Factors affecting nest-site selection and nest success of translocated greater sage grouse
Rick J. Baxter A D , Jerran T. Flinders A , David G. Whiting B and Dean L. Mitchell CA Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
B Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
C Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, UT 84114, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: rjb47@hotmail.com
Wildlife Research 36(6) 479-487 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07185
Submitted: 6 December 2007 Accepted: 19 June 2009 Published: 29 September 2009
Abstract
Translocations have been used for decades to restore or augment wildlife populations, yet more often than not, little to no data and/or arbitrary means are used for determining translocation success. The objectives of our study were to describe nesting habitat utilised by the greater sage grouse translocated into an extant population and to identify factors related to nest success, thereby demonstrating the adaptability of the birds to their new environment and producing one measure of long-term translocation success. We trapped female grouse individuals during the spring on and near leks of source populations, fitted them with radio-transmitters, and released them in the morning onto an active lek in an extant population in Strawberry Valley, Utah. We monitored translocated females for nesting activity and documented nesting attempts, nest success, clutch size and embryo viability. Data were recorded on habitat variables associated with nest sites and paired-random sites, including factors known to be important for resident females that nested successfully. We used logistic regression and an a priori information-theoretic approach for modelling nest v. paired-random sites and successful v. unsuccessful nest sites. Our analyses suggested that crown area of the nest shrub and percentage grass cover were the two variables that discriminated between nest and paired-random sites. Females that nested successfully selected sites with more total shrub canopy cover, intermediate size-shrub crown area, aspects other than NW and SE, and steeper slopes than for unsuccessful nests. After being translocated from distant sites with differing habitat characteristics, these birds were able to initiate a nest, nest successfully, and select micro-habitat features similar to those selected by resident sage grouse across the species range. Our results demonstrate the adaptability of the translocated female sage grouse individuals and produce one tangible measure of long-term translocation success.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Brigham Young University, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the USA Forest Service, and Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife for their funding and support. We thank the numerous research assistants and volunteers who collected data. We also thank the private landowners and agency personnel for the cooperation, help, and support of the project. Animals were handled according to the techniques approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Project code: 05-0301) of Brigham Young University.
Aldridge, C. L. , and Brigham, R. M. (2002). Sage grouse nesting and brood habitat use in southern Canada. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 433–444.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baxter, R. J. , Flinders, J. T. , and Mitchell, D. L. (2008). Survival, movements, and reproduction of translocated greater sage-grouse in Strawberry Valley, Utah. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 179–186.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bunnell, K. D. , Flinders, J. T. , Mitchell, D. L. , and Warder, J. H. (2004). Occupied and unoccupied sage grouse habitat in Strawberry Valley, Utah. Journal of Range Management 57, 524–531.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Canfield, R. H. (1941). Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Range Management 39, 388–394.
Connelly, J. W. , and Braun, C. E. (1997). Long-term changes in sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus populations in western North America. Wildlife Biology 3, 229–234.
Connelly, J. W. , Schroeder, M. A. , Sands, A. R. , and Braun, C. E. (2000). Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 967–985.
Dullum, J. L. D. , Foresman, K. R. , and Matchett, M. R. (2005). Efficacy of translocations for restoring populations of black-tailed prairie dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 842–850.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregg, M. A. , Crawford, J. A. , Drut, M. S. , and Delong, A. K. (1994). Vegetational cover and predation of sage grouse nests in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 162–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hagen, C. A. , Pitman, J. C. , Sandercock, B. K. , Robel, R. J. , and Applegate, R. D. (2005). Age-pecific variation in apparent survival rates of male lesser prairie-chickens. The Condor 107, 78–86.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holloran, M. J. , Heath, B. J. , Lyon, A. G. , Slater, S. J. , Kuipers, J. L. , and Anderson, S. H. (2005). Greater sage-grouse nesting habitat selection and success in Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 638–649.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hosmer, D. W. , Hosmer, T. S. , Cessie, L. , and Lemeshow, S. (1997). A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 16, 965–980.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laycock, W. A. , and Conrad, P. A. (1981). Responses to vegetation and cattle to various grazing on seeded and native mountain rangelands in eastern Utah. Journal of Range Management 34, 52–58.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moynahan, B. J. , Lindberg, M. S. , Rotella, J. J. , and Thomas, J. W. (2007). Factors affecting nest survival of greater sage-grouse in Northcentral Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1773–1783.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seddon, P. J. , Armstrong, D. P. , and Maloney, R. F. (2007). Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21, 303–312.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Wakkinen, W. L. , Reese, K. P. , Connelly, J. W. , and Fischer, R. A. (1992). An improved spotlighting technique for capturing sage grouse. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20, 425–426.
Wallestad, R. O. , and Pyrah, D. B. (1974). Movement and nesting of sage grouse hens in central Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 630–633.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, G. C. , and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Suppl.), 120–138.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, R. J. , Drobney, R. D. , and Hallett, D. L. (1992). Survival, dispersal, and site fidelity of wild female ring-necked pheasants following translocation. Journal of Wildlife Management 56, 79–85.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |