Simulation model for contraceptive management of the Assateague Island feral horse population using individual-based data
Jonathan D. Ballou A F , Kathy Traylor-Holzer B , Allison Turner C , Aurelio F. Malo A , David Powell D , Jesus Maldonado A and Lori Eggert EA Center for Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
B IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN 55124, USA.
C Assateague Island National Seashore, National Park Service, Berlin, MD 21811, USA.
D Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460, USA.
E University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: ballouj@si.edu
Wildlife Research 35(6) 502-512 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07124
Submitted: 30 August 2007 Accepted: 18 March 2008 Published: 22 October 2008
Abstract
The National Park Service (NPS) manages a culturally significant population of feral horses (Equus caballus) inhabiting the Maryland portion of Assateague Island, a barrier island in the eastern United States. Rapid growth of this population over the past few decades from 28 to 166 horses negatively impacts native species and ecological processes on the island. Since 1994, contraception via porcine zona pellucida vaccine has been used to control horse numbers, although herd reduction has been slower than initially expected, leading NPS to consider other management options. An individual-based stochastic simulation model was developed using the Vortex software program to examine the effects of different management strategies on the population. Data from the managed population were used to populate the model parameters. Model projections over the next 50 years using current management practices show an average rate of population decline of 13% per year, suggesting that the population will reach the management target of 80–100 horses in 5–8 years. The effectiveness of contraception to reduce the herd and maintain it at various target sizes of 20–100 horses was also assessed. The accumulation of inbreeding at each target population size was also modelled.
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Zimmerman and M. Sturm for information about the ASIS horse population and J. Kirkpatrick for valuable comments and suggestions on the modelling and manuscript. The manuscript was improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers.
De Stoppelaire, G. H. , and Gillespie, T. W. (2004). Use of remote sensing techniques to determine the effects of grazing on vegetation cover and dune elevation at Assateague Island National Seashore: impact of horses. Environmental Management 34, 642–649.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Garrott, R. A. (1991). Feral horse fertility control potential and limitations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19, 52–58.
Kirkpatrick, J. F. , and Turner, A. (2002). Reversibility of action and safety during pregnancy of immunizing against porcine zona pellucida in wild mares (Equus caballus). Reproduction Supplement 06, 197–202.
MacCluer, J. W. , VandeBerg, J. L. , Read, B. , and Ryder, O. A. (1986). Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biology 5, 147–160.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ralls, K. , Ballou, J. D. , and Templeton, A. R. (1988). Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conservation Biology 2, 185–193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner, A. , and Kirkpatrick, J. F. (2002). Effects of immunocontraception on population, longevity and body condition in wild mares (Equus caballus). Reproduction Supplement 60, 187–195.
| CAS |
Zhang, Z. (2000). Mathematical models of wildlife management by contraception. Ecological Modelling 132, 105–113.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |