Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer

Paul M. Dolman A B and Kristin Wäber A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

B Corresponding author. Email: p.dolman@uea.ac.uk

Wildlife Research 35(3) 202-214 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07114
Submitted: 15 August 2007  Accepted: 31 March 2008   Published: 20 May 2008

Abstract

Numerous deer species have been introduced beyond their native range into ecosystems around the world. Their economic value leads to further accidental and deliberate releases and lack of control is contributing to range expansion in Australia, South America and Europe. Despite localised or regional concern, the scale and generality of detrimental impacts have not been widely recognised. We review the direct and indirect impacts on ecosystems and evidence for interspecific effects on native deer. In New Zealand, where large herbivores were previously absent, severe and novel impacts have been found in susceptible forests. Even where ecosystems contain native deer, invasion by taxonomically exotic deer species carries the risk of cascade effects on spatial plant dynamics and forest composition. In Patagonia, introduced deer have disrupted forest composition, whereas in Europe, ecosystem impacts of introduced species can differ from those of over-abundant native deer. Introduced Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) within a coniferous forestry landscape in eastern England differ from native European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in their distribution of herbivory among differing habitats, and provide much lower rates of endozoochorous seed dispersal. Frequent concern is expressed that introduced deer species may have detrimental effects on native deer and other ungulates, although potential epidemiological effects have not been investigated. Apparent competition, with introduced prey resulting in increased predation rates on native deer, may be occurring between South American huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) and southern pudu (Pudu puda). Habitat and dietary overlap is often substantial among native and introduced ungulates, including deer, and exploitation competition is likely. Evidence includes spatial responses of native to non-native deer and negatively correlated changes in population abundance, but demographic mechanisms have not been demonstrated previously. In a coniferous forestry landscape in eastern England, substantial habitat and dietary overlap occurs between native roe deer and high-density introduced Chinese muntjac. This roe deer population has shown a reduction in body weight and fertility following establishment and increasing abundance of non-native Chinese muntjac, compatible with interspecific competition. European roe deer also appear susceptible to competition from larger grazing deer, including native red deer (Cervus elaphus) and introduced fallow (Dama dama). The widely introduced fallow deer may be a particularly effective competitor in sympatry with intermediate or concentrate feeders. There is need for further investigation of potential interactions of introduced and native deer species, and a wider recognition of the ecological impacts of introduced deer.

Additional keywords: dietary overlap, endozoochory, habitat impacts, interspecific competition, invasive species, niche overlap, seed dispersal.


Acknowledgements

We thank Piran White and an anonymous referee for valuable suggestions during the development of this paper.


References

Albon, S. D. , Clutton-Brock, T. H. , and Guinness, F. E. (1987). Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II. Density-independent effects and cohort variation. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 69–82.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Chapman D., and Chapman N. (1975). ‘Fallow Deer: Their History, Distribution and Biology.’ (Terence Dalton: Laverham.)

Chapman, N. (1993). Deer in East Anglia. Transactions of the Suffolk Natural History Society 29, 117–127.
Clutton-Brock T. H., and Albon S. D. (1989). ‘Red Deer in the Highlands.’ (Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford.)

Clutton-Brock, T. H. , Major, M. , and Guinness, F. E. (1985). Population regulation in male and female red deer. Journal of Animal Ecology 54, 831–846.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Corbet G. B. (1978). ‘The Mammals of the Palearctic Region: A Taxonomic Review.’ (British Museum (Natural History): London.)

Corbet G. B., and Harris S. (1991). ‘Handbook of British Mammals.’ 3rd edn. (Blackwell Scientific: Oxford.)

Danilkin A. A. (1996). ‘Siberian and European Roe Deer.’ (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Delap, P. (1955). Roe deer and fallow. Oryx 3, 38–39.
Eldridge W., MacNamara M., and Pacheco N. (1987). Activity patterns and habitat utilization of Pudus (Pudu puda) in south-central Chile. In ‘Biology and Management of the Cervidae’. (Ed. C. M. Wemmer.) pp. 352–370. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)

Eycott, A. E. , Watkinson, A. R. , and Dolman, P. M. (2006a). Plant diversity in clearfell forest: ecological patterns and management effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 1160–1171.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forde P. (1989). Comparative ecology of muntjac and roe deer in a commercial coniferous forest. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol.

Forsyth, D. M. , and Hickling, G. U. (1998). Increasing Himalayan tahr and decreasing chamois densities in the eastern Southern Alps, New Zealand: evidence for interspecific competition. Oecologia 113, 377–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Harding S. P. (1986). ‘Aspects of the ecology and social organisation of the muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford.

Hearney, A. W. , and Jennings, T. J. (1983). Annual foods of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in east of England. Journal of Zoology 201, 565–570.
Hemami M. R. (2003). The ecology of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in a forested landscape in eastern England. Ph.D. Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Hemami, M. R. , Watkinson, A. R. , and Dolman, P. M. (2004). Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 194, 49–60.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | IUCN (2007). ‘2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ (IUCN: Gland.)

Jaksic, F. M. (1998). Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1427–1445.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Langbein J., and Chapman N. (2002). ‘Fallow Deer.’ (The Mammal Society and the British Deer Society: London.)

Latham, J. , Staines, B. W. , and Gorman, M. L. (1996). The relative densities of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer and their relationship in Scottish plantation forests. Journal of Zoology 240, 285–299.
Lever C. (1985). ‘Naturalised Mammals of the World.’ (Longman: London.)

Lin, Y. C. , James, R. , and Dolman, P. M. (2007). Conservation of heathland ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): the value of lowland coniferous plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 1337–1358.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mouissie A. M. (2004). Seed dispersal by large herbivores: Implications for the restoration of plant biodiversity. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands.

Myers, J. A. , Vellend, M. , Gardesc, S. , and Marks, P. L. (2004). Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139, 35–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Nowak R. M. (1999). ‘Walkers Mammals of the World. Volume II.’ (John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)

Nugent, G. , Fraser, W. , and Sweetapple, P. (2001). Top down or bottom up? Comparing the impacts of introduced arboreal possums and ‘terrestrial’ ruminants on native forests in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 99, 65–79.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Osborne P. L. (1993). Wetlands of Papua New Guinea. In ‘Wetlands of the World: Inventory, Ecology and Management. Vol. I’. (Eds D. F. Whigham, D. Dykjová and S. Hejný.) pp. 305–344. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

Pakeman, R. J. , Digneffe, G. , and Small, J. L. (2002). Ecological correlates of endozoochory by herbivores. Functional Ecology 16, 296–304.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Prins H. H. T., and Olff H. (1998). Species-richness of African grazer assemblages: towards a functional explanation. In ‘Dynamics of Tropical Communities. The 37th Symposium of the British Ecological Society’. (Eds D. M. Newberry, H. H. T. Prins and N. D. Brown.) (Blackwell Science: London.)

Putman, R. J. (1986a). Competition and coexistence in a multi-species grazing system. Acta Theriologica 31, 271–291.
Putman R. J. (1996). ‘Competition and Resource Partitioning in Temperate Ungulate Assemblies.’ (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Putman R. J., and Langbein J. (1992). Effects of stocking density, feeding and herd management on mortality of park deer. In ‘Biology of Deer’. (Ed R. Brown.) pp. 180–188. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Putman, R. J. , Edwards, P. J. , Mann, J. E. E. , Howe, R. C. , and Hill, S. D. (1989). Vegetational and faunal change in an area of heavily grazed woodland following relief of grazing. Biological Conservation 47, 13–32.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rau J. R., Martinez D. R., and Munoz-Pedreros A. (1995). Trophic ecology of pumas in southern South America. In ‘Integrating people and wildlife for a sustainable future. Proceedings of the first International Wildlife Mangement Congress’. (Eds J. A. Bissonette and P. R. Krausman.) pp. 602–604. (WCS: Bethesda, MD.)

Relva, M. A. , and Veblen, T. T. (1998). Impacts of introduced large herbivores on Austrocedrus chilensis forests in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Forest Ecology and Management 108, 27–40.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | SCI (2006). ‘Introduced Deer (North America).’ (Safari Club International: Tucson, AZ.)

Smit, R. , Bokdam, J. , den-Ouden, J. , Olff, H. , Schot-Opschoor, H. , and Schrijvers, M. (2001). Effects of introduction and exclusion of large herbivores on small rodent communities. Plant Ecology 155, 119–127.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ueckermann E., and Hansen P. (1994). ‘Das Damwild.’ (Verlag Paul Parey: Hamburg.)

Vázquez, D. P. (2002). Multiple effects of introduced mammalian herbivores in a temperate forest. Biological Invasions 4, 175–191.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wemmer C. (1998). ‘Deer – Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan.’ (IUCN: Gland.)

Wiles, G. J. , Buden, D. W. , and Worthington, D. J. (1999). History of introduction, population status, and management of Philippine deer (Cervus mariannus) on Micronesian Islands. Mammalia 63, 193–215.


Wilson, D. J. , Ruscoe, W. A. , Burrows, L. E. , McElrea, L. M. , and Choquenot, D. (2006). An experimental study of the impacts of understorey forest vegetation and herbivory by red deer and rodents on seedling establishment and species composition in Waitutu Forest, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 30, 191–207.


Wright, L. J. , Hoblyn, R. A. , Sutherland, W. J. , and Dolman, P. M. (2007). Reproductive success of Woodlarks Lullula arborea in traditional and recently colonised habitats. Bird Study 54, 315–323.


Zörner, H. (1986). Untersuchungen zur Ernährung des Damwildes in einem Laubwaldrevier. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 14, 139–154.