Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Soil and fertiliser nitrogen performance indicators for irrigated cotton in Australia

John Smith https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2774-657X A B C * , Shu Fukai C and Michael Bell B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A AgriFutures Australia, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

B Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia.

C School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.

* Correspondence to: john.smith@uqconnect.edu.au

Handling Editor: Peter Grace

Soil Research 61(4) 329-344 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21323
Submitted: 24 December 2021  Accepted: 29 October 2022   Published: 6 December 2022

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: Current cotton industry nitrogen (N) performance indicators have been developed in a narrow geographic region and do not represent production in southern Queensland (SQld) and southern New South Wales (SNSW), Australia.

Aims: To benchmark soil and fertiliser N use efficiency (NUE) in irrigated cotton crops in these production areas, and to determine whether the current industry benchmarks are relevant in these regions.

Methods: Eight field experiments were conducted over three growing seasons on commercial farms in SQld and SNSW. Experiments applied rates of urea-N to fields using surface or overhead irrigation.

Key results: The industry partial factor productivity for N and internal N use efficiency (iNUE) benchmarks were not suitable NUE targets for these experiments because of variations in soil types, background soil N and other constraints to crop yield. Crops grown with soil N alone accumulated crop N and lint yield at 75% and 79% of crops producing 95% of site maximum lint yield (Y95). At fertiliser rates producing Y95, apparent N budgeting indicated only 25–30% of the potentially available soil and fertiliser N was present in crop biomass and soil mineral N at the end of season.

Conclusions: Improving fertiliser N efficiency in irrigated cotton will require an understanding of site-specific factors that influence N availability, crop N demand and the ability of the crop to produce lint from N accumulated in biomass.

Implications: Further research is required to develop the understanding of regional factors that influence crop N performance for the industry to improve its NUE.

Keywords: agronomic efficiency, cotton, fertiliser nitrogen uptake efficiency, internal nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen, nitrogen fertiliser, nitrogen use efficiency, soil nitrogen uptake efficiency.


References

Antille DL, Moody PW (2021) Nitrogen use efficiency indicators for the Australian cotton, grains, sugar, dairy and horticulture industries. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 10, 100099
Nitrogen use efficiency indicators for the Australian cotton, grains, sugar, dairy and horticulture industries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bange M (2013) Introduction to the cotton industry. In ‘Australian cotton production manual’. (Ed. S Maas) pp. 6–7 (Greenmount Press: Toowoomba, QLD)

Bange MP, Milroy SP, Thongbai P (2004) Growth and yield of cotton in response to waterlogging. Field Crops Research 88, 129–142.
Growth and yield of cotton in response to waterlogging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barakat M, Cheviron B, Angulo-Jaramillo R (2016) Influence of the irrigation technique and strategies on the nitrogen cycle and budget: a review. Agricultural Water Management 178, 225–238.
Influence of the irrigation technique and strategies on the nitrogen cycle and budget: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brackin R, Buckley S, Pirie R, Visser F (2019) Predicting nitrogen mineralisation in Australian irrigated cotton cropping systems. Soil Research 57, 247–256.
Predicting nitrogen mineralisation in Australian irrigated cotton cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braunack MV (2013) Cotton farming systems in Australia: factors contributing to changed yield and fibre quality. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 834–844.
Cotton farming systems in Australia: factors contributing to changed yield and fibre quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bronson KF (2021) Optimal internal nitrogen use efficiency for irrigated cotton in the southwestern United States. Agronomy Journal 113, 2821–2831.
Optimal internal nitrogen use efficiency for irrigated cotton in the southwestern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bronson KF, Hunsaker DJ, Mon J, Andrade-Sanchez P, White JW, Conley MM, Thorp KR, Bautista E, Barnes EM (2017) Improving nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in surface- and overhead sprinkler-irrigated cotton in the desert southwest. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81, 1401–1412.
Improving nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in surface- and overhead sprinkler-irrigated cotton in the desert southwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen D, Suter H, Islam A, Edis R, Freney JR, Walker CN (2008) Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 289–330.
Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Constable GA, Bange MP (2015) The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Research 182, 98–106.
The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Constable GA, Hodgson AS (1990) A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil. 3. Yield and quality of four cultivars. Irrigation Science 11, 149–153.
A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil. 3. Yield and quality of four cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Constable GA, Rochester IJ (1988) Nitrogen application to cotton on clay soil: timing and soil testing. Agronomy Journal 80, 498–502.
Nitrogen application to cotton on clay soil: timing and soil testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cotton Australia Limited (2021) Trust in the Future: Annual Report 2020-21. (Cotton Australia Limited). Available at https://cottonaustralia.com.au/assets/general/Publications/Annual-Reports/2020-21-Cotton-Australia-Annual-Report.pdf [Verified 15 November 2022]

