Evaluating scat surveys as a tool for population and community assessments
Alexandra J. Paton
A B , Jessie C. Buettel A and Barry W. Brook A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Sandy Bay, Tas. 7001, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: Alexandra.Paton@utas.edu.au
Wildlife Research 49(3) 206-214 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21056
Submitted: 25 March 2021 Accepted: 13 July 2021 Published: 3 December 2021
Abstract
Context: Reliable, cost-effective monitoring methods are essential for managing wildlife populations. Scat-and-sign surveys (i.e. monitoring defecation, animal scratching, footprints, food remains) are a rapid, low-cost, non-invasive monitoring approach, but unquantified biases and uncertainties associated with these methods have caused researchers to doubt their reliability.
Aims: We sought to quantify how richness, occupancy and activity estimates derived from a long-term camera-trap study differed from those of scat surveys in the same locations, to determine scat-survey reliability and model bias corrections.
Methods: We used transect-based scat surveys at 110 sites in the temperate forests of southern Tasmania (Australia), to estimate occupancy, activity and community richness for common, ground-dwelling vertebrates. These results were compared with estimates derived from a long-term passive camera-trap study at the same sites. In addition, time-lapse imagery taken with the camera traps was used to monitor the persistence of rufous-belled pademelon (Thylogale billardierii) and Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) scats in relation to environmental correlates.
Key results: Scat persistence differed between these two species. The half-life of S. harrisii scats was 113 days, compared with 63 days for T. billardierii. Generalised linear modelling showed that scat surveys were most efficacious at sites with little disturbance and homogenous substrates. Overall, scat surveys consistently underestimated site occupancy and richness relative to the camera traps (μ = 2.7:1), but this bias was inconsistent, with the ratio exceeding 15 for the arboreal brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Scats were most reliably detected for large, trail-using mammals such as S. harrisii, T. billardierii, and common wombat (Vombatus ursinus). Scat surveys were less useful for the surveillance of low-density and arboreal species. Scats were uncommon for the two bird species examined, but alternative superb lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) signs were detected reliably.
Conclusions: Scat surveys reliably detected large, trail-using mammals. However, estimates of activity were poorly correlated between camera traps and scat surveys.
Implications: When used appropriately, scat surveys can provide an effective and cheap ‘snapshot’ index for wildlife monitoring, especially if the species-specific biases have been calibrated for the vertebrate community and environment under monitoring.
Keywords: scat, camera-trap, Tasmania, scat persistence, species richness.
References
Alves, J., da Silva, A. A., Soares, A. M. V. M., and Fonseca, C. (2013). Pellet group count methods to estimate red deer densities: precision, potential accuracy and efficiency. Mammalian Biology 78, 134–141.| Pellet group count methods to estimate red deer densities: precision, potential accuracy and efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anton, V., Hartley, S., and Wittmer, H. U. (2018). Evaluation of remote cameras for monitoring multiple invasive mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 42, 74–79.
Balme, G. A., Hunter, L. T. B., and Slotow, R. (2009). Evaluating Methods for Counting Cryptic Carnivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 433–441.
| Evaluating Methods for Counting Cryptic Carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barnes, R. F. W., Asamoah-Boateng, B, Majam, J. N., and Agyei-Ohemeng, J. (1997). Rainfall and the population dynamics of elephant dung-piles in the forests of southern Ghana. African Journal of Ecology 35, 39–52.
| Rainfall and the population dynamics of elephant dung-piles in the forests of southern Ghana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Birks, J., Messenger, J., Braithwaite, T., Davison, A., Brookes, R., and Strachan, C. (2005). Are scat surveys a reliable method for assessing distribution and population status of pine martens? In ‘Martens and fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments’. (Eds D. J. Harrison, A. K. Fuller, and G. Proulx.) pp. 235–252. (Springer.)
Bureau of Meteorology (2019). ‘Climate Data Online.’ Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/ [verified 1 November 2019].
Canty, A., and Ripley, B. (2019). ‘boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions.’ Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=boot [verified 13 September 2021].
Clare, J. D., Anderson, E. M., MacFarland, D. M., and Sloss, B. L. (2015). Comparing the costs and detectability of bobcat using scat‐detecting dog and remote camera surveys in central Wisconsin. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 210–217.
| Comparing the costs and detectability of bobcat using scat‐detecting dog and remote camera surveys in central Wisconsin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cowan, P. (1992). The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve. Biological Conservation 61, 217–226.
| The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cristescu, R. H., Goethals, K., Banks, P. B., Carrick, F. N., and Frère, C. (2012). Experimental evaluation of koala scat persistence and detectability with implications for pellet-based fauna census. International Journal of Zoology 2012, 631856.
Davis, N. E., and Coulson, G. (2016). Habitat-specific and season-specific faecal pellet decay rates for five mammalian herbivores in south-eastern Australia. Australian Mammalogy 38, 105–116.
| Habitat-specific and season-specific faecal pellet decay rates for five mammalian herbivores in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Day, C. C., Westover, M. D., Hall, L. K., Larsen, R. T., and McMillan, B. R. (2016). Comparing direct and indirect methods to estimate detection rates and site use of a cryptic semi-aquatic carnivore. Ecological Indicators 66, 230–234.
| Comparing direct and indirect methods to estimate detection rates and site use of a cryptic semi-aquatic carnivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fancourt, B. (2009). Measurement of defaecation rates in captive swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor). Australian Mammalogy 31, 107–110.
| Measurement of defaecation rates in captive swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fiske, I., and Chandler, R. (2011). ‘unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance.’ Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/unmarked/index.html.
Godbois, I. A., Conner, L. M., Leopold, B. D., and Warren, R. J. (2005). Effect of diet on mass loss of bobcat scat after exposure to field conditions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 149–153.
| Effect of diet on mass loss of bobcat scat after exposure to field conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gompper, M. E., Kays, R. W., Ray, J. C., Lapoint, S. D., Bogan, D. A., and Cryan, J. R. (2006). A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1142–1151.
| A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrington, L. A., Harrington, A. L., Hughes, J., Stirling, D., and Macdonald, D. W. (2010). The accuracy of scat identification in distribution surveys: American mink, Neovison vison, in the northern highlands of Scotland. European Journal of Wildlife Research 56, 377–384.
| The accuracy of scat identification in distribution surveys: American mink, Neovison vison, in the northern highlands of Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hendry H.Mann C. (2017 )
Hohnen, R., Ashby, J., Tuft, K., and McGregor, H. (2013). Individual identification of northern quolls (Dasyurus hallucatus) using remote cameras. Australian Mammalogy 35, 131–135.
| Individual identification of northern quolls (Dasyurus hallucatus) using remote cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Houser, A. M., Somers, M. J., and Boast, L. K. (2009). Spoor density as a measure of true density of a known population of free-ranging wild cheetah in Botswana. Journal of Zoology 278, 108–115.
| Spoor density as a measure of true density of a known population of free-ranging wild cheetah in Botswana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jeffress, M. R., Paukert, C. P., Sandercock, B. K., and Gipson, P. S. (2011). Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 144–150.
| Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson, C., and Jarman, P. (1987). Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek. 6. A validation of the use of dung-pellet counts for measuring absolute densities of populations of macropodids. Wildlife Research 14, 139–145.
| Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek. 6. A validation of the use of dung-pellet counts for measuring absolute densities of populations of macropodids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kluever, B. M., Gese, E. M., and Dempsey, S. J. (2015). The influence of road characteristics and species on detection probabilities of carnivore faeces. Wildlife Research 42, 75–82.
| The influence of road characteristics and species on detection probabilities of carnivore faeces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koike, S., Soga, M., Enari, H., Kozakai, C., and Nemoto, Y. (2013). Seasonal changes and altitudinal variation in deer fecal pellet decay. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59, 765–768.
| Seasonal changes and altitudinal variation in deer fecal pellet decay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kuhn, M. (2019). ‘caret: Classification and Regression Training.’ Available at https://github.com/topepo/caret/ [verified 13 September 2021].
