Challenges in managing invasive raccoons in Japan
Takaaki Suzuki
A B C and Tohru Ikeda A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan.
B National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
C Corresponding author. Email: takaakisuzuki@let.hokudai.ac.jp
Wildlife Research 46(6) 476-483 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR18172
Submitted: 12 April 2018 Accepted: 20 April 2019 Published: 1 August 2019
Abstract
Context: In Japan, the raccoon is an invasive, non-native mammal that causes significant agricultural damage and impacts on native biodiversity throughout the country. Local governments are mainly responsible for raccoon management. Intensive control campaigns focused on the early invasion stage have controlled raccoons in some regions but, generally, there are very few regions where raccoon numbers have been reduced sustainably, and no raccoon populations have been eradicated.
Aims: To improve national management of raccoons and canvass the opinions and perceptions of local government officers involved in raccoon control, and to review the efficiency and effectiveness of raccoon management strategies.
Methods: A questionnaire survey of 47 prefectural and 366 municipal governments was conducted, regarding raccoon management measures, during 2012 and 2013. The survey covered two topics: (1) management difficulties experienced by officers; and (2) details of the current raccoon management regime.
Key results: Efforts to manage raccoon populations have encountered some difficulties, including shortages of raccoon control officers, funding, expertise in raccoon biology and management, and lack of information about the invasion status of local raccoon populations and ecological traits of raccoons. Prefectures not currently managing raccoons indicated that they suffered from a lack of appropriate management procedures. However, current management programs were not generally functioning efficiently or effectively because many local governments did not implement appropriate monitoring. About 70% of local governments did not set control target indices, and there were very few quantitative datasets that could be used to measure the effectiveness of control in reducing raccoon impacts.
Conclusions: Best practice management programs have been being implemented in very few government areas, with institutional characteristics and difficulties in obtaining relevant information causing major problems.
Implications: Collecting and sharing information about effective raccoon management methods and case study examples from successful regions would enable other local administrations to select and implement the most effective and efficient control strategy, methods and monitoring program for their region.
Additional keywords: adaptive management, invasive species, pest management, social dimensions.
References
Abe, G. (2011). Raccoon – departure from nuisance control. In ‘Invasive Alien Mammals in Japan: Biology of Control Strategy and Conservation’. (Eds F. Yamada, T. Ikeda and G. Ogura.) pp. 139–161. (University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo.) [In Japanese].Agetsuma-Yanagihara, Y. (2004). Process of establishing an introduced raccoon (Procyon lotor) population in Aichi and Gifu Prefectures, Japan: policy for managing threats posed by introduced raccoons. Mammalian Science 44, 147–160.
Ando, S., and Kajiura, K. (1985). Status of raccoons in Gifu Prefecture. Bulletin of the Gifu Prefectural Museum 6, 23–30.
Asada, M. (2013). “Lag-phase management” as a population management method in low density areas in sika deer (Cervus nippon) and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Mammalian Science 53, 243–255.
Baker, P. J., and Harris, S. (2006). Does culling reduce fox (Vulpes vulpes) density in commercial forests in Wales, UK? European Journal of Wildlife Research 52, 99–108.
| Does culling reduce fox (Vulpes vulpes) density in commercial forests in Wales, UK?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bertolino, S., and Genovesi, P. (2003). Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia. Biological Conservation 109, 351–358.
| Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Byrom, A. E. (2002). Dispersal and survival of juvenile feral ferrets Mustela furo in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 67–78.
| Dispersal and survival of juvenile feral ferrets Mustela furo in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clayton, R., and Cowan, P. (2010). Management of animal and plant pests in New Zealand – patterns of control and monitoring by regional agencies. Wildlife Research 37, 360–371.
| Management of animal and plant pests in New Zealand – patterns of control and monitoring by regional agencies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clout, M. N., and Williams, P. A. (2009). ‘Invasive Species Management: A Handbook of Principles and Techniques.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Dauphiné, N., and Cooper, R. J. (2011). Pick one: outdoor cats or conservation. The Wildlife Professional 5, 50–56.
Estévez, R. A., Anderson, C. B., Pizarro, J. C., and Burgman, M. A. (2015). Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conservation Biology 29, 19–30.
| Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25155068PubMed |
Gehrt, S. D. (2003). Raccoons and allies. In ‘Wild Mammals of North America’. 2nd edn. (Eds G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson and J. A. Chapman.) pp. 611–634. (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Hori, S., and Matoba, Y. (2001). Arthropods recognised from the contents in the digestive tract of raccoons. Bulletin of the Historical Museum of Hokkaido 29, 67–76.
Ikeda, T. (1999). Progress and challenges of introduced raccoon problems in Hokkaido. In ‘The Annual Reports on Cultural Science 47’. pp. 149–175. (Hokkaido University: Hokkaido.) [In Japanese].
Ikeda, T. (2000). Toward fundamental management of invasive raccoons. Hozen Seitaigaku Kenkyu 5, 159–170.
Ikeda, T. (2002). Raccoon. In ‘Handbook of Alien Species in Japan’. (Eds O. Murakami and I. Washitani.) pp. 70. (Chijin-shokan: Tokyo.) [In Japanese].
Ikeda, T. (2013). Effective and efficient strategy development of raccoon management. In ‘Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of Japan’, 15 March 2013, Hiroshima. [Abstract; in Japanese]. Available at http://www.esj.ne.jp/meeting/abst/61/S14-5.html [verified 7 January 2015].
Ikeda, T. (2014). Read the change, social and political challenge of invasive non-native species management focus on raccoon issue. SEEder 10, 76–80.
Ikeda, T., Asano, M., Matoba, Y., and Abe, G. (2004). Present status of invasive alien raccoon and its impact in Japan. Global Environmental Research 8, 125–131.
IUCN (2000). IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kada, Y., Nakatani, K., Nishijima, T., Taki, K., Nakanishi, N., and Maeda, H. (2010). A study of water policy based on life environmentalism: the position of environmental sociology in government policy (<Disasters Studies> New Perspectives in Environmental Sociology). The Journal of Environmental Sociology 16, 33–47.
Kaneda, M., Yamasaki, F., Kamiyama, N., Kato, T., Uchiyama, K., and Ito, H. (2012). A note on egg sacs of the Tokyo salamander (Hynobius tokyoensis) found in the digestive tract of the invasive raccoon (Procyon lotor). Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 2012, 107–109.
Kawamichi, M., Kawamichi, T., Kaneda, M., and Kato, T. (2010). Actual conditions of raccoon invasion about wooden building as mainly cultural assets. Historical Disaster Studies in Kyoto 11, 31–40.
Kishioka, T., Hashimoto, S., Hoshino, S., and Kuki, Y. (2012). The relationship between implementation system of wildlife management in prefectures and its cooperation with municipalities: a case study of prefectures in Kinki area. Journal of Rural Planning Association 31, 339–344.
| The relationship between implementation system of wildlife management in prefectures and its cooperation with municipalities: a case study of prefectures in Kinki area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kobayashi, F., Toyama, M., and Koizumi, I. (2014). Potential resource competition between an invasive mammal and native birds: overlap in tree cavity preferences of feral raccoons and Ural owls. Biological Invasions 16, 1453–1464.
| Potential resource competition between an invasive mammal and native birds: overlap in tree cavity preferences of feral raccoons and Ural owls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F., and Marchetti, M. P. (2013). ‘Invasion Ecology.’ (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.)
Long, J. L. (2003). ‘Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution and Influence.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Matsuo, R., and Ochiai, K. (2009). Dietary overlap among two introduced and one native sympatric carnivore species, the raccoon, the masked palm civet, and the raccoon dog, in Chiba Prefecture, Japan. Mammal Study 34, 187–194.
| Dietary overlap among two introduced and one native sympatric carnivore species, the raccoon, the masked palm civet, and the raccoon dog, in Chiba Prefecture, Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McNeely, J. A. 2001. ‘The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species.’ (IUCN: Gland.)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. (2011). Status of crop damage by wild birds and animals in Japan. [Attachment]. Report of Agricultural Production Bureau, Sustainable Agriculture Division, Wild Animals Damage Prevention Office. [In Japanese]. Available at http://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo2/h23/pdf/130625_a.pdf [verified 7 January 2015].
