Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR09127
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 37(5)

Belled collars reduce catch of domestic cats in New Zealand by half

J. K. Gordon A , C. Matthaei A and Y. van Heezik A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: Yolanda.vanheezik@stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Wildlife Research 37(5) 372-378 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09127
Submitted: 22 July 2009  Accepted: 31 May 2010   Published: 11 August 2010

Abstract

Context. As evidence accumulates implicating domestic cats as significant predators of urban wildlife, the need for effective mitigation of potentially negative impacts becomes more pressing. Belled collars are probably one of the cheapest and least intrusive methods, although the opinion of a proportion of members of the public in New Zealand is that they are not effective.

Aims. We aimed to determine whether belled collars reduced prey catch.

Methods. Prey caught and brought back home by cats that were regular hunters during 6 weeks when they wore a belled collar was compared with prey caught during 6 weeks when they did not wear a collar.

Key results. Predation of birds and rodents was reduced by 50% and 61%, respectively. The number of rats, lizards and insects was not significantly reduced; however, these constituted a small proportion of the total catch. Sex and age of cats, as well as time did not affect catch rates, with the exception that older cats were more likely to catch rats (Rattus spp.) than were younger cats. Most of the cats in the study were young, reflecting our selection criteria that cats be regular and frequent hunters.

Conclusions. The degree to which catch of birds and rodents was reduced is similar to that reported in two experimental studies in the UK, and confirms that belled collars are effective in the New Zealand environment.

Implications. In New Zealand, small mammals are introduced pests and hunters of native wildlife; predation by cats may regulate their populations in urban areas and so care should be taken when instituting cat-control measures. It is also possible that a 50% reduction in predation may be insufficient to ensure viability for some urban wildlife populations.

Additional keywords: domestic cats, Felis catus, urban birds, urban mammals, wildlife management.


Acknowledgements

Thanks go to all the volunteers who participated in the study, both cats and owners. Bastiaan Star provided advice on study design and statistical analysis and Philip Seddon provided constructive comments.


References

Andersson, M. , and Erlinge, S. (1977). Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos 29, 591–597.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fitzgerald B. M. (1988). Diet of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 123–147. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Fitzgerald, B. M. , and Karl, B. J. (1979). Foods of feral house cats (Felis catus L.) in forest of the Orongorongo Valley, Wellington. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 107–126.
Fitzgerald B. M. , and Turner D. C. (2000). Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. 2nd edn. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp151–175. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Flux, J. E. C. (2007). Seventeen years of predation by one suburban cat in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 34, 289–296.
Grayson J. , and Calver M. (2004). Regulation of domestic cat ownership to protect urban wildlife: a justification based on the precautionary principle. In ‘Urban Wildlife: More Than Meets the Eye’. (Eds D. Lunney and S. Burgin.) pp. 169–178. (Royal Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Grayson, J. , Calver, M. C. , and Styles, I. (2002). Suburban west Australians support most aspects of cat control legislation. Australian Veterinary Journal 80, 536–543.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | King C. M. (1984). ‘Immigrant Killers: Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New Zealand.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Lepczyk, C. A. , Mertig, A. G. , and Liu, J. (2004). Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation 115, 191–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lilith M. , Calver M. , and Garkaklis M. (2008). Roaming habits of pet cats on the suburban fringe in Perth, Western Australia: what size buffer zone is needed to protect wildlife in reserves? In ‘Too Close for Comfort: Contentious Issues I. Human–Wildlife Encounters’. (Eds D. Lunney, A. Munn and W. Meikle.) pp. 65–72. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

McCulloch A. (2009). Ship rat density in urban Dunedin. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Meek, P. D. (1998). Food items brought home by domestic cats Felis catus (L.) living in Booderee National park, Jervis Bay. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 120, 43–47.
Moore S. (2001). Cat confinement – does it work? In ‘Proceedings of the 10th Urban Animal Management Conference, Brisbane.’ Available at http://www.uam.net.au/publications [accessed July 2009].

Morgan, S. A. , Hansen, C. M. , Ross, J. G. , Hickling, G. J. , and Ogilvie, S. C. (2009). Urban cat (Felis catus) movement and predation activity associated with a wetland reserve in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 36, 574–580.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Paton D. C. (1991). Loss of wildlife to domestic cats. In ‘Proceedings of a Workshop on the Impact of Cats on Native Wildlife’. (Ed. C. Potter.) pp. 64–69. (Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service: Canberra.)

Paton D. C. (1993). Impacts of domestic and feral cats on wildlife. In ‘Cat Management Workshop; Proceedings 1993’. (Eds G. Siepen and C. Owens.) pp. 9–15. (Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage: Brisbane.)

Pergl G. (1994). The Sherbrooke cat law – does it work? In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd Urban Animal Management Conference, Canberra’. Available at http://www.uam.net.au/Publications [accessed July 2009].

Robertson, I. D. (1998). Survey of predation by domestic cats. Australian Veterinary Journal 76, 551–554.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Turner D. C. , and Meister O. (1988). Hunting behaviour of the domestic cat. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 111–121. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

van Heezik, Y. , Smyth, A. , Adams, A. , and Gordon, J. (2010). Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations? Biological Conservation 143, 121–130.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woods, M. , McDonald, R. A. , and Harris, S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review 33, 174–188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |