Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Sympathy for the devil: captive-management style did not influence survival, body-mass change or diet of Tasmanian devils 1 year after wild release

Tracey Rogers A C , Samantha Fox B , David Pemberton B and Phil Wise B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of BEES, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

B Wildlife Monitoring and Management Section, Wildlife Management Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: tracey.rogers@unsw.edu.au

Wildlife Research 43(7) 544-552 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15221
Submitted: 3 December 2015  Accepted: 2 September 2016   Published: 2 November 2016

Journal Compilation © CSIRO Publishing 2016 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Context: The value of captive breeding for recovery programs of endangered carnivorous mammals is often questioned because of low post-release survival reported for founder animals following translocation.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to test the effect of rearing method on survival and body mass of captive-raised Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) following release on an offshore island. We also compared the post-release diet of these devils with the diet of wild devils on mainland Tasmania, where a similar array of diet items is available.

Methods: Twenty-eight captive-raised devils were released onto the island; 19 had been raised in intensive captive-management facilities (IC) and nine in free-range (22 ha) enclosures (FRE). Survival and body-mass change were compared between IC and FRE for up to 440 days post-release. Devil diet was assessed via scat analysis.

Key results: A high proportion (96%) of the founders survived 1 year post-release. Pre-release captive-rearing method had no effect. Released devils gained an average of 14% of their original body mass, irrespective of captive-rearing method. There was very little difference in the diet of captive-reared devils released onto Maria Island relative to wild mainland devils: Tasmanian pademelon, Thylogale billardierii, was the primary food item for both.

Conclusions: The intensity of captive rearing did not affect the survival of devils released onto Maria Island. This suggests that even devils held in IC facilities retain the innate behaviour required to scavenge and hunt prey, and therefore maintain bodyweight post-release. The lack of any threatening processes on the island is also likely to have contributed to the high survival rate 2 years post-release.

Implications: Our study provided preliminary evidence that the release of captive-raised Tasmanian devils onto off-shore islands is a viable conservation action. Captive-breeding programs and captive-raised founders can play a viable and valuable role in the conservation action plans for recovery programs of endangered carnivorous mammals.

Additional keywords: applied ecology, conservation biology, endangered species, foraging, vertebrates, wildlife management.


References

Aaltonen, K., Bryant, A. A., Hostetler, J. A., and Oli, M. K. (2009). Reintroducing endangered Vancouver Island marmots: survival and cause-specific mortality rates of captive-born versus wild-born individuals. Biological Conservation 142, 2181–2190.
Reintroducing endangered Vancouver Island marmots: survival and cause-specific mortality rates of captive-born versus wild-born individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ackerman, B. B., Lindzey, F. G., and Hemker, T. P. (1984). Cougar food habits in southern Utah. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 147–155.
Cougar food habits in southern Utah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Armstrong, D. P., and Seddon, P. J. (2008). Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, 20–25.
Directions in reintroduction biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Attard, M. R. G., Chamoli, U., Ferrara, T. L., Rogers, T. L., and Wroe, S. (2011). Skull mechanics and implications for feeding behaviour in a large marsupial carnivore guild: the thylacine, Tasmanian devil and spotted-tailed quoll. Journal of Zoology 285, 292–300.
Skull mechanics and implications for feeding behaviour in a large marsupial carnivore guild: the thylacine, Tasmanian devil and spotted-tailed quoll.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Birillouin, L. (Ed.) (1956). ‘Science and Information Theory.’ (Academic Press: New York.)

Carbone, C., Mace, G. M., Roberts, S. C., and Macdonald, D. W. (1999). Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature 402, 286–288.
Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnvFSiu70%3D&md5=ffb5edba908a8ff7805d53bfa635f182CAS | 10580498PubMed |

Christie, M. R., Marine, M. L., French, R. A., and Blouin, M. S. (2012). Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 238–242.
Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVehtr0%3D&md5=f651ee280149883669227d7832646285CAS |

DPIPWE (2011). Proposal to establish a managed population of Devil facial tumour disease (DFTD)-free Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) on Maria Island. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Internal Document, Tasmania. Available at http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/file.aspx?id=26885 [Accessed: 18 August 2016].

Farrell, L. E., Roman, J., and Sunquist, M. E. (2000). Dietary separation of sympatric carnivores identified by molecular analysis of scats. Molecular Ecology 9, 1583–1590.
Dietary separation of sympatric carnivores identified by molecular analysis of scats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgt1Cmtg%3D%3D&md5=80883747d16f9ec41f3b797974022451CAS | 11050553PubMed |

Fischer, J., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96, 1–11.
An assessment of the published results of animal relocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W., and Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–480.
Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvitlKqsA%3D%3D&md5=de6fb9f4f9b24852ce51ebaf19069fcaCAS | 17750257PubMed |

Hamede, R. K., McCallum, H., and Jones, M. (2013). Biting injuries and transmission of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. Journal of Animal Ecology 82, 182–190.
Biting injuries and transmission of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22943286PubMed |

Hawkins, C. E., Baars, C., Hesterman, H., Hocking, G. J., Jones, M. E., Lazenby, B., and Mann, D. (2006). Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation 131, 307–324.
Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hawkins, C. E., McCallum, H., Mooney, N., Jones, M., and Holdsworth, M. (2008). Sarcophilus harrisii. In ‘IUCN 2014. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1’. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/40540/0 [Accessed: 18 August 2015].

Hope J. H. 1972 Mammals of the Bass Strait Islands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 85 163U195

Jones, M. E. (2001). Large marsupial carnivores. In ‘The New Encyclopedia of Mammals’. (Ed. D. Macdonald.) pp. 814–817. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Jones, K. E., Bielby, J., Cardillo, M., Fritz, S. A., O’Dell, J., Orme, C. D. L., Safi, K., Sechrest, W., Boakes, E. H., Carbone, C., and Connolly, C. (2009). PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648.
PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jule, K. R., Leaver, L. A., and Lea, S. E. G. (2008). The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: a review and analysis. Biological Conservation 141, 355–363.
The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: a review and analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maran, T., Põdra, M., Põlma, M., and Macdonald, D. W. (2009). The survival of captive-born animals in restoration programmes: case study of the endangered European mink Mustela lutreola. Biological Conservation 142, 1685–1692.
The survival of captive-born animals in restoration programmes: case study of the endangered European mink Mustela lutreola.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin, T. G., Nally, S., Burbidge, A. A., Arnall, S., Garnett, S. T., Hayward, M. W., Lumsden, L. F., Menkhorst, P., McDonald‐Madden, E., and Possingham, H. P. (2012). Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conservation Letters 5, 274–280.
Acting fast helps avoid extinction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mathews, F., Orros, M., McLaren, G., Gelling, M., and Foster, R. (2005). Keeping fit on the ark: assessing the suitability of captive-bred animals for release. Biological Conservation 121, 569–577.
Keeping fit on the ark: assessing the suitability of captive-bred animals for release.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCallum, H., Jones, M., Hawkins, C., Hamede, R., Lachish, S., Sinn, D. L., Beeton, L., and Lazenby, B. (2009). Transmission dynamics of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease may lead to disease induced extinction. Ecology 90, 3379–3392.
Transmission dynamics of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease may lead to disease induced extinction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20120807PubMed |

Moehrenschlager, A., and Somers, M. (2004). Canid reintroductions and metapopulation management. In ‘Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan’. (Ed. C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffman and D. W. Macdonald.) pp. 289–297. (IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland.)

Owen, D., and Pemberton, D. (2005). ‘The Tasmanian Devil: a Unique and Threatened Animal.’ (Allen and Unwin: Sydney.)

Pearse, A. M., and Swift, K. (2006). Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease. Nature 439, 549.
Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpsVCitA%3D%3D&md5=07b38d805b9cf3fbacf02c2ddd7d947dCAS | 16452970PubMed |

Pemberton, D., and Renouf, D. (1993). A field-study of communication and social-behavior of the Tasmanian devil at feeding sites. Australian Journal of Zoology 41, 507–526.
A field-study of communication and social-behavior of the Tasmanian devil at feeding sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pemberton D. Gales S. Bauer B. Gales R. Lazenby B. Medlock K. 2008 The diet of the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii, as determined from analysis of scat and stomach contents. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 142 1322

Rabin, L. A. (2003). Maintaining behavioural diversity in captivity for conservation: natural behaviour management. Animal Welfare 12, 85–94.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnvV2rtQ%3D%3D&md5=75d01f117e94af78f2ca8a4d3089567dCAS |

Simón, M. A., Arenas-Rojas, R., Rodriguez-Siles, J., García-Tardío, M., Perez-Marin, J., Gil-Sánchez, J. M., and Lopez, G. (2013). Re-introduction of the Iberian lynx, Andalusia, Spain. In ‘Global Re-introduction Perspectives 2013. Further Case Studies from around the Globe’. (Ed. P. S. Soorae.) pp. 120–124. (IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group Abu Dhabi and Environment Agency: Abu Dhabi.)

Sinn, D. L., Cawthen, L., Jones, S. M., Pukk, C., and Jones, M. E. (2014). Boldness towards novelty and translocation success in captive-raised, orphaned Tasmanian devils. Zoo Biology 33, 36–48.
Boldness towards novelty and translocation success in captive-raised, orphaned Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24375492PubMed |

Snyder, N. F., Derrickson, S. R., Beissinger, S. R., Wiley, J. W., Smith, T. B., Toone, W. D., and Miller, B. (1996). Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10, 338–348.
Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soorae, P. S. (Ed.) (2013). ‘Global Re-introduction Perspectives 2013. Further Case Studies from around the Globe.’ (SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE Environment Agency: Abu Dhabi.)

Stoinski, T. S., Beck, B. B., Bloomsmith, M. A., and Maple, T. L. (2003). A behavioral comparison of captive-raised, reintroduced golden lion tamarins and their wild-born offspring. Behaviour 140, 137–160.
A behavioral comparison of captive-raised, reintroduced golden lion tamarins and their wild-born offspring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tarszisz, E., Dickman, C. R., and Munn, A. J. (2014). Physiology in conservation translocations. Conservation Physiology 2, .
Physiology in conservation translocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27293675PubMed |

Tucker, M. A., and Rogers, T. L. (2014a). Examining the prey mass of terrestrial and aquatic carnivorous mammals: minimum, maximum and range. PLoS One 9, e106402.
Examining the prey mass of terrestrial and aquatic carnivorous mammals: minimum, maximum and range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25162695PubMed |

Tucker, M. A., and Rogers, T. L. (2014b). Examining predator-prey body size, trophic level and body mass across marine and terrestrial mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 2014–2103.
Examining predator-prey body size, trophic level and body mass across marine and terrestrial mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Heezik, Y., and Ostrowski, S. (2001). Conservation breeding for reintroductions: assessing survival in a captive flock of houbara bustards. Animal Conservation 4, 195–201.
Conservation breeding for reintroductions: assessing survival in a captive flock of houbara bustards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vickery, S. S., and Mason, G. J. (2003). Behavioural persistence and its implication for reintroduction success. Ursus 14, 35–46.

Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21, 213–251.
Evolution and measurement of species diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolf, C. M., Griffith, B., Reed, C., and Temple, S. (1996). Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conservation Biology 10, 1142–1154.
Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |