Wildlife and human use of buffer-zone areas in a wildlife sanctuary
Sukanda Jotikapukkana A , Åke Berg A C and Anak Pattanavibool B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A The Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
B Wildlife Conservation Society, Thailand Program, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
C Corresponding author. Email: Ake.Berg@cbm.slu.se
Wildlife Research 37(6) 466-474 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09132
Submitted: 28 September 2009 Accepted: 28 August 2010 Published: 18 October 2010
Abstract
Context.: Buffer zones are supposed to serve the dual purpose of ‘extension buffering’, or an extension of core habitat areas, and ‘socio buffering’ to provide goods and services to humans; however, few studies have evaluated both human use of buffer zones and the occurrence of wildlife.
Aims.: The aim of the present study was to quantify the effects of human disturbance on wildlife by recording the use of the 4-km-wide buffer zone of Huai Kha Kaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (HKKWS), Thailand, by humans and domestic animals.
Methods.: Occurrence of signs of large mammals were recorded along 37 transects and relationships among distance to settlements, human activities, occurrence of domestic animals and different wildlife species were analysed.
Key results.: In total, 210 interviewed respondents from adjacent villages all used the buffer zone, and the transect survey revealed that a large proportion of the plots (71%) were used by humans and/or domestic animals. The frequency of human use decreased linearly with distance from the buffers-zone edge, whereas the use by cattle decreased rapidly at a distance of 2000 m from the buffer-zone edge. In general, the HKKWS buffer zone was a suitable habitat for several wildlife species. Sambar deer and banteng occurred in >25% of the plots. The proportion of plots with signs of sambar deer, banteng and elephant was negatively associated with the proportion of plots with signs of domestic animals, whereas the proportion of plots with signs of common muntjac was negatively associated with the proportion of plots with signs of human activities.
Conclusions.: The results from the present study suggest that the 4-km buffer zone in HKKWS reduces the impact of both humans and domestic animals.
Implications.: The size of human populations, restrictions for grazing domestic animals and habitat quality are suggested to be factors of importance for establishment of well designed buffer zones.
References
Barve, N., Kiran, M. C., Vanaraj, G., Aravind, N. A., Rao, D., Shaanker, R. U., Ganeshaiah, K. N., and Poulsen, J. G. (2005). Measuring and mapping threats to a wildlife sanctuary in southern India. Conservation Biology 19, 122–130.| Measuring and mapping threats to a wildlife sanctuary in southern India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blom, A., van Zalinge, R., Heitköning, I. M. A., and Prins, H. H. T. (2005). Factors influencing distribution of large mammals within a protected central African forest. Oryx 39, 381–388.
| Factors influencing distribution of large mammals within a protected central African forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christensen, M., and Heilman-Clausen, J. (2009). Forest biodiversity gradients and the human impact in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 2205–2221.
| Forest biodiversity gradients and the human impact in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dembéle, F., Picard, N., Karembe, M., and Birnbaum, P. (2006). Tree vegetation patterns along a gradient of human disturbance in the Sahelian area of Mali. Journal of Arid Environments 64, 284–297.
| Tree vegetation patterns along a gradient of human disturbance in the Sahelian area of Mali.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foley, J. A., Asner, G. P., Costa, M. H., Coe, M. T., DeFries, R., Gibbs, H. K., Howard, E. A., Olson, S., Patz, J., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. (2007). Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 25–32.
| Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Francis, C. M. (2001). ‘A Photographic Guide to Mammals of South-east Asia: Including Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Java, Sumatra, Bali and Borneo.’ (Ralph Curtis Books: Sanibel Island, FL.)
Hill, C. M. (1997). Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: the farmer’s perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management 43, 77.
| Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: the farmer’s perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karanth, K. U., and Nichols, J. D. (2002). ‘Monitoring Tigers and their Prey: a Manual for Researchers, Managers, and Conservationists in Tropical Asia.’ (Centre for Wildlife Studies: Bangalore, India.)
Karanth, K. K., Curran, L. M., and Reuning-Scherer, J. D. (2006). Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biological Conservation 128, 147–157.
| Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kumar, R., and Shahabuddin, G. (2005). Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity and composition of forests in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 32, 248–259.
| Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity and composition of forests in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laidlaw, R. K. (2000). Effects of habitat disturbance and protected areas on mammals of Peninsular Malaysia. Conservation Biology 14, 1639–1648.
| Effects of habitat disturbance and protected areas on mammals of Peninsular Malaysia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation 91, 109–117.
| Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewis, S. L. (2006). Tropical forests and the changing earth system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 361, 195–210.
| Tropical forests and the changing earth system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Luoga, E. J., Witkowski, E. T. F., and Balkwill, K. (2002). Harvested and standing wood stocks in protected and communal miombo woodlands in eastern Tanzania. Forest Ecology and Management 164, 15–30.
| Harvested and standing wood stocks in protected and communal miombo woodlands in eastern Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKinnon, J., Mackinnnon, K., Child, G., and Thorsell, J. (1986). ‘Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics.’ (IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas, UNEP: Gland, Switzerland.)
Muchaal, P. K., and Ngandjui, G. (1999). Impact of village hunting on wildlife populations in the Western Dja reserve, Cameroon. Conservation Biology 13, 385–396.
| Impact of village hunting on wildlife populations in the Western Dja reserve, Cameroon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naughton-Treves, L. (1997). Farming the forest fdge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review 87, 27–46.
| Farming the forest fdge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naughton-Treves, L., Treves, A., Chapman, C., and Wrangham, R. (1998). Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 35, 596–606.
| Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ndangalasi, H. J., Bitariho, R., and Dovie, D. B. (2007). Harvesting of non-timber forest products and implications for conservation in two montane forests of East Africa. Biological Conservation 134, 242–250.
| Harvesting of non-timber forest products and implications for conservation in two montane forests of East Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nepal, S., and Weber, K. (1994). A buffer zone for biodiversity conservation: viability of the concept in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park. Environmental Conservation 21, 333–341.
| A buffer zone for biodiversity conservation: viability of the concept in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nyhus, P., and Tilson, R. (2004). Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 104, 87–97.
| Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Brien, T. G., Kinnaird, M. F., and Wibisono, H. T. (2003). Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 6, 131–139.
| Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Office of the National Environment Board (1990). ‘Nomination of Natural Property to the World Heritage List: Thung Yai-Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary.’ (ONEB: Bangkok.)
Pattanavibool, A., and Dearden, P. (2002). Fragmentation and wildlife in montane evergreen forests, northern Thailand. Biological Conservation 107, 155–164.
| Fragmentation and wildlife in montane evergreen forests, northern Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prayurasiddhi, T. (1997). The ecological separation of guar (Bos gaurus) and banteng (Bos javanicus) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Royal Forest Department, Bangkok.
Rajani, M. R. B. (1999). System plan of protected area management in Thailand. Royal Forest Department, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rao, M., Rabinowitz, A., and Khaing, S. T. (2002). Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 16, 360–368.
| Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rawat, G. S. (1997). Conservation status of forests and wildlife in the eastern Ghats, India. Environmental Conservation 24, 307–315.
| Conservation status of forests and wildlife in the eastern Ghats, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmtFKhtA%3D%3D&md5=3bb1147fdca41f1aef79f61cc2f507c3CAS |
Salwasser, H., Schonewald-Cox, C., and Baker, R. (1987). The role of interagency cooperation in managing for viable populations. In ‘Viable Populations for Conservation’. (Ed. M. E. Soulé.) pp. 159–173. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)
Sekhwela, M. B. M. (2003). Woody vegetation resource changes around selected settlements along aridity gradient in the Kalahari, Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments 54, 469–482.
| Woody vegetation resource changes around selected settlements along aridity gradient in the Kalahari, Botswana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shafer, C. L. (1999). US National Park buffer zones: historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environmental Management 23, 49–73.
| US National Park buffer zones: historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9817771PubMed |
Shahabuddin, G., and Kumar, R. (2006). Influence of anthropogenic disturbance on bird communities in a tropical dry forest: role of vegetation structure. Animal Conservation 9, 404–413.
| Influence of anthropogenic disturbance on bird communities in a tropical dry forest: role of vegetation structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh, J. (2002). The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted review. Current Science 82, 638–647.
SPSS (1994). ‘SPSS Standard Version.’ (SPSS: Chigago, IL.)
Srikosamatara, S. (1993). Density and biomass of large herbivores and other mammals in a dry tropical forest, western Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9, 33–43.
| Density and biomass of large herbivores and other mammals in a dry tropical forest, western Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stamps, J. A., Buechner, M., and Krishnan, V. V. (1987). The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. American Naturalist 129, 533–552.
| The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steinmetz, R. (2004). Gaur (Bos gaurus) and Banteng (B. javanicus) in the lowland forest mosaic of Xe Pian Protected Area, Lao PDR: abundance, habitat use, and conservation. Mammalia 68, 141–157.
| Gaur (Bos gaurus) and Banteng (B. javanicus) in the lowland forest mosaic of Xe Pian Protected Area, Lao PDR: abundance, habitat use, and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stræde, S., and Treue, T. (2006). Beyond buffer zone protection: a comparative study of park and buffer zone products’ importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. Journal of Environmental Management 78, 251–267.
| 16171933PubMed |
Stræde, S., Nebel, G., and Rijal, A. (2002). Structure and floristic composition of community forests and their compatibility with villagers’ traditional needs for forest products. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 487–508.
| Structure and floristic composition of community forests and their compatibility with villagers’ traditional needs for forest products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thapa, S., and Chapman, D. S. (2010). Impacts of resource extraction on forest structure and diversity in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 641–649.
| Impacts of resource extraction on forest structure and diversity in Bardia National Park, Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trisurat, Y. (2004). ‘GIS Database and Its Applications in Ecosystem Management.’ Western Forest Complex Ecosystem Management Project. (National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department: Bangkok.)
UNESCO (1974). ‘Task Force on: Criteria and Guidelines for the Choice and Establishment of Biosphere Reserves Organized Jointly by UNESCO and UNEP.’ (UNESCO: Paris.)
Vujakovic, P. (1987). Monitoring extensive ‘buffer zones’ in Africa: an application for satellite imagery. Biological Conservation 39, 195–208.
| Monitoring extensive ‘buffer zones’ in Africa: an application for satellite imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
