Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Providing perches for predatory and aggressive birds appears to reduce the negative impact of frugivorous birds in vineyards

Rebecca K. Peisley A B C , Manu E. Saunders A and Gary W. Luck A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Land Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

B School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rpeisley@csu.edu.au

Wildlife Research 44(4) 334-342 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17028
Submitted: 10 October 2016  Accepted: 26 May 2017   Published: 16 June 2017

Abstract

Context: Birds active in vineyards in south-eastern Australia can reduce or enhance crop yields via their foraging activities (e.g. by consuming grapes or by preying on grape-eating species).

Aims: We examined the effectiveness of artificial perches in encouraging predatory birds into vineyards to scare frugivorous birds and consequently reduce the damage they cause to grapes.

Methods: We monitored 12 artificial perches for 4 months during the growing season, spread over six vineyards in north-eastern Victoria, and compared bird damage to grapes at these sites with control sites without perches.

Key results: We found that raptors did not use the artificial perches. However, the large and aggressive Australian magpie (Cracticus tibicen) commonly used perches and we recorded 38 513 perch visits by this species. Grapevines around perch sites suffered >50% less grape damage (4.13% damage per bunch) than control sites (8.57% damage per bunch).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that providing artificial perches in vineyards can play a role in reducing frugivore damage to grapes. However, the effectiveness of perches can vary under different environmental conditions and certain perch types are not suitable for all predatory or aggressive birds.

Implications: Future research should focus on the potential role of large-bodied and competitively aggressive species such as the Australian magpie in altering the activity of smaller frugivorous birds in vineyards, and also on the optimum height and location of artificial perches within vineyards to increase visitation by other predatory or aggressive bird species.


References

Andersson, M., Wallander, J., and Isaksson, D. (2009). Predator perches: a visual search perspective. Functional Ecology 23, 373–379.
Predator perches: a visual search perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Askham, L. R. (1990). Effect of artificial perches and nests in attracting raptors to orchards. In ‘Proceedings of the Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference’, 6–8 March 1990, Sacramento, CA, USA. (Eds L. R. Davis and R. E. Marsh.) Paper 2, pp. 144–148. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Avery, M. L., and DeHaven, R. (1982). Bird damage to sunflowers in the Sacramento Valley, California. In ‘Proceedings of the Tenth Vertebrate Pest Conference’, 23–25 February 1982, Monterey, CA, USA. (Ed. R. E. Marsh.) pp. 197–200. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Bollinger, E. K., and Caslick, J. W. (1985). Factors influencing blackbird damage to field corn. The Journal of Wildlife Management 49, 1109–1115.
Factors influencing blackbird damage to field corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bomford, M., and Sinclair, R. (2002). Australian research on bird pests: impact, management and future directions. Emu 102, 29–45.
Australian research on bird pests: impact, management and future directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cummings, J. L., Guarino, J. L., Knittle, C. E., and Royall, W. C. (1987). Decoy plantings for reducing blackbird damage to nearby commercial sunflower fields. Crop Protection 6, 56–60.
Decoy plantings for reducing blackbird damage to nearby commercial sunflower fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DeHaven, R. W., and Hothem, R. L. (1981). Estimating bird damage from damage incidence in wine grape vineyards. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 32, 1–4.

Devereux, C. L., Whittingham, M. J., Fernandez-Juricic, E., Vickery, J. A., and Krebs, J. R. (2006). Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 17, 303–309.
Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunn, G., and Zurbo, B. (2014). Grape vine pests and their management. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries. Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/110998/Grapevine-pests-and-their-management.pdf [accessed 1 June 2017].

Farabaugh, M., Brown, E. D., and Hughe, J. M. (1992). Cooperative territorial defense in the Australian magpie, Gymnorhim tibicen (Passeriformes, Cracticidae), a group-living songbird. Ethology 92, 283–292.
Cooperative territorial defense in the Australian magpie, Gymnorhim tibicen (Passeriformes, Cracticidae), a group-living songbird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fukuda, Y., Frampton, C. M., and Hickling, G. J. (2008). Evaluation of two visual birdscarers, the Peaceful Pyramid® and an eye‐spot balloon, in two vineyards. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 35, 217–224.
Evaluation of two visual birdscarers, the Peaceful Pyramid® and an eye‐spot balloon, in two vineyards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilsdorf, J. M., Hygnstrom, S. E., and VerCauteren, K. C. (2002). Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 7, 29–45.
Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Google Maps (2016). Satellite View. Available at https://www.google.com.au/maps/ [accessed 10 October 2016].

Grasswitz, T. R., and Fimbres, O. (2013). Efficacy of a physical method for control of direct pests of apples and peaches. Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 790–800.
Efficacy of a physical method for control of direct pests of apples and peaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hagy, H. M., Linz, G. M., and Bleier, W. J. (2008). Optimizing the use of decoy plots for blackbird control in commercial sunflower. Crop Protection 27, 1442–1447.
Optimizing the use of decoy plots for blackbird control in commercial sunflower.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall, T., Howard, W., and Marsh, R. (1981). Raptor use of artificial perches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9, 296–298.

Jedlicka, J. A., Greenberg, R., and Letourneau, D. K. (2011). Avian conservation practices strengthen ecosystem services in California vineyards. PLoS One 6, e27347.
Avian conservation practices strengthen ecosystem services in California vineyards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhsFKhs7rE&md5=7978e64d7b6eba583a43e78d4bfa86d8CAS |

Kay, B. J., Twigg, L. E., Korn, T. J., and Nicol, H. I. (1994). The use of artificial perches to increase predation on house mice (Mus domesticus) by raptors. Wildlife Research 21, 95–105.
The use of artificial perches to increase predation on house mice (Mus domesticus) by raptors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kim, D. H., Chavez-Ramirez, F., and Slack, R. D. (2003). Effects of artificial perches and interspecific interactions on patch use by wintering raptors. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 2038–2047.
Effects of artificial perches and interspecific interactions on patch use by wintering raptors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kinross, C. (2004). Avian use of farm habitats, including windbreaks, on the New South Wales Tablelands. Pacific Conservation Biology 10, 180–192.
Avian use of farm habitats, including windbreaks, on the New South Wales Tablelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kross, S. M., Tylianakis, J. M., and Nelson, X. J. (2012). Effects of introducing threatened falcons into vineyards on abundance of passeriformes and bird damage to grapes. Conservation Biology 26, 142–149.
Effects of introducing threatened falcons into vineyards on abundance of passeriformes and bird damage to grapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Luck, G. W., Triplett, S., and Spooner, P. G. (2013). Bird use of almond plantations: implications for conservation and production. Wildlife Research 40, 523–535.
Bird use of almond plantations: implications for conservation and production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Luck, G. W., Hunt, K., and Carter, A. (2015). The species and functional diversity of birds in almond orchards, apple orchards, vineyards and eucalypt woodlots. Emu 115, 99–109.
The species and functional diversity of birds in almond orchards, apple orchards, vineyards and eucalypt woodlots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lyon, L. A., and Caccamise, D. F. (1981). Habitat selection by roosting blackbirds and starlings: management implications. The Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 435–443.
Habitat selection by roosting blackbirds and starlings: management implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller, J. R., and Cale, P. (2000). Behavioral mechanisms and habitat use by birds in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecological Applications 10, 1732–1748.
Behavioral mechanisms and habitat use by birds in a fragmented agricultural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morgan, D., Waas, J. R., and Innes, J. (2005). Magpie interactions with other birds in New Zealand: results from a literature review and public survey. Notornis 52, 61–74.

Peisley, R. K., Saunders, M. E., and Luck, G. W. (2016). Cost–benefit trade-offs of bird activity in apple orchards. PeerJ 4, e2179.
Cost–benefit trade-offs of bird activity in apple orchards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Poiani, A. (1991). Anti-predator behaviour in the bell miner Manorina melanophrys. Emu 91, 164–171.
Anti-predator behaviour in the bell miner Manorina melanophrys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rowley, I. (1973). The comparative ecology of Australian corvids II. Social organization and behaviour. Wildlife Research 18, 25–65.
The comparative ecology of Australian corvids II. Social organization and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SAS Institute Inc. (2013). ‘SAS/STAT® 13.1 User’s Guide.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.)

Saunders, M. E., Peisley, R. K., Rader, R., and Luck, G. (2016). Pollinators, pests and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems. Ambio 45, 4–14.
Pollinators, pests and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saxton, V. P., Creasy, G. L., Paterson, A. M., and Trought, M. C. T. (2009). Behavioral responses of European blackbirds and Australasian silvereyes to varying acid and sugar levels in artificial grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 60, 82–86.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXivFWlsr0%3D&md5=425750db2b25a6a27dac4787d10c695aCAS |

Sheffield, L. M., Crait, J. R., Edge, W. D., and Wang, G. (2001). Response of American kestrels and gray-tailed voles to vegetation height and supplemental perches. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 380–385.
Response of American kestrels and gray-tailed voles to vegetation height and supplemental perches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Somers, C. M., and Morris, R. D. (2002). Birds and wine grapes: foraging activity causes small-scale damage patterns in single vineyards. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 511–523.
Birds and wine grapes: foraging activity causes small-scale damage patterns in single vineyards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tracey, J. P., and Saunders, G. R. (2010). A technique to estimate bird damage in wine grapes. Crop Protection 29, 435–439.
A technique to estimate bird damage in wine grapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tscharntke, T., Sekercioglu, C. H., Dietsch, T. V., Sodhi, N. S., Hoehn, P., and Tylianakis, J. M. (2008). Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89, 944–951.
Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Veltman, C. J., and Hickson, R. E. (1989). Predation by Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) on pasture invertebrates: are non-territorial birds less successful? Australian Journal of Ecology 14, 319–326.
Predation by Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) on pasture invertebrates: are non-territorial birds less successful?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, D. M. (2003). The ‘standardized search’: an improved way to conduct bird surveys. Austral Ecology 28, 515–525.
The ‘standardized search’: an improved way to conduct bird surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, M. J. (2014). Starling control and management in Macquarie Street, Dubbo. Report No. 77. Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW.

Wenny, D. G., Devault, T. L., Dohnson, M. D., Kelly, D. H., Sekercioglu, C., Tomback, D., and Whelan, C. J. (2011). The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. The Auk 128, 1–14.
The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Widén, P. (1994). Habitat quality for raptors: a field experiment. Journal of Avian Biology 25, 219–223.
Habitat quality for raptors: a field experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolff, J. O., Fox, T., Skillen, R. R., and Wang, G. M. (1999). The effects of supplemental perch sites on avian predation and demography of vole populations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 535–541.
The effects of supplemental perch sites on avian predation and demography of vole populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |