The role of the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) as an umbrella species for Andean ecoregions
Sofía Crespo-Gascón A B and José Guerrero-Casado B C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Instituto de Idiomas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, 130104, Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador.
B Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Córdoba, Edifico Charles Darwin, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
C Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, 130104, Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador.
D Corresponding author. Email: guerrero.casado@gmail.com
Wildlife Research 46(2) 176-183 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR18056
Submitted: 18 August 2017 Accepted: 18 December 2018 Published: 14 March 2019
Abstract
Context: The concept of umbrella species has been proposed as a surrogate for the conservation of a wider range of species and ecosystems. This concept has, however, frequently been questioned by researchers because of the lack of empirical evidence to support it.
Aims: The aim of the present study was to test the role of the spectacled bear, Tremarctos ornatus (FG Cuvier, 1825), also known as Andean bear, as a putative umbrella species for the 12 Andean ecoregions it inhabits.
Methods: The number of threatened vertebrates, as well as the total number of vertebrate species (mammals and birds) existing in areas where the spectacled bear is present (distribution range) and absent, were compared within each ecoregion to assess the role of spectacled bear as an umbrella species, using geographical information systems.
Key results: In absolute terms, the spectacled bear could be considered an umbrella species, because 20.6% of the area of the 12 ecoregions was covered by the bear’s distribution range, and the total numbers of both vertebrate species richness and threatened species were higher in areas where the bears were present than in those where they were absent. However, the results showed that the differences with regard to the number of species in areas in which the bears were present and absent depended on the ecoregion and the targeted taxa.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the effectiveness of the spectacled bear as an umbrella species is not widespread, because conserving the areas in which bears are present may not always equate to greater conservation benefits (higher species richness) in all the ecoregions for all the taxa.
Implications: If spectacled bear is used as an umbrella species, it is necessary to consider both the ecoregions and the targeted taxa whose conservation would be improved as a result of the preservation of the spectacled bear’s distribution range.
Additional keywords: Andean mountains, Andean bear, biodiversity conservation, conservation shortcuts, wildlife conservation, wildlife management.
References
Andelman, S. J., and Fagan, W. F. (2000). Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 5954–5959.| Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10811901PubMed |
Bifolchi, A., and Lodé, T. (2005). Efficiency of conservation shortcuts: an investigation with otters as umbrella species. Biological Conservation 126, 523–527.
| Efficiency of conservation shortcuts: an investigation with otters as umbrella species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Branton, M., and Richardson, J. S. (2011). Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis. Conservation Biology 25, 9–20.
| Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21091767PubMed |
Caro, T. M. (2003). Umbrella species: critique and lessons from East Africa. Animal Conservation 6, 171–181.
| Umbrella species: critique and lessons from East Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caro, T. M., and O’Doherty, G. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 13, 805–814.
| On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Castellanos, A., Cisneros, R., Cuesta, C. F., Narváez, R., Suárez, L., and Tirira, D. G. (2011). Oso andino (Tremarctos ornatus). In ‘Libro Rojo de los mamíferos del Ecuador’. (Eds Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador y, and Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador.) Available at http://librorojo.mamiferosdelecuador.com/lista-de-especies-/carnivora/ursidae/597-tremarctos-ornatus-corto.html [Verified February 2019]
Clark, M. R. (2004). Using the spectacled bear as a conservation tool in the Condor Bioreserve, Ecuador. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 18, 223–236.
| Using the spectacled bear as a conservation tool in the Condor Bioreserve, Ecuador.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Deguise, I. E., and Kerr, J. T. (2006). Protected areas and prospects for endangered species conservation in Canada. Conservation Biology 20, 48–55.
| Protected areas and prospects for endangered species conservation in Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16909658PubMed |
Edman, T., Angelstam, P., Mikusiński, G., Roberge, J.-M., and Sikora, A. (2011). Spatial planning for biodiversity conservation: assessment of forest landscapes’ conservation value using umbrella species requirements in Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning 102, 16–23.
| Spatial planning for biodiversity conservation: assessment of forest landscapes’ conservation value using umbrella species requirements in Poland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleishman, E., Murphy, D. D., and Brussard, P. F. (2000). A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications 10, 569–579.
| A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleishman, E., Blair, R. B., and Murphy, D. D. (2001). Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications 11, 1489–1501.
| Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
García-Rangel, S. (2012). Andean bear Tremarctos ornatus natural history and conservation. Mammal Review 42, 85–119.
| Andean bear Tremarctos ornatus natural history and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
García-Rangel, S., Edgard, Y., Torres, T., Bracho, A., Rodríguez-Clark, K., Sánchez-Mercado, A., Goldstein, I., Molina, C., Cambero, J., and Imarú Lameda, F. (2008). Oso Frontino, Tremarctos ornatus. In ‘Libro Rojo de la Fauna Venezolana’. (Eds J. Rodríguez and F. Rojas-Suárez.) p. 103. (Provita y Shell Venezuela: Caracas.)
IUCN and UNEP-WCMC (2016). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Available at www.protectedplanet.net [Verified 1 September 2016]
Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., and Joppa, L. N. (2013). Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, E2602–E2610.
| Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23803854PubMed |
Jenkins, C. N., Alves, M. A. S., Uezu, A., and Vale, M. M. (2015). Patterns of vertebrate diversity and protection in Brazil. PLoS One 10, e0145064.
| Patterns of vertebrate diversity and protection in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26679348PubMed |
Kattan, G., Hernández, O. L., Goldstein, I., Rojas, V., Murillo, O., Gómez, C., Restrepo, H., and Cuesta, F. (2004). Range fragmentation in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes. Oryx 38, 155–163.
| Range fragmentation in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lambeck, R. J. (1997). Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Especies Focales: Una Sombrilla Multiespecifica para Conservar la Naturaleza. Conservation Biology 11, 849–856.
| Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Especies Focales: Una Sombrilla Multiespecifica para Conservar la Naturaleza.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
| Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10706275PubMed |
Olson, D., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D’Amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51, 933–938.
| Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peyton, E. (1999). Spectacled bear conservation action plan. In ‘Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan’. (Eds C. Servheen, S. Herrero and B. Peyton.) pp. 157–164. (IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.) Available at http://www.carnivoreconservation.org/files/actionplans/bears.pdf [Verified February 2019]
Peyton, E., Yerena, E., Rumiz, D. I., Jorgenson, J., and Orejuela, J. (1998). Status of wild Andean bears and policies for their management. Ursus 10, 87–100.
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., and Sexton, J. O. (2014). The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752.
| The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24876501PubMed |
Rios-Uzeda, B., Gomez, H., and Wallace, R. B. (2006). Habitat preferences of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Zoology 268, 271–278.
| Habitat preferences of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Bolivian Andes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roberge, J.-M., and Angelstam, P. (2004). Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18, 76–85.
| Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rowland, M. M., Wisdom, M. J., Suring, L. H., and Meinke, C. W. (2006). Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates. Biological Conservation 129, 323–335.
| Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rozylowicz, L., Popescu, V. D., Pătroescu, M., and Chişamera, G. (2011). The potential of large carnivores as conservation surrogates in the Romanian Carpathians. Biodiversity and Conservation 20, 561–579.
| The potential of large carnivores as conservation surrogates in the Romanian Carpathians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seddon, P. J., and Leech, T. (2008). Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria. Oryx 42, 240–245.
| Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stuber, E. F., and Fontaine, J. J. (2018). Ecological neighborhoods as a framework for umbrella species selection. Biological Conservation 223, 112–119.
| Ecological neighborhoods as a framework for umbrella species selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Suter, W., Graf, R. F., and Hess, R. (2002). Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology 16, 778–788.
| Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Velez–Liendo, X., and García-Rangel, S. (2017). Tremarctos ornatus (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22066A123792952. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22066/0 [Verified 15 July 2018]
Velez–Liendo, X., Adriaensen, F., and Matthysen, E. (2014). Landscape assessment of habitat suitability and connectivity for Andean bears in the Bolivian Tropical Andes. Ursus 25, 172–187.
| Landscape assessment of habitat suitability and connectivity for Andean bears in the Bolivian Tropical Andes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wallace, R. B. (Ed.) (2014). ‘Unidades de Conservación Prioritarias del Oso Andino en Bolivia y en Perú’. (Wildlife Conservation Society, Centro de Biodiversidad y Genética de la Universidad Mayor de San Simón de Bolivia, Universidad Cayetano Heredia de Perú y Universidad de Antwerpen de Bélgica: La Paz, Bolivia.)
WWF Colombia (2003). ‘Estrategia Ecorregional para la Conservacion del Oso Andino en los Andes del Norte.’ (Eds D. Rodríguez, F. Cuesta, I. Goldstein, L. Germán Naranjo and O. L. Hernández.) (World Wildlife Fund: Gland, Switzerland.) Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277720827 [Verified 10 July 2018]