Ministry of the Environment (2011). Raccoon control manual (methods of systematic control). Ministry of the Environment Nature Conservation Bureau Wildlife Division, Tokyo. [In Japanese].
Ministry of the Environment (2012). Report of the research project on the issue of invasive alien species in fiscal year 2011. Ministry of the Environment Nature Conservation Bureau Wildlife Division, Tokyo. [In Japanese].
Ministry of the Environment. (2014). Raccoon control manual (methods of systematic control). Revised version. Ministry of the Environment Nature Conservation Bureau Wildlife Division, Tokyo. [In Japanese].
Ministry of the Environment Kinki local office. (2008). Raccoon control manual in Kinki district. Wildlife Management Office, Tokyo, Japan. [In Japanese].
Murakami, O. (2011). Invasive Species Act – management and challenges under current legislation. In ‘Invasive Alien Mammals in Japan: Biology of Control Strategy and Conservation’. (Eds F. Yamada, T. Ikeda and G. Ogura.) pp. 27–28. (University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo.) [In Japanese].
Nagamine, T. (2011). Cat – the most familiar invasive mammal. In ‘Invasive Alien Mammals in Japan: Biology of Control Strategy and Conservation’. (Eds F. Yamada, T. Ikeda and G. Ogura.) pp. 27–28. (University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo.) [In Japanese].
Nakamura, K. (1991). A note on the naturalization of common raccoon in Kanagawa Prefecture. Natural History Report of Kanagawa 12, 17–19.
National Institute for Environmental Studies (2017). Invasive species of Japan [web database]. Available at http://www.nies.go.jp/biodiversity/invasive/index_en.html [verified 12 December 2017].
Oi, T., Kawamura, S., Takeshita, Y., Asada, M., and Yamada, F. (2014). A report on the workshop “Management of feral rhesus monkeys and their hybrids as an invasive alien species in Chiba Prefecture” The Mammal Society of Japan 54, 175–176.
Parker, I. M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P. M., Williamson, M. H., Von Holle, B., Moyle, P. B., Byers, J. E., and Goldwasser, L. (1999). Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1, 3–19.
| Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pascal, M., Lorvelec, O., Bretagnolle, V., and Culioli, J. M. (2008). Improving the breeding success of a colonial seabird: a cost-benefit comparison of the eradication and control of its rat predator. Endangered Species Research 4, 267–276.
| Improving the breeding success of a colonial seabird: a cost-benefit comparison of the eradication and control of its rat predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at https://www.r-project.org/ [verified 4 July 2017].
Raffaelli, D., and Moller, H. (1999). Manipulative field experiments in animal ecology: do they promise more than they can deliver? Advances in Ecological Research 30, 299–338.
| Manipulative field experiments in animal ecology: do they promise more than they can deliver?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reddiex, B., and Forsyth, D. M. (2006). Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge. Wildlife Research 33, 711–717.
| Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Russell, J. C., Jones, H. P., Armstrong, D. P., Courchamp, F., Kappes, P. J., Seddon, P. J., and Genovesi, P. (2016). Importance of lethal control of invasive predators for island conservation. Conservation Biology 30, 670–672.
| Importance of lethal control of invasive predators for island conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26634637PubMed |
Sato, H. (2005). Zoonotic roundworm infection, with special reference to Baylisascaris procyonis larva migrans. Modern Medicine 51, 177–186.
Simberloff, D. (2013). ‘Invasive Species: What Everyone Needs to Know.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Takatsuki, S., Kubozono, M., and Minami, M. (2014). Dietary analysis of raccoons captured in Yokohama, eastern Japan. Hozen Seitaigaku Kenkyu 19, 87–93.
Timm, R., Cuarón, A. D., Reid, F., Helgen, K., and González-Maya, J. F. (2016). Procyon lotor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T41686A45216638. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/41686/0 [verified 23 February 2017].
Zeveloff, S. I. (2002). ‘Raccoons: A Natural History.’ (The Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC.)