CottonInfo (2020) ‘2020 Australian Cotton Production Manual.’ (CottonInfo). Available at https://www.cottoninfo.com.au/publications/australian-cotton-production-manual [Verified 4 January 2021]

Cotton Research and Development Corporation (2018) Nitrogen (N). In ‘NUTRIpak: a practical guide to cotton nutrition’. (Eds J Smith, J Welsh) pp. 11–28 (Cotton Research and Development Corporation). Available at https://cottoninfo.com.au/publications/nutripak

Crews TE, Peoples MB (2005) Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agroecosystems? A review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72, 101–120.
Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agroecosystems? A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

De Antoni Migliorati M, Bell MJ, Grace PR, Rowlings DW, Scheer C, Strazzabosco A (2014) Assessing agronomic and environmental implications of different N fertilisation strategies in subtropical grain cropping systems on Oxisols. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 100, 369–382.
Assessing agronomic and environmental implications of different N fertilisation strategies in subtropical grain cropping systems on Oxisols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM, Alfaro M, Gourley CJP, Oenema O, Powell JM (2017) Nitrogen performance indicators for dairy production systems. Soil Research 55, 479–488.
Nitrogen performance indicators for dairy production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunn BW, Dunn TS, Orchard BA (2016) Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice. Crop & Pasture Science 67, 1149–1157.
Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris RH, Armstrong RD, Wallace AJ, Belyaeva ON (2016) Effect of nitrogen fertiliser management on soil mineral nitrogen, nitrous oxide losses, yield and nitrogen uptake of wheat growing in waterlogging-prone soils of south-eastern Australia. Soil Research 54, 619–633.
Effect of nitrogen fertiliser management on soil mineral nitrogen, nitrous oxide losses, yield and nitrogen uptake of wheat growing in waterlogging-prone soils of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hearn AB (1986) Effect of preceding crop on the N requirements of irrigated cotton on a vertisol. Field Crops Research 13, 159–75..

Hulugalle NR, Broughton KJ, Tan DKY (2015) Root growth of irrigated summer crops in cotton-based farming systems sown in Vertosols of northern New South Wales. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 158–167.
Root growth of irrigated summer crops in cotton-based farming systems sown in Vertosols of northern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2016) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Clayton South, Vic, Australia)

Janke C, Moody P, Bell MJ (2020) Three-dimensional dynamics of nitrogen from banded enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 188, 227–247.
Three-dimensional dynamics of nitrogen from banded enhanced efficiency fertilisers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnston AM, Bruulsema TW (2014) 4R nutrient stewardship for improved nutrient use efficiency. Procedia Engineering 83, 365–370.
4R nutrient stewardship for improved nutrient use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kant S, Bi Y-M, Rothstein SJ (2011) Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1499–1509.
Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kelley KR, Stevenson FJ (1995) Forms and nature of organic N in soil. Fertilizer Research 42, 1–11.
Forms and nature of organic N in soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kraiser T, Gras DE, Gutierrez AG, Gonzalez B, Gutierrez RA (2011) A holistic view of nitrogen acquisition in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1455–1466.
A holistic view of nitrogen acquisition in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lemaire G, Gastal F (2019) Crop responses to nitrogen. In ‘Crop science’. (Eds R Savin, G Slafer) pp. 159–184. (Springer)

Macdonald BCT, Chang YF, Nadelko A, Tuomi S, Glover M (2017) Tracking fertiliser and soil nitrogen in irrigated cotton: uptake, losses and the soil N stock. Soil Research 55, 264–272.
Tracking fertiliser and soil nitrogen in irrigated cotton: uptake, losses and the soil N stock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald BCT, Latimer JO, Schwenke GD, Nachimuthu G, Baird JC (2018) The current status of nitrogen fertiliser use efficiency and future research directions for the Australian cotton industry. Journal of Cotton Research 1, 15
The current status of nitrogen fertiliser use efficiency and future research directions for the Australian cotton industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Milroy SP, Bange MP, Thongbai P (2009) Cotton leaf nutrient concentrations in response to waterlogging under field conditions. Field Crops Research 113, 246–255.
Cotton leaf nutrient concentrations in response to waterlogging under field conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

North S (2019) Key constraints to irrigated wheat yields in the wouthern Murray-Darling basin. Cells to Satellites. In ‘Proceedings of the 19th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference. 25–29 November. Wagga Wagga NSW Australia’. Available at http://agronomyaustraliaproceedings.org/images/sampledata/2019/2019ASA_North_Sam_79.pdf

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods – Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Vic, Australia)

Redding MR, Shorten PR, Lewis R, Pratt C, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Hill J (2016) Soil N availability, rather than N deposition, controls indirect N2O emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 95, 288–298.
Soil N availability, rather than N deposition, controls indirect N2O emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ (2011) Assessing internal crop nitrogen use efficiency in high-yielding irrigated cotton. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 90, 147–156.
Assessing internal crop nitrogen use efficiency in high-yielding irrigated cotton.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ (2014) Growing high yielding nitrogen efficient cotton. In ‘17th Australian cotton conference’. (Cotton Research and Development Corporation: Gold Coast, Qld Australia)

Rochester IJ, Bange M (2013) Developing N-efficient cotton systems that produce low GHG emissions and promote healthy soil. (Cotton Research and Development Corporation). Available at Inside Cotton.com

Rochester IJ, Bange M (2016) Nitrogen fertiliser requirements of high-yielding irrigated transgenic cotton. Crop & Pasture Science 67, 641–648.
Nitrogen fertiliser requirements of high-yielding irrigated transgenic cotton.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Constable GA (2000) Denitrification and immobilisation in flood-irrigated alkaline grey clays as affected by nitrification inhibitors, wheat straw, and soil texture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 633–642.
Denitrification and immobilisation in flood-irrigated alkaline grey clays as affected by nitrification inhibitors, wheat straw, and soil texture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Gordon K (2014) Nitrogen use efficiency. In ‘17th Australian cotton conference’. (Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia) Available at https://www.crdc.com.au/sites/default/files/pdf/Cotton%20Conference%20-%20papers%20and%20e-summaries%20MR.pdf

Rochester IJ, Constable GA, MacLeod DA (1992) Preferential nitrate immobilization in alkaline soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 737–749.
Preferential nitrate immobilization in alkaline soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Constable GA, MacLeod DA (1993) Cycling of fertilizer and cotton crop residue nitrogen. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 597–609.
Cycling of fertilizer and cotton crop residue nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Constable GA, Saffigna PG (1997) Retention of cotton stubble enhances N fertilizer recovery and lint yield of irrigated cotton. Soil and Tillage Research 41, 75–86.
Retention of cotton stubble enhances N fertilizer recovery and lint yield of irrigated cotton.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Peoples MB, Hulugalle NR, Gault RR, Constable GA (2001a) Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research 70, 27–41.
Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Peoples MB, Constable GA (2001b) Estimation of the N fertiliser requirement of cotton grown after legume crops. Field Crops Research 70, 43–53.
Estimation of the N fertiliser requirement of cotton grown after legume crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rochester IJ, Constable GA, Oosterhuis DM, Errington M (2012) Nutritional requirements of cotton during flowering and fruiting. In ‘Flowering and fruiting in cotton’. Eds (DM Oosterhuis, JT Cothren) pp. 35–50. (The Cotton Foundation: Cordova, Tennessee, U.S.A.)

Roth Rural (2017) Cotton growing practices 2016: findings of the CRDC’s survey of cotton growers. (Cotton Research and Development Corporation: Narrabri, NSW, Australia)

Scheer C, Rowlings DW, Antille DL, De Antoni Migliorati M, Fuchs K, Grace PR (2022) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated cotton production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Improving nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated cotton production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schwenke GD, Haigh BM (2016) The interaction of seasonal rainfall and nitrogen fertiliser rate on soil N2O emission, total N loss and crop yield of dryland sorghum and sunflower grown on sub-tropical Vertosols. Soil Research 54, 604–618.
The interaction of seasonal rainfall and nitrogen fertiliser rate on soil N2O emission, total N loss and crop yield of dryland sorghum and sunflower grown on sub-tropical Vertosols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Systat Software (2017) ‘SigmaPlot 14.0.’ (Inpixon) Available at https://systatsoftware.com/

VSN International (2015) ‘Genstat reference manual.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Welsh J, Powell J, Scott F (2015) Optimising nitrogen fertiliser in high yielding irrigated cotton: a benefit-cost analysis and the feasibility of participation in the ERF. Australian Farm Business Management Journal 12, 51–69.