Effects of large-scale high-severity fire on occupancy and abundances of an invasive large mammal in south-eastern Australia
David M. Forsyth A D , Andrew M. Gormley A C , Luke Woodford A and Tony Fitzgerald B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.
B Parks Victoria, Kinglake National Park, PO Box 300, Kinglake, Vic. 3763, Australia.
C Present address: Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.
D Corresponding author. Email: dave.forsyth@dse.vic.gov.au
Wildlife Research 39(7) 555-564 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12033
Submitted: 13 February 2012 Accepted: 22 July 2012 Published: 29 August 2012
Abstract
Context: Despite large mammals being an important component of many ecosystems, there is little information on the impacts of fire on large mammal populations.
Aims: We evaluated the effects of the large-scale high-severity ‘Black Saturday’ fires of 7 February 2009 on occupancy and abundances of an invasive large mammal, the sambar deer (Cervus unicolor), in south-eastern Australia.
Methods: The effects of the Black Saturday fires on the abundance of sambar deer were assessed using repeated annual counts of faecal pellets during 2007–11 in Kinglake National Park, which was burnt, and in Mount Buffalo National Park, which was not burnt. Pre-fire occupancy was modelled from data collected at 80 4-km2 cells using three survey methods. The same survey methods were used at 15 burnt (n = 9 sampled pre-fire) and 15 unburnt (n = 5 sampled pre-fire) cells 16–24 months after Black Saturday. Because multiple surveys were performed in each cell, we used a Bayesian state–space site-occupancy model to partition changes in the probability of occupancy from changes in the probability of detection.
Key results: Counts of sambar deer pellets increased linearly during 2007–11 in the unburnt Mount Buffalo National Park. Pellet counts also increased linearly in Kinglake National Park from 2007 to 2008, and then decreased (to zero) following Black Saturday; pellet counts increased again in 2010 and 2011. Sambar deer occupancy was weakly reduced (from 0.99 to 0.88) in burnt cells 16–24 months after Black Saturday, but was little changed in unburnt cells (from 0.99 to 0.98).
Conclusions: We conclude that the abundance of sambar deer was substantially reduced by the large-scale high-severity Black Saturday fires, but that most burnt habitat was reoccupied 16–24 months later.
Implications: There is concern about the negative impacts of invasive sambar deer on native biodiversity, particularly immediately post-fire. Our study suggests that it takes at least 8 months before sambar deer recolonise areas burnt by a large-scale high-severity fire; however, a risk-averse approach would be to act (e.g. by erecting fences or culling) sooner than that.
References
Allen, R. B., Wright, E. F., MacLeod, C. J., Bellingham, P. J., Forsyth, D. M., Mason, N. W. H., Gormley, A. M., Marburg, A. E., MacKenzie, D. I., and McKay, M. (2009). Designing an inventory and monitoring programme for the Department of Conservation’s Natural Heritage Management System. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0809/153. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.Arthur, A. D., Catling, P. C., and Reid, A. (2012). The relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post-fire population dynamics of ground-dwelling vertebrates. Austral Ecology , .
| The relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post-fire population dynamics of ground-dwelling vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bailey, J. K., and Whitham, T. G. (2002). Interactions among fire, aspen, and elk affect insect diversity: reversal of a community response. Ecology 83, 1701–1712.
| Interactions among fire, aspen, and elk affect insect diversity: reversal of a community response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bennett, A., and Coulson, G. (2011). The impacts of sambar Cervus unicolor on the threatened shiny nematolepis Nematolepis wilsonii. Pacific Conservation Biology 16, 251–260.
Bennett, L. J., English, P. F., and McCain, R. (1940). A study of deer populations by use of pellet-group counts. The Journal of Wildlife Management 4, 398–403.
| A study of deer populations by use of pellet-group counts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bentley, A. (1998). ‘An Introduction to the Deer of Australia.’ (Australian Deer Research Foundation: Melbourne.)
Bradstock, R. A., Williams, J. E., and Gill, A. M. (Eds) (2002). ‘Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York.)
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodal Inference: a Practical Information–Theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)
Catling, P. C., Coops, N. C., and Burt, R. J. (2001). The distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in relation to time since wildfire and vegetation structure in south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 28, 555–564.
| The distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in relation to time since wildfire and vegetation structure in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke, M. (2008). Catering for the needs of fauna in fire management: science or just wishful thinking? Wildlife Research 35, 385–394.
| Catering for the needs of fauna in fire management: science or just wishful thinking?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Sustainability and Environment (2009). ‘Draft Flora and Fauna Guarantee Action Statement: Reduction in Biodiversity of Native Vegetation by Sambar Deer (Cervus unicolor).’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne.)
Downes, M. (1983). ‘The Forest Deer Project 1982. Vol. II. Ecology and Hunting.’ (Forests Commission: Melbourne.)
Forsyth, D. M. (2005). Protocol for estimating changes in the relative abundance of deer in New Zealand forests using the faecal pellet index (FPI). Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/conservation/threats-and-impacts/animal-pests/fpi-protocol.pdf [verified 20 November 2011].
Forsyth, D. M. (2006). A monitoring program for deer in Alpine National Park and surrounding areas. Arthur Rylah Institute client report to Parks Victoria. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Forsyth, D. M., and Davis, N. E. (2011). Diets of non-native deer in Australia estimated by macroscopic versus microhistological rumen analysis. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1488–1497.
| Diets of non-native deer in Australia estimated by macroscopic versus microhistological rumen analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forsyth, D. M., Barker, R. J., Morriss, G., and Scroggie, M. P. (2007). Modeling the relationship between fecal pellet indices and deer density. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 964–970.
| Modeling the relationship between fecal pellet indices and deer density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forsyth, D. M., McLeod, S. R., Scroggie, M. P., and White, M. (2009). Modelling the abundance of wildlife using field surveys and GIS: non-native sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in the Yarra Ranges, south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 36, 231–241.
| Modelling the abundance of wildlife using field surveys and GIS: non-native sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in the Yarra Ranges, south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fox, B. J. (1982). Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath. Ecology 63, 1332–1341.
| Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fox, B. J. (1996). Long-term studies of small-mammal communities from disturbed habitats in eastern Australia. In ‘Long-Term Studies of Vertebrate Communities’. (Eds M. L. Cody and J. A. Smallwood.) pp. 467–501. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)
Fraser, K. W., and Nugent, G. N. (2005). Sambar deer. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 436–442. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Friend, G. R. (1993). Impact of fire on small vertebrates in mallee woodlands and heathlands of temperate Australia: a review. Biological Conservation 65, 99–114.
| Impact of fire on small vertebrates in mallee woodlands and heathlands of temperate Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friend, G. R. (2004). Fire impacts on fauna. Victorian Naturalist 121, 116–121.
Gill, A. M. (1975). Fire and the Australian flora: a review. Australian Forestry 38, 4–25.
Gill, A. M. (1981). Adaptive responses of Australian vascular plant species to fire. In ‘Fire and the Australian Biota’. (Eds A. M. Gill, R. H. Groves and I. R. Noble.) pp. 243–272. (Australian Academy of Science: Canberra.)
Gill, A. M., and Catling, P. C. (2002). Fire regimes and biodiversity of forested landscapes of southern Australia. In ‘Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds R. A. Bradstock, J. E. Williams and A. M. Gill.) pp. 351–369. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)
Gordon, I. J., Hester, A. J., and Festa-Bianchet, M. (2004). The management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 1021–1031.
| The management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gormley, A. M., Forsyth, D. M., Griffioen, P., Woodford, L., Lindeman, M., Scroggie, M. P., and Ramsey, D. S. L. (2011). Using presence-only and presence–absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 25–34.
| Using presence-only and presence–absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison, M. (2010). ‘Sambar – The Magnificent Deer.’ (Australian Deer Research Foundation: Melbourne.)
Hone, J., Duncan, R. P., and Forsyth, D. M. (2010). Estimates of maximum annual population growth rates (r m) of mammals and their application in wildlife management. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 507–514.
| Estimates of maximum annual population growth rates (r m) of mammals and their application in wildlife management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kéry, M. (2010). ‘Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists: a Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses.’ (Academic Press: Burlington, MA.)
Land Victoria (2000). ‘VICGRID94 Map Projection.’ Available at www.dse.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/117102/VICGRID94MapProjectionInformation.pdf [verified 8 December 2011].
Leslie, D. M. (2011). Rusa unicolor (Artiodactyla: Cervidae). Mammalian Species 43, 1–30.
| Rusa unicolor (Artiodactyla: Cervidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewis, J. C., Flynn, L. B., Marchinton, R. L., Shea, S. M., and Marchinton, E. M. (1990). Biology of sambar deer on St Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Tall Timbers Research Station Bulletin 25, 1–107.
Likens, G. E., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2011). A strategic plan for an Australian Long-Term Environmental Monitoring Network. Austral Ecology 36, 1–8.
| A strategic plan for an Australian Long-Term Environmental Monitoring Network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, D. B., MacGregor, C., Welsh, A., Donnelly, C., Crane, M., Michael, D., Montague-Drake, R., Cunningham, R. B., Brown, D., Fortescue, M., Dexter, N., Hudson, M., and Gill, A. M. (2008). Contrasting mammal responses to vegetation type and fire. Wildlife Research 35, 395–408.
| Contrasting mammal responses to vegetation type and fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lo, P. (1985) Movements, home ranges and habitat utilisation by sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in Santoft Forest, Manawatu. (New Zealand Forest Service: Palmerston North.)
Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., and Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine 28, 3049–3067.
| The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
| Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ (Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA.)
Mason, E. J. (2008). ‘Secrets of the Sambar: Biology, Ecology, Behaviour and Hunting Strategies. Vol. 2.’ (Shikari Press: Swifts Creek, Vic.)
Mayle, B. A., Peace, A. J., and Gill, R. M. A. (1999). ‘How Many Deer? A Field Guide to Estimating Deer Population Size.’ (Forestry Commission: Edinburgh, UK.)
Menkhorst, P. W. (Ed.) (1995). ‘Mammals of Victoria: Distribution, Ecology and Conservation.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Newsome, A. E., McIlroy, J., and Catling, P. (1975). The effects of an extensive wildfire on populations of twenty ground vertebrates in south-east Australia. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 9, 107–123.
O’Connell, A. F., Nichols, J. D., and Karanth, K. U. (Eds) (2011). ‘Camera Traps in Ecology.’ (Springer-Verlag: Tokyo.)
Pearson, S. M., Turner, M. G., Wallace, L. L., and Romme, W. H. (1995). Winter habitat use by large ungulates following fire in northern Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications 5, 744–755.
Royo, A. A., Collins, R., Adams, M. B., Kirschbaum, C., and Carson, W. P. (2010). Pervasive interactions between ungulate browsers and disturbance promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity. Ecology 91, 93–105.
| Pervasive interactions between ungulate browsers and disturbance promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scientific Advisory Committee. (2007). ‘Final Recommendation on a Nomination for Listing: Reduction in Biodiversity of Native Vegetation by Sambar (Cervus unicolor).’ (Flora and Fauna Guarantee Scientific Advisory Committee: Melbourne.)
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and Van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 64, 583–639.
| Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sutherland, E. F., and Dickman, C. R. (1999). Mechanisms of recovery after fire by rodents in the Australian environment: a review. Wildlife Research 26, 405–419.
| Mechanisms of recovery after fire by rodents in the Australian environment: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Teague, B., McLeod, R., and Pascoe, S. (2010). The fires and the fire-related deaths. Final report. Vol. 1. 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission, Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne.
Thompson, W. L., White, G. C., and Gowan, C. (1998). ‘Monitoring Vertebrate Populations.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)
Van Dyck, S., and Strahan, R. (Eds) (2008). ‘Mammals of Australia.’ 3rd edn. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Whelan, R. J. (1995). ‘The Ecology of Fire.’ (Cambridge University Press: Melbourne.)
