Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of alkaline flyash-based products to amend acid soils: Plant growth response and nutrient uptake

K. M. Spark A B and R. S. Swift A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Queensland, Faculty of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: kaye.spark@uq.edu.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(7) 578-584 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07209
Submitted: 27 November 2007  Accepted: 14 July 2008   Published: 8 October 2008

Abstract

Vast quantities of flyash are generated annually by the burning of coal in the power industry, with most of this material being stockpiled with little prospect of being utilised at present. Two alkaline flyash-based products (FAP) for use as soil amendments (FAP1 and FAP2) have been assessed using glasshouse pot trials to determine the suitability of using these products to treat acid soils. The products both contain ~80% flyash which originated from coal-fired electricity generation. The acid soils used in the study were 2 Podsols and a Ferrosol, all originating from south-east Queensland and ranging in pH (1 : 5 suspension in water) from 4 to 5.5. The flyash products when applied to the soil significantly enhanced growth of maize plants (Zea mays L.), with optimal application rates in the range 1.25–5% w/w. The FAP/soil mixtures and plants were analysed using a range of methods including extraction with DTPA, and plant biomass (aboveground dry matter). The results indicate that in addition to the liming effect, the flyash in the alkaline flyash products may enhance plant growth as a result of increasing the uptake of micro-nutrients such as copper, zinc, and manganese. The study suggests that flyash has the potential to be used as a base material in the production of soil amendment materials that can change soil pH and act as a fertiliser for certain soil micro-nutrients such as Cu, Mn, and Zn.

Additional keywords: soil acidity, soil amendments, plant growth, plant micro-nutrients.


Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Central Research Institute of the Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) in Japan.


References


ADAA (2007) Ash Development Association of Australia. Available at: www.adaa.asn.au/statistics.htm (accessed 15 October 2007)

Adriano DC, Weber J, Bolan NS, Paramasivam S, Koo B-J, Sajan KS (2002) Effects of high rates of coal fly ash on soil, turfgrass, and groundwater quality. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 139, 365–385.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Agricultural Standards Act (1994) ‘Australian Standards Regulation 1997.’ Reprint No. 2, 2003. (Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel: Brisbane, Qld)

Ariese F, Swart K, Morabito R, Brunori C, Balzamo S, Slobodnik J, Korenková E, Janoš P, Wildnerova M, Hlavay J, Polyák K, Fodor P, Muntau H (2002) Leaching studies of inorganic and organic compounds from fly ash. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 82, 751–770.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

ASTM (2003) American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C618, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Curtin D (2003) Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability. Advances in Agronomy 78, 215–272.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dee BM, Haynes RJ, Graham MH (2003) Changes in soil acidity and the size and activity of the microbial biomass in response to the addition of sugar mill wastes. Biology and Fertility of Soils 37, 47–54. open url image1

El-Mogazi D, Lisk DJ, Weinstein H (1988) A review of physical, chemical, and biological properties of fly ash and effects on agricultural ecosystems. The Science of the Total Environment 74, 1–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Elseewi AA, Straughan IR, Page AL (1980) Sequential cropping of fly ash-amended soils: effects on soil chemical properties and yield and elemental composition of plants. The Science of the Total Environment 15, 247–259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Haynes RJ, Swift RS (1986) Effects of soil acidification and subsequent leaching on levels of extractable nutrients in a soil. Plant and Soil 95, 327–336.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jala S, Goyal D (2006) Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production—a review. Bioresource Technology 97, 1136–1147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Jones JB (1972) Plant tissue analyses for micronutrients. In ‘Micronutrients in agriculture’. (Eds JJ Mortvedt et al.) pp. 319–346. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Kingston HM, Walter PJ (1992) Comparison of microwave versus conventional dissolution for environmental applications. Spectroscopy 7, 20–27. open url image1

Macnicol RD, Beckett PHT (1985) Critical tissue concentrations of potentially toxic elements. Plant and Soil 85, 107–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mortvedt J (1983) Impacts of acid deposition on micronutrient cycling in agro-ecosystems. Environmental and Experimental Botany 23, 243–249.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nable RO, Banuelos GS, Paull JG (1997) Boron toxicity. Plant and Soil 193, 181–198.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pathan SM, Aylmore LAG, Colmer TD (2003) Properties of several fly ash materials in relation to use as soil amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 687–693.
PubMed |
open url image1

Rayment GE , Higginson FR (1992) ‘Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods.’ (Inkata Press: Melbourne, Vic.)

Tarkalson DD, Hegert GW, Stevens WB, McCallister DL, Kachman SD (2005) Fly ash as a liming material for corn production. Soil Science 170, 386–398.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ukonmaanaho L, Starr M (2002) Major nutrients and acidity: budgets and trends at four remote boreal stands in Finland during the 1990s. The Science of the Total Environment 297, 21–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1