Can translocations be used to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts?
Giovanna Massei A B , Roger J. Quy A , Joanne Gurney A and Dave P. Cowan AA The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York Y041 1 LZ, UK.
B Corresponding author. Email: giovanna.massei@fera.gsi.gov.uk
Wildlife Research 37(5) 428-439 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08179
Submitted: 23 December 2008 Accepted: 3 July 2010 Published: 11 August 2010
Abstract
Growing public concerns about lethal methods to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts place increasing constraints on wildlife management options. Translocations, perceived as humane and non-lethal solutions, are increasingly advocated to resolve these conflicts. The present study summarises the literature on translocations of wild mammals, with particular emphasis on ‘problem’ animals, reviews the impact of translocations on survival, behaviour, animal welfare and potential spread of diseases, and evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of translocations to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts. Translocations may have a detrimental impact on survival rates and lead to extreme dispersal movements. In some species, stress-related capture results in substantial mortality. In other species, homing causes animals to leave the release area. In addition, some animals resume the nuisance behaviour at the release site. Individuals that survive a translocation may suffer from malnutrition, dehydration, decreased immunocompetence and predation. Supportive measures such as acclimatisation pens and provision of food and shelter can drastically reduce post-release dispersal movements and mortality, although the adoption of these measures increases the cost of translocation. Translocations have the potential to spread diseases to conspecifics, humans, domestic animals and livestock. Health surveillance, seldom implemented, is likely to add significantly to the cost of translocation. Very few studies have reported the costs of translocations or addressed which stakeholders are expected to pay for translocating problem animals. Alternative management options are rarely mentioned. Despite the perceived humaneness of translocations to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts, the fate of translocated animals has been rarely monitored. In addition, very few studies have mentioned whether and for how long the conflict was resolved. We suggest that determining whether the translocation leads to the resolution of the problem should be the main criterion to evaluate the success of the translocation of problem animals. We propose a list of criteria to assist decisions regarding the suitability, effectiveness and humaneness of translocations to manage problems posed by wild mammals.
Additional keywords: animal welfare, diseases, problem animals, relocation, soft and hard release, wildlife management.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by Defra under project WM0304. We are grateful to Alistair Ward for comments on the first draft. We also thank four reviewers for suggesting changes that improved the clarity of the manuscript.
Adams, L. W. , Hadidian, J. , and Flyger, V. (2004). Movement and mortality of translocated urban–suburban grey squirrels. Animal Welfare 13, 45–50.
Calenge, C. , Maillard, D. , Invernia, N. , and Gaudin, J.-C. (2005). Reintroduction of roe deer Capreolus capreolus into a Mediterranean habitat: female mortality and dispersion. Wildlife Biology 11, 153–161.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Craven, S. , Barnes, T. , and Kania, G. (1998). Toward a professional position on the translocation of problem wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 171–177.
Jones, D. N. , and Nealson, T. (2003). Management of aggressive Australian magpies by translocation. Wildlife Research 30, 167–177.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kloor, K. (1999). Lynx and biologists try to recover after disastrous start. Science 285, 320–321.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leighton, F. A. (2002). Health risk assessment of the translocation of wild animals. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 21, 187–195.
Miller, S. D. , and Ballard, W. B. (1982). Homing of transplanted Alaskan brown bears. The Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 869–876.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Bryan, M. K. , and McCullough, D. R. (1985). Survival of black-tailed deer following relocation in California. The Journal of Wildlife Management 49, 115–119.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robinette, K. W. , Andelt, W. F. , and Burnham, K. P. (1995). Effect of group-size on survival of relocated prairie dogs. The Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 867–874.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rushton, S. P. , Lurz, P. W. W. , Gurnell, J. , and Fuller, R. (2000). Modelling the spatial dynamics of parapoxvirus disease in red and grey squirrels: a possible cause of the decline of the red squirrel in the UK? Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 997–1012.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Suleman, M. A. , Wango, E. , Sapolsky, R. M. , Odongo, H. , and Hau, J. (2004). Physiologic manifestations of stress from capture and restraint of free-ranging male African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 35, 20–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Wolf, C. M. , Garland, T. , and Griffith, B. (1998). Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation 86, 243–255.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodford, M. H. (1993). International disease implications for wildlife translocation. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24, 265–270.