Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)

Christine Groom

doi:10.1071/WR09129

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 37(3)

Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)

Christine Groom

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

Species and Communities Branch, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia. Email: christine.groom@dec.wa.gov.au

Wildlife Research 37(3) 183-193 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09129
Submitted: 24 July 2009 Accepted: 12 February 2010 Published: 18 May 2010

Abstract

Context. There are few cases where a species has been removed from a list of threatened species as a result of conservation efforts. One such example is the woylie (also known as the brush-tailed bettong), Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi, which was removed from state (Western Australian), national (Australian) and international lists in 1996, following the successful implementation of the species’ recovery plan. Since downgrading of its conservation status, the woylie has been considered conservation dependent. Conservation efforts continued in the form of toxic baiting to control the species’ principal predator, monitoring to identify trends in distribution and abundance, and translocation to help restore ecosystem function and further secure the conservation status of the species. Recent observations of a decline in abundance of the species have prompted a review of its conservation status.

Aims. To assess the conservation status of the woylie in 2006 against IUCN criteria and to investigate the value of continued conservation efforts following the delisting of the species.

Methods. Monitoring data were collated and parameters required to assess the conservation status of the woylie against IUCN criteria were investigated. The various processes associated with conserving the species, such as translocation and monitoring, were also assessed.

Key results. The species underwent a rapid decline between 2001 and 2006, reducing the population by ~75% to an estimated 10 000 individuals. The decline has not been consistent across occurrences and of particular concern are the declines observed at Perup/Lake Muir, Dryandra and Batalling, which were previously considered amongst the largest and most stable occurrences. In 2006, the species qualified for listing as Endangered using IUCN criteria. The resources allocated to translocation and monitoring the delisted woylie have ultimately resulted in managers being in a much better position to understand and act when an unforeseeable population decline occurred.

Conclusion. Conservation efforts and population monitoring of delisted species must continue at a level where changes in distribution or abundance, which are significant enough to support relisting, can be detected.

Implications. Threatened species lists should not be the primary consideration in allocation of resources to conservation efforts.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Keith Morris for his supervisory and financial support through the Western Australian Government’s Saving Our Species initiative. The efforts of numerous staff and volunteers involved in collecting fauna monitoring information under the Western Shield program are acknowledged and appreciated. Peter Orell maintains the Western Australian databases that were utilised in the study. Amy Mutton prepared the maps. Information and data were kindly provided by Jason van Weenen and Dave Armstrong from the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage and from Joss Bentley and Trish Gardner from the Australian Wildlife Conservancy. Dr Peter Mawson, Associate Professor Mike Calver, Dr Adrian Wayne and three referees commented on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

Abbott, I. (2006). Mammalian faunal collapse in Western Australia, 1975–1925: the hypothesised role of epizootic disease and a conceptual model of its origin, introduction, transmission, and spread. Australian Zoologist 33, 531–561.
Bellchambers K. (2001). Brush-tailed bettong re-introduction and monitoring in the Flinders Ranges National Park and bushbird and emu monitoring in the Flinders Ranges and Gammon Ranges National Parks. A research consultancy prepared for the Department of Environment and Heritage, SA. (Ardeotis Biological Consultants Pty Ltd: Hawker, SA.)

Burbidge, A. A. , and McKenzie, N. L. (1989). Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: causes and conservation implications. Biological Conservation 50, 143–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CALM (1995). ‘Translocation of Threatened Flora and Fauna. Policy Statement No. 29, July 1995.’ (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth.)

Christensen P. , Annels A. , Liddelow G. , and Skinner P. (1985). ‘Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia: A Survey. Forests Department of Western Australia Bulletin 94.’ (Forests Department of Western Australia: Perth.)

Delroy, L. B. , Earl, J. , Radbone, I. , Robinson, A. C. , and Hewett, M. (1986). The breeding and re-establishment of the brush-tailed bettong, Bettongia penicillata, in South Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 13, 387–396.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | de Tores P. (1999). Control and ecology of the red fox in Western Australia – Prey response to 1080 baiting over large areas. 1997–1998 Report to Environment Australia National Feral Animal Control Program. Unpublished report. (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth.)

Department for Environment and Heritage (2006). ‘Island Parks of Western Eyre Peninsula Management Plan.’ (Department for Environment and Heritage: Adelaide.)

Garkaklis, M. J. , Bradley, J. S. , and Wooller, R. D. (1998). The effects of woylie (Bettongia penicillata) foraging on soil water repellency and water infiltration in heavy textured soils in southwestern Australia. Austral Ecology 23, 492–496.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hide A. (2006). Survival and dispersal of the threatened woylie Bettongia penicillata after translocation. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis. University of Western Australia, Perth.

IUCN (1987). ‘IUCN Position Statement on Translocation of Living Organisms: Introductions, Re-introductions and Re-stocking.’ Prepared by the Species Survival Commission in collaboration with the Commission on Ecology, and the Commission on Environmental Policy, Law and Administration. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

IUCN (1994). ‘IUCN Red List Categories.’ Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

IUCN (1995). ‘Guidelines for Re-introductions.’ Prepared by the IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

IUCN (2001). ‘IUCN Red List Categories.’ IUCN Species Survival Commission. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

James, H. , Acharya, A. B. , Taylor, J. A. , and Freak, M. J. (2002). A case of bitten bettongs. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 20, 10–12.
| CAS | PubMed | Kennedy M. (Compiler) (1992). ‘Australasian Marsupials and Monotremes: An Action Plan for Their Conservation.’ (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

Lamont, B. B. , Ralph, C. S. , and Christensen, P. E. S. (1985). Mycophagous marsupials as dispersal agents for ectomycorrhizal fungi on Eucalyptus calophylla and Gastrolobium bilobum. New Phytologist 101, 651–656.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Leftwich T. D. (1983). ‘The Reintroduction of the Woylie (Bettongia penicillata) into a Forest Area.’ (Forests Department: Manjimup, WA.)

Martin S. , Bull S. , and Peeters P. (2006). Reintroduction of the brush-tailed bettong (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) into Lincoln National Park: program review from September 1999 to July 2004. Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide.

Mawson, P. (2004). Translocations and fauna reconstruction sites: Western Shield review – February 2003. Conservation Science Western Australia 5, 122–130.
Maxwell S. , Burbidge A. A. , and Morris K. (1996). ‘The 1996 Action Plan for Australian Marsupials and Monotremes.’ Wildlife Australia Endangered Species Program Project Number 500. (Environment Australia: Canberra.)

Morris K. , Johnson B. , Rooney J. , and Ward C. (2000). The short-term impacts of timber harvesting and associated activities on the abundance of medium-sized mammals in the jarrah forest of Western Australia. In ‘Nature Conservation 5, Conservations in Production Environments: Managing the Matrix’. (Eds J. L. Craig, N. Mitchell and D. A. Saunders.) pp. 60–70. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Murphy, M. T. , Garkaklis, M. J. , and Hardy, G. (2005). Seed caching by woylies Bettongia penicillata can increase sandalwood Santalum spicatum regeneration in Western Australia. Austral Ecology 30, 747–755.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Nelson L. S. , Storr R. F. , and Robinson A. C. (1992). ‘Plan of Management for the Brush-tailed Bettong, Bettongia penicillata Gray 1837 (Marsupialia, Potoroidae), in South Australia.’ National Parks and Wildlife Service. (Department of Environment and Planning: Adelaide.)

O’Donoghue, M. , Boutin, S. , Krebs, C. J. , and Hofer, E. J. (1997). Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 80, 150–162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sampson J. C. (1971). The biology of Bettongia penicillata Gray, 1837. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth.

Shortridge, G. C. (1909). An account of the geographical distribution of the marsupials and monotremes of south-west Australia having special reference to the specimens collected during the Balston Expedition of 1904–1907. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1909, 803–848.
Standards and Petitions Working Group (2006). ‘Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 6.2.’ Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee in December 2006. Available at http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 16 May 2008].

Start A. N. , Burbidge A. A. , and Armstrong D. (1995). ‘Woylie Recovery Plan.’ Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management Wildlife Management Program No. 16. (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth.)

Start, A. N. , Burbidge, A. A. , and Armstrong, D. (1998). A review of the conservation status of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) using IUCN criteria. CALMScience 2, 277–289.
Wayne A. (Ed.) (2008). Progress report on the Woylie Conservation Research Project: diagnosis of recent woylie (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) declines in southwestern Australia: report to the Department of Environment and Conservation Corporate Executive, January 2008. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth. Available at http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/programs/saving-our-species/woylie-conservation-research-project/the-progress-report.html [accessed 24 September 2009].

Wayne A. , Friend T. , Burbidge A. , Morris K. , and van Weenen J. (2008). Bettongia penicillata. In ‘IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1’. Available at www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 22 September 2009].

Wood Jones F. (1925). ‘The Mammals of South Australia.’ (Reprinted 1968). (Government printer: Adelaide.)

Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)

Abstract

Acknowledgements

Subscriber Login