
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Hobbs, Trevor J. 
A1  - James, Craig D. 
T1  - Influence of shade covers on pitfall trap temperatures and capture success of reptiles and small mammals in arid Australia
JF  - Wildlife Research
JO  - Wildl. Res.
Y1  - 1999
VL  - 26
IS  - 3
SP  - 341
EP  - 349
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98032 
N2  - Shade covers for pitfall traps can be used to reduce the amount of solar radiation penetrating to the bottom of pitfall buckets, thereby reducing the number of captured animals dying from heat-stress. We tested the effectiveness of a variety of shade covers for reducing temperatures in pitfalls and trap mortality of small vertebrates, and examined the effect of one cover design on trap success in arid landscapes. Shade covers made of insulation foil were found to reduce core pitfall temperatures by 20&#8211;22&#x02DA;C compared with uncovered buckets, which reached temperatures greater than 66&ordm;C. Other cover types tested (plastic lid or cardboard) were found to be less effective: core bucket temperatures still reached 48&#8211;53&ordm;C. While foil covers do reduce temperatures and therefore the probability of heat-stress-related mortality, above-ground foil covers also influence trap success. Traps with above-ground foil covers caught 39&#8211;43% fewer small vertebrates and 7&#8211;42% fewer species than uncovered traps. Above-ground foil covers had the greatest influence on the sampled abundance of scincid lizards (reduced by 50&#8211;52%), reduced the sampled abundance of most other lizard families and mammals, but increased capture success for snakes. If shade covers are required to minimise heat stress and mortality in pitfall buckets we recommend foil covers placed inside the bottom pitfall buckets as they significantly reduce pitfall temperatures and are likely to have minimal influence on trap success. However, regular checking of traps is still one of the most reliable ways to reduce heat-stress- related and other deaths in pitfall traps. 
ER  -

