Soil water storage, drainage, and leaching in four irrigated cotton-based cropping systems sown in a Vertosol with subsoil sodicity
N. R. Hulugalle A B , T. B. Weaver A and L. A. Finlay A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Australian Cotton Research Institute and Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre, Locked Bag 1000, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: nilantha.hulugalle@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Soil Research 50(8) 652-663 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR12199
Submitted: 20 July 2012 Accepted: 28 November 2012 Published: 14 January 2013
Abstract
Comparative studies of drainage and leaching in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) based cropping systems in Australian Vertosols are sparse. Our objective was to quantify soil water storage, drainage, and leaching in four cotton-based cropping systems sown on permanent beds in an irrigated Vertosol with subsoil sodicity. Drainage was inferred using the chloride mass-balance method, and soil water storage and leaching were measured with a neutron moisture meter and ceramic-cup water samplers, respectively, from September 2005 to May 2011 in an ongoing experiment. The experimental treatments were: CC, cotton monoculture, summer cotton with winter fallow; CV, cotton–vetch (Vicia benghalensis L.) rotation with vetch stubble retained as in-situ mulch; CW, cotton–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), with wheat stubble incorporated and a summer–winter fallow; and CWV, cotton–wheat–vetch, with wheat and vetch stubbles retained as in-situ mulch and summer and spring fallows. Soil water storage was generally highest under CW and CWV and least under CV. An untilled short fallow (~3 months) when combined with retention of crop residues as surface mulch, as in CWV, was as effective in harvesting rainfall as a tilled long fallow (~11 months) with stubble incorporation, as in CW. Drainage under cotton was generally in the order CW ≥ CWV > CC = CV, all of which were considerably greater than drainage during fallows. Except for very wet and dry winters, drainage under wheat rotation crops was greater than that under vetch. During wet winters, saturated soil in the 0–0.6 m depth of treatments under fallow resulted in more drainage than in the drier, cropped plots. No definitive conclusions could be made with respect to the effects of cropping systems on salt and nutrient leaching. Leachate contained less nitrate-nitrogen, magnesium, and potassium, but leachate electrical conductivity was ~6 times higher than infiltrated water. The greater salinity of the leachate may pose a risk to groundwater resources.
Additional keywords: Haplustert, hydrology, permanent bed, rotation, salinity, stubble retention, Vertisol.
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) ‘Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements.’ FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. (FAO: Rome)Analytical Software (2008) ‘Statistix 9—User’s Manual.’ (Analytical Software: Tallahassee, FL)
Barton A, Meyer WS (2008) ‘An analysis of method and meteorological measurement for evapotranspiration estimation. Part 1: Results using weather data from Griffith, NSW.’ CRC for Irrigation Futures Technical Report No. 09–1/08. (CRC for Irrigation Futures/CSIRO: Canberra, ACT)
Beatty HJ, Loveday J (1974) Soluble cations and anions. In ‘Methods for analysis of irrigated soils’. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils Technical Communication No. 54. (Ed. J Loveday) pp. 108–117. (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau: Farnham Royal, UK)
Ben-Hur M, Li FH, Keren R, Ravina I, Shalit G (2001) Water and salt distribution in a field irrigated with marginal water under high water table conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 191–198.
| Water and salt distribution in a field irrigated with marginal water under high water table conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Booltink HWG (1995) Field monitoring of nitrate leaching and water flow in a structured clay soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 52, 251–261.
| Field monitoring of nitrate leaching and water flow in a structured clay soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bronswijk JJB, Hamminga W, Oostindie K (1995) Rapid nutrient leaching to groundwater and surface water in clay soil areas. European Journal of Agronomy 4, 431–439.
CSDEDT (Cotton Seed Distributors Extension and Development Team) CSDEDT (Cotton Seed Distributors Extension and Development Team) (2006) Delving deeper into the high yielding crops. Australian Cottongrower 27, 16–22.
Dugdale H, Harris G, Neilsen J, Richards D, Roth G, Williams D (2004) ‘WATERpak – a guide for irrigation management in cotton.’ (Cotton Research and Development Corporation: Narrabri, NSW)
Evett S (Ed.) (2008) ‘Field estimation of soil water content: A practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technology.’ (IAEA: Vienna)
Friend JJ (2000) Assessment of winter crop rotation phases for salinity prevention in cotton based rotation systems. Final Report, CRDC Project DAN 99C, NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW.
Greacen EL (Ed.) (1981) ‘Soil water assessment by the neutron method.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne)
Gunawardena TA, McGarry D, Robinson JB, Silburn DM (2011) Deep drainage through Vertosols in irrigated fields measured with drainage lysimeters. Soil Research 49, 343–354.
| Deep drainage through Vertosols in irrigated fields measured with drainage lysimeters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harris G (2004) Irrigation: water balance scheduling. Agdex 100/561. Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, Brisbane, Qld.
Hulugalle NR (2005) Recovering leached N by sowing wheat after irrigated cotton in a Vertosol. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27, 39–51.
| Recovering leached N by sowing wheat after irrigated cotton in a Vertosol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Scott F (2008) A review of the changes in soil quality and profitability accomplished by sowing rotation crops after cotton in Australian Vertosols from 1970 to 2006. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 173–190.
| A review of the changes in soil quality and profitability accomplished by sowing rotation crops after cotton in Australian Vertosols from 1970 to 2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Finlay LA, Entwistle PC (2001) Physical and chemical properties of soil near cracks in irrigated vertosols sown with cotton-wheat rotations. Arid Land Research and Management 15, 13–22.
Hulugalle NR, Nehl DB, Weaver TB (2004) Soil properties, and cotton growth, yield and fibre quality in three cotton-based cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research 75, 131–141.
| Soil properties, and cotton growth, yield and fibre quality in three cotton-based cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Ghadiri H (2005a) A simple method to estimate the value of salt and nutrient leaching in irrigated Vertosols in Australia. Advances in Geoecology 36, 579–588.
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Scott F (2005b) Continuous cotton and cotton–wheat rotation effects on soil properties and profitability in an irrigated Vertisol. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27, 5–24.
| Continuous cotton and cotton–wheat rotation effects on soil properties and profitability in an irrigated Vertisol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Finlay LA (2006) Residual effects of cotton-based crop rotations on soil properties of irrigated Vertosols in central-western and north-western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 467–477.
| Residual effects of cotton-based crop rotations on soil properties of irrigated Vertosols in central-western and north-western New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Finlay LA (2010) Soil water storage and drainage under cotton-based cropping systems in a furrow-irrigated Vertisol. Agricultural Water Management 97, 1703–1710.
| Soil water storage and drainage under cotton-based cropping systems in a furrow-irrigated Vertisol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Finlay LA, Weaver TB (2012a) An integrated mechanical and chemical method for managing prostrate cover crops on permanent beds. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27, 148–156.
| An integrated mechanical and chemical method for managing prostrate cover crops on permanent beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Finlay LA, Lonergan P (2012b) Soil properties, black root-rot incidence, yield and greenhouse gas emissions in irrigated cotton cropping systems sown in a Vertosol with subsoil sodicity. Soil Research 50, 278–292.
| Soil properties, black root-rot incidence, yield and greenhouse gas emissions in irrigated cotton cropping systems sown in a Vertosol with subsoil sodicity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB, Finlay LA (2012c) Carbon inputs by wheat and vetch roots to an irrigated Vertosol. Soil Research 50, 177–187.
| Carbon inputs by wheat and vetch roots to an irrigated Vertosol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ 2nd edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259–263.
| World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lipiec J, Arvidsson J, Murer E (2003) Review of modelling crop growth, movement of water and chemicals in relation to topsoil and subsoil compaction. Soil & Tillage Research 73, 15–29.
| Review of modelling crop growth, movement of water and chemicals in relation to topsoil and subsoil compaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maas S, Chapman V (2005) Understanding water & soil quality – for minimum BMP requirement. Cotton Catchment Communities CRC Information Sheet. Cotton Catchment Communities CRC, Narrabri, NSW.
McGarry D (1995) The optimisation of soil structure for cotton production. In ‘Challenging the future. Proceedings World Cotton Research Conference—1’. 14–17 February 1994, Brisbane, Qld. (Eds GA Constable, NW Forrester) pp. 169–176. (CSIRO: Melbourne)
McKenzie DC (Ed.) (1998) ‘SOILpak for cotton growers.’ 3rd edn (NSW Agriculture: Orange, NSW)
Paydar Z, Huth N, Ringrose-Voase A, Young R, Bernardi T, Keating B, Cresswell H (2005) Deep drainage and land use systems. Model verification and systems comparison. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 995–1007.
| Deep drainage and land use systems. Model verification and systems comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Phillips IR (2002) Nutrient leaching losses from undisturbed soil cores following applications of piggery wastewater. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 515–532.
| Nutrient leaching losses from undisturbed soil cores following applications of piggery wastewater.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) ‘Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water methods.’ (Inkata: Melbourne, Sydney)
Ringrose-Voase A, Nadelko A (2010) Deep drainage in a Vertosol under irrigated cotton. In ‘Soil solutions for a changing world. Proceedings 19th World Congress of Soil Science’. (Eds R Gilkes, N Prakongkep) pp. 27–30. (ISSS: Brisbane)
Sarmah AK, Pillai-McGarry U, McGarry D (1996) Repair of the structure of a compacted Vertosol via wet/dry cycles. Soil & Tillage Research 38, 17–33.
| Repair of the structure of a compacted Vertosol via wet/dry cycles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scott B, Eberbach PL, Evans J, Wade LJ (2010) ‘Stubble retention in cropping in south eastern Australia perceived benefits and challenges.’ EH Graham Centre Monograph No. 1. (Eds EH Clayton, HM Burns) (Industry & Investment NSW: Orange, NSW)
Silburn DM, Cowie BA, Thornton CM (2009) The Brigalow Catchment Study revisited: Effects of land development on deep drainage determined from non-steady chloride profiles. Journal of Hydrology 373, 487–498.
| The Brigalow Catchment Study revisited: Effects of land development on deep drainage determined from non-steady chloride profiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slavich PG, Petterson GH, Griffin D (2002) Effects of irrigation water salinity and sodicity on infiltration and lucerne growth over a shallow watertable. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 281–290.
| Effects of irrigation water salinity and sodicity on infiltration and lucerne growth over a shallow watertable.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soil Survey Staff (2010) ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 11th edn (Natural Resources Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
USSL (United States Salinity Laboratory) (1954) ‘Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils.’ Agriculture Handbook No. 60. (Ed. LA Richards) (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
Weaver TB, Hulugalle NR, Ghadiri H (2005) Comparing deep drainage estimated with transient and steady state assumptions in irrigated vertisols. Irrigation Science 23, 183–191.
| Comparing deep drainage estimated with transient and steady state assumptions in irrigated vertisols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Willis TM, Black AS, Meyer WS (1997) Estimates of deep percolation beneath cotton in the Macquarie Valley. Irrigation Science 17, 141–150.
| Estimates of deep percolation beneath cotton in the Macquarie Valley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zischke R, Gordon I (2000) Addressing the issues of root zone salinity and deep drainage under irrigated cotton. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th Australian Cotton Conference’. 16–18 August, Brisbane, Qld. pp. 371–377. (Australian Cottongrowers’ Research Association: Orange, NSW)
