Flooding-induced mortality of loggerhead sea turtle eggs
Colin J. Limpus A , Jeffrey D. Miller B and Joseph B. Pfaller C D EA Threatened Species Operations, Queensland Department of Environment and Science, PO Box 2454, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
B Biological Research and Education Consultants, 446 Dearborn Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA.
C Caretta Research Project, PO Box 9841, Savannah, GA 31412, USA.
D Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research and Department of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: jpfaller@ufl.edu
Wildlife Research 48(2) 142-151 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20080
Submitted: 7 May 2020 Accepted: 17 July 2020 Published: 6 October 2020
Abstract
Context: Marine turtle eggs incubate in dynamic beaches, where they are vulnerable to both saltwater and freshwater flooding. Understanding the capacity for marine turtle eggs to tolerate flooding will aid management efforts to predict and mitigate the impacts of climate change, including sea-level rise and increases in coastal flooding.
Aims: Evaluate the interactive effects of flooding duration and incubation stage on the hatching success of loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) eggs.
Methods: Groups of 20 eggs from multiple clutches were incubated in plastic containers in a beach hatchery. Eggs at six stages of incubation (0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 weeks post-oviposition) were excavated from the hatchery and exposed to saltwater or freshwater flooding for seven durations of time (0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 24 or 48 h). Containers of eggs were either submerged in a bucket of water or left outside of the bucket (control; no flooding) for their designated duration, allowed to drain, then reburied in the hatchery. Following hatchling emergence, the hatching success of each group of eggs was evaluated.
Key results: Freshly laid eggs and eggs on the verge of hatching exposed to any flooding and all eggs exposed to extended periods of flooding (24 and 48 h) suffered complete mortality. Eggs at 20–80% development exposed to short periods of flooding (1–6 h) maintained high hatching success that was statistically equivalent to control eggs, while eggs at <20% and >80% development exhibited significant decreases in hatching success.
Conclusions: Marine turtle eggs in the middle of incubation can tolerate saltwater and freshwater flooding for up to 6 h. Outside of this period or when flooding is longer, disruption of gas concentrations and osmotic gradients in the egg chamber can lead to embryonic mortality. These findings have reinforced concerns regarding the capacity for marine turtle populations to continue to function as rising sea levels and increases in coastal flooding alter the hydrology of nesting beaches.
Implications: As current and predicted climate change threatens the suitability of the incubation environment used by marine turtles, corrective actions to maximise hatching success need to be taken before the eggs are flooded.
Keywords: climate change, conservation management, marine turtle eggs, sea-level rise.
References
Ackerman, R. A. (1977). The respiratory gas exchange of sea turtle nests (Chelonia, Caretta). Respiration Physiology 31, 19–38.| The respiratory gas exchange of sea turtle nests (Chelonia, Caretta).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 918411PubMed |
Ackerman, R. A. (1980). Physiology and ecological aspects of gas exchange by sea turtle eggs. American Zoologist 20, 575–583.
| Physiology and ecological aspects of gas exchange by sea turtle eggs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ackerman, R. A. (1981). Oxygen consumption by sea turtle (Chelonia, Caretta) eggs during development. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 54, 316–324.
Ackerman, R. A. (1991). Physical factors affecting the water exchange of buried reptile eggs. In ‘Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles’. (Eds D. C. Demming, and M. W. J. Ferguson.) pp. 193–211. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Ackerman, R. A. (1994). Temperature, time, and reptile egg water exchange. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 40, 293–306.
Ackerman, R. A. (1997). The nest environment and the embryonic development of sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Sea Turtles’. (Eds P. L. Lutz, and J. Musick.) pp. 83–106. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)
Ackerman, R. A., and Prange, H. D. (1972). Oxygen diffusion across sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) egg shell. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 43, 905–909.
| Oxygen diffusion across sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) egg shell.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baldwin, W. P., and Lofton, J. M. (1940). ‘The Loggerheads of Cape Romain. Cape Romain Migratory Bird Refuge, US Biological Survey’. (The Village Museum: McClellanville, SC, USA)
Caldwell, D. K. (1959). The loggerhead turtles of Cape Romain, South Carolina. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Series 4, 319–348.
Caut, S., Guirlet, E., and Girondot, M. (2010). Effect of tidal overwash on the embryonic development of leatherback turtles in French Guiana. Marine Environmental Research 69, 254–261.
| Effect of tidal overwash on the embryonic development of leatherback turtles in French Guiana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19969341PubMed |
Chan, E. H., Salleh, H. U., and Liew, H. C. (1985). Effects of handling on hatchability of eggs of the leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea (L.). Pertanika 8, 265–271.
Cheng, I. J., Lin, C., and Tseng, C.-T. (2015). Factors influencing variations of oxygen content in nests of green sea turtles during egg incubation with a comparison of two nesting environments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 471, 104–111.
| Factors influencing variations of oxygen content in nests of green sea turtles during egg incubation with a comparison of two nesting environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dunstan, A. J. (2016). Raine Island Recovery Project: 2015–16 season technical report to the Raine Island Scientific Advisory Committee and Raine Island Reference Group. Department of National Parks, Sport and Racing, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Ehrenfeld, D. (1979). Behavior associated with nesting. In ‘Turtles Perspectives and Research’. (Eds M. Harless, and H. Morlock.) pp. 417–434. (Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA.)
Ehrhart, L. M. (1981). A review of sea turtle reproduction. In ‘Biology and Conservation of Sea Turtles’. (Ed. K. A. Bjorndal.) pp. 29–38. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Fish, M. R., Côté, I. M., Gill, J. A., Jones, A. P., Renshoff, S., and Watkinson, A. R. (2005). Predicting the impact of sea-level rise on Caribbean Sea turtle nesting habitat. Conservation Biology 19, 482–491.
| Predicting the impact of sea-level rise on Caribbean Sea turtle nesting habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FitzSimmons, N. N., and Limpus, C. J. (2014). Marine turtle genetic stocks of the Indo-Pacific: identifying boundaries and knowledge gaps. Indian Ocean Turtle Newsletter 20, 2–18.
Foley, A. M., Peck, S. A., and Harman, G. R. (2006). Effects of sand characteristics and inundation on the hatching success of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) clutches on low-relief mangrove islands in Southwest Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 5, 32–41.
| Effects of sand characteristics and inundation on the hatching success of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) clutches on low-relief mangrove islands in Southwest Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., and Abbs, D. (2010). Effects of projected changes in tropical cyclone frequency on sea turtles. Marine Ecology Progress Series 412, 283–292.
| Effects of projected changes in tropical cyclone frequency on sea turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., and Cinner, J. E. (2010). Using expert opinion to prioritize impacts of climate change on sea turtles’ nesting grounds. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 2511–2518.
| Using expert opinion to prioritize impacts of climate change on sea turtles’ nesting grounds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Limpus, C. J., and Hamann, M. (2010a). Impacts of climate change on the largest green turtle population in the world: the nGBR green turtle population. Indian Ocean Turtle Newsletter 12, 6–8.
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Limpus, C. J., Hamann, M., and Dawson, J. (2010b). Potential impacts of projected sea-level rise on sea turtle rookeries. Aquatic Conservation 20, 132–139.
| Potential impacts of projected sea-level rise on sea turtle rookeries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Dawson, J. L., Smithers, S. G., Hamann, M., and Limpus, C. J. (2010c). Sedimentological characteristics of key sea turtle rookeries: potential implications under projected climate change. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 464–473.
| Sedimentological characteristics of key sea turtle rookeries: potential implications under projected climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Limpus, C. J., and Hamann, M. (2010d). Past, current and future thermal profiles of green turtle nesting grounds: Implications from climate change. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 383, 56–64.
| Past, current and future thermal profiles of green turtle nesting grounds: Implications from climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Bateman, B. L., and Hamann, M. (2011a). Relationship between tropical cyclones and the distribution of sea turtle nesting grounds. Journal of Biogeography 38, 1886–1896.
| Relationship between tropical cyclones and the distribution of sea turtle nesting grounds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Limpus, C. J., and Hamann, M. (2011b). Vulnerability of sea turtle nesting grounds to climate change. Global Change Biology 17, 140–153.
| Vulnerability of sea turtle nesting grounds to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Georges, A., Limpus, C. J., and Parmenter, C. J. (1993). Natural history of the Chelonia. In ‘Fauna of Australia, vol. 2A’. (Eds C. J. Glasby, G. J. B. Ross, and P. L. Beelsley.) pp. 120–128. (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)
Hamann, M., Limpus, C. J., and Read, M. A. (2008). Vulnerability of marine reptiles in the Great Barrier Reef to climate change. In ‘Climate Change and the Great Barrier Reef: a Vulnerability Assessment’. (Eds J. E. Johnson, and P. A. Marshall.) pp. 466–496. (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority: Townsville, Qld, Australia.)
Hawkes, L. A., Broderick, A. C., Godfrey, M. H., and Godley, B. J. (2009). Climate change and marine turtles. Endangered Species Research 7, 137–154.
| Climate change and marine turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horikoshi, K. (1992). Egg survivorship and primary sex ratio of green turtles, Chelonia mydas, at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013). ‘Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.’ (Eds T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley.) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.)
Kraemer, J. E., and Bell, R. (1980). Rain-induced mortality of eggs and hatchlings of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Georgia coast. Herpetologica 36, 72–77.
Limpus, C. J. (1985). A study of the loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in eastern Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Limpus, C. J., and Limpus, D. (2003). The loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in the equatorial and southern Pacific Ocean: a species in decline. In ‘Loggerhead Sea Turtles’. (Eds A. B. Bolten, and B. E. Witherington.) pp. 199–209. (Smithsonian Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Limpus, C. J., Baker, V., and Miller, J. D. (1979). Movement induced mortality of loggerhead eggs. Herpetologica 35, 335–338.
Limpus, C. J., Carter, D., and Hamann, M. (2001). The green turtle, Chelonia mydas, in Queensland: the Bramble Cay rookery in the 1979–1980 breeding season. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4, 34–46.
Limpus, C. J., Miller, J. D., Parmenter, C. J., and Limpus, D. J. (2003). The green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population of Raine Island and the northern Great Barrier Reef: 1843–2001. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 49, 349–440.
Maloney, J. E., Darian-Smith, C., Takahashi, Y., and Limpus, C. J. (1990). The environment for development of the embryonic loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) in Queensland. Copeia 1990, 378–387.
| The environment for development of the embryonic loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGehee, M. A. (1979). Factors affecting the hatching success of loggerhead sea turtle eggs (Caretta caretta). Master’s Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
McGehee, M. A. (1990). Effects of moisture on eggs and hatchlings of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Herpetologica 46, 251–258.
Miller, J. D. (1985). Embryology of marine turtles. In ‘Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 14A’. (Eds C. Gans, F. Billett, and P. F. A. Maderson.) pp. 269–328. (Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA.)
Miller, J. D. (1997). Reproduction in sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Sea Turtles’. (Eds P. L. Lutz, and J. Musick.) pp. 51–79. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)
Miller, J. D., and Limpus, C. J. (1981). Incubation period and sexual differentiation in the Green turtle. In ‘Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium’. (Eds C. B. Banks, and A. A. Martin.) pp. 66–73. (Zoological Board of Victoria: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)
Miller, J. D., Limpus, C. J., and Godfrey, M. H. (2003). Nest site selection, oviposition, eggs, development, hatching, and emergence of loggerhead turtles. In ‘Loggerhead Sea Turtles’. (Eds A. B. Bolten, and B. E. Witherington.) pp. 125–143. (Smithsonian Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Miller, J. D., Mortimer, J., and Limpus, C. J. (2017). A field key to the developmental stages of marine turtles (Cheloniidae) with notes on the development of Dermochelys. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 16, 111–122.
| A field key to the developmental stages of marine turtles (Cheloniidae) with notes on the development of Dermochelys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mortimer, J. A. (1990). The influence beach sand characteristics on the nesting behaviour and clutch survival of green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Copeia 1990, 802–817.
| The influence beach sand characteristics on the nesting behaviour and clutch survival of green turtles (Chelonia mydas).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Research Council (NRC) (1990). ‘The Decline of the Sea Turtles: Causes and Prevention.’ (National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Packard, G. C., and Packard, M. J. (1988). The physiological ecology of reptilian eggs and embryos. In ‘Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 16’. (Eds C. Gans, and R. Huey.) pp. 525–607. (Alan R. Liss Press: New York, NY, USA.)
Parmenter, C. J. (1980). Incubation of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Torres Strait, Australia: the effect on hatchability. Australian Wildlife Research 7, 487–491.
| Incubation of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Torres Strait, Australia: the effect on hatchability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pfaller, J. B., Limpus, C. J., and Bjorndal, K. A. (2009). Nest-site selection in individual loggerhead turtles and consequences of doomed-egg relocation. Conservation Biology 23, 72–80.
| Nest-site selection in individual loggerhead turtles and consequences of doomed-egg relocation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18798862PubMed |
Pike, D. A., Roznik, E. A., and Bell, I. P. (2015). Nest inundation from sea-level rise threatens sea turtle population viability. Royal Society Open Science 2, 150127.
| Nest inundation from sea-level rise threatens sea turtle population viability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26587269PubMed |
Poloczanska, E. S., Limpus, C. J., and Hays, G. C. (2009). Vulnerability of marine turtles to climate change. Advances in Marine Biology 56, 151–211.
| Vulnerability of marine turtles to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19895975PubMed |
Prange, H. D., and Ackerman, R. A. (1974). Oxygen consumption and mechanisms of gas exchange of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) eggs and hatchlings. Copeia 1974, 758–768.
| Oxygen consumption and mechanisms of gas exchange of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) eggs and hatchlings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2017). ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [verified 16 April 2020].
Ragotzkie, R. (1959). Mortality of loggerhead turtle eggs from excessive rainfall. Ecology 40, 303–305.
| Mortality of loggerhead turtle eggs from excessive rainfall.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waller, N. L., Gynther, I. C., Freemen, A. B., Lavery, T. H., and Leung, L. K.-P. (2017). The Bramble Cay melomys Melomys rubicola (Rodentia: Muridae): a first mammalian extinction caused by human-induced climate change. Wildlife Research 44, 9–21.
| The Bramble Cay melomys Melomys rubicola (Rodentia: Muridae): a first mammalian extinction caused by human-induced climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., and Moss, R. H. (1996). ‘Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific–Technical Analysis.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Wibbels, T. (2003). Critical approaches to sex determination in sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Sea Turtles, vol II’. (Eds P. L. Lutz, J. A. Musick, and J. Wyneken.) pp. 103–134. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)
Williamson, S. A., Evans, R. G., and Reina, R. D. (2017a). When is embryonic arrest broken in turtle eggs? Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 90, 523–532.
| When is embryonic arrest broken in turtle eggs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28636430PubMed |
Williamson, S. A., Evans, R. G., Robinson, N. J., and Reina, R. D. (2017b). Hypoxia as a novel method for preventing movement-induced mortality during translocation of turtle eggs. Biological Conservation 216, 86–92.
| Hypoxia as a novel method for preventing movement-induced mortality during translocation of turtle eggs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yntema, C. L., and Mrosovsky, N. (1980). Sexual differentiation in hatchling loggerheads (Caretta caretta) incubated at different controlled temperatures. Herpetologica 36, 33–36.