Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Snow track counts for density estimation of mammalian predators in the boreal forest

Mark O’Donoghue https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-6962 A * , Brian G. Slough B , Kim Poole C , Stan Boutin D , Elizabeth J. Hofer E , Garth Mowat F G , Dennis Murray H and Charles J. Krebs E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Environment Yukon, Fish and Wildlife Branch, Box 310, Mayo, YT Y0B 1M0, Canada.

B 37-71 Aksala Drive, Whitehorse, YT Y1A 0M5, Canada.

C Aurora Wildlife Research, 1918 Shannon Point Road, Nelson, BC V1L 6K1, Canada.

D Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.

E Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

F B.C. Ministry of Forests, Fish and Wildlife Branch, Suite 401, 333 Victoria Street, Nelson, BC V1L 4K3, Canada.

G Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.

H Department of Biology, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada.

* Correspondence to: Mark.ODonoghue@yukon.ca

Handling Editor: Thomas Newsome

Wildlife Research - https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21159
Submitted: 30 October 2021  Accepted: 13 September 2022   Published online: 4 October 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Methods for estimating density of meso-carnivores in northern ecosystems are labour intensive and expensive to implement if mark–recapture and radio collaring are used. One alternative is to count tracks in the snow along transects as an index of density, but this method has been criticised as imprecise and lacking validation.

Aims: We aimed to examine the utility of track counts along snowmobile trails in the snow for measuring changes in populations of Canada lynx and coyotes in the boreal forest of north-western Canada.

Methods: We compared winter track counts of Canada lynx at three study sites and of coyotes at one site with concurrent estimates of density based on locations of radio-collared animals and estimates of numbers of uncollared animals from three 7–9-year studies in the Yukon and Northwest Territories, during a period of cyclical population fluctuations.

Key results: Snow track counts were positively correlated (r2 = 0.83) with density of Canada lynx, estimated by live trapping and radio collaring in the three survey areas. Coyotes also showed a clear relationship (r2 = 0.80) between known density and snow track counts, but track counts were strongly affected by season, with much higher counts in the early winter when snow was shallower. This indicates the need to control for season or snow depth when using track counts as indices of coyote abundance. We recommend sample sizes of at least 10 track counts per winter along a 25-km transect to maximise precision.

Conclusions: Snow track counts are a relatively simple, inexpensive method of concurrently tracking abundance of multiple species of meso-carnivores. These data indicate that track counts may be reliably used to monitor trends in numbers, but we suggest site-specific validation of the regressions reported here between tracks and animal abundance are required to translate these indices into estimates of density.

Implications: Track counts have the potential to be an affordable alternative to more intensive methods of monitoring trends in abundance of medium-sized mammals, for purposes such as management of harvest or to measure the success of programs to increase or reduce population abundance.

Keywords: abundance indices, Canada lynx, census methods, coyote, Kluane Lake, mammalian meso-predators, snow tracking, Yukon.


References

Allen, LR, and Engeman, RM (2015). Evaluating and validating abundance monitoring methods in the absence of populations of known size: review and application to a passive tracking index. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22, 2907–2915.
Evaluating and validating abundance monitoring methods in the absence of populations of known size: review and application to a passive tracking index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson, DR (2003). Response to Engeman: index values rarely constitute reliable information. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 288–291.

Balme, GA, Hunter, LTB, and Slotow, R (2009). Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 433–441.
Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Becker, M, Huggard, DJ, Dickie, M, Warbington, C, Schieck, J, Herdman, E, Serrouya, R, and Boutin, S (2022). Applying and testing a novel method to estimate animal density from motion-triggered cameras. Ecosphere 13, e4005.
Applying and testing a novel method to estimate animal density from motion-triggered cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brand, CJ, Keith, LB, and Fischer, CA (1976). Lynx responses to changing snowshoe hare densities in Central Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 40, 416–428.
Lynx responses to changing snowshoe hare densities in Central Alberta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burton, AC, Neilson, E, Moreira, D, Ladle, A, Steenweg, R, Fisher, JT, Bayne, E, and Boutin, S (2015). Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 675–685.
Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campos-Candela, A, Palmer, M, Balle, S, and Alós, J (2018). A camera-based method for estimating absolute density in animals displaying home range behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology 87, 825–837.
A camera-based method for estimating absolute density in animals displaying home range behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cattadori, IM, Haydon, DT, Thirgood, SR, and Hudson, PJ (2003). Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting. Oikos 100, 439–446.
Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choate, DM, Wolfe, ML, and Stoner, DC (2006). Evaluation of cougar population estimators in Utah. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 782–799.
Evaluation of cougar population estimators in Utah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Danilov, P, Helle, P, Annenkov, V, Belkin, V, Bljudnik, L, Helle, E, Kanshiev, V, Linden, H, and Markovsky, V (1996). Status of game animal populations in Karelia and Finland according to winter track count data. Finnish Game Research 49, 18–25.

Dempsey, SJ, Gese, EM, and Kluever, BM (2014). Finding a fox: an evaluation of survey methods to estimate abundance of a small desert carnivore. PLoS ONE 9, e105873.
Finding a fox: an evaluation of survey methods to estimate abundance of a small desert carnivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doran-Myers, D, Kenney, AJ, Krebs, CJ, Lamb, CT, Menzies, AK, Murray, D, Studd, EK, Whittington, J, and Boutin, S (2021). Density estimates for Canada lynx vary among estimation methods. Ecosphere 12, e03774.
Density estimates for Canada lynx vary among estimation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dziçciolowski, R (1976). Estimating ungulate numbers in a forest by track counts. Acta Theriologica 21, 217–222.

Engeman, RM (2003). More on the need to get the basics right: population indices. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 286–287.

Engeman, RM, Pipas, MJ, Gruver, KS, and Allan, L (2000). Monitoring coyote population changes with a passive activity index. Wildlife Research 27, 553–557.
Monitoring coyote population changes with a passive activity index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gese EM (2001) Monitoring of terrestrial carnivore populations. In ‘Carnivore Conservation’. (Eds Gittleman JL, Funk SM, MacDonald DW, Wayne RK) pp. 372–396. (Cambridge University Press and the Zoological Society of London: Cambridge, UK)

Gibbs, JP, Droege, S, and Eagle, P (1998). Monitoring populations of plants and animals. BioScience 48, 935–940.
Monitoring populations of plants and animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gompper, ME, Kays, RW, Ray, JC, Lapoint, SD, Bogan, DA, and Cryan, JR (2006). A comparison on noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1142–1151.
A comparison on noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Graham, IM (2002). Estimating weasel Mustela nivalis abundance from tunnel tracking indices at fluctuating field vole Microtus agrestis density. Wildlife Biology 8, 279–287.
Estimating weasel Mustela nivalis abundance from tunnel tracking indices at fluctuating field vole Microtus agrestis density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayne, DW (1949). Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30, 1–18.
Calculation of size of home range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayward, MW, Boitani, L, Burrows, ND, Funston, PJ, Karanth, KU, MacKenzie, DI, Pollock, KH, and Yarnell, RW (2015). FORUM: Ecologists need robust survey designs, sampling and analytical methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 286–290.
FORUM: Ecologists need robust survey designs, sampling and analytical methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Helle, P, Ikonen, K, and Kantola, A (2016). Wildlife monitoring in Finland: online information for game administration, hunters, and the wider public. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 46, 1491–1496.
Wildlife monitoring in Finland: online information for game administration, hunters, and the wider public.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Howe, EJ, Buckland, ST, Després-Einspenner, M-L, and Kühl, HS (2017). Distance sampling with camera traps. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, 1558–1565.
Distance sampling with camera traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jędrzejewski, W, and Jędrzejewska, B (1996). Rodent cycles in relation to biomass and productivity of ground vegetation and predation in the Palearctic. Acta Theriologica 41, 1–34.

Jolly, GM (1969). Sampling methods for aerial censuses of wildlife populations. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 34, 46–49.
Sampling methods for aerial censuses of wildlife populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeping, D, and Pelletier, R (2014). Animal density and track counts: understanding the nature of observations based on animal movements. PLoS ONE 9, e96598.
Animal density and track counts: understanding the nature of observations based on animal movements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeping, D, Burger, JH, Keitsile, AO, Gielden, M-C, Mudongo, E, Wallgren, M, Skarpe, C, and Foote, AL (2018). Can trackers count free-ranging wildlife as effectively and efficiently as conventional aerial survey and distance sampling? Implications for citizen science in the Kalahari, Botswana. Biological Conservation 223, 156–169.

Krebs CJ (1999) ‘Ecological Methodology.’ 2nd edn. (Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.: Menlo Park, CA, USA)

Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R (Eds) (2001) ‘Ecosystem Dynamics of the Boreal forest: the Kluane Project.’ (Oxford University Press: New York, USA)

Laurent, M, Dickie, M, Becker, M, Serrouya, R, and Boutin, S (2021). Evaluating the mechanisms of landscape change on white-tailed deer populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 85, 340–353.
Evaluating the mechanisms of landscape change on white-tailed deer populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindén, H, Helle, E, Helle, P, and Wikman, M (1996). Wildlife triangle scheme in Finland: methods and aims for monitoring wildlife population. Finnish Game Research 49, 4–11.

Long RA, Zielinski W (2008) Designing effective noninvasive carnivore surveys. In ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores’. (Ed. RA Long, P MacKay, J Ray, W Zielinski) pp. 8–40. (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA)

Long RA, MacKay P, Ray J, Zielinski W (Eds) (2008) ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA)

Mowat, G, Slough, BG, and Rivard, R (1994). A comparison of three live capturing devices for lynx: capture efficiency and injuries. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22, 644–650.

Mowat, G, Slough, BG, and Boutin, S (1996). Lynx recruitment during a snowshoe hare population peak and decline in southwest Yukon. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 441–452.
Lynx recruitment during a snowshoe hare population peak and decline in southwest Yukon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Murray, DL, and Boutin, S (1991). The influence of snow on lynx and coyote movements in southwestern Yukon: does morphology affect behaviour? Oecologia 88, 463–469.
The influence of snow on lynx and coyote movements in southwestern Yukon: does morphology affect behaviour?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Murray DL, Sandercock BK (Eds) (2020) ‘Population Ecology in Practice.’ (John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Nakashima, Y, Fukasawa, K, and Samejima, H (2018). Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 735–744.
Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Donoghue, M, Boutin, S, Krebs, CJ, and Hofer, EJ (1997). Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 80, 150–162.

O’Donoghue, M, Boutin, S, Krebs, CJ, Murray, DL, and Hofer, EJ (1998a). Behavioural responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 82, 169–183.

O’Donoghue, M, Boutin, S, Krebs, CJ, Zuleta, G, Murray, DL, and Hofer, EJ (1998b). Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecology 79, 1193–1208.
Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Donoghue M, Boutin S, Murray DL, Krebs CJ, Hofer EJ, Breitenmoser U, Breitenmoser-Wuersten C, Zuleta G, Doyle CE, Nams VO (2001) Coyotes and lynx. In ‘Ecosystem Dynamics of the Boreal Forest: the Kluane Project’. (Eds CJ Krebs, S Boutin, R Boonstra) pp. 275–323. (Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA)

O’Donoghue M, Slough BG, Poole KG, Boutin S, Hofer EJ, Mowat G, Krebs CJ (2010) Cyclical dynamics and behaviour of Canada lynx in northern Canada. In ‘Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids’. (Eds DW MacDonald, AJ Loveridge) pp. 521–536. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Poole, KG (1994). Characteristics of an unharvested lynx population during a snowshoe hare decline. Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 608–618.
Characteristics of an unharvested lynx population during a snowshoe hare decline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Poole, KG (1995). Spatial organization of a lynx population. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 632–641.
Spatial organization of a lynx population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Poole, KG, Mowat, G, and Slough, BG (1993). Chemical immobilization of lynx. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21, 136–140.

Prugh, LR (2005). Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply. Oikos 110, 253–264.
Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prugh, LR, Ritland, CE, Arthur, SM, and Krebs, CJ (2005). Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces. Molecular Ecology 14, 1585–1596.
Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rowcliffe, JM, Field, J, Turvey, ST, and Carbone, C (2008). Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1228–1236.
Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Slough, BG, and Mowat, G (1996). Lynx population dynamics in an untrapped refugium. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 946–961.
Lynx population dynamics in an untrapped refugium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Slough BG, Jessup RH, McKay DI, Stephenson AB (1987) Wild furbearer management in western and northern Canada. In ‘Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America’. (Eds M Novak, JA Baker, ME Obbard, B Malloch) pp. 1062–1076. (Ontario Trappers Association: North Bay, Ontario, Canada)

Squires, JR, Olson, LE, Turner, DL, DeCesare, NJ, and Kolbe, JA (2012). Estimating detection probability for Canada lynx Lynx canadensis using snow-track surveys in the northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USA. Wildlife Biology 18, 215–224.
Estimating detection probability for Canada lynx Lynx canadensis using snow-track surveys in the northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stephens, PA, Zaumyslova, OY, Miquelle, DG, Myslenkov, AI, and Hayward, GD (2006). Estimating population density from indirect sign: track counts and the Formozov–Malyshev–Pereleshin formula. Animal Conservation 9, 339–348.
Estimating population density from indirect sign: track counts and the Formozov–Malyshev–Pereleshin formula.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sundell, J, O’Hara, RB, Helle, P, Hellstedt, P, Henttonen, H, and Piettiänen, H (2013). Numerical response of small mustelids to vole abundance: delayed or not? Oikos 122, 1112–1120.
Numerical response of small mustelids to vole abundance: delayed or not?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Villette, P, Krebs, CJ, Jung, TJ, and Boonstra, R (2016). Can camera trapping provide accurate estimates of small mammal (Myodes rutilus and Peromyscus maniculatus) density in the boreal forest? Journal of Mammalogy 97, 32–40.
Can camera trapping provide accurate estimates of small mammal (Myodes rutilus and Peromyscus maniculatus) density in the boreal forest?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Villette, P, Krebs, CJ, and Jung, TJ (2017). Evaluating camera traps as an alternative to live trapping for estimating the density of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). European Journal of Wildlife Research 63, 7.
Evaluating camera traps as an alternative to live trapping for estimating the density of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ward, RMP, and Krebs, CJ (1985). Behavioural responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 2817–2824.
Behavioural responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) ‘Analysis and Management of Animal Populations.’ (Academic Press: New York, NY, USA)

Wilson, GJ, and Delahay, RJ (2001). A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation. Wildlife Research 28, 151–164.
A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |