The use of point-of-view cameras (Kittycams) to quantify predation by colony cats (Felis catus) on wildlife
Sonia M. Hernandez A B , Kerrie Anne T. Loyd
C F , Alexandra N. Newton A , Benjamin L. Carswell D and Kyler J. Abernathy E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
B Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
C Arizona State University, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403, USA.
D Jekyll Island Authority, Jekyll Island, GA 31627, USA.
E National Geographic Society, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: k.loyd@asu.edu
Wildlife Research 45(4) 357-365 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17155
Submitted: 10 June 2017 Accepted: 18 May 2018 Published: 23 July 2018
Abstract
Context: Domestic cats (Felis catus) are efficient and abundant non-native predators, recently labelled as primary contributors to global biodiversity loss.
Aims: Specific research goals included determining the proportion of hunters, estimating hunting efficiency, identifying primary prey and examining predictors of kill rate and efficacy.
Methods: We investigated hunting of wildlife by stray cats living in managed outdoor colonies on a barrier island in the southeastern USA, and monitored 29 stray cats seasonally in 2014 and 2015 using Kittycam video cameras.
Key results: In total, 24 cats exhibited hunting behaviour and 18 captured prey. The estimated average daily predation rate from these successful hunters was 6.15 kills per 24-h period. Hunting effectiveness (percentage of capture attempts that translate to a kill) was an average of 44%. The most common type of prey captured was invertebrate (primarily Orthopteran and Hemipteran insects), followed by amphibians and reptiles. Eighty-three percent of kills occurred between dusk and dawn.
Conclusions: Colony location (near undeveloped island habitat) was related to higher kill rates. Cat sex and nocturnal hunting activity were related to greater hunting efficiency.
Implications: These results address the significant gap in knowledge about stray cat hunting activities, and raise conservation concerns for some groups of organisms (reptiles and amphibians) that have not been widely identified as vulnerable to cat predation.
Additional keywords: anthropogenic impacts, cat behaviour, invasive species, islands.
References
Baker, P. J., Molony, S. E., Stone, E., Cuthill, I. C., and Harris, S. (2008). Cats about town: is predation by free‐ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations? The Ibis 150, 86–99.| Cats about town: is predation by free‐ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barratt, D. G. (1998). Predation by house cats, Felis catus, in Canberra, Australia. II. Factors affecting the amount of prey caught and estimates of the impact on wildlife. Wildlife Research 25, 475–487.
| Predation by house cats, Felis catus, in Canberra, Australia. II. Factors affecting the amount of prey caught and estimates of the impact on wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonnaud, E., Medina, F., Vidal, E., Nogales, M., Tershy, B., Zavaleta, E., Donlan, C., Keitt, B., Le Corre, M., and Horwath, S. (2011). The diet of feral cats on islands: a review and a call for more studies. Biological Invasions 13, 581–603.
| The diet of feral cats on islands: a review and a call for more studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonnington, C., Gaston, K. J., and Evans, K. L. (2013). Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait‐mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 15–24.
| Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait‐mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Churcher, P., and Lawton, J. (1987). Predation by domestic cats in an English village. Journal of Zoology 212, 439–455.
| Predation by domestic cats in an English village.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davis, D. E. (1957). The use of food as a buffer in a predator–prey system. Journal of Mammalogy 38, 466–472.
| The use of food as a buffer in a predator–prey system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dickman, C. R., and Newsome, T. M. (2015). Individual hunting behavior and prey specialization in the house cat Felis catus: implications for conservation and management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 173, 76–87.
| Individual hunting behavior and prey specialization in the house cat Felis catus: implications for conservation and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doherty, T. S., Glen, A. S., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2016). Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 11261–11265.
| Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald, B. M., and Karl, B. J. (1979). Foods of the feral house cat in forest of Orongorongo Valley, Wellington. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 107–126.
| Foods of the feral house cat in forest of Orongorongo Valley, Wellington.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald, B. M., and Turner, D. C. (2000). Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour.’ (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson). pp. 151–175. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.)
George, W. G. (1974). Domestic cats as predators and factors in winter shortages of raptor prey. The Wilson Bulletin 86, 384–396.
Gerhold, R. W., and Jessup, D. A. (2013). Zoonotic diseases associated with free-roaming cats. Zoonoses and Public Health 60, 189–195.
| Zoonotic diseases associated with free-roaming cats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hernandez, S. M., Loyd, K. A. T., Newton, A. N., Gallagher, M. C., and Abernathy, K. J. (2018). The activity patterns and interactions of free-roaming, domestic cats in managed Trap–Neuter–Return colonies as documented through point-of-view video cameras. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 202, 63–68.
| The activity patterns and interactions of free-roaming, domestic cats in managed Trap–Neuter–Return colonies as documented through point-of-view video cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kays, R. W., and DeWan, A. A. (2004). Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. Animal Conservation 7, 273–283.
| Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keitt, B. S., Wilcox, C., Tershy, B. R., Croll, D. A., and Donlan, C. J. (2002). The effect of feral cats on the population viability of balck-vented shearwaters (Puffinus opisthomelas) on Natividad Island, Mexico. Animal Conservation 5, 217–223.
| The effect of feral cats on the population viability of balck-vented shearwaters (Puffinus opisthomelas) on Natividad Island, Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Konecny, M. J. (1987). Home range and activity patterns of feral house cats in the Galapagos Islands. Oikos 50, 17–23.
| Home range and activity patterns of feral house cats in the Galapagos Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liberg, O. (1984). Food habits and prey impact by feral and house-based domestic cats in a rural area in southern Sweden. Journal of Mammalogy 65, 424–432.
| Food habits and prey impact by feral and house-based domestic cats in a rural area in southern Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loss, S. R., and Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications 4, 1–7.
Loss, S. R., Will, T., and Marra, P. P. (2017). Population impacts of free-ranging domestic cats on mainland vertebrates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Online (Bergheim) 15, 502–509.
Loyd, K. A. T., Hernandez, S. M., Carroll, J. P., Abernathy, K. J., and Marshall, G. J. (2013). Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras. Biological Conservation 160, 183–189.
| Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marra, P. P., and Santella, C. (2016). ‘Cat Wars: the Devastating Consequences of a Cuddly Killer.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)
McGregor, H., Legge, S., Jones, M. E., and Johnson, C. N. (2015). Feral cats are better killers in open habitats, revealed by animal-borne video. PLoS One 10, e0133915.
| Feral cats are better killers in open habitats, revealed by animal-borne video.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McRuer, D. L., Gray, L. C., Horne, L., and Clark, E. E. (2017). Free‐roaming cat interactions with wildlife admitted to a wildlife hospital. The Journal of Wildlife Management 81, 163–173.
| Free‐roaming cat interactions with wildlife admitted to a wildlife hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meynecke, J., Abernathy, K. J., and Marshall, G. J. (2015). In murky waters: Crittercam on juvenile bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas). Marine Technology Society Journal 49, 25–30.
| In murky waters: Crittercam on juvenile bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Millspaugh, J. J., Kesler, D. C., Kays, R. W., Gitzen, R. A., Schulz, J. H., Rota, C. T., Bodinof, C. M., Belant, J. L., and Keller, B. J. (2012). Wildlife radiotelemetry and remote monitoring. In ‘The Wildlife Techniques Manual: Volume 1: Research’. 7th edn. pp. 258–283. (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Molsher, R., Newsome, A., and Dickman, C. R. (1999). Feeding ecology and population dynamics of the feral cat in relation to the availability of prey in central-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 26, 593–607.
| Feeding ecology and population dynamics of the feral cat in relation to the availability of prey in central-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nifong, J. C., Lowers, R. H., Silliman, B. R., Abernathy, K. J., and Marshall, G. J. (2013). Attachment and deployment of remote video/audio recording devices (Crittercams) on wild American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Herpetological Review 44, 243–247.
Nogales, M., and Medina, F. M. (1996). A review of the diet of feral domestic cats on the Canary Islands, with new data from the laurel forest of LaGomera. International Journal of Mammal Biology 61, 1–6.
Ogan, C. V., and Jurek, R. M. (1997). Biology and ecology of feral, free-roaming, and stray cats. In ‘Mesocarnivores of Northern California Biology, Management, & Survey Techniques’. (Eds J. E. Harris and C. V. Ogan.) . pp. 87–92. (Humbolt State University Press: Arcata, CA.)
Spotte, S. (2014). ‘Free-ranging Cats: Behavior, Ecology, Management.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York.)
Stanton, L. A., Sullivan, M. S., and Fazio, J. M. (2015). A standardized ethogram for the Felidae: a tool for behavioral researchers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 173, 3–16.
| A standardized ethogram for the Felidae: a tool for behavioral researchers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
United States Census Bureau. (2014). American Community Survey. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases/2014.html [accessed 25 June 2018].
Warner, R. E. (1985). Demography and movements of free-ranging cats in rural Illinois. The Journal of Wildlife Management 49, 340–346.
| Demography and movements of free-ranging cats in rural Illinois.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, K. C. (2015). Integrating multiple technologies to understand the foraging behavior and habitat use of monk seals in the main Hawaiian islands. PhD Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.
