Response to soil compaction of the electrical resistivity tomography, induced polarisation, and electromagnetic induction methods: a case study in Belgium
Danial Mansourian![https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-6199](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
A
B
C
Abstract
Soil compaction acts at different scales and is challenging to measure on field scales.
To evaluate soil compaction under a controlled traffic experiment, using three different geophysical methods.
Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Electromagnetic Induction (EMI), and Induced Polarisation (IP) were selected to map soil compaction. Two different ERT arrays and EMI geometries were selected with different spacings. The influences of configuration, electrode spacing, and the Depth of Investigation Index (DOI) were evaluated. Soil physical properties were measured in the Laboratory and in the field. Error models were developed to assess the accuracy of the ERT profiles and later correlated with EMI and soil physical results.
Penetration resistance measurements identified a compacted layer at 25 to 35 cm depth with a maximum value of 5 MPa under fixed tracks and bulk density of 1.52 Mg m−3, while lowest values were 1.4 MPa and 1.36 Mg m−3. The dipole–dipole (DD) 10 cm array was more accurate towards both soil properties and locating the zones of high resistivity. The IP method identified chargeability anomalies at the same depth as the resistivity anomalies, possibly indicating a similar origin. The EMI test was less successful in accurately determining the locations of the conductive areas.
A clear relationship between the absolute value of the resistivity/conductivity signals with the level of compaction was not found, yet patterns of lateral variations in resistivity were identified.
Further studies are needed to establish the concrete relationship between soil compaction and geophysical signals.
Keywords: controlled traffic, depth of investigation index, electrical resistivity tomography, electromagnetic induction, geophysical methods, induced polarisation, penetration resistance, soil compaction.
References
Alvemar H, Andersson H, Pedersen HH (2017) Profitability of controlled traffic in grass silage production – economic modelling and machinery systems. Advances in Animal Biosciences 8(2), 749-753.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
André F, van Leeuwen C, Saussez S, Van Durmen R, Bogaert P, Moghadas D, de Rességuier L, Delvaux B, Vereecken H, Lambot S (2012) High-resolution imaging of a vineyard in south of France using ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics 78, 113-122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Antille DL, Peets S, Galambošová J, Botta GF, Rataj V, Macak M, Tullberg JN, Chamen WCT, White DR, Misiewicz PA, Hargreaves PR (2019) Soil compaction and controlled traffic farming in arable and grass cropping systems. Agronomy Research 17(3), 653-682.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Apparao A, Gangadhara Rao T, Sivarama Sastry R, Subrahmanya Sarma V (1992) Depth of detection of buried conductive targets with different electrode arrays in resistivity prospecting. Geophysical Prospecting 40(7), 749-760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the AIME 146(1), 54-62.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Barker RD (1989) Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays. Geophysics 54(8), 1031-1037.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Benoit S, Ghysels G, Gommers K, Hermans T, Nguyen F, Huysmans M (2019) Characterization of spatially variable riverbed hydraulic conductivity using electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization. Hydrogeology Journal 27(1), 395-407.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Besson A, Séger M, Giot G, Cousin I (2013) Identifying the characteristic scales of soil structural recovery after compaction from three in-field methods of monitoring. Geoderma 204–205, 130-139.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bharti AK, Pal SK, Priyam P, Pathak VK, Kumar R, Ranjan SK (2016) Detection of illegal mine voids using electrical resistivity tomography: the case-study of Raniganj coalfield (India). Engineering Geology 213, 120-132.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bharti AK, Pal SK, Saurabh , Singh KKK, Singh PK, Prakash A, Tiwary RK (2019) Groundwater prospecting by the inversion of cumulative data of Wenner–Schlumberger and Dipole–Dipole arrays: a case study at Turamdih, Jharkhand, India. Journal of Earth System Science 128(4), 107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Binley A, Hubbard SS, Huisman JA, Revil A, Robinson DA, Singha K, Slater LD (2015) The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resources Research 51(6), 3837-3866.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Blanchy G, Saneiyan S, Boyd J, McLachlan P, Binley A (2020) ResIPy, an intuitive open source software for complex geoelectrical inversion/modeling. Computers & Geosciences 137, 104423.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bobe C, Hanssens D, Hermans T, Van De Vijver E (2020) Efficient probabilistic joint inversion of direct current resistivity and small-loop electromagnetic data. Algorithms 13(6), 144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Botta GF, Antille DL, Nardon GF, Rivero D, Bienvenido F, Contessotto EE, Ezquerra-Canalejo A, Ressia JM (2022) Zero and controlled traffic improved soil physical conditions and soybean yield under no-tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 215, 105235.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Boyd J, Blanchy G, Saneiyan S, McLachlan P, Binley A (2019) 3D geoelectrical problems with ResIPy, an open source graphical user interface for geoelectrical data processing. Fast Times 24(4), 85-92.
| Google Scholar |
Brevik EC, Fenton TE (2002) Influence of soil water content, clay, temperature, and carbonate minerals on electrical conductivity readings taken with an EM-38. Soil Survey Horizons 43, 9-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brevik EC, Fenton TE (2004) The effect of changes in bulk density on soil electrical conductivity as measured with the Geonics EM-38. Soil Survey Horizons 45, 96-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brogi C, Huisman JA, Pätzold S, von Hebel C, Weihermüller L, Kaufmann MS, van der Kruk J, Vereecken H (2019) Large-scale soil mapping using multi-configuration EMI and supervised image classification. Geoderma 335, 133-148.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brogi C, Huisman JA, Weihermüller L, Herbst M, Vereecken H (2021) Added value of geophysics-based soil mapping in agro-ecosystem simulations. Soil 7(1), 125-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brunet P, Clément R, Bouvier C (2010) Monitoring soil water content and deficit using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – A case study in the Cevennes area, France. Journal of Hydrology 380(1–2), 146-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bulgakov V, Pascuzzi S, Nadykto V, Ivanovs S, Adamchuk V (2021) Experimental study of the implement-and-tractor aggregate used for laying tracks of permanent traffic lanes inside controlled traffic farming systems. Soil and Tillage Research 208, 104895.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Caterina D, Beaujean J, Robert T, Nguyen F (2013) A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics 11(6), 639-658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Caterina D, Hermans T, Nguyen F (2014) Case studies of incorporation of prior information in electrical resistivity tomography: comparison of different approaches. Near Surface Geophysics 12, 451-465.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chinh PD (2000) Electrical properties of sedimentary rocks having interconnected water-saturated pore spaces. Geophysics 65(4), 1093-1097.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cong-Thi D, Dieu LP, Thibaut R, Paepen M, Ho HH, Nguyen F, Hermans T (2021) Imaging the structure and the saltwater intrusion extent of the luy river coastal aquifer (Binh Thuan, Vietnam) using electrical resistivity tomography. Water 13(13), 1743.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysics Prospecting 52(5), 379-398.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Das P, Pal SK, Mohanty PR, Priyam P, Bharti AK, Kumar R (2017) Abandoned mine galleries detection using Electrical resistivity tomography method over Jharia coal field, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 90(2), 169-174.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
de Jong SM, Heijenk RA, Nijland W, van der Meijde M (2020) Monitoring soil moisture dynamics using electrical resistivity tomography under homogeneous field conditions. Sensors 20(18), 5313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
De Smedt P, Saey T, Lehouck A, Stichelbaut B, Meerschman E, Islam MM, Van De Vijver E, Van Meirvenne M (2013) Exploring the potential of multi-receiver EMI survey for geoarchaeological prospection: a 90 ha dataset. Geoderma 199, 30-36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Deceuster J, Etienne A, Robert T, Nguyen F, Kaufmann O (2014) A modified DOI-based method to statistically estimate the depth of investigation of dc resistivity surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics 103, 172-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Deiana R, Bonetto J, Mazzariol A (2018) Integrated electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar measurements applied to tomb detection. Surveys in Geophysics 39(6), 1081-1105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Deleersnyder W, Maveau B, Hermans T, Dudal D (2021) Inversion of electromagnetic induction data using a novel wavelet-based and scale-dependent regularization term. Geophysical Journal International 226(3), 1715-1729.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Delgado MCJ, Guerrero IC (2007) The selection of soils for unstabilised earth building: a normative review. Construction and Building Materials 21(2), 237-251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Demirci I, Gündoğdu NY, Candansayar ME, Soupios P, Vafidis A, Arslan H (2020) Determination and evaluation of saltwater intrusion on bafra plain: joint interpretation of geophysical, hydrogeological and hydrochemical data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 177, 5621-5640.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Donohue S, Forristal D, Donohue LA (2013) Detection of soil compaction using seismic surface waves. Soil and Tillage Research 128, 54-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Doolittle JA, Brevik EC (2014) The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies. Geoderma 223–225, 33-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Edwards LS (1977) A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP. Geophysics 42(5), 1020-1036.