Differences in brushtail possum home-range characteristics among sites of varying habitat and population density
Belinda I. Whyte A B , James G. Ross A and Helen M. Blackie A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Wildlife Management and Conservation, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: belindawhyte@gmail.com
Wildlife Research 40(7) 537-544 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13063
Submitted: 4 April 2013 Accepted: 1 November 2013 Published: 28 November 2013
Abstract
Context: In New Zealand, the Australian brushtail possum is a pest, because this species preys on native birds and transmits bovine tuberculosis (bTB) to livestock. Previous studies on possums have shown that home-range characteristics differ depending on habitat and/or population density. However, direct comparisons between studies are limited because of the use of differing monitoring techniques, some of which are now out-dated and imprecise. Understanding how possum ranging behaviour varies in response to habitat and density may allow the development of more effective and site-specific control operations. For example, variations in home-range characteristics (e.g. home-range overlap with conspecifics) among populations may mean that bTB transmission risk is not uniform among populations, resulting in the need for some sites to be prioritised for control over others.
Aims: To investigate whether home-range characteristics varied among three sites of differing habitat and population density, and investigate whether possum home-range characteristics varied between males and females.
Methods: Global Positioning System (GPS)- and VHF-tracking were used to compare possum home-range characteristics among three sites. Two sites were within pine (Pinus radiata) habitat and had low-density possum populations, and one site was within oak (Quercus robur) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) habitat, and had a higher-density possum population.
Key results: Possum home-range characteristics did not vary between the two low-density sites. However, these populations exhibited considerably larger home-range sizes and home-range overlap between pairs of collared possums than did the high-density population. In addition, the low-density populations used more dens and changed these more often. Across all sites, there were generally no intersexual differences in home-range characteristics.
Key conclusions: The present research highlights that the home-range characteristics of possums can vary among populations, depending on habitat and/or population density.
Implications: Further research into the drivers of possum home-range characteristics would be beneficial to allow identification of how spatial behaviour is likely to vary depending on habitat and density. This would allow the design of more targeted and therefore effective control strategies that account for these variations in behaviour, such as using a larger spatial scale of control devices where possums are known to range further.
Additional keywords: bovine tuberculosis, den site, GPS tracking, pest management, VHF radio-tracking.
References
AHB (2012). Animal Health Board annual report 2011/2012. Animal Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.Anderson, D. R. (2008). ‘Model Based Inference in the Life Sciences.’ (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: New York.)
Arthur, T., Ramsey, D., and Efford, M. (2002). Changes in possum behaviour at reduced density – a review. Landcare Research contract report: LC0102/102. Landcare Research, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Asari, Y., Johnson, C. N., Parsons, M., and Larson, J. (2010). Gap-crossing in fragmented habitats by mahogany gliders (Petaurus gracilis). Do they cross roads and powerline corridors? Australian Mammalogy 32, 10–15.
| Gap-crossing in fragmented habitats by mahogany gliders (Petaurus gracilis). Do they cross roads and powerline corridors?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Benson, J. F., Chamberlain, M. J., and Leopold, B. D. (2006). Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability? Animal Behaviour 71, 685–693.
| Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackie, H. M. (2010a). Comparative performance of three brands of lightweight global positioning system collars. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1911–1916.
| Comparative performance of three brands of lightweight global positioning system collars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackie, H. M. (2010b). Natal dispersal and range establishment behaviour of the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) characterised with advanced satellite telemetry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
Blackie, H. M., Russell, J. C., and Clout, M. N. (2011). Maternal influence on philopatry and space use by juvenile brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 477–483.
| Maternal influence on philopatry and space use by juvenile brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21155769PubMed |
Blundell, G. M., Maier, J. A. K., and Debevec, E. M. (2001). Linear home ranges: effects of smoothing, sample size, and autocorrelation on kernel estimates. Ecological Monographs 71, 469–489.
Bolker, B. (2009). ‘Dealing with Quasi-models in R.’ Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bbmle/vignettes/quasi.pdf [verified 14 February 2013].
Brockie, R. E., Ward, G. D., and Cowan, P. E. (1997). Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) on Hawke’s bay farmland: spatial distribution and population structure before and after a control operation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 27, 181–191.
| Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) on Hawke’s bay farmland: spatial distribution and population structure before and after a control operation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer Science+Business Media: New York.)
Carpenter, F. L., and Macmillen, R. E. (1976). Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194, 639–642.
| Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvktlKgsw%3D%3D&md5=8e29cf3718786c92f72030d3270afc10CAS | 17818435PubMed |
Clinchy, M., Krebs, C. J., and Jarman, P. J. (2001). Dispersal sinks and handling effects: interpreting the role of immigration in common brushtail possum populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 515–526.
| Dispersal sinks and handling effects: interpreting the role of immigration in common brushtail possum populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clout, M. N. (1977). The ecology of the possum (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) in Pinus radiata plantations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
Clout, M., and Ericksen, K. (2000). Anatomy of a disastrous success: the brushtail possum as an invasive species. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 1–9. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Clout, M. N., and Gaze, P. D. (1984). Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) in a New Zealand beech (Nothofagus) forest. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 7, 147–155.
Coleman, J., and Caley, P. (2000). Possums as a reservoir of bovine tb. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 92–104. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Coleman, T. D., Green, W. Q., and Polson, I. G. (1985). Diet of brushtail possums over a pasture-alpine gradient in Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 8, 21–35.
Cooch, E., and White, G. (Eds) (2011). ‘Program Mark: ‘a Gentle Introduction.’ 9th edn. (Ithaca, NY.)
Cowan, P. E. (1989). Denning habits of common brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, in New Zealand lowland forest. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 63–78.
| Denning habits of common brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, in New Zealand lowland forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cowan, P., and Clout, M. (2000). Possums on the move: activity patterns, home ranges, and dispersal. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 24–34. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Crawley, M. C. (1973). A live-trapping study of Australian brush-tailed possums, Trichosurus vulpecula (Kerr), in the Orongorongo Valley, Wellington, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Zoology 21, 75–90.
| A live-trapping study of Australian brush-tailed possums, Trichosurus vulpecula (Kerr), in the Orongorongo Valley, Wellington, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crawley, M. J. (2007). ‘The R book.’ (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK.)
Day, T., O’Connor, C., and Matthews, L. (2000). Possum social behaviour. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial.’ (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 35–46. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Efford, M., Warburton, B., and Spencer, N. (2000). Home-range changes by brushtail possums in response to control. Wildlife Research 27, 117–127.
| Home-range changes by brushtail possums in response to control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glen, A. S., Byrom, A. E., Pech, R. P., Cruz, J., Schwab, A., Sweetapple, P. J., Yockney, I., Nugent, G., Coleman, M., and Whitford, J. (2012). Ecology of brushtail possums in a New Zealand dryland ecosystem. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 36, 29–37.
Green, W. Q. (1984). A review of ecological studies relevant to management of the common brushtail possum. In ‘Possums and Gliders’. (Eds A. P. Smith and I. D. Hume.) pp. 483–499. (Australian Mammal Society: Sydney.)
Harestad, A. S., and Bunnell, F. L. (1979). Home range and body weight – a reevaluation. Ecology 60, 389–402.
| Home range and body weight – a reevaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulbert, I. A. R., and French, J. (2001). The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 869–878.
| The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ji, W., Sarre, S. D., Craig, J. L., and Clout, M. N. (2003). Denning behavior of common brushtail possums in populations recovering from density reduction. Journal of Mammalogy 84, 1059–1067.
| Denning behavior of common brushtail possums in populations recovering from density reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, M. C., Marron, J. S., and Sheather, S. J. (1996). A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 401–407.
Kenward, R. E., Walls, S. S., South, A. B., and Casey, N. M. (2008). ‘Ranges8: for the Analysis of Tracking and Location Data. Online Manual.’ (Anatrack Limited: Wareham, UK.)
Kerle, J. A. (1984). Variation in the ecology of Trichosurus: its adaptive significance. In ‘Possums and Gliders.’ (Eds A. P. Smith and I. D. Hume.) pp. 115–128. (Australian Mammal Society: Sydney.)
Kie, J. G., Matthiopoulos, J., Fieberg, J., Powell, R. A., Cagnacci, F., Mitchell, M. S., Gaillard, J., and Moorcroft, P. R. (2010). The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 2221–2231.
King, C. M. (2005). ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals.’ 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press: Auckland.)
Laver, P. N., and Kelly, M. J. (2008). A critical review of home range studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 290–298.
| A critical review of home range studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lettink, M., and Armstrong, D. P. (2003). ‘An Introduction to Using Mark–recapture Analysis for Monitoring Threatened Species.’ (Department of Conservation: Christchurch, New Zealand.)
Metsers, E. M., Seddon, P. J., and Heezik, Y. M. v. (2010). Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be? Wildlife Research 37, 47–56.
| Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morgan, D. R., Nugent, G., Gleeson, D., and Howitt, R. (2007). Animal Health Board project no. R-10623. Are some possums untrappable, unpoisonable, and therefore unmonitorable? Landcare Research contract report: LC0607/143. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Nugent, G., Sweetapple, P., Coleman, J., and Suisted, P. (2000). Possum feeding patterns: dietary tactics of a reluctant folivore. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 10–23. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., and Anderson, D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62, 3–135.
Paterson, B. M., Morris, R. S., Weston, J., and Cowan, P. E. (1995). Foraging and denning patterns of brushtail possums, and their possible relationship to contact with cattle and the transmission of bovine tuberculosis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43, 281–288.
| Foraging and denning patterns of brushtail possums, and their possible relationship to contact with cattle and the transmission of bovine tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzntlOrtw%3D%3D&md5=2d9a676bae702c06d82737bb6988a8b4CAS | 16031867PubMed |
Pech, R., Byrom, A., Anderson, D., Thomson, C., and Coleman, M. (2010). The effect of poisoned and notional vaccinated buffers on possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) movements: minimising the risk of bovine tuberculosis spread from forest to farmland. Wildlife Research 37, 283–292.
| The effect of poisoned and notional vaccinated buffers on possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) movements: minimising the risk of bovine tuberculosis spread from forest to farmland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Powell, R. A. (2000). Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In ‘Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences’. (Eds L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller.) pp. 65–110. (Columbia University Press: New York.)
Pryde, M. A. (2003). ‘Using Program ‘MARK’ for Assessing Survival in Cryptic Threatened Species: Case Study Using Long-tailed Bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus).’ (Department of Conservation: Christchurch, New Zealand.)
Ramsey, D., Spencer, N., Caley, P., Efford, M., Hansen, K., Lam, M., and Cooper, D. (2002). The effects of reducing population density on contact rates between brushtail possums: implications for transmission of bovine tuberculosis. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 806–818.
| The effects of reducing population density on contact rates between brushtail possums: implications for transmission of bovine tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Recio, M. R., Mathieu, R., Maloney, R., and Seddon, P. J. (2010). First results of feral cats (Felis catus) monitored with GPS collars in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 34, 288–296.
Rouco, C., Norbury, G. L., Smith, J., Byrom, A. E., and Pech, R. P. (2013). Population density estimates of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in dry grassland in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 37, 12–17.
Sadleir, R. (2000). Evidence of possums as predators of native animals. In ‘The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague.) pp. 126–131. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Sirtrack (2010). ‘Sirtrack® Wildlife GPS User Guide.’ (Sirtrack: Havelock North, New Zealand.)
Whyte, B. (2013). ‘Home Range Use of the Australian Brushtail Possum in New Zealand: Is Density a Driver?’ Ph.D. Thesis, Lincoln University, Lincoln.
Whyte, B. I., Ross, J. G., and Buckley, H. L. (2014). Changes in Australian brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) den site use following density reduction. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 38, XXX–YYY.
Woodroffe, R., Donnelly, C. A., Jenkins, H. E., Johnston, W. T., Cox, D. R., Bourne, F. J., Cheeseman, C. L., Delahay, R. J., Clifton-Hadley, R. S., Gettinby, G., Gilks, P., Hewinson, R. G., McInerney, J. P., and Morrison, W. I. (2006). Culling and cattle controls influence tuberculosis risk for badgers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 14713–14717.
| Culling and cattle controls influence tuberculosis risk for badgers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVyhtrfJ&md5=81b4c80c95e7a21ce87b1b4d8a036784CAS |
Yockney, I., Nugent, G., Latham, M. C., Perry, M., Cross, M. L., and Byrom, A. E. (2013). Comparison of ranging behaviour in a multi-species complex of free-ranging hosts of bovine tuberculosis in relation to their use as disease sentinels. Epidemiology and Infection 141, 1407–1416.
| Comparison of ranging behaviour in a multi-species complex of free-ranging hosts of bovine tuberculosis in relation to their use as disease sentinels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3svgsFyltQ%3D%3D&md5=7970d15fee84d6bcf5291d15cdaab80fCAS | 23433406PubMed |