Livingston, T. R., Gipson, P. S., Ballard, W. B., Sanchez, D. M., and Krausman, P. R. (2005). Scat removal: a source of bias in feces-related studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 172–178.
| Scat removal: a source of bias in feces-related studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long, R. A., Donovan, T. M., Mackay, P., Zielinski, W. J., and Buzas, J. S. (2007). Comparing scat detection dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 2018–2025.
| Comparing scat detection dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lonsinger, R. C., Gese, E. M., Knight, R. N., Johnson, T. R., and Waits, L. P. (2016). Quantifying and correcting for scat removal in noninvasive carnivore scat surveys. Wildlife Biology 22, 45–54.
| Quantifying and correcting for scat removal in noninvasive carnivore scat surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lyra-Jorge, M. C., Ciocheti, G., Pivello, V. R., and Meirelles, S. T. (2008). Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 739–744.
| Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marucco, F., Pletscher, D. H., Boitani, L., Schwartz, M. K., Pilgrim, K. L., and Lebreton, J. D. (2009). Wolf survival and population trend using non‐invasive capture–recapture techniques in the western Alps. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 1003–1010.
| Wolf survival and population trend using non‐invasive capture–recapture techniques in the western Alps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Massei, G., Coats, J., Lambert, M. S., Pietravalle, S., Gill, R., and Cowan, D. (2018). Camera traps and activity signs to estimate wild boar density and derive abundance indices. Pest Management Science 74, 853–860.
| Camera traps and activity signs to estimate wild boar density and derive abundance indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29024317PubMed |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G.-A., and Fleming, P. J. (2015). The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 13–22.
| The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Roeland, K, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O’Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Szoecs, E, Wagner, H (2019). ‘vegan: Community Ecology Package.’ Available at https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan [verified 13 September 2021].
Pemberton, D. (2019). The Tasmanian devil: a uniquely threatened animal. In ‘Saving the Tasmanian Devil: Recovery through Science-based Management’. (Eds C. Hogg, S. Fox, D. Pemberton, K. Belov.) pp. 18–21. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)
Pfeffer, S. E., Spitzer, R., Allen, A. M., Hofmeester, T. R., Ericsson, G., Widemo, F., Singh, N. J., and Cromsigt, J. P. G. M. (2018). Pictures or pellets? Comparing camera trapping and dung counts as methods for estimating population densities of ungulates. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 4, 173–183.
| Pictures or pellets? Comparing camera trapping and dung counts as methods for estimating population densities of ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Phillips, C. A., Woolley, C., Mann, D., and McGrew, W. C. (2018). Disappearance rate of chimpanzee scats: implications for census work on Pan troglodytes. African Journal of Ecology 56, 168–178.
| Disappearance rate of chimpanzee scats: implications for census work on Pan troglodytes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poggenburg, C., Nopp-Mayr, U., Coppes, J., and Sachser, F. (2018). Shit happens … and persists: decay dynamics of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) droppings under natural and artificial conditions. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64, .
Putman, R. (1984). Facts from faeces. Mammal Review 14, 79–97.
| Facts from faeces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2019). ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.)
Rowcliffe, J. M., Field, J., Turvey, S. T., and Carbone, C. (2008). Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1228–1236.
| Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, D. H. V., and Weston, K. A. (2017). Capturing the cryptic: a comparison of detection methods for stoats (Mustela erminea) in alpine habitats. Wildlife Research 44, 418–426.
| Capturing the cryptic: a comparison of detection methods for stoats (Mustela erminea) in alpine habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stanley, T. R., and Royle, J. A. (2005). Estimating site occupancy and abundance using indirect detection indices. The Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 874–883.
| Estimating site occupancy and abundance using indirect detection indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens, P. A., Pettorelli, N., Barlow, J., Whittingham, M. J., and Cadotte, M. W. (2015). Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1–6.
| Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Therneau, T (2015). ‘A Package for Survival Analysis in S.’ Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival [verified 13 September 2021].
Trolliet, F, Vermeulen, C, Huynen, M-C, and Hambuckers, A (2014). Use of camera traps for wildlife studies: a review. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement= Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment [= BASE] 18, 446–454.
Vine, S., Crowther, M., Lapidge, S., Dickman, C. R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M., and English, A. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436–446.
| Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wall, L., and Wheeler, W. (1966). Lyrebirds in Tasmania. Emu-Austral Ornithology 66, 123–131.
| Lyrebirds in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wickman, H. (2016). ‘ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA.)
Wise, P., Lee, D., Peck, S., Clarke, J., Thalmann, S., Hockley, J., Schaap, D., and Pemberton, D. (2016). The conservation introduction of Tasmanian devils to Maria Island National Park: a response to devil facial tumor disease (DFTD). In ‘Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2016. Case-Studies From Around the Globe’. (Ed. P. S. Soorae.) pp. 166–171. (IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group: Gland; Environment Agency: Abu Dhabi.)
Wright, M. N., and Ziegler, A. (2017). ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software 77, 1–17.
