Evaluation of methods for inferring air and water properties of soils from field morphology

Abstract

The accurate characterization of soil water and air properties is difficult in soil survey because of logistic constraints. Less reliable surrogates are commonly used to estimate these properties. The surrogates provide a method for moving from measures that tend to be static and semi-empirical to those characterizing soil processes. The utility of four schemes for predicting air-filled porosity, available water capacity and saturated hydraulic conductivity on the basis of field-determined soil morphology has been assessed using data from a limited number of profiles with features commonly encountered in Australia. None of the systems provided statistically significant predictions of available water capacity and the results for air-filled porosity were moderate (McKeague et al. (1986), r2 = 0.58; Hall et al. (19771, r2 = 0 -64; Williams et al. (1991), r2 = 0.70). Encouragingly, the Hollis and Woods (1989) system generated good predictions of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (r2 = 0.77). It is concluded that better measurement methods and programs of data collection are needed for both the properties used as surrogates (e.g. morphology) and those for which predictions are required (e.g. air and water properties).