Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Sulfate sorption measured by a buffering index over a range of properties of soils from south Western Australia

G. C. Anderson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-1600
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, PO Box 483, Northam, WA 6401, Australia. Email: geoff.anderson@dpird.wa.gov.au

Soil Research 58(7) 651-661 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20005
Submitted: 6 January 2020  Accepted: 1 July 2020   Published: 30 July 2020

Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY

Abstract

Sulfate sorption by the soil affects the rate of sulfate leaching, which impacts on the availability of soil sulfate for plant uptake. In Australia, plant-available sulfur is measured using 0.25 M KCl heated for 3 h at 40°C to extract soil sulfur (SKCl40). This paper describes a technique referred to as a sulfate buffering index (SBI), which provides a measurement of sulfate sorption. SBI when combined with the estimates of the q and b parameters of the Freundlich equation, can be used to define a sorption curve. The equation is S = acb – q; where S is the amount of sulfate adsorbed (mg S kg–1), c is the equilibrium concentration of sulfate measured in solution (mg S L–1) and a, b and q are coefficients that describe the soil sulfate sorption curve. Coefficients S and c were measured using six sulfate solution concentrations ranging from 0 to 250 mg S kg–1. The adsorption curve was fitted using the modified Freundlich equation including setting of b = 0.41 and q = SKCl40 using recently collected soil samples. The modified Freundlich a coefficient or SBI was calculated as SBI = (S + SKCl40)/c0.41; where S and c were determined using 50 mg S kg–1 of added sulfate. The SBI ranged within 1–40. The SKCl40 was related to SBI below a depth of 10 cm (r2 = 0.71) but not for the 0–10 cm soil layer where S sorption was minimal.

Additional keywords: crop management, leaching.


References

Allen DG, Barrow NJ, Bolland MDA (2001) Comparing simple methods for measuring phosphate sorption by soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 1433–1442.
Comparing simple methods for measuring phosphate sorption by soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson GC, Lefroy RDB, Chinoim N, Blair GJ (1992) Soil sulfur testing. Sulfur in Agriculture 16, 6–14.

Anderson GC, Fillery IRP, Ripper FH, Leach BJ (2006) Sulfur mineralisation in a coarse-textured soil after different sulfate fertilisation histories and yield responses of wheat and lupin. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 165–174.
Sulfur mineralisation in a coarse-textured soil after different sulfate fertilisation histories and yield responses of wheat and lupin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson GC, Peverill K, Brennan R (2013) Soil sulfur – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 64, 523–530.
Soil sulfur – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asseng S, Fillery IRP, Dunin FX, Keating BA, Meinke H (2001) Potential deep drainage under wheat crops in a Mediterranean climate. 1. Temporal and spatial variability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 45–56.
Potential deep drainage under wheat crops in a Mediterranean climate. 1. Temporal and spatial variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (1967) Studies on extraction and on availability to plants of adsorded plus soluble sulfate. Soil Science 104, 242–249.
Studies on extraction and on availability to plants of adsorded plus soluble sulfate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (1978) The description of phosphate adsorption curves. Journal of Soil Science 29, 447–462.
The description of phosphate adsorption curves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (1983) A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. Journal of Soil Science 34, 733–750.
A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (2000) Towards a single-point method for measuring phosphate sorption by soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 1099–1113.
Towards a single-point method for measuring phosphate sorption by soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (2008) The description of sorption curves. European Journal of Soil Science 59, 900–910.
The description of sorption curves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ, Debnath A (2015) Effect of phosphate status and pH on sulphate sorption and desorption. European Journal of Soil Science 66, 286–297.
Effect of phosphate status and pH on sulphate sorption and desorption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blair GJ, Chinoim N, Lefroy RDB, Anderson GC, Crocker GJ (1991) A soil sulfur test for pasture and crops. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 619–629.
A soil sulfur test for pasture and crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blair GJ, Anderson GC, Crestani M, Lewis D (1997) Soil sulfur status, sulfur fertiliser responses and rainfall sulfur accession at trial sites in the National Reactive Phosphate Rock Project. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 995–1001.
Soil sulfur status, sulfur fertiliser responses and rainfall sulfur accession at trial sites in the National Reactive Phosphate Rock Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bolan NS, Scotter DR, Syers JK, Tillman RW (1986) The effect of adsorption on sulfate leaching. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 1419–1424.
The effect of adsorption on sulfate leaching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bolland MDA, Allen DG (2003) Phosphorus sorption by sandy soils from Western Australia: effect of previously sorbed phosphorus on PBC and single–point phosphorus sorption indices. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 1369–1388.
Phosphorus sorption by sandy soils from Western Australia: effect of previously sorbed phosphorus on PBC and single–point phosphorus sorption indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brennan RF, Bolland MDA (2006) Soil and tissue tests to predict the sulphur requirements of canola in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1061–1068.
Soil and tissue tests to predict the sulphur requirements of canola in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burkitt LL, Moody PW, Gourley CJP, Hannah MC (2002) A simple phosphorus buffering index of Australian soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 497–513.
A simple phosphorus buffering index of Australian soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen W, Blair G, Scott J, Lefroy R (1999) Nitrogen and sulfur dynamic of contrasting grazed pastures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1381–1392.
Nitrogen and sulfur dynamic of contrasting grazed pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 3, 190–198.
The estimation of the phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In ‘Methods of soil analysis Part 1’. (Eds CA Black, DD Evans, JL White, LE Ensminger, FE Clark) pp. 545–66. (Madison, WI, USA).

Gourley CJP, Weaver DM, Simpson RJ, Aarons SR, Hannah MM, Peverill KI (2019) The development and application of functions describing pasture yield responses to phosphorus, potassium and sulfur in Australia using meta-data analysis and derived soil-test calibration relationships. Crop and Pasture Science
The development and application of functions describing pasture yield responses to phosphorus, potassium and sulfur in Australia using meta-data analysis and derived soil-test calibration relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gustafsson JP, Akram M, Tiberg C (2015) Predicting sulphate adsorption/desorption in forest soils: evaluation of an extended Freundlich equation. Chemosphere 119, 83–89.
Predicting sulphate adsorption/desorption in forest soils: evaluation of an extended Freundlich equation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24972174PubMed |

Isbell RF, National Committee on Soil and Terrain (2016) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Johnson DW, Todd DE (1983) Relationships among iron, aluminium, carbon, and sulfate in a variety of forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47, 792–800.
Relationships among iron, aluminium, carbon, and sulfate in a variety of forest soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lisle L, Gaudron J, Lefory R (1991) ‘Laboratory techniques for plant and soil analysis.’ (University of New England, Department of Agronomy and Soil Science: Armidale, NSW)

Neave HR (1978) ‘Statistics tables for mathematicians, engineers, economists and the behavioural and management sciences.’ (Allen & Unwin: London)

Ozanne PG, Shaw TC (1968) Advantages of the recently developed phosphate sorption test over older extractant methods for soil phosphate. In ‘Transactions of the 9th International Congress in Soil Science’. Adelaide. vol. 2. pp. 273–280. (International Society of Soil Science)

Peltovuori T (2007) Sorption of phosphate in field–moist and air-dry samples from four weakly developed cultivated soil profiles. European Journal of Soil Science 58, 8–17.
Sorption of phosphate in field–moist and air-dry samples from four weakly developed cultivated soil profiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Probert ME (1976) Studies on ‘available’ and isotopically exchangeable sulfur in some North Queensland soils. Plant and Soil 45, 461–475.
Studies on ‘available’ and isotopically exchangeable sulfur in some North Queensland soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rayment GE, Higginson FR (2010) ‘Soil chemical methods – Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Santoso D, Lefroy RDB, Blair GJ (1995) A Comparison of sulfur extractants for weathered acid soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 125–133.
A Comparison of sulfur extractants for weathered acid soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Selim HM, Gobrun GR, Guan X, Clake N (2004) Mobility of sulfate in forest soils: kinetic modelling. Journal of Environmental Quality 33, 488–495.
Mobility of sulfate in forest soils: kinetic modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15074799PubMed |

Till AR (2010) ‘Sulphur and sustainable agriculture.’ 1st edn. (International Fertilizer Industry Association: Paris, France)

Till AR, McArthur GS, Rocks RL (1984). An automated procedure for the simultaneous determination of sulfur and phosphorus and radioactivity in biological samples. In ‘Proceedings of International Conference, Sulphur-84’, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 3–6 June 1984. pp. 649–660. (Sulphur Development Institute of Canada (SUDIC): Calgary, Canada)

Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.
An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walton K, Allen D (2004) Mehlich No. 3 soil test - the Western Australian experience. In ‘SuperSoil 2004: 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference’, 5–9 December 2004, University of Sydney, Australia. (Ed B Singh). Available at www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/ [verified 15 July 2020].

Watkinson JH, Kear MJ (1994) High-performance ion chromatography measurement of sulfate in 20 mM phosphate extracts of soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 25, 1015–1033.
High-performance ion chromatography measurement of sulfate in 20 mM phosphate extracts of soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watkinson JH, Kear MJ (1996) Sulfate and mineralisable organic sulfur in pastoral soils of New Zealand. I. A quasi-equilibrium between sulfate and mineralisable organic sulfur. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 385–403.
Sulfate and mineralisable organic sulfur in pastoral soils of New Zealand. I. A quasi-equilibrium between sulfate and mineralisable organic sulfur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wong MTF, Wittwer K (2009) Positive charge discovered across Western Australian wheatbelt soils challenges key soil and nitrogen management assumptions. Australian Journal of Soil Research 47, 127–135.
Positive charge discovered across Western Australian wheatbelt soils challenges key soil and nitrogen management assumptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wong MTF, Webb MJ, Wittwer K (2013) Development of buffer methods and evaluation of pedotransfer functions to estimate pH buffer capacity of highly weathered soils. Soil Use and Management 29, 30–38.
Development of buffer methods and evaluation of pedotransfer functions to estimate pH buffer capacity of highly weathered soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |