoidance with respect to hunting. We used daily and seasonal patterns of activity to determine how ungulates shifted their temporal use in response to hunting activity and whether they became more nocturnal as a result.
We found that ungulates responded temporally to the hunting period by generally shifting their activity to more nocturnal hours, with white-tailed deer showing the biggest temporal shift, suggesting that the ungulates distinguish between consumptive and non-consumptive human activities. Nevertheless, temporal overlap between humans and all ungulate species increased during the hunting period as humans targeted times of increased ungulate activity. Spatially, the response was less distinctive and was species-specific. Elk showed little change in spatial behaviour in response to the hunting period. In contrast, moose decreased the use of trail areas and other areas frequented by humans, whereas deer, counterintuitively, increased the use of trail areas, albeit their use became much more nocturnal.
We have shown that responses of ungulates to hunting exceed those to non-consumptive recreational use, and whereas temporal responses (increased nocturnality) were consistent across ungulate species, spatial responses were species-specific.
Management in small fenced multi-use areas needs to account for shifts in the intensity of disturbance resulting from a change in human disturbance from recreational activity to hunting. Providing spatial opportunities for avoidance of humans is key for most species if hours of operation in these areas already limit the timing of human activity.
Keywords: animal activity, camera traps, human disturbance, hunting, recreation, spatiotemporal behaviour, ungulate, wildlife management.
References
Apollonio M, Belkin VV, Borkowski J, Borodin OI, Borowik T, Cagnacci F, Danilkin AA, Danilov PI, Faybich A, Ferretti F, Gaillard JM, Hayward M, Heshtaut P, Heurich M, Hurynovich A, Kashtalyan A, Kerley GIH, Kjellander P, Kowalczyk R, Kozorez A, Matveytchuk S, Milner JM, Mysterud A, Ozolinš J, Panchenko DV, Peters W, Podgórski T, Pokorny B, Rolandsen CM, Ruusila V, Schmidt K, Sipko TP, Veeroja R, Velihurau P, Yanuta G (2017) Challenges and science-based implications for modern management and conservation of European ungulate populations. Mammal Research 62, 209-217.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Baker AD, Leberg PL (2018) Impacts of human recreation on carnivores in protected areas. PLoS ONE 13(4), e0195436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Balmford B, Green RE, Onial M, Phalan B, Balmford A (2019) How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species? Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 73-84.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Benhaiem S, Delon M, Lourtet B, Cargnelutti B, Aulagnier S, Hewison AJM, Morellet N, Verheyden H (2008) Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Animal Behaviour 76, 611-618.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berger-Tal O, Polak T, Oron A, Lubin Y, Kotler BP, Saltz D (2011) Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework. Behavioral Ecology 22, 236-239.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bonnot N, Morellet N, Verheyden H, Cargnelutti B, Lourtet B, Klein F, Hewison AJM (2013) Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59, 185-193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brown CL, Hardy AR, Barber JR, Fristrup KM, Crooks KR, Angeloni LM (2012) The effect of human activities and their associated noise on ungulate behavior. PLoS ONE 7, e40505.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ciuti S, Northrup JM, Muhly TB, Simi S, Musiani M, Pitt JA, Boyce MS (2012) Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear. PLoS ONE 7, e50611.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Clare JDJ, Zuckerberg B, Liu N, Stenglein JL, Van Deelen TR, Pauli JN, Townsend PA (2023) A phenology of fear: investigating scale and seasonality in predator–prey games between wolves and white-tailed deer. Ecology 104, e4019.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Crosmary W-G, Valeix M, Fritz H, Madzikanda H, Côté SD (2012) African ungulates and their drinking problems: hunting and predation risks constrain access to water. Animal Behaviour 83, 145-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
DaRugna OA, Chizinski CJ, Pope KL, Powell LA, Kaemingk MA (2022) Visualizing social-ecological intensities for management of recreation visitors in a multiuse system. Journal of Environmental Management 304, 114224.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dressel S, Ericsson G, Sandström C (2018) Mapping social-ecological systems to understand the challenges underlying wildlife management. Environmental Science & Policy 84, 105-112.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dröge E, Creel S, Becker MS, M’soka J (2017) Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 1123-1128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Frair JL, Merrill EH, Allen JR, Boyce MS (2007) Know thy enemy: experience affects elk translocation success in risky landscapes. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 541-554.
| Google Scholar |
Gallo T, Fidino M, Lehrer EW, Magle S (2019) Urbanization alters predator avoidance behaviours. Journal of Animal Ecology 88, 793-803.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science 360, 1232-1235.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
George SL, Crooks KR (2006) Recreation and large mammal activity in an urban nature reserve. Biological Conservation 133, 107-117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Havmøller RW, Jacobsen NS, Scharff N, Rovero F, Zimmermann F (2020) Assessing the activity pattern overlap among leopards (Panthera pardus), potential prey and competitors in a complex landscape in Tanzania. Journal of Zoology 311, 175-182.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hedley RW, Joubert B, Bains HK, Bayne EM (2022) Acoustic detection of gunshots to improve measurement and mapping of hunting activity. Wildlife Society Bulletin 46, e1370.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Janzen M, Ritter A, Walker PD, Visscher DR (2019) EventFinder: a program for screening remotely captured images. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191, 406.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Keim JL, Lele SR, DeWitt PD, Fitzpatrick JJ, Jenni NS (2019) Estimating the intensity of use by interacting predators and prey using camera traps. Journal of Animal Ecology 88, 690-701.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Landler L, Ruxton GD, Malkemper EP (2019) The Hermans–Rasson test as a powerful alternative to the Rayleigh test for circular statistics in biology. BMC Ecology 19, 30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Laundré JW (2010) Behavioral response races, predator–prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey. Ecology 91, 2995-3007.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lewis JS, Spaulding S, Swanson H, Keeley W, Gramza AR, VandeWoude S, Crooks KR (2021) Human activity influences wildlife populations and activity patterns: implications for spatial and temporal refuges. Ecosphere 12, e03487.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Little AR, Webb SL, Demarais S, Gee KL, Riffell SK, Gaskamp JA (2016) Hunting intensity alters movement behaviour of white-tailed deer. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 360-369.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lone K, Loe LE, Meisingset EL, Stamnes I, Mysterud A (2015) An adaptive behavioural response to hunting: surviving male red deer shift habitat at the onset of the hunting season. Animal Behaviour 102, 127-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Manor R, Saltz D (2003) Impact of human nuisance disturbance on vigilance and group size of a social ungulate. Ecological Applications 13, 1830-1834.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Marzano M, Dandy N (2012) Recreationist behaviour in forests and the disturbance of wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation 21, 2967-2986.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meredith M, Ridout M (2014) Overview of the overlap package. R Project 1, 1-9.
| Google Scholar |
Mitchell WA, Lima SL (2002) Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey. Oikos 99, 249-259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Monterroso P, Alves PC, Ferreras P (2014) Plasticity in circadian activity patterns of mesocarnivores in southwestern Europe: implications for species coexistence. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, 1403-1417.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H (2017) The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 14, 20170213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Neumann W, Ericsson G, Dettki H (2011) The impact of human recreational activities: moose as a case study. Alces: a Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose 47, 17-25.
| Google Scholar |
Norum JK, Lone K, Linnell JDC, Odden J, Loe LE, Mysterud A (2015) Landscape of risk to roe deer imposed by lynx and different human hunting tactics. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61, 831-840.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Parsons AW, Wikelski M, Keeves von Wolff B, Dodel J, Kays R (2022) Intensive hunting changes human–wildlife relationships. PeerJ 10, e14159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Paton DG, Ciuti S, Quinn M, Boyce MS (2017) Hunting exacerbates the response to human disturbance in large herbivores while migrating through a road network. Ecosphere 8, e01841.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Phillips GE, Alldredge AW (2000) Reproductive success of elk following disturbance by humans during calving season. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64, 521-530.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Proffitt KM, Grigg JL, Hamlin KL, Garrott RA (2009) Contrasting effects of wolves and human hunters on elk behavioral responses to predation risk. Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 345-356.
| Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2021) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria). Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Reed SE, Merenlender AM (2008) Quiet, nonconsumptive recreation reduces protected area effectiveness. Conservation Letters 1, 146-154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14, 322-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen PA (2014) Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, 1170-1179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saïd S, Tolon V, Brandt S, Baubet E (2012) Sex effect on habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance: the study of wild boar. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 107-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sergeyev M, McMillan BR, Hall LK, Hersey KR, Jones CD, Larsen RT (2022) Reducing the refuge effect: using private-land hunting to mitigate issues with hunter access. Journal of Wildlife Management 86, e22148.
| Google Scholar |
Sheriff MJ, Peacor SD, Hawlena D, Thaker M (2020) Non-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: a dearth of evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology 89, 1302-1316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Sibbald AM, Hooper RJ, McLeod JE, Gordon IJ (2011) Responses of red deer (Cervus elaphus) to regular disturbance by hill walkers. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57, 817-825.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sih A (1984) The behavioral response race between predator and prey. The American Naturalist 123, 143-150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Smith JA, Thomas AC, Levi T, Wang Y, Wilmers CC (2018) Human activity reduces niche partitioning among three widespread mesocarnivores. Oikos 127, 890-901.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Smith JA, Gaynor KM, Suraci JP (2021) Mismatch between risk and response may amplify lethal and non-lethal effects of humans on wild animal populations. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9, 604973.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stankowich T (2008) Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta analysis. Biological Conservation 141, 2159-2173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Swenson JE (1982) Effects of hunting on habitat use by mule deer on mixed-grass prairie in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 10, 115-120.
| Google Scholar |
Sytsma MLT, Lewis T, Gardner B, Prugh LR (2022) Low levels of outdoor recreation alter wildlife behaviour. People and Nature 4, 1547-1559.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tablado Z, Jenni L (2017) Determinants of uncertainty in wildlife responses to human disturbance. Biological Reviews 92, 216-233.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Taylor AR, Knight RL (2003) Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecological Applications 13, 951-963.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Visscher DR, Macleod I, Vujnovic K, Vujnovic D, Dewitt PD (2017) Human risk induced behavioral shifts in refuge use by elk in an agricultural matrix. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41, 162-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Visscher DR, Walker PD, Flowers M, Kemna C, Pattison J, Kushnerick B (2023) Human impact on deer use is greater than predators and competitors in a multiuse recreation area. Animal Behaviour 197, 61-69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Viviano A, Mori E, Fattorini N, Mazza G, Lazzeri L, Panichi A, Strianese L, Mohamed WF (2021) Spatiotemporal overlap between the European brown hare and its potential predators and competitors. Animals 11, 562.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wakefield S, Attum O (2006) The effects of human visits on the use of a waterhole by endangered ungulates. Journal of Arid Environments 65, 668-672.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Xu W, Dejid N, Herrmann V, Sawyer H, Middleton AD (2021) Barrier Behaviour Analysis (BaBA) reveals extensive effects of fencing on wide-ranging ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 58, 690-698.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
