Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

High clay contents, dense soils, and spatial variability are the principal subsoil constraints to cropping the higher rainfall land in south-eastern Australia

R. J. MacEwan A F , D. M. Crawford B , P. J. Newton C D and T. S. Clune C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 3100, Bendigo Delivery Centre, Vic. 3554, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, 621 Sneydes Rd, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.

C Department of Primary Industries, RMB 1145, Chiltern Valley Rd, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.

D Current address: PO Box 572, Wodonga, Vic. 3689, Australia.

E North East Water, PO Box 863, Wodonga, Vic. 3689, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: richard.macewan@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(2) 150-166 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09076
Submitted: 26 April 2009  Accepted: 2 February 2010   Published: 31 March 2010

Abstract

Available soil information and unpublished data from soil survey indicate that high clay contents and high bulk density are the major subsoil constraints to crop growth in the high rainfall zone (HRZ) of south-eastern Australia. Seven high rainfall agroecological zones are proposed as sub-divisions of the region to focus future research and development. The HRZ is dominated by texture-contrast soils (69.9%) and soils with clay subsoil (89.4%) and high bulk density (mean 1.6 t/m3). Sodicity and acidity are also significant constraints to crop production in the HRZ. The physical limitations to root growth in the HRZ subsoils are best appreciated through the least-limiting water range concept and growth-limiting bulk densities. Management options and results of past research and intervention in soil loosening, drainage, raised beds, liming, and gypsum are reviewed. Climatic uncertainty raises questions about the future relevance of waterlogging as a constraint in the HRZ and confounds the development of reliable recommendations for engineering intervention.

Additional keywords: agroecological zones, bulk density, acidity, compaction, salinity, sodicity, waterlogging, texture contrast soils.


Acknowledgments

The Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Victorian Department of Primary Industries provided funding to carry out this review. Colleagues in New South Wales, South Australian, and Tasmanian government agencies are thanked for assistance in accessing data. David Maschmedt (Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, SA) and Greg Chapman (Department of Natural Resources, NSW) were instrumental in providing soils data and knowledge from their respective states. The 2 anonymous referees and Dr David Nash (Department of Primary Industries) are thanked for their comments on the original manuscript.


References


Adcock D, McNeill AM, McDonald GK, Armstrong RD (2007) Subsoil constraints to crop production on neutral and alkaline soil in south-eastern Australia: a review of current knowledge and management strategies. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1245–1261.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | (accessed January 2010).

Christy B (1996) Soil Management Strategies for Increased Autumn-Winter Milk Production-DAV 258. Institute for Integrated Agricultural Development.

Conyers MH, McGhie W, Poile G (2003) Amelioration of acidity with time by limestone under contrasting tillage. Soil & Tillage Research 72, 85–94.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed June 2006).

Lapen DR, Topp GC, Gregorich EG, Curnoe WE (2004) Least limiting water range indicators of soil quality and corn production, eastern Ontario, Canada. Soil & Tillage Research 78, 151–170.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed January 2010).

Pierce FJ, Larson WE, Dowdy RH, Graham WAP (1983) Productivity of soils: assessing long-term changes due to erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38, 39–44. open url image1

Poole ML, Turner NC, Young JM (2002) Sustainable cropping systems for high rainfall areas of southwestern Australia. Agricultural Water Management 53, 201–211.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Prescott J, Thomas J (1949) The length of the growing season in Australia as determined by the effectiveness of the rainfall. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of Australia, South Australia Branch 50, 42–46. open url image1

Proffitt APB, Bendotti S, Howell MR, Eastham J (1993) The effect of sheep trampling and grazing on soil physical properties and pasture growth for a red-brown earth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 317–331.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Radford BJ, Yule DF, McGarry D, Playford C (2001) Crop responses to applied soil compaction and to compaction repair treatments. Soil & Tillage Research 61, 157–166.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raij BV (1991) Fertility of acid soils. Developments in Plant & Soil Sciences 45, 159–167. open url image1

Raper RL (2005) Subsoiler shapes for site-specific tillage. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 21, 25–30. open url image1

Reeder RC, Wood RK, Finck CL (1993) Five subsoiler designs and their effects on soil properties and crop yields. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36, 1525–1531. open url image1

Reeves DW, Mullins GL (1995) Subsoiling and potassium placement effects on water relations and yield of cotton. Agronomy Journal 87, 847–852.
CAS |
open url image1

Reeves DW, Touchton JT (1991) Deep tillage ahead of cover crop planting reduces soil compaction for following crop. Highlights of Agricultural Research – Alabama, Agricultural Experiment Station 38, 4. open url image1

Rengasamy P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 351–361.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sarlistyaningsih L, Sivasithamparam K, Setter TL (1995) Influence of waterlogging on germination and survival of lupin seeds (Lupinus angustifolius L. cv. Gungurru) coated with calcium peroxide and streptomycin. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 537–541.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Schilfgarde J (1974) ‘Drainage for agriculture.’ Monograph 17. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Scott B, Ridley A, Conyers M (2000) Management of soil acidity in long-term pastures of south eastern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 1173–1198.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Smedema LK , Rycroft DW (1983) ‘Land drainage.’ (Batsford: London)

Soane BD , Van Ouwerkerk C (Eds) (1994) ‘Soil compaction in crop production.’ (Elsevier: Amsterdam)

Soil Survey Staff (2006) ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 10th edn (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)

Sojka RE, Busscher WJ, Gooden DT, Morrison WH (1990) Subsoiling for sunflower production in the southeast Coastal Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54, 1107–1112. open url image1

Spoor G (1995) Application of mole drainage in the solution of subsoil management. In ‘Subsoil management techniques’. (Eds NS Jayawardane, BA Stewart) pp. 67–108. (Lewis, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Spoor G (2006) Alleviation of soil compaction: requirements, equipment and techniques. Soil Use and Management 22, 113–122.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Spoor G, Ford RA (1987) Mechanics of mole drainage channel deterioration. Journal of Soil Science 38, 369–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Spoor G, Godwin RJ (1978) An experimental investigation into the deep loosening of soil by rigid tines. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 23, 243–258.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Spoor G, Godwin RJ, Miller SM (1987) Mole plough grade control. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 38, 145–166.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Spoor G, Leeds-Harrison PB, Godwin RJ (1982a) Potential role of soil density and clay mineralogy in assessing the suitability of soils for mole drainage. Journal of Soil Science 33, 427–441.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Spoor G, Leeds-Harrison PB, Godwin RJ (1982b) Some fundamental aspects of the formation, stability and failure of mole drainage channels. Journal of Soil Science 33, 411–425.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sumner ME (1995) Amelioration of subsoil acidity with minimum disturbance. In ‘Subsoil management techniques’. (Eds NS Jayawardane, BA Stewart) pp. 147–186. (Lewis, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Surapaneni A, Olsson K, Burrow D, Heecher H, Ham J, Stevens R, Hulugalle N, McKenzie D, Rengasamy P (2002) Tatura Sodicity Conference: knowledge gaps in sodicity research for major agricultural industries. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 379–387.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Taboada MA, Lavado RS (1993) Influence of cattle trampling on soil porosity under alternate dry and ponded conditions. Soil Use and Management 9, 139–143.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Taddese G, Mohamed Saleem MA, Ayalneh W (2002) Effect of livestock grazing on physical properties of a cracking and self-mulching Vertisol. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 129–133.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Toma M, Sumner ME, Weeks G, Saigusa M (1999) Long-term effects of gypsum on crop yield and subsoil chemical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 39, 891–895. open url image1

Tullberg JN (2000) Wheel traffic effects on tillage draught. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 75, 375–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

USDA (1999) ‘Soil Quality Test Guide.’ (Soil Quality Institute, USDA-ARS NRCS)

van der Watt HVH, Barnard RO, Cronje IJ, Dekker J, Croft GJB, van der Walt MM (1991) Amelioration of subsoil acidity by application of a coal-derived calcium fulvate to the soil surface. Nature 350, 146–148.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Van Ouwerkerk C , Soane BD (1994) Conclusions and recommendations for further research on soil compaction in crop production. In ‘Soil compaction in crop production. Developments in Agricultural Engineering 11’. (Eds BD Soane, C Van Ouwerkerk) pp. 627–642. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)

Wesley RA, Elmore CD, Spurlock SR (2001) Deep tillage and crop rotation effects on cotton, soybean, and grain sorghum on clayey soils. Agronomy Journal 93, 170–178. open url image1

West LT, Hendrix PF, Bruce RR (1991) Micromorphic observation of soil alteration by earthworms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 34, 363–370.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whalley WR, Riseley B, Leeds-Harrison PB, Bird NRA, Leech PK, Adderley WP (2005) Structural differences between bulk and rhizosphere soil. European Journal of Soil Science 56, 353–360.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wu L, Feng G, Letey J, Ferguson L, Mitchell J, McCullough-Sanden B, Markegard G (2003) Soil management effects on the nonlimiting water range. Geoderma 114, 401–414.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yunusa IAM, Newton PJ (2003) Plants for amelioration of subsoil constraints and hydrological control: the primer-plant concept. Plant and Soil 257, 261–281.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML, Simpson N (2006) Crop production in the high rainfall zones of southern Australia—potential, constraints and opportunities. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1035–1049.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zobel RW (2005) Tertiary Root Systems. In ‘Roots and Soil Management: Interactions between Roots and the Soil.’ Agronomy Monograph 8. (Eds RW Zobel, SF Wright) pp. 35–56. (American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI)

Zou C, Sands R, Buchan , Hudson I (2000) Least limiting water range: a potential indicator of physical quality in forest soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 947–958.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1