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Esteban DAA, de Souza ZM, Tormena CA, Lovera LH, de Souza Lima E, de Oliveira IN, de Paula Ribeiro N (2019) Soil compaction, root system and productivity of sugarcane under different row spacing and controlled traffic at harvest. Soil and Tillage Research 187, 60-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Evrard M, Dumont G, Hermans T, Chouteau M, Francis O, Pirard E, Nguyen F (2018) Geophysical investigation of the Pb–Zn deposit of Lontzen–Poppelsberg, Belgium. Minerals 8(6), 233.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fargier Y, Antoine R, Dore L, Lopes SP, Fauchard C (2017) 3D assessment of an underground mine pillar by combination of photogrammetric and geoelectric methods. Geophysics 82(4), E143-E153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Flores-Orozco A, Gallistl J, Steiner M, Brandstätter C, Fellner J (2020) Mapping biogeochemically active zones in landfills with induced polarization imaging: the Heferlbach landfill. Waste Management 107, 121-132.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fox RC, Hohmann GW, Killpack TJ, Rijo L (1980) Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys. Geophysics 45(1), 75-93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Friedman SP (2005) Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1–3), 45-70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gallistl J, Weigand M, Stumvoll M, Ottowitz D, Glade T, Orozco AF (2018) Delineation of subsurface variability in clay-rich landslides through spectral induced polarization imaging and electromagnetic methods. Engineering Geology 245, 292-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
García-Tomillo A, de Figueiredo T, Dafonte JD, Almeida A, Paz-González A (2018) Effects of machinery trafficking in an agricultural soil assessed by Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT). Open Agriculture 3(1), 378-385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Garré S, Hyndman D, Mary B, Werban U (2021) Geophysics conquering new territories: the rise of “agrogeophysics”. Vadose Zone Journal 20(4), e20115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gebbers R, Lück E, Dabas M, Domsch H (2009) Comparison of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale. Near Surface Geophysics 7(3), 179-190.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Greenhouse JP, Slaine DD (1983) The use of reconnaissance electromagnetic methods to map contaminant migration. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation 3(2), 47-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Grover BL (1955) Simplified air permeameters for soil in place. Soil Science Society of America Journal 19, 414.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heil K, Schmidhalter U (2019) Theory and guidelines for the application of the geophysical sensor EM38. Sensors 19(19), 4293.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hermans T, Vandenbohede A, Lebbe L, Martin R, Kemna A, Beaujean J, Nguyen F (2012) Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data. Journal of Hydrology 438–439, 168-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hermans T, Goderniaux P, Jougnot D, Fleckenstein JH, Brunner P, Nguyen F, Linde N, Huisman JA, Bour O, Lopez Alvis J, Hoffmann R, Palacios A, Cooke A-K, Pardo-Álvarez Á, Blazevic L, Pouladi B, Haruzi P, Fernandez Visentini A, Nogueira GEH, Tirado-Conde J, Looms MC, Kenshilikova M, Davy P, Le Borgne T (2023) Advancing measurements and representations of subsurface heterogeneity and dynamic processes: towards 4D hydrogeology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 27, 255-287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heydarizad M, Pumijumnong N, Mansourian D, Anbaran ED, Minaei M (2023) The deterioration of groundwater quality by seawater intrusion in the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(3), 424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Himi M, Tapias J, Benabdelouahab S, Salhi A, Rivero L, Elgettafi M, El Mandour A, Stitou J, Casas A (2017) Geophysical characterization of saltwater intrusion in a coastal aquifer: the case of Martil-Alila plain (North Morocco). Journal of African Earth Sciences 126, 136-147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Horn R, Domżżał H, Słowińska-Jurkiewicz A, Van Ouwerkerk C (1995) Soil compaction processes and their effects on the structure of arable soils and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research 35(1–2), 23-36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Horo D, Pal SK, Singh S, Srivastavaa S (2020) Combined self-potential, electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarisation for mapping of gold prospective zones over a part of Babaikundi-Birgaon Axis, North Singhbhum Mobile Belt, India. Exploration Geophysics 51(1), 507-522.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jabrane O, Martínez-Pagán P, El Azzab D, Martínez-Segura MA, Urruela A (2023) A review of python-based code for landslide odelling and inversion using Electrical Resistivity Tomography method. Software Impacts 16, 100501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jeřábek J, Zumr D, Dostál T (2017) Identifying the plough pan position on cultivated soils by measurements of electrical resistivity and penetration resistance. Soil and Tillage Research 174, 231-240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jongmans D, Garambois S (2007) Geophysical investigation of landslides: a review. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 178(2), 101-112.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Keller T, Lamandé M, Arvidsson J, Berli M, Ruiz S, Schjønning P, Selvadurai P (2012) Comparing measured with simulated vertical soil stress under vehicle load: are the measurements or the models wrong? Agrociencia 16(3), 318-326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Keller T, Colombi T, Ruiz S, Manalili MP, Rek J, Stadelmann V, Wunderli H, Breitenstein D, Reiser R, Oberholzer H, Schymanski S, Romero-Ruiz A, Linde N, Weisskopf P, Walter A, Or D (2017) Long-term soil structure observatory for monitoring post-compaction evolution of soil structure. Vadose Zone Journal 16(4), 1-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Koch K, Kemna A, Irving J, Holliger K (2011) Impact of changes in grain size and pore space on the hydraulic conductivity and spectral induced polarization response of sand. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15, 1785-1794.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kominz MA, Patterson K, Odette D (2011) Lithology dependence of porosity in slope and deep marine sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Research 81(10), 730-742.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kumar R, Pal SK, Gupta PK (2021) Water seepage mapping in an underground coal-mine barrier using self-potential and electrical resistivity tomography. Mine Water and the Environment 40(3), 622-638.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lavoué F, van der Krak J, Rings J, André F, Moghadas D, Huisman JA, Lambot S, Weiherrnüller L, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2010) Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics 8(6), 553-561.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lesparre N, Robert T, Nguyen F, Boyle A, Hermans T (2019) 4D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) for aquifer thermal energy storage monitoring. Geothermics 77, 368-382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lipiec J, Hatano R (2003) Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma 116(1–2), 107-136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lucas DR, Fankhauser K, Springman SM (2017) Application of geotechnical and geophysical field measurements in an active alpine environment. Engineering Geology 219, 32-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Makarian E, Abad ABMN, Manaman NS, Mansourian D, Elyasi A, Namazifard P, Martyushev DA (2023) An efficient and comprehensive poroelastic analysis of hydrocarbon systems using multiple data sets through laboratory tests and geophysical logs: a case study in an iranian hydrocarbon reservoir. Carbonates and Evaporites 38(2), 37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mansourian D, Hamidi A, Makarian E, Namazifard P, Mirhashemi M (2023) Geophysical surveys for saltwater intrusion assessment using electrical resistivity tomography and electromagnetic induction methods. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics 48(4), 1-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Martorana R, Capizzi P, D’Alessandro A, Luzio D (2017) Comparison of different sets of array configurations for multichannel 2D ERT acquisition. Journal of Applied Geophysics 137, 34-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Maślakowski M, Kowalczyk S, Mieszkowski R, Józefiak K (2014) Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) as a tool in geotechnical investigation of the substrate of a highway. Studia Quaternaria 31(2), 83-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mašek J, Kroulík M, Kumhála F (2010) Benefits of controlled traffic farming. In ‘Engineering for Rural Development. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference, Jelgava, Latvia, 28–29 May 2009. pp. 54–58. (Latvia University of Agriculture, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Mechanics)
McQueen DJ, Shepherd TG (2002) Physical changes and compaction sensitivity of a fine-textured, poorly drained soil (Typic Endoaquept) under varying durations of cropping, Manawatu Region, New Zealand. Soil and Tillage Research 63(3–4), 93-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mendieta A, Jougnot D, Leroy P, Maineult A (2021) Spectral induced polarization characterization of non-consolidated clays for varying salinities—An experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 126, e2020JB021125.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mol L, Preston PR (2010) The writing’s in the wall: a review of new preliminary applications of electrical resistivity tomography within archaeology. Archaeometry 52(6), 1079-1095.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Needham SJ, Worden RH, McIlroy D (2004) Animal-sediment interactions: the effect of ingestion and excretion by worms on mineralogy. Biogeosciences 1, 113-121.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nijland W, van der Meijde M, Addink EA, de Jong SM (2010) Detection of soil moisture and vegetation water abstraction in a Mediterranean natural area using electrical resistivity tomography. Catena 81(3), 209-216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Okpoli CC (2013) Sensitivity and resolution capacity of electrode configurations. International Journal of Geophysics 2013, 608037.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Oldenburg DW, Li Y (1999) Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics 64(2), 403-416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Orozco AF, Steiner M, Katona T, Roser N, Moser C, Stumvoll MJ, Glade T (2022) Application of induced polarization imaging across different scales to understand surface and groundwater flow at the Hofermuehle landslide. CATENA 219, 106612.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Paepen M, Deleersnyder W, De Latte S, Walraevens K, Hermans T (2022) Effect of groundwater extraction and artificial recharge on the geophysical footprints of fresh submarine groundwater discharge in the western belgian coastal area. Water 14(7), 1040.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pazzi V, Morelli S, Fanti R (2019) A review of the advantages and limitations of geophysical investigations in landslide studies. International Journal of Geophysics 2019, 2983087.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pedersen HH, Sørensen CG, Oudshoorn FW, Krogsgård P, Munkholm LJ (2015) Evaluation of onion production on sandy soils by use of reduced tillage and controlled traffic farming with wide span tractors. Acta Technologica Agriculturae 18(3), 74-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Perrone A, Lapenna V, Piscitelli S (2014) Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: a review. Earth-Science Reviews 135, 65-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Petersen H, Fleige H, Rabbel W, Horn R (2005) Applicability of geophysical prospecting methods for mapping of soil compaction and variability of soil texture on farm land. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science-Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkunde 168(1), 68-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piccoli I, Furlan L, Lazzaro B, Morari F (2020) Examining conservation agriculture soil profiles: Outcomes from northeastern Italian silty soils combining indirect geophysical and direct assessment methods. European Journal of Soil Science 71(6), 1064-1075.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pulido Moncada M, Helwig Penning L, Timm LC, Gabriels D, Cornelis WM (2017) Visual examination of changes in soil structural quality due to land use. Soil and Tillage Research 173, 83-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Revil A, Karaoulis M, Johnson T, Kemna A (2012) Some low-frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal 20(4), 617-658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Revil A, Ghorbani A, Jougnot D, Yven B (2023) Induced polarization of clay-rich materials – Part 1: The effect of desiccation. Geophysics 88(4), MR195-MR210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rhoades JD, Corwin DL (1990) Soil electrical conductivity: effects of soil properties and application to soil salinity appraisal. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 21(11–12), 837-860.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Robain H, Descloitres M, Ritz M, Atangana QY (1996) A multiscale electrical survey of a lateritic soil system in the rain forest of Cameroon. Journal of Applied Geophysics 34, 237-253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Robert T, Paulus C, Bolly PY, Lin EKS, Hermans T (2019) Heat as a proxy to image dynamic processes with 4D electrical resistivity tomography. Geosciences 9, 414.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Romero-Ruiz A, Linde N, Keller T, Or D (2018) A review of geophysical methods for soil structure characterization. Reviews of Geophysics 56(4), 672-697.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rucker DF, Tsai CH, Carroll KC, Brooks S, Pierce EM, Ulery A, Derolph C (2021) Bedrock architecture, soil texture, and hyporheic zone characterization combining electrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics 188, 104306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saad R, Nawawi MNM, Mohamad ET (2012) Groundwater detection in alluvium using 2-D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT). Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 17, 369-376.
| Google Scholar |
Saffih-Hdadi K, Défossez P, Guy R, Cui Y-J, Tang A-M, Chaplain V (2009) A method for predicting soil susceptibility to the compaction of surface layers as a function of water content and bulk density. Soil and Tillage Research 105(1), 96-103.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saneiyan S, Slater L (2021) Complex conductivity signatures of compressive deformation and shear failure in soils. Engineering Geology 291, 106219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sangawi A, Al-Manmi DAM, Aziz BQ (2023) Integrated GIS, remote sensing, and electrical resistivity tomography methods for the delineation of groundwater potential zones in Sangaw Sub-Basin, Sulaymaniyah, KRG-Iraq. Water 15(6), 1055.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Seger M, Besson A, Cousin II, Giot G, Thiesson J, Agrillo A, Nicoullaud BB, Richard G (2010) In situ temporal and spatial monitoring of the structure of a compacted and cultivated loamy soil by the 2D ERT method. In ‘Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science; Soil Solutions for a Changing World’, 01–06 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia. pp. 75–78. (IUSS-International Union of Soil Sciences)
Singh KKK, Bharti AK, Pal SK, Prakash A, Saurabh , Kumar R, Singh PK (2019) Delineation of fracture zone for groundwater using combined inversion technique. Environmental Earth Sciences 78, 110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Slater L, Binley AM, Daily W, Johnson R (2000) Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics 44(2), 85-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tamirat TW, Pedersen SM, Farquharson RJ, de Bruin S, Forristal PD, Sørensen CG, Nuyttens D, Pedersen HH, Thomsen MN (2022) Controlled traffic farming and field traffic management: Perceptions of farmers groups from Northern and Western European countries. Soil and Tillage Research 217, 105288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Taylor JH (1983) Benefits of permanent traffic lanes in a controlled traffic crop production system. Soil and Tillage Research 3(4), 385-395.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Taylor JA, Coulouma G, Lagacherie P, Tisseyre B (2009) Mapping soil units within a vineyard using statistics associated with high-resolution apparent soil electrical conductivity data and factorial discriminant analysis. Geoderma 153(1–2), 278-284.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thibaut R, Kremer T, Royen A, Kim Ngun B, Nguyen F, Hermans T (2021) A new workflow to incorporate prior information in minimum gradient support (MGS) inversion of electrical resistivity and induced polarization data. Journal of Applied Geophysics 187, 104286.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thibaut R, Compaire N, Lesparre N, Ramgraber M, Laloy E, Hermans T (2022) Comparing well and geophysical data for temperature monitoring within a bayesian experimental design framework. Water Resources Research 58, e2022WR033045.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tullberg J, Antille DL, Bluett C, Eberhard J, Scheer C (2018) Controlled traffic farming effects on soil emissions of nitrous oxide and methane. Soil and Tillage Research 176, 18-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Van Riet B, Six S, Walraevens K, Vandenbohede A, Hermans T (2022) Assessing the impact of fractured zones imaged by ERT on groundwater model prediction: a case study in a chalk aquifer in voort (Belgium). Frontiers in Water 3, 783983.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Vanderhasselt A, Euben R, D’Hose T, Cornelis W (2022) Slurry spreading on a silt loam soil: influence of tyre inflation pressure, number of passages, machinery choice and tillage method on physical soil quality and sugar beet growth. Land 11, 913.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Vinegar HJ, Waxman MH (1984) Induced polarization of shaly sands. Geophysics 49, 1267-1287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
von Hebel C, Rudolph S, Mester A, Huisman JA, Kumbhar P, Vereecken H, van der Kruk J (2014) Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large-scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data. Water Resources Research 50(3), 2732-2748.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Weller A, Slater L, Binley A, Nordsiek S, Xu S (2015) Permeability prediction based on induced polarization: Insights from measurements on sandstone and unconsolidated samples spanning a wide permeability range. Geophysics 80(2), D161-D173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Whiteley JS, Watlet A, Kendall JM, Chambers JE (2021) Brief communication: The role of geophysical imaging in local landslide early warning systems. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 21(12), 3863-3871.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wilkinson PB, Loke MH, Meldrum PI, Chambers JE, Kuras O, Gunn DA, Ogilvy RD (2012) Practical aspects of applied optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography. Geophysical Journal International 189(1), 428-440.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Xue Y, Chen L, Xiang L, Zhou Y, Wang T (2023) Experimental investigation on electromagnetic induction thermal desorption for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management 328, 117200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zare P, Narani SS, Abbaspour M, Fahimifar A, Hosseini SMMM, Zare P (2020) Experimental investigation of non-stabilized and cement-stabilized rammed earth reinforcement by Waste Tire Textile Fibers (WTTFs). Construction and Building Materials 260, 120432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64(2), 253-260.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |