Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relationship between earthworm abundance, ecological diversity and soil function in pastures

N. L. Schon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-1382 A * , P. M. Fraser B and A. D. Mackay C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

B Plant & Food Research, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

C AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: Nicole.schon@agresearch.co.nz

Handling Editor: Nick Dickinson

Soil Research 59(8) 767-777 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20273
Submitted: 25 September 2020  Accepted: 17 May 2021   Published: 29 September 2021

© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Earthworms contribute to a wide range of process that underpin soil function and ecosystem services and are an important component of a soil’s natural capital stocks. With increasing interest in soil health, it is important to better understand the type of earthworm community required to enhance soil functions. This is of particular interest in New Zealand where pasture systems are dominated by exotic earthworm species and low ecological diversity. Two separate mesocosm experiments were established to explore the interaction between earthworm abundance and ecological diversity as it influences soil functions. Experimental increases in earthworm abundance increased soil macroporosity and water infiltration, increased plant nitrogen (N) and plant growth. Although some benefits were observed at the lowest earthworm abundances, the greatest benefits were seen at the higher abundances. Earthworm ecological diversity is also critical to ensure soil functions are optimised. For example, the single species of Aporrectodea caliginosa alone was not able to improve water infiltration or pasture production. However, when this species was found in combination with Aporrectodea longa, there was positive influence on soil functions despite the abundance of A. longa itself not increasing. This study highlights the importance of including a measure of ecological diversity alongside a measure of abundance to assess soil biological health.

Keywords: biological indicator, earthworm abundance, earthworm ecological groups, ecosystem services, mesocosms, plant growth, soil health, water infiltration.


References

Andriuzzi WS, Schmidt O, Brussaard L, Faber JH, Bolger T (2016) Earthworm functional traits and interspecific interactions affect plant nitrogen acquisition and primary production. Applied Soil Ecology 104, 148–156.
Earthworm functional traits and interspecific interactions affect plant nitrogen acquisition and primary production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker GH, Carter PJ, Barrett VJ (1999) Influence of earthworms, Aporrectodea spp. (Lumbricidae), on pasture production in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1247–1257.
Influence of earthworms, Aporrectodea spp. (Lumbricidae), on pasture production in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barot S, Ugolini A, Brikci FB (2007) Nutrient cycling efficiency explains the long-term effect of ecosystem engineers on primary production. Functional Ecology 21, 1–10.
Nutrient cycling efficiency explains the long-term effect of ecosystem engineers on primary production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bhadauria T, Saxena KG (2010) Role of earthworms in soil fertility maintenance through the production of biogenic structures. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2010, 816073
Role of earthworms in soil fertility maintenance through the production of biogenic structures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, et al. (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science 64, 161–182.
A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bottinelli N, Hedde M, Jouquet P, Capowiez Y (2020) An explicit definition of earthworm ecological categories – Marcel Bouché’s triangle revisited. Geoderma 372, 114361
An explicit definition of earthworm ecological categories – Marcel Bouché’s triangle revisited.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bouché MB (1977) Strategies lombriciennes. In ‘Soil organisms as components of ecosystems’, vol. 25. (Eds U Lohm, T Persson) pp. 122–133. (Ecological Bulletins: Stockholm, Sweden)

Bouché MB, Al-Addan F (1997) Earthworms, water infiltration and soil stability: some new assessments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 441–452.
Earthworms, water infiltration and soil stability: some new assessments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyle KE, Curry JP, Farrell EP (1997) Influence of earthworms on soil properties and grass production in reclaimed cutover peat. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25, 20–26.
Influence of earthworms on soil properties and grass production in reclaimed cutover peat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Breure AM, Mulder C, Rutgers M, Schouten AJ, Wijnen HJv (2004) Belowground biodiversity as an indicator for sustainability of soil use. Land use systems in grassland dominated regions. In ‘Proceedings of the 20th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Luzern, Switzerland, 21–24 June 2004’, pp. 195–197. Available at https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20053181523

Brown GG, Edwards CA, Brussaard L (2004) How earthworms affect plant growth: burrowing into the mechanisms. In ‘Earthworm ecology’. (Ed. CA Edwards) pp. 13–49. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Bünemann EK, Bongiorno G, Bai Z, et al. (2018) Soil quality – a critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 120, 105–125.
Soil quality – a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cameron EK, Cahill JF, Bayne EM (2014) Root foraging influences plant growth responses to earthworm foraging. PLoS One 9, e108873
Root foraging influences plant growth responses to earthworm foraging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25268503PubMed |

Curry JP (1987) The invertebrate fauna of grassland and its influence on productivity. 2. Factors affecting the abundance and composition of the fauna. Grass and Forage Science 42, 197–212.
The invertebrate fauna of grassland and its influence on productivity. 2. Factors affecting the abundance and composition of the fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Curry JP (1994) ‘Grassland invertebrates: ecology, influence on soil fertility, and effects on plant growth’. p. 437. (Chapman & Hall: New York, NY, USA)

Curry JP, Doherty P, Purvis G, Schmidt O (2008) Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland. Applied Soil Ecology 39, 58–64.
Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Danielson RE, Sutherland PL (1986) Porosity. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods’. SSSA book series 5. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 443–461. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Domínguez J, Bohlen PJ, Parmelee RW (2004) Earthworms increase nitrogen leaching to greater soil depths in row crop agroecosystems. Ecosystems 7, 672–685.
Earthworms increase nitrogen leaching to greater soil depths in row crop agroecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In ‘Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment: proceedings of a symposium, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 4–5 November 1992’. (Eds J Doran, D Coleman, D Bezdicek, B Stewart) pp. 3–21. (SSSA). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1

Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology 15, 3–11.
Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edwards CA (2004) ‘Earthworm ecology’. p. 441. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) ‘Biology and ecology of earthworms’. p. 426. (Chapman & Hall: London, UK)

Edwards WM, Shipitalo MJ, Owens LB, Norton LD (1989) Water and nitrate movement in earthworm burrows within long-term no-till cornfields. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44, 240–243.

Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ, Linden DR, Subler S (1995) Earthworms in agroecosystems. In ‘Earthworm ecology and biogeography in North America’. (Ed. PF Hendrix) pp. 185–213. (Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Flohre A, Rudnick M, Traser G, Tscharntke T, Eggers T (2011) Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs simple landscapes? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 141, 210–214.
Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs simple landscapes?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Francis GS, Fraser PM (1998) The effects of three earthworm species on soil macroporosity and hydraulic conductivity. Applied Soil Ecology 10, 11–19.
The effects of three earthworm species on soil macroporosity and hydraulic conductivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hallam J, Hodson ME (2020) Impact of different earthworm ecotypes on water stable aggregates and soil water holding capacity. Biology and Fertility of Soils 56, 607–617.
Impact of different earthworm ecotypes on water stable aggregates and soil water holding capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haynes RJ, Fraser PM (1998) A comparison of aggregate stability and biological activity in earthworm casts and uningested soil as affected by amendment with wheat or Lucerne straw. European Journal of Soil Science 49, 629–636.
A comparison of aggregate stability and biological activity in earthworm casts and uningested soil as affected by amendment with wheat or Lucerne straw.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haynes RJ, Fraser PM, Piercy JE, Tregurtha RJ (2003) Casts of Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny) and Lumbricus rubellus (Hoffmeister) differ in microbial activity, nutrient availability and aggregate stability. Pedobiologia 47, 882–887.
Casts of Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny) and Lumbricus rubellus (Hoffmeister) differ in microbial activity, nutrient availability and aggregate stability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hewitt AE (1993) ‘New Zealand soil classification’. p. 131. (Manaaki-Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand)

Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373–386.
Organisms as ecosystem engineers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Józefowska A, Woźnica K, Sokołowska J, Sochan A, Zaleski T, Ryżak M, Bieganowski A (2021) Stability of aggregates made by earthworms in soils with organic additives. Agronomy 11, 421
Stability of aggregates made by earthworms in soils with organic additives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeney DR, Bremner JM (1966) Characterization of mineralizable nitrogen in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 30, 714–719.
Characterization of mineralizable nitrogen in soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laakso J, Setälä H, Palojarvi A (2000) Influence of decomposer food web structure and nitrogen availability on plant growth. Plant and Soil 225, 153–165.
Influence of decomposer food web structure and nitrogen availability on plant growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laossi KR, Ginot A, Noguera DC, Blouin M, Barot S (2010) Earthworm effects on plant growth do not necessarily decrease with soil fertility. Plant and Soil 328, 109–118.
Earthworm effects on plant growth do not necessarily decrease with soil fertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee KE (1961) Interactions between native and introduced earthworms. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 8, 60–62.

Lee KE, Foster RC (1991) Soil fauna and soil structure. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 745–775.
Soil fauna and soil structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee KE, Pankhurst CE (1992) Soil organisms and sustainable productivity. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 855–892.
Soil organisms and sustainable productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lubbers IM, van Groenigen JW (2013) A simple and effective method to keep earthworms confined to open-top mesocosms. Applied Soil Ecology 64, 190–193.
A simple and effective method to keep earthworms confined to open-top mesocosms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lubbers IM, Brussaard L, Otten W, van Groenigen JW (2011) Earthworm-induced N mineralization in fertilized grassland increases both N2O emission and crop-N uptake. European Journal of Soil Science 62, 152–161.
Earthworm-induced N mineralization in fertilized grassland increases both N2O emission and crop-N uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsen SR, Cole CV, Wanatabe FS, Dean LA (1954) ‘Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium hydrogen carbonate’. Circular, no. 939, 19 pp. (US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA)

Paoletti MG (1999) The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74, 137–155.
The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paul BK, Lubbers IM, van Groenigen JW (2012) Residue incorporation depth is a controlling factor of earthworm-induced nitrous oxide emissions. Global Change Biology 18, 1141–1151.
Residue incorporation depth is a controlling factor of earthworm-induced nitrous oxide emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rizhiya E, Bertora C, van Vliet PCJ, Kuikman PJ, Faber JH, van Groenigen JW (2007) Earthworm activity as a determinant for N2O emission from crop residue. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39, 2058–2069.
Earthworm activity as a determinant for N2O emission from crop residue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Römbke J, Jansch S, Didden W (2005) The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 62, 249–265.
The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15922446PubMed |

Schon NL, Mackay AD, Minor MA, Yeates GW, Hedley MJ (2008) Soil fauna in grazed New Zealand hill country pastures at two management intensities. Applied Soil Ecology 40, 218–228.
Soil fauna in grazed New Zealand hill country pastures at two management intensities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schon NL, Mackay AD, Minor MA (2011) Earthworms in New Zealand sheep- and dairy-grazed pastures with focus on anecic Aporrectodea longa. Pedobiologia 54, S131–137.
Earthworms in New Zealand sheep- and dairy-grazed pastures with focus on anecic Aporrectodea longa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schon NL, Mackay AD, Minor MA (2012) Relationship between food resource, soil physical condition and invertebrates in pastoral soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76, 1644–1654.
Relationship between food resource, soil physical condition and invertebrates in pastoral soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schon NL, Mackay AD, Gray RA, Dodd MB, van Koten C (2015) Quantifying dung carbon incorporation by earthworms in pasture soils. European Journal of Soil Science 66, 348–358.
Quantifying dung carbon incorporation by earthworms in pasture soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schon NL, Bartlam S, Deakin EL, Gray RA, Mackay AD, van Koten C (2017) Do exotic earthworms invade New Zealand native forests? New Zealand Natural Sciences Journal 42, 6–17.

Schon NL, Mackay AD, Gray RA, van Koten C, Dodd MB (2017) Influence of earthworm abundance and diversity on soil structure and the implications for soil services throughout the season. Pedobiologia 62, 41–47.
Influence of earthworm abundance and diversity on soil structure and the implications for soil services throughout the season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schon NL, Curtin D, Beare MH, Mackay AD, Gray RA, Dodd MB, van Koten C (2020) Earthworm induced transfer of dung-carbon into soil particle size fractions. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 63, 551–558.
Earthworm induced transfer of dung-carbon into soil particle size fractions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sharpley AN, Syers JK (1976) Potential role of earthworm casts for the phosphorus enrichment of run-off waters. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 8, 341–346.
Potential role of earthworm casts for the phosphorus enrichment of run-off waters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shepherd TG (2000) ‘Visual soil assessment. Volume 1. Field guide for cropping and pastoral grazing on flat to rolling country’. (horizons.mw and Landcare Research: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

Shuster WD, McDonald LP, McCartney DA, Parmelee RW, Studer NS, Stinner BR (2002) Nitrogen source and earthworm abundance affected runoff volume and nutrient loss in a tilled-corn agroecosystem. Biology & Fertility of Soils 35, 320–327.
Nitrogen source and earthworm abundance affected runoff volume and nutrient loss in a tilled-corn agroecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith E (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of preferential flow in a subsurface-drained landscape in North-Central Iowa. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Springett JA (1983) Effect of five species of earthworm on some soil properties. Journal of Applied Ecology 20, 865–872.
Effect of five species of earthworm on some soil properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Springett JA (1992) Distribution of lumbricid earthworms in New Zealand. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24, 1377–1381.
Distribution of lumbricid earthworms in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Springett J, Gray R (1997) The interaction between plant roots and earthworm burrows in pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 621–625.
The interaction between plant roots and earthworm burrows in pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stockdill SMJ (1982) Effects of introduced earthworms on the productivity of New Zealand pastures. Pedobiologia 24, 281–299.

Syers JK, Springett JA (1983) Earthworm ecology in grassland soils. In ‘Earthworm ecology: from Darwin to vermiculture’. (Ed. JE Satchell) pp. 67–83. (Chapman & Hall: London, UK). 10.1007/978-94-009-5965-1_7

van Groenigen JW, Lubbers IM, Vos HMJ, Brown GG, De Deyn GB, van Groenigen KJ (2014) Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 4, 6365
Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25219785PubMed |

van Groenigen JW, van Groenigen KJ, Koopmans GF, Stokkermans L, Vos HMJ, Lubbers IM (2019) How fertile are earthworm casts? A meta-analysis. Geoderma 338, 525–535.
How fertile are earthworm casts? A meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |