Temporal changes in an alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) population
Mitchell B. East A C D , J. Daren Riedle B and Day B. Ligon AA Department of Biology, Missouri State University, 901 S. National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897, USA.
B Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Lincoln University, Jefferson City, MO 65010, USA.
C Present address: Natural Heritage New Mexico, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: mitch.east86@gmail.com
Wildlife Research 40(1) 77-81 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12075
Submitted: 14 April 2012 Accepted: 12 February 2013 Published: 7 March 2013
Abstract
Context: Monitoring populations of long-lived species requires continuous long-term efforts. This is especially applicable for species that have experienced declines range-wide.
Aims: Our study assessed the current status of a population of wild Macrochelys temminckii and compared the present results to those from a survey conducted nearly a decade ago.
Methods: Trapping in 2010–2011 was conducted on two creeks within the refuge, during the months of May–July. Capture data were compared with data collected by similar methods in 1997–2001.
Key results: The population structure of M. temminckii was dominated by juveniles, with few large adults or small juveniles detected and a missing size class was evident. Retrospective analysis of 1997–2001 data revealed that the population was likely to be in decline even then, despite high capture rates.
Conclusions: The M. temminckii population showed significant declines that indicated that the population had experienced stressors of unknown origin. The status of M. temminckii at the refuge is concerning, given the protection afforded this remnant population.
Implications: Short-term data from 1997–2001 indicated a healthy M. temminckii population, whereas longer-term data showed that the population has declined, resulting in significant demographic changes. Continued monitoring will be necessary to develop management recommendations and track the impact of implemented management practices. Longer-term monitoring of long-lived vertebrates is required to identify population trends.
References
Akcakaya, H. R. (2002). ‘RAMAS Metapop: Viability Analysis for Stage-structured Metapopulations.’ (Applied Biomathematics: Setauket, NY.)Akcakaya, H. R., and Sjögren-Gulve, P. (2000). Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. Ecological Bulletins 48, 9–21.
Averill-Murray, R. C., Woodman, A. P., and Howland, J. M. (2002). Population ecology of the Sonoran desert tortoise in Arizona. In ‘The Sonoran Desert Tortoise: Natural History, Biology, and Conservation’. (Ed. T. R. Van Devender.) pp. 109–134. (The University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ.)
Cagle, F. R. (1939). A system of marking turtles for future identification. Copeia 1939, 170–173.
| A system of marking turtles for future identification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Center for Biological Diversity (2008). Emergency rulemaking request to repeal Oklahoma’s turtle collection law. (Center for Biological Diversity: Tucson, AZ.)
Chen, T., Chang, H., and Lue, K. (2009). Unregulated trade in turtle shells for Chinese traditional medicine in east and Southeast Asia: the case of Taiwan. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 8, 11–18.
| Unregulated trade in turtle shells for Chinese traditional medicine in east and Southeast Asia: the case of Taiwan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Congdon, J. D., Dunham, A. E., and van Loben Sels, R. C. (1993). Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7, 826–833.
| Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Congdon, J. D., Dunham, A. E., and van Loben Sels, R. C. (1994). Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of longlived organisms. American Zoologist 34, 397–408.
Ernst, C. H., and Lovich, J. E. (Eds) (2009). ‘Turtles of the United States and Canada.’ 2nd edn. (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Geluso, K. N., and Geluso, K. G. (2012). Effects of environmental factors on capture rates of insectivorous bats, 1971–2005. Journal of Mammalogy 93, 161–169.
| Effects of environmental factors on capture rates of insectivorous bats, 1971–2005.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbon, J. W., Scott, D. E., Ryan, T. J., Buhlmann, K. A., Tuberville, T. D., Metts, B. S., Greene, J. L., Mills, T., Leiden, Y., Poppy, S., and Winne, C. T. (2000). The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians. Bioscience 50, 653–666.
| The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hambler, C. (1994). Giant tortoise Geochelone gigantean translocation to Curieuse Island (Seychelles): success or failure? Biological Conservation 69, 293–299.
| Giant tortoise Geochelone gigantean translocation to Curieuse Island (Seychelles): success or failure?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holcomb, S. R., and Carr, J. L. (2011). Hatchling emergence from naturally incubated alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) nests in northern Louisiana. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 10, 222–227.
| Hatchling emergence from naturally incubated alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) nests in northern Louisiana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ladle, R. J. (2009). Forcasting extinctions: uncertainties and limitations. Diversity 1, 133–150.
| Forcasting extinctions: uncertainties and limitations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lande, R. (1988). Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241, 1455–1460.
| Genetics and demography in biological conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1czjs1yktA%3D%3D&md5=b3e466517192c5deb1965b47e863a33dCAS |
Ligon, D. B., and Reasor, J. (2007). Predation on alligator snapping turtles (Macrochelys temminckii) by northern river otters (Lontra canadensis). The Southwestern Naturalist 52, 608–610.
| Predation on alligator snapping turtles (Macrochelys temminckii) by northern river otters (Lontra canadensis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Madsen, T., and Shine, R. (2001). Conflicting conclusions from long-term versus short-term studies on growth and reproduction of a tropical snake. Herpetologica 57, 147–156.
Marchand, M. N., and Litvaitis, J. A. (2004). Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conservation Biology 18, 758–767.
| Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nichols, J. D. (1992). Capture–recapture models. Bioscience 42, 94–102.
| Capture–recapture models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pritchard, P. C. H. (1989). ‘The Alligator Snapping Turtle: Biology and Conservation.’ (Milwaukee Public Museum: Milwaukee, WI.)
Rasband, W. S. (1997–2011). ‘ImageJ.’ (US National Institute of Health: Bethesda, MD.)
Riedle, J. D. (2001). The ecology of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. M.Sc. Thesis, Oklahoma State University.
Riedle, J. D., and Averill-Murray, R. C. (2004). Disease incidence on Sonoran Desert long term monitoring plots. In ‘Proceedings of the 2002 and 2003 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia’. (Eds D. K. Duncan, G. Stewart, M. Tuegel, T. B. Egan, D. Pond) pp. 141–146. (Omnipress: Madison, WI.)
Riedle, J. D., Shipman, P. A., Fox, S. F., and Leslie, D. M. (2005). Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist 50, 79–84.
| Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Riedle, J. D., Shipman, P. A., Fox, S. F., and Leslie, D. M. (2006). Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist 51, 35–40.
| Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Riedle, J. D., Shipman, P. A., Fox, S. F., Hackler, J. C., and Leslie, D. M. (2008). Population structure of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, on the western edge of its range. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 7, 100–104.
| Population structure of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, on the western edge of its range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roman, J., and Bowen, B. W. (2000). The mock turtle syndrome: genetic identification of turtle meat purchased in the south-eastern United States of America. Animal Conservation 3, 61–65.
| The mock turtle syndrome: genetic identification of turtle meat purchased in the south-eastern United States of America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seber, G. A. F. (1982). ‘Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.’ 2nd edn. (Griffin: London.)
Sterrett, S. C., Smith, L. L., Golladay, S. W., Schweitzer, S. H., and Maerz, J. C. (2011). The implications of riparian land use on river turtles. Animal Conservation 14, 38–46.
| The implications of riparian land use on river turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, G. C., and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked individuals. Bird Study 46, S120–S139.
| Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
