
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Yao, K. A. 
A1  - Bitty, E. A. 
A1  - Kassé, K. B. 
A1  - Kouakou, Y. C. 
A1  - Yaokokoré-Beibro, K. H. 
A1  - Bi, S. Gonedelé 
A1  - McGraw, W. Scott 
T1  - <i>Corrigendum to</i>: Distribution and relative abundance of forest duikers in Dassioko Sud Forest Reserve (coastal C&#xf4;te d'Ivoire)
JF  - Wildlife Research
JO  - Wildl. Res.
Y1  - 2018
VL  - 45
IS  - 2
SP  - 194
EP  - 194
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17068_CO 
N2  - Context Duikers play a vital role in maintaining forest ecosystems, as both seed dispersers and prey. In West Africa, duikers are also an important source of food and income; however, it is likely that some species are now being hunted at unsustainable levels. So as to contribute to duiker conservation, we used line-transect data and additional information on dung and track counts to estimate relative abundance and establish distribution patterns of forest duikers in C&#xf4;te d'Ivoire's Dassioko Sud Forest Reserve (DSFR), a poorly known, remnant coastal rainforest. We also collected basic information on hunting pressure.   Methods Forest duiker counts were made twice per month from July 2013 to March 2014 on six line transects of varying lengths (5.6&#x2013;6.7km) and in different regions of the DSFR, representing different habitat types. The number of sightings per kilometre walked, defined as &#x2018;encounter rate', was used to compute an index of relative abundance. We recorded all evidence of poachers and used these data to generate a poaching index (# poaching signs per kilometre) for different habitat types.   Key results The DSFR has lost three of seven total forest duiker species and populations of the four remaining species are declining. Encounter rates were greatest for Philantomba maxwellii (0.46 indices km&#x2013;1) and accounted for 68% of total encounters. Cephalophus niger, C. dorsalis and C. silvicultor were encountered at similar (0.07 indices km&#x2013;1) but much lower rates. For all species, mean encounter rates were highest in degraded forest (0.38&#x2013;0.73 indices km&#x2013;1), followed by secondary (0.2&#x2013;0.44 indices km&#x2013;1) and primary (0.19&#x2013;0.44 indices km&#x2013;1) forest.   Conclusions Of the four forest duiker species still present in the DSFR, the black, bay and yellow-backed duikers are the most affected by anthropogenic pressures. Duiker abundance in the DSFR varies with habitat type. This variation is apparently influenced by differences in forest structure, poaching pressure and proximity to villages.   Implications The study provides baseline data for future managing of ungulate populations in the DSFR. We recommend that a biomonitoring study of duiker populations be initiated immediately to help determine population trends, investigate habitat preferences, and help curb illegal hunting activities in this important forest reserve. 
ER  -

