The relationships between land use and amphibian assemblages in a traditional agricultural area, the Sun Moon Lake, of Taiwan
Chau-Ren Jung
A B D and Sheng-Hai Wu C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Japan Environment and Children’s Study Program Office, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
B Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, No. 100, Jingmao 1st Road, Beitun District, Taichung 406, Taiwan.
C Department of Life Sciences, National Chung-Hsing University, No. 145 Xingda Road, South District, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.
D Corresponding author. Email: jung.chau-ren@nies.go.jp
Wildlife Research 48(2) 181-192 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20025
Submitted: 13 February 2020 Accepted: 6 August 2020 Published: 6 November 2020
Abstract
Context: Understanding the relationships between land use and anuran habitat selection would help make conservation-management and habitat-restoration decisions. However, only a few studies have investigated all the available amphibian habitats in terrestrial and aquatic environments.
Aims: The objective of the present study is to assess the associations between different land-use types and individual anuran species in a traditional agricultural area. We also hypothesise that connectivity and land-use heterogeneity are important in determining species richness.
Methods: We conducted monthly roadside calling surveys at 71 sites in the Sun Moon Lake (SML) region in central Taiwan during 2008–2010. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with envfit was used to investigate the relationships between land-use characteristics and anuran assemblage. We use a site-occupancy model to assess the associations between land use and occupancy rate of each species. Generalised linear regression with Poisson distribution was used to assess the relationships among connectivity, land-use heterogeneity and species richness.
Key results: In total, 19 species in five families were detected by roadside calling surveys. The NMDS results showed anuran assemblages in the SML region being distributed through an environmental gradient from those most dominated by agricultural land to forest-dominant sites. According to site-occupancy models, the occupancy rates of anurans were mainly correlated with proportion of agricultural land, grassland and distance to river. The species richness was positively correlated with land-use heterogeneity.
Conclusions: The results showed that the distributions of anurans largely depended on surrounding land-use types in the terrestrial environment. The major trend of anuran assemblages in the traditional agricultural area was dependent on the transition from forest to agricultural land.
Implications: The data suggested that land-use heterogeneity should be a primary consideration for increasing amphibian species richness.
Keywords: amphibians, assemblage, heterogeneity, landscape, land use, roadside calling survey, site-occupancy model.
References
Archer, R. W., and Jones, K. E. (2009). The marsh monitoring program annual report, 1995–2007. Prepared for Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Port Rowan, Ontario, Canada. Available at https://bsc-eoc.org/download/mmpannualreport.pdf [verified 12 July 2020].Banks, J. E. (2004). Divided culture: integrating agriculture and conservation biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2, 537–545.
| Divided culture: integrating agriculture and conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bastazini, C. V., Munduuruca, J. F. V., Rocha, P. L. B., and Napoli, M. F. (2007). Which environmental variables better explain changes in anuran community composition? A case study in the restinga of Mata de São João, Bahia, Brazil. Herpetologica 63, 459–471.
| Which environmental variables better explain changes in anuran community composition? A case study in the restinga of Mata de São João, Bahia, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beier, P., and Loe, S. (1992). A checklist for evaluating impacts to wildlife movement corridors. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20, 434–440.
Beja, P., and Alcazar, R. (2003). Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biological Conservation 114, 317–326.
| Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., and Wilson, J. D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 182–188.
| Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bishop, C. A., Mahony, N. A., Struger, J., Ng, P., and Pettit, K. E. (1999). Anuran development, density and diversity in relation to agricultural activity in the Holland river watershed, Ontario, Canada (1990–1992). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 57, 21–43.
| Anuran development, density and diversity in relation to agricultural activity in the Holland river watershed, Ontario, Canada (1990–1992).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Central Weather Bureau (2020). ‘CWB Observation Data Inquire System.’ Available at https://e-service.cwb.gov.tw/HistoryDataQuery/index.jsp [verified 16 July 2020].
Collins, S. J., and Fahrig, L. (2017). Responses of anurans to composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 239, 399–409.
| Responses of anurans to composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Collins, J. P., and Storfer, A. (2003). Global amphibian decline: sorting the hypothesis. Diversity & Distributions 9, 89–98.
| Global amphibian decline: sorting the hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cushman, S. A. (2006). Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128, 231–240.
| Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Daily, G. C., Ceballos, G., Pacheco, J., Suzán, G., and Sánchez-Azofeifa, A. (2003). Countryside biogeography of neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscape of Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 17, 1814–1826.
| Countryside biogeography of neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscape of Costa Rica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dorcas, M. E., Price, S. J., Walls, S. C., and Barichivich, W. J. (2009). Auditory monitoring of anuran population. In ‘Conservation and Ecology in Amphibians’. (Ed. K. Dodd.) pp. 281–298. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Findlay, C. S., and Houlahan, J. (1997). Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11, 1000–1009.
| Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forman, T. T. R. (1995). Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 10, 133–142.
| Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gooch, M. M., Heupel, A. M., Price, S. J., and Dorcas, M. E. (2006). The effects of survey protocol on detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates of summer breeding anurans. Applied Herpetology 3, 129–142.
| The effects of survey protocol on detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates of summer breeding anurans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grant, T. J., Otis, D. L., and Koford, R. R. (2015). Short-term anuran community dynamics in the Missouri River floodplain following an historic flood. Ecosphere 6, art197.
| Short-term anuran community dynamics in the Missouri River floodplain following an historic flood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., and Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760.
| Global change and the ecology of cities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18258902PubMed |
Guerry, A. D., and Hunter, M. L. (2002). Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration. Conservation Biology 16, 745–754.
| Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hartel, T., Nemes, S., Cogălniceanu, D., Öllerer, K., Moga, C. I., Lesbarrères, D., and Demeter, L. (2009). Pond and landscape determinants of Rana dalmatina population sizes in a Romanian rural landscape. Acta Oecologica 35, 53–59.
| Pond and landscape determinants of Rana dalmatina population sizes in a Romanian rural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hartel, T., Schweiger, O., Öllere, K., Cogălniceanu, D., and Arntzen, J. W. (2010). Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of eastern Europe: probing the effect of landscape composition. Biological Conservation 143, 1118–1124.
| Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of eastern Europe: probing the effect of landscape composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hazell, D., Cunnningham, R., Lindenmayer, D., Mackev, B., and Osborne, W. (2001). Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 102, 155–169.
| Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herrmann, H. L., Babbitt, K. J., Baber, M. J., and Congalton, R. G. (2005). Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape. Biological Conservation 123, 139–149.
| Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hof, C., Araújo, M. B., Jetz, W., and Rahbek, C. (2011). Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity. Nature 480, 516–519.
| Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22089134PubMed |
Homyack, J. C., O’Bryan, C. J., Thornton, J. E., and Baldwin, R. F. (2014). Anuran assemblages associated with roadside ditches in a managed pine landscape. Forest Ecology and Management 334, 217–231.
| Anuran assemblages associated with roadside ditches in a managed pine landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Homyack, J. C., O’Bryan, C. J., Thornton, J. E., and Baldwin, R. F. (2016). Community occupancy of herpetofauna in roadside ditches in a managed pine landscape. Forest Ecology and Management 361, 346–357.
| Community occupancy of herpetofauna in roadside ditches in a managed pine landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Houlahan, J. E., and Findlay, C. S. (2003). The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60, 1078–1094.
| The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Houlahan, J. E., Findlay, C. S., Schmidt, B. R., Meyer, A. H., and Kuzmin, S. L. (2000). Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404, 752–755.
| Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10783886PubMed |
IUCN (2020). ‘Numbers of Threatened Species by Major Groups of Organisms (1996–2020).’ Available at https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/content/attachment_files/2020-2_RL_Stats_Table1b.pdf [verified 1 September 2020].
Jang-Liaw, N. H., and Chou, W. H. (2015). Anuran fauna of Taiwan and adjacent islands based on valid specimen records. Collection and Research 28, 5–53.
Jones, K. S., and Tupper, T. A. (2015). Fowler’s toad (Anaxyrus fowleri) occupancy in the southern mid-Atlantic, USA. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 9, 24–33.
Kam, Y. C., and Chen, T. C. (1999). Abundance and movement of a riparian frog (Rana swinhoana) in a subtropical forest of Guandau Stream, Taiwan. Zoological Studies 39, 67–76.
Katayama, N., Amano, T., Naoe, S., Yamakita, T., Komatsu, I., Takagawa, S., Sato, N., Ueta, M., and Miyashita, T. (2014). Landscape heterogeneity–biodiversity relationship: effect of range size. PLoS One 9, e93359.
| Landscape heterogeneity–biodiversity relationship: effect of range size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25254662PubMed |
Knutson, M. G., Sauer, J. R., Olsen, D. A., Mossman, M. J., Hemesath, L. M., and Lannoo, M. J. (1999). Effect of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 13, 1437–1446.
| Effect of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knutson, M. G., Richardson, W. B., Reineke, D. M., Gray, B. R., Parmelee, J. R., and Weick, S. E. (2004). Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecological Applications 14, 669–684.
| Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kuramoto, M. (1973). The amphibians of Iriomote of the Ryukyu islands: ecological and zoogeographical notes. Bulletin of Fukuoka University of Education 22, 139–151.
Laan, R., and Verboom, B. (1990). Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54, 251–262.
| Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lehtinen, R. M., Galatowitsch, S. M., and Tester, J. R. (1999). Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19, 1–12.
| Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Levin, G., Fjellstad, W. J., Hedblom, M., Rehunen, A., and Münier, B. (2008). ‘Connectivity of Nature in the Nordic Countries (CONNOR). Assessing Landscape Structure in Habitat Monitoring in the Nordic Countries–Potential Approaches, Methods and Data.’ (Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark.)
Liu, C. L. (2009). Amphibian diversity in two riparian forest habitats in central Taiwan. M.Sc. Thesis. Tung-Hai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lubchenco, J., Olson, A. M., Brubaker, L. B., Carpenter, S. R., Holland, M. M., Hubbell, S. P., Levin, S. A., MacMahon, J. A., Maston, P. A., Melillo, J. M., Mooney, H. A., Peterson, C. H., Pulliam, H. R., Real, L. A., Regal, P. J., and Risser, P. J. (1991). The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda: a report from ecological society of America. Ecology 72, 371–412.
| The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda: a report from ecological society of America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., and Kendall, W. L. (2002). How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance. Ecology 83, 2387–2393.
| How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. J., Nichols, J. D., Seamans, M. E., and Gutiérrez, R. J. (2009). Modeling species occurrence dynamics with multiple states and imperfect detection. Ecology 90, 823–835.
| Modeling species occurrence dynamics with multiple states and imperfect detection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
May, R. M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science 241, 1441–1449.
| How many species are there on earth?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17790039PubMed |
Nelson, G. L., and Graves, B. M. (2004). Anuran population monitoring: comparison of the north American amphibian monitoring program’s calling index with mark–recapture estimates for Rana clamitans. Journal of Herpetology 38, 355–359.
| Anuran population monitoring: comparison of the north American amphibian monitoring program’s calling index with mark–recapture estimates for Rana clamitans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oksanen, J. (2018). ‘Vegan: an Introduction to Ordination.’ Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vignettes/intro-vegan.pdf [verified 16 July, 2020].
Pasimeni, M. R., Valente, D., Semeraro, T., Petrosillo, I., and Zurlini, G. (2019). Anthropogenic Landscapes. In ‘Encyclopedia of Ecology, Vol. 4’. 2nd edn. (Ed. B. D. Fath.) pp. 472–481. (Elsevier: Oxford, UK.)
Pieterson, E. C., Addison, L. M., and Agobin, J. N. (2006). Five years of the southwest Florida frog monitoring network: changes in frog communities as an indicator of landscape change. Florida Scientist 69, 166–178.
Piha, H., Luoto, M., Piha, M., and Merila, J. (2007). Anuran abundance and persistence in agricultural landscapes during a climatic extreme. Global Change Biology 13, 300–311.
| Anuran abundance and persistence in agricultural landscapes during a climatic extreme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pillsbury, F. C., and Miller, J. R. (2008). Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban–rural gradient. Ecological Applications 18, 1107–1118.
| Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban–rural gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18686575PubMed |
Porej, D., Micacchion, M., and Hetheringto, T. E. (2004). Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations salamanders and wood frogs in agriculture landscape. Biological Conservation 120, 399–409.
| Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations salamanders and wood frogs in agriculture landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2020). ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.’ Available at https://www.r-project.org/ [verified 1 September 2020].
Richter, K., and Azous, A. (1995). Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin. Wetlands 15, 305–312.
| Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ricklefs, R. E. (2001). ‘The Economy of Nature.’ 5th edn. (W. H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA.)
Rustigian, H. L., Santelmann, M. V., and Schumaker, N. H. (2003). Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics. Landscape Ecology 18, 65–81.
| Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Semlitsch, R. D., and Bodie, J. R. (2003). Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetland and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17, 1219–1228.
| Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetland and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stevens, C. E., and Paszkowski, C. A. (2004). Using chorus-size ranks from call surveys to estimate reproductive activity of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Journal of Herpetology 38, 404–410.
| Using chorus-size ranks from call surveys to estimate reproductive activity of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strain, G. F., Turk, P. J., Tri, A. N., and Anderson, J. T. (2017). Anuran occupancy of created wetlands in the Central Appalachians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 25, 369–384.
| Anuran occupancy of created wetlands in the Central Appalachians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stuart, S. N., Chanson, J. S., Cox, N. A., Young, B. E., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Fishman, D. L., and Waller, R. W. (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786.
| Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15486254PubMed |
Swanson, J. E., Pierce, C. L., Dinsmore, S. J., Smalling, K. L., Vandever, M. W., Stewart, T. W., and Muths, E. (2019). Factors influencing anuran wetland occupancy in an agricultural landscape. Herpetologica 75, 47–56.
| Factors influencing anuran wetland occupancy in an agricultural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindller, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D., and Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292, 281–284.
| Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11303102PubMed |
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8, 857–874.
| Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Buskirk, J. (2005). Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86, 1936–1947.
| Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Villena, O. C., Royle, J. A., Weir, L. A., Foreman, T. M., Gazenski, K. D., and Grant, E. H. C. (2016). Southeast regional and state trends in anuran occupancy from calling survey data (2001–2013) from the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 11, 373–385.
Vitousek, P. M. (1994). Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75, 1861–1876.
| Beyond global warming: ecology and global change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weir, L. A., and Mossman, M. J. (2005). North American amphibian monitoring program (NAAMP). In ‘Amphibian Decline: Conservation Status of United States Species’. (Ed. M. J. Lannoo.) pp. 307–313. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.)
Weir, L. A., Royle, J. A., Nanjappa, P., and Jung, R. E. (2005). Modeling anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. Journal of Herpetology 39, 627–639.
| Modeling anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Werner, E. E., Skelly, D. K., Relyea, D. R. A., and Yurewicz, K. L. (2007). Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos 116, 1697–1712.
| Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
