Weighed down by science: do collar-mounted devices affect domestic cat behaviour and movement?
Cayley E. Coughlin A and Yolanda van Heezik A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: yolanda.vanheezik@otago.ac.nz
Wildlife Research 41(7) 606-614 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14160
Submitted: 5 August 2014 Accepted: 19 December 2014 Published: 20 March 2015
Abstract
Context: Animals carrying tracking and logging devices are subject to a range of instrument effects that negatively affect survival, reproduction and behaviour. The common recommendation is that device weight should not exceed 5% body mass (BM) for terrestrial species; however, this rule-of-thumb has little empirical basis. Modelling indicates that devices weighing less than 3% BM may still have impacts. Several studies have used telemetry and data loggers on domestic cats (Felis catus) with instruments ranging in weight from 30 g to 125 g, but there has been no quantitative evaluation of instrument effects. In addition, inexpensive GPS tags such as iGotU are increasingly being used to track domestic cats, but often with little acknowledgement of habitat-related location error.
Aims: We evaluated the impact of wearing devices of different weights on domestic cat movements, and quantified location error across typical suburban habitats.
Methods: We recorded movements of cats wearing three different GPS collar weights for a week at a time: light, 30 g (<1% BM); medium, 80 g (~2% BM); and heavy, 130 g (~3% BM). Location error (LE) and fix success rates (FSR) were compared between backyard habitats and up- or downward orientation of the GPS tags on collars.
Key results: Home-range size and distance travelled from home were smaller when cats wore the heaviest collar. LE was lower and FSR higher for GPS tags with direct-line-of-sight to satellites (e.g. on lawns), but there was no difference between tags placed in dense vegetation (hedges) or more open vegetation (trees), or tags oriented up or down.
Conclusions: Collars carrying instruments on cats should be no more than 2% BM (medium-weight collar). LE was large relative to typical urban habitat size, indicating that misclassification of locations into habitats could easily occur in habitat-selection studies.
Implications: Some published accounts of cat home-range sizes may be underestimates, resulting in underestimates of the extent of impacts on prey species. Habitat-use studies should acknowledge the error associated with GPS tags and incorporate it into analyses using techniques such as Brownian Bridges.
References
Adams, A. L., Dickinson, K. J. M., Robertson, B. C., and van Heezik, Y. (2013). An evaluation of the accuracy and performance of lightweight GPS collars in a suburban environment. PLoS ONE 8, e68496.| An evaluation of the accuracy and performance of lightweight GPS collars in a suburban environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtFyis73N&md5=9d176eb450f5922c24fb3176c84511f2CAS | 23874645PubMed |
Aldridge, H., and Brigham, R. (1988). Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry. Journal of Mammalogy 69, 379–382.
| Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baker, P. J., Molony, S. E., Stone, E., Cuthill, I. C., and Harris, S. (2008). Cats about town: is predation by free-ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations? The Ibis 150, 86–99.
| Cats about town: is predation by free-ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ballard, G., Ainley, D. G., Ribic, C. A., and Barton, K. R. (2001). Effect of instrument attachment and other factors on foraging trip duration and nesting success of Adélie penguins. The Condor 103, 481–490.
| Effect of instrument attachment and other factors on foraging trip duration and nesting success of Adélie penguins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barratt, D. (1997). Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L.), in Canberra, Australia. I. Prey composition and preference. Wildlife Research 24, 263–277.
| Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L.), in Canberra, Australia. I. Prey composition and preference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barron, D. G., Brawn, J. D., and Weatherhead, P. J. (2010). Meta-analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, 180–187.
| Meta-analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berteaux, D., Masseboeuf, F., Bonzom, J. M., Bergeron, J. M., Thomas, D. W., and Lapierre, H. (1996). Effect of carrying a radiocollar on expenditure of energy by meadow voles. Journal of Mammalogy 77, 359–363.
| Effect of carrying a radiocollar on expenditure of energy by meadow voles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowman, J. L., Kochanny, C. O., Demarais, S., and Leopold, B. D. (2000). Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 141–145.
Brander, R., and Cochran, W. (1969). Radio-location telemetry. In ‘Wildlife Management Techniques Manual’. (Ed. R. H. Giles.) pp. 95–103. (The Wildlife Society: Washington, DC.)
Brooks, C., Bonyongo, C., and Harris, S. (2008). Effects of global positioning system collar weight on zebra behavior and location error. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 527–534.
| Effects of global positioning system collar weight on zebra behavior and location error.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Casper, R. M. (2009). Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 78, 1477–1483.
| Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33, 107–112.
| Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
D’Eon, R. G. (2003). Effects of a stationary GPS fix-rate bias on habitat-selection analyses. Journal of Wildlife Management 67, 858–863.
| Effects of a stationary GPS fix-rate bias on habitat-selection analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald, B., and Karl, B. (1986). Home range of feral house cats (Felis catus L.) in forest of the Orongorongo Valley, Wellington, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 9, 71–82.
Frair, J. L., Fieberg, J., Hebblewhite, M., Cagnacci, F., DeCesare, N. J., and Pedrotti, L. (2010). Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 365, 2187–2200.
| Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20566496PubMed |
Godfrey, J., and Bryant, D. (2003). Effects of radio transmitters: review of recent radio-tracking studies. In ‘Conservation Applications of Measuring Energy Expenditure of New Zealand Birds: Assessing Habitat Quality and Costs of Carrying Radio-transmitters’. (Ed. M. Williams.) pp. 83–95. (Science for Conservation, Department of Conservation: Wellington.)
Godfrey, J. D., Bryant, D. M., and Williams, M. J. (2003). Radio-telemetry increases free-living energy costs in the endangered takahe Porphyrio mantelli. Biological Conservation 114, 35–38.
| Radio-telemetry increases free-living energy costs in the endangered takahe Porphyrio mantelli.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goszczynski, J., Krauze, D., and Gryz, J. (2009). Activity and exploration range of house cats in rural areas of central Poland. Folia Zoologica 58, 363–371.
Gursky, S. (1998). Effects of radio transmitter weight on a small nocturnal primate. American Journal of Primatology 46, 145–155.
| Effects of radio transmitter weight on a small nocturnal primate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvksVKiug%3D%3D&md5=09fa8cc7ab9a6867553dab28fbbb2f40CAS | 9773677PubMed |
Hamel, N. J., Parrish, J. K., Conquest, L. L., and Burger, A. (2004). Effects of tagging on behavior, provisioning, and reproduction in the common murre (Uria aalge), a diving seabird. The Auk 121, 1161–1171.
| Effects of tagging on behavior, provisioning, and reproduction in the common murre (Uria aalge), a diving seabird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawkins, P. (2004). Bio-logging and animal welfare: practical refinements. Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research 58, 58–68.
Hay, M., and Nebel, S. (2012). The use of biotelemetry in the study of animal migration. Nature Education Knowledge 3(12), 5.
Hervías, S., Oppel, S., Medina, F., Pipa, T., Díez, A., Ramos, J., Ruiz de Ybáñez, R., and Nogales, M. (2014). Assessing the impact of introduced cats on island biodiversity by combining dietary and movement analysis. Journal of Zoology 292, 39–47.
| Assessing the impact of introduced cats on island biodiversity by combining dietary and movement analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hines, J. E., and Zwickel, F. C. (1985). Influence of radio packages on young blue grouse. Journal of Wildlife Management 49, 1050–1054.
| Influence of radio packages on young blue grouse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horn, J. A., Mateus-Pinilla, N., Warner, R. E., and Heske, E. J. (2011). Home range, habitat use, and activity patterns of free-roaming domestic cats. Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1177–1185.
| Home range, habitat use, and activity patterns of free-roaming domestic cats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M., and Lewis, J. S. (2007). Analyzing animal movements using Brownian Bridges. Ecology 88, 2354–2363.
| Analyzing animal movements using Brownian Bridges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17918412PubMed |
Kays, R. W., and DeWan, A. A. (2004). Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. Animal Conservation 7, 273–283.
| Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kenward, R. E., Walls, S. S., South, A. B., and Casey, N. (2008). ‘Ranges 8: for the Analysis of Tracking and Location Data. Online Manual.’ (Anatrack: Wareham, UK.)
Konecny, M. J. (1987). Food habits and energetics of feral house cats in the Galapagos Islands. Oikos 50, 24–32.
| Food habits and energetics of feral house cats in the Galapagos Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Legagneux, P., Simard, A. A., Gauthier, G., and Bêty, J. (2013). Effect of neck collars on the body condition of migrating greater snow geese. Journal of Field Ornithology 84, 201–209.
| Effect of neck collars on the body condition of migrating greater snow geese.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lepczyk, C. A., Mertig, A. G., and Liu, J. (2004). Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation 115, 191–201.
| Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loss, S. R., Will, T., and Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature communications 4, 1396.
| The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23360987PubMed |
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., and De Poorter, M. (2000). ‘100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: a Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database.’ (Invasive Species Specialist Group: Auckland.)
Loyd, K. A. T., Hernandez, S. M., Carroll, J. P., Abernathy, K. J., and Marshall, G. J. (2013). Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras. Biological Conservation 160, 183–189.
| Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mathieu, R., Freeman, C., and Aryal, J. (2007). Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landscape and Urban Planning 81, 179–192.
| Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Medina, F. M., Bonnaud, E., Vidal, E., Tershy, B. R., Zavaleta, E. S., Josh Donlan, C., Keitt, B. S., Corre, M., Horwath, S. V., and Nogales, M. (2011). A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates. Global Change Biology 17, 3503–3510.
| A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Metsers, E. M., Seddon, P. J., and van Heezik, Y. M. (2010). Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be? Wildlife Research 37, 47–56.
| Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Millspaugh, J., and Marzluff, J. M. (2001). ‘Radio tracking and animal populations.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)
Millspaugh, J., Kesler, D., Kays, R., Gitzen, R., Schulz, J., Rota, C., Bodinof, C., Belant, J., and Keller, B. (2012). Wildlife radiotelemetry and remote monitoring. In ‘The Wildlife Techniques Manual’. 7th edn. (Eds J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluf.) pp. 258–283. (John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Morgan, S., Hansen, C., Ross, J., Hickling, G., Ogilvie, S., and Paterson, A. (2009). Urban cat (Felis catus) movement and predation activity associated with a wetland reserve in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 36, 574–580.
| Urban cat (Felis catus) movement and predation activity associated with a wetland reserve in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murray, D. L., and Fuller, M. R. (2000). A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In ‘Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences’. 2nd edn. (Eds L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller.) pp. 15–64. (Columbia University Press: New York.)
New Zealand Statistics (2006). QuickStats about Dunedin City. Available at: http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2006CensusHomePage (Accessed 30 Novemeber 2013).
Oberg, A. L., and Mahoney, D. W. (2007). Linear mixed effects models. In ‘Topics in Biostatistics’. (Ed. W. T. Ambrosius.) pp. 213–234. (Humana Press: New York.)
Pietz, P. J., Krapu, G. L., Greenwood, R. J., and Lokemoen, J. T. (1993). Effects of harness transmitters on behavior and reproduction of wild mallards. Journal of Wildlife Management 57, 696–703.
| Effects of harness transmitters on behavior and reproduction of wild mallards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Powell, R. A. (2000). Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In ‘Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences’. 2nd edn. (Eds L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller.) pp. 65–110. (Columbia University Press: New York.)
Recio, M. R., and Seddon, P. J. (2013). Understanding determinants of home range behaviour of feral cats as introduced apex predators in insular ecosystems: a spatial approach. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, 1971–1981.
| Understanding determinants of home range behaviour of feral cats as introduced apex predators in insular ecosystems: a spatial approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Snyder, N. F., Beissinger, S. R., and Fuller, M. R. (1989). Solar radio-transmitters on snail kites in Florida. Journal of Field Ornithology 60, 171–177.
Tennent, J., Downs, C. T., and Bodasing, M. (2009). Management recommendations for feral cat (Felis catus) populations within an urban conservancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 39, 137–142.
| Management recommendations for feral cat (Felis catus) populations within an urban conservancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Heezik, Y., Smyth, A., Adams, A., and Gordon, J. (2010). Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations? Biological Conservation 143, 121–130.
| Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vandenabeele, S. P., Shepard, E. L., Grogan, A., and Wilson, R. P. (2012). When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. Marine Biology 159, 1–14.
| When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker, K. A., Trites, A. W., Haulena, M., and Weary, D. M. (2012). A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals. Wildlife Research 39, 15–30.
| A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watanabe, S., Izawa, M., Kato, A., Ropert-Coudert, Y., and Naito, Y. (2005). A new technique for monitoring the detailed behaviour of terrestrial animals: a case study with the domestic cat. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94, 117–131.
| A new technique for monitoring the detailed behaviour of terrestrial animals: a case study with the domestic cat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, G. C., and Garrott, R. A. (1990). ‘Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data.’ (Academic Press: USA.)
Wilson, A. M., Lowe, J., Roskilly, K., Hudson, P. E., Golabek, K., and McNutt, J. (2013). Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs. Nature 498, 185–189.
| Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXptlGrurk%3D&md5=cc7a19588e9e8d16819c5be05ebbc288CAS | 23765495PubMed |
Wilson, R. P., and McMahon, C. R. (2006). Measuring devices on wild animals: what constitutes acceptable practice? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4, 147–154.
| Measuring devices on wild animals: what constitutes acceptable practice?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woods, M., McDonald, R. A., and Harris, S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review 33, 174–188.
| Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
