Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Macrofauna communities and their relationship with soil structural quality in different land use systems

Wilian Demetrio https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-4587 A , Karina Maria Vieira Cavalieri-Polizeli https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1688-4106 B * , Rachel Muylaert Locks Guimarães https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-8486 C , Stephanie de Almeida Ferreira B , Lucilia Maria Parron D and George G. Brown B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Institute for Space Research – INPE, Avenue dos Astronautas 1758, São José dos Campos, SP 12227-010, Brazil.

B Federal University of Paraná – UFPR, Rua dos Funcionários 1540, Curitiba, PR 80035-050, Brazil.

C Departamento de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Via do Conhecimento, km 1, Pato Branco, PR 85503-390, Brazil.

D Embrapa Forestry, Estrada da Ribeira km 111, Colombo, PR 83411-000, Brazil.

* Correspondence to: karina.cavalieri@ufpr.br

Handling Editor: Nick Dickinson

Soil Research 60(7) 648-660 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21157
Submitted: 10 June 2021  Accepted: 14 January 2022   Published: 15 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Soil structural quality (Sq) influences soil water dynamics, greenhouse gas emissions and plant productivity in natural and agricultural environments. Hence, assessing soil structural quality using simple methods is crucial to identifying potential impacts of different land uses.

Aims: Identify correlations between Sq and macroinvertebrate communities in seven land use systems (LUS).

Methods: Seven LUS were studied: native mixed ombrophylous forest (NF), native grassland (NG), native grass pasture (NP), Eucalyptus sp. plantation (EP, 20-years-old), no-tillage annual cropping (NT), integrated crop–livestock (ICL) and crop–livestock–forestry (ICLF). Each LUS had three plots and Sq and macrofauna community were evaluated. Sq was assessed through visual evaluation of soil structure (VESS) – a Sq score was assigned to each identified layer. Soil macrofauna were hand-sorted from each of these layers. Soil samples were taken in each LUS to describe selected chemical and physical attributes related to soil quality.

Results: All LUS had non-degraded soil structure quality (Sq ≤ 3); however, with differences in Sq among LUS mainly in deeper layers. The VESS showed better Sq in NF (1.53) and NP (1.85) compared to the other LUS, with highest Sq scores for ICL and NG. The NP had the largest macrofauna communities (12 183 ind. m−2), comprising mainly termites and earthworms, with taxa richness highest in NF.

Conclusions: Correlations between soil macrofauna (i.e. total density, termites and other groups) and Sq were observed, demonstrating that larger macrofauna populations were associated with better soil structural quality.

Implications: Biological indicators, like soil macrofauna, can be easily measured at low cost and linked to visual Sq, facilitating simultaneous assessment of soil physical and biological health.

Keywords: integrated agroecosystems, land-use change, macroinvertebrates, soil fauna, soil health, soil quality, soil structure, VESS.


References

Abdalla M, Hastings A, Chadwick DR, Jones DL, Evans CD, Jones MB, Rees RM, Smith P (2018) Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 253, 62–81.
Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Adhikari K, Hartemink AE (2016) Linking soils to ecosystem services – a global review. Geoderma 262, 101–111.
Linking soils to ecosystem services – a global review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.
Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alves BJR, Madari BE, Boddey RM (2017) Integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems: prospects for a sustainable agricultural intensification. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 108, 1–4.
Integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems: prospects for a sustainable agricultural intensification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ambus JV, Reichert JM, Gubiani PI, de Faccio Carvalho PC (2018) Changes in composition and functional soil properties in long-term no-till integrated crop-livestock system. Geoderma 330, 232–243.
Changes in composition and functional soil properties in long-term no-till integrated crop-livestock system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) ‘Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford)

Auler AC, Galetto SL, Hennipman FS, Guntzel ED, Giarola NF, da Fonseca AF (2017) Soil structural quality degradation by the increase in grazing intensity in integrated crop-livestock system. Bragantia 76, 550–556.
Soil structural quality degradation by the increase in grazing intensity in integrated crop-livestock system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bacher MG, Fenton O, Bondi G, Creamer RE, Karmarkar M, Schmidt O (2018) The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures. BMC Ecology 18, 59
The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30567522PubMed |

Baer SG, Birgé HE (2018) Soil ecosystem services: an overview. In ‘Managing soil health sustainable agriculture’. (Ed. D Reichosky) pp. 17–38. (Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited: London).
| Crossref |

Ball BC, Batey T, Munkholm LJ (2007) Field assessment of soil structural quality – a development of the Peerlkamp test. Soil Use and Management 23, 329–337.
Field assessment of soil structural quality – a development of the Peerlkamp test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ball BC, Guimarães RML, Cloy JM, Hargreaves PR, Shepherd TG, McKenzie BM (2017) Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research 173, 114–124.
Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Balota EL, Calegari A, Nakatani AS, Coyne MS (2014) Benefits of winter cover crops and no-tillage for microbial parameters in a Brazilian Oxisol: a long-term study. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 197, 31–40.
Benefits of winter cover crops and no-tillage for microbial parameters in a Brazilian Oxisol: a long-term study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartz MLC, Pasini A, Brown GG (2013) Earthworms as soil quality indicators in Brazilian no-tillage systems. Applied Soil Ecology 69, 39–48.
Earthworms as soil quality indicators in Brazilian no-tillage systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartz MLC, Brown GG, da Rosa MG, Filho OK, James SW, Decaëns T, Baretta D (2014) Earthworm richness in land-use systems in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology 83, 59–70.
Earthworm richness in land-use systems in Santa Catarina, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baumert VL, Vasilyeva NA, Vladimirov AA, Meier IC, Kögel-Knabner I, Mueller CW (2018) Root exudates induce soil macroaggregation facilitated by fungi in subsoil. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 1–17.
Root exudates induce soil macroaggregation facilitated by fungi in subsoil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 425–442. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Blanco-Canqui H, Ruis SJ (2020) Cover crop impacts on soil physical properties: a review. Soil Science Society of America Journal 84, 1527–1576.

Borges WLB, Calonego JC, Rosolem CA (2019) Impact of crop-livestock-forest integration on soil quality. Agroforestry Systems 93, 2111–2119.
Impact of crop-livestock-forest integration on soil quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bortolon L, Gianello C, Kovar JL (2010) Phosphorus availability to corn and soybean evaluated by three soil-test methods for Southern Brazilian Soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42, 39–49.
Phosphorus availability to corn and soybean evaluated by three soil-test methods for Southern Brazilian Soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal 54, 464–465.
Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown GG, Benito NP, Pasini A, Sautter KD, Guimarães MdF, Torres E (2003) No-tillage greatly increases earthworm populations in Paraná state, Brazil: the 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology. Cardiff · Wales · 2002. Pedobiologia 47, 764–771.
No-tillage greatly increases earthworm populations in Paraná state, Brazil: the 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology. Cardiff · Wales · 2002.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brussaard L, Van Faassen HG (1994) Effects of compaction on soil biota and soil biological processes. In ‘Developments in Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 11’. (Eds BD Soane, C van Ouwerkerk) pp. 215–235. (Elsevier: Amsterdam).
| Crossref |

Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 233–244.
Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bunnenberg C, Taeschner M (2000) Soil fauna transport versus radionuclide migration. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 92, 35–38.
Soil fauna transport versus radionuclide migration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Castioni GA, Cherubin MR, Menandro LMS, Sanches GM, Bordonal RdO, Barbosa LC, Franco HCJ, Carvalho JLN (2018) Soil physical quality response to sugarcane straw removal in Brazil: a multi-approach assessment. Soil and Tillage Research 184, 301–309.
Soil physical quality response to sugarcane straw removal in Brazil: a multi-approach assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Castle SE, Miller DC, Ordonez PJ, Baylis K, Hughes K (2021) The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 17, e1167
The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cervi AC, von Linsingen L, Hatschbach G, Ribas OS (2007) A vegetação do parque estadual de Vila Velha, município de Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Botânico Municipal 69, 1–52.

Cherubin MR, Franco ALC, Guimarães RML, Tormena CA, Cerri CEP, Karlen DL, Cerri CC (2017) Assessing soil structural quality under Brazilian sugarcane expansion areas using visual evaluation of soil structure (VESS). Soil and Tillage Research 173, 64–74.
Assessing soil structural quality under Brazilian sugarcane expansion areas using visual evaluation of soil structure (VESS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cherubin MR, Chavarro-Bermeo JP, Silva-Olaya AM (2019) Agroforestry systems improve soil physical quality in northwestern Colombian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 93, 1741–1753.
Agroforestry systems improve soil physical quality in northwestern Colombian Amazon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

da Silva AP, Ball BC, Tormena CA, Giarola NFB, Guimarães RML (2014) Soil structure and greenhouse gas production differences between row and interrow positions under no-tillage. Scientia Agricola 71, 157–162.
Soil structure and greenhouse gas production differences between row and interrow positions under no-tillage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

da Silveira Bueno R, Marchetti L, Cocozza C, Marchetti M, Salbitano F (2021) Could cattle ranching and soybean cultivation be sustainable? A systematic review and a meta-analysis for the Amazon. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 14, 285–298.
Could cattle ranching and soybean cultivation be sustainable? A systematic review and a meta-analysis for the Amazon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Decaëns T, Lavelle P, Jimenez Jaen JJ, Escobar G, Rippstein G (1994) Impact of land management on soil macrofauna in the oriental Llanos of Colombia. European Journal of Soil Biology 30, 157–168.

Demetrio WC, Ribeiro RH, Nadolny H, Bartz MLC, Brown GG (2020) Earthworms in Brazilian no-tillage agriculture: current status and future challenges. European Journal of Soil Science 71, 988–1005.
Earthworms in Brazilian no-tillage agriculture: current status and future challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dray S, Dufour A-B (2007) The ade4 Package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22, 1–20.
The ade4 Package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dudas R, Demetrio WC, Nadolny H, Pasini A, Brown GG, Bartz MLC (2020) Declínio das populações de MINHOCAS no PD. A Granja 859, 47–49.

Fernández PL, Alvarez CR, Taboada MA (2015) Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research 153, 86–94.
Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franco ALC, Cherubin MR, Cerri CEP, Guimarães RML, Cerri CC (2017) Relating the visual soil structure status and the abundance of soil engineering invertebrates across land use change. Soil and Tillage Research 173, 49–52.
Relating the visual soil structure status and the abundance of soil engineering invertebrates across land use change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gale WJ, Cambardella CA, Bailey TB (2000) Root-derived carbon and the formation and stabilization of aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 201–207.
Root-derived carbon and the formation and stabilization of aggregates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In ‘Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods’ (Ed. A Klute) pp. 383–411. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Giarola NFB, da Silva ÁP, Tormena CA, Guimarães RML, Ball BC (2013) On the visual evaluation of soil structure: the Brazilian experience in Oxisols under no-tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 127, 60–64.
On the visual evaluation of soil structure: the Brazilian experience in Oxisols under no-tillage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gould IJ, Quinton JN, Weigelt A, De Deyn GB, Bardgett RD (2016) Plant diversity and root traits benefit physical properties key to soil function in grasslands. Ecology Letters 19, 1140–1149.
Plant diversity and root traits benefit physical properties key to soil function in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27459206PubMed |

Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA (2011) Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use and Management 27, 395–403.
Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA, Giarola NFB, da Silva ÁP (2013) Relating visual evaluation of soil structure to other physical properties in soils of contrasting texture and management. Soil and Tillage Research 127, 92–99.
Relating visual evaluation of soil structure to other physical properties in soils of contrasting texture and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guimarães RML, Neves Junior AF, Silva WG, Rogers CD, Ball BC, Montes CR, Pereira BFF (2017) The merits of the visual evaluation of soil structure method (VESS) for assessing soil physical quality in the remote, undeveloped regions of the Amazon basin. Soil and Tillage Research 173, 75–82.
The merits of the visual evaluation of soil structure method (VESS) for assessing soil physical quality in the remote, undeveloped regions of the Amazon basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gunstone T, Cornelisse T, Klein K, Dubey A, Donley N (2021) Pesticides and soil invertebrates: a hazard assessment. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9, 1–21.
Pesticides and soil invertebrates: a hazard assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 4

Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50, 346–363.
Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18481363PubMed |

IBGE (2017) Área com plantio direto na palha. Censo. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available at https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/Tabela/6855

IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. (FAO: Rome) Available at https://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf

Johannes A, Weisskopf P, Schulin R, Boivin P (2019) Soil structure quality indicators and their limit values. Ecological Indicators 104, 686–694.
Soil structure quality indicators and their limit values.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Joris HAW, Caires EF, Scharr DA, Bini ÂR, Haliski A (2016) Liming in the conversion from degraded pastureland to a no-till cropping system in Southern Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 162, 68–77.
Liming in the conversion from degraded pastureland to a no-till cropping system in Southern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jouquet P, Thi PN, Hong HN, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Chevallier T, Tran Duc T (2011) Laboratory investigation of organic matter mineralization and nutrient leaching from earthworm casts produced by Amynthas khami. Applied Soil Ecology 47, 24–30.
Laboratory investigation of organic matter mineralization and nutrient leaching from earthworm casts produced by Amynthas khami.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jouquet P, Blanchart E, Capowiez Y (2014) Utilization of earthworms and termites for the restoration of ecosystem functioning. Applied Soil Ecology 73, 34–40.
Utilization of earthworms and termites for the restoration of ecosystem functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R, Kienzle J (2015) Overview of the wordwide spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports 8, 1–11.

Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R (2018) Global spread of conservation agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies 76, 29–51.
Global spread of conservation agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keller T, Sandin M, Colombi T, Horn R, Or D (2019) Historical increase in agricultural machinery weights enhanced soil stress levels and adversely affected soil functioning. Soil and Tillage Research 194, 104293
Historical increase in agricultural machinery weights enhanced soil stress levels and adversely affected soil functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lavelle P (1988) Earthworm activities and the soil system. Biology and Fertility of Soils 6, 237–251.
Earthworm activities and the soil system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lavelle P, Bignell D, Heal W, Lepage M, Roger P, Dhillion S (1997) Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. European Journal of Soil Biology 33, 159–193.

Lavelle P, Spain A, Fonte S, Bedano JC, Blanchart E, Galindo V, Grimaldi M, Jimenez JJ, Velasquez E, Zangerlé A (2020) Soil aggregation, ecosystem engineers and the C cycle. Acta Oecologica 105, 103561
Soil aggregation, ecosystem engineers and the C cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lehmann A, Zheng W, Rillig MC (2017) Soil biota contributions to soil aggregation. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 1828–1835.
Soil biota contributions to soil aggregation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Léonard J, Rajot JL (2001) Influence of termites on runoff and infiltration: quantification and analysis. Geoderma 104, 17–40.
Influence of termites on runoff and infiltration: quantification and analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li CH, Ma BL, Zhang TQ (2002) Soil bulk density effects on soil microbial populations and enzyme activities during the growth of maize (Zea mays L.) planted in large pots under field exposure. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82, 147–154.
Soil bulk density effects on soil microbial populations and enzyme activities during the growth of maize (Zea mays L.) planted in large pots under field exposure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lima SS, Ceddia MB, Zuchello F, de Aquino AM, Mercante FM, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Martius C, Boddey RM (2015) Spatial variability and vitality of epigeous termites mounds in pastures of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 39, 49–58.
Spatial variability and vitality of epigeous termites mounds in pastures of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mando A, Stroosnijder L, Brussaard L (1996) Effects of termites on infiltration into crusted soil. Geoderma 74, 107–113.
Effects of termites on infiltration into crusted soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marchão RL, Lavelle P, Celini L, Balbino LC, Vilela L, Becquer T (2009) Macrofauna edáfica em sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária num Latossolo Vermelho do Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44, 1011–1020.
Macrofauna edáfica em sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária num Latossolo Vermelho do Cerrado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marichal R, Grimaldi M, Feijoo M A, Oszwald J, Praxedes C, Ruiz Cobo DH, del Pilar Hurtado M, Desjardins T, Silva Junior MLd, Silva Costa LGd, Miranda IS, Delgado Oliveira MN, Brown GG, Tsélouiko S, Martins MB, Decaëns T, Velasquez E, Lavelle P (2014) Soil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services in deforested landscapes of Amazonia. Applied Soil Ecology 83, 177–185.
Soil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services in deforested landscapes of Amazonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martins MFdO, Thomazini MJ, Baretta D, Brown GG, da Rosa MG, Zagatto MRG, Santos A, Nadolny HS, Cardoso GBX, Niva CC, Bartz MLC, Feitosa RM (2020) Accessing the subterranean ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in native and modified subtropical landscapes in the neotropics. Biota Neotropica 20, 1–16.
Accessing the subterranean ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in native and modified subtropical landscapes in the neotropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mehlich A (1953) ‘Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na and NH4.’ (North Carolina Soil Test Division: Raleigh, NC, USA)

Moro RS, Carmo MRB (2007). A vegetação campestre nos Campos Gerais. In ‘Patrimônio Natural dos Campos Gerais do Paraná.’ (Eds MS Melo, RS Moro, GB Guimarães). pp. 93–98. (Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa)

Nadolny H, Santos A, Demetrio W, Ferreira T, Maia LdS, Conrado AC, Bartz M, Garrastazu M, da Silva E, Lavelle P, Baretta D, Pasini A, Vezzani F, Sousa JP, Cunha L, Mathieu J, Römbke J, Brown G (2020) Recommendations for assessing earthworm populations in Brazilian ecosystems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 55, e01006
Recommendations for assessing earthworm populations in Brazilian ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nascimento DMd, Cavalieri-Polizeli KMV, Silva AHd, Favaretto N, Parron LM (2019) Soil physical quality under long-term integrated agricultural production systems. Soil and Tillage Research 186, 292–299.
Soil physical quality under long-term integrated agricultural production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parron LM, Garcia JR, Rachwal MFG, Franchini JC, Franciscon L, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Brown GG (2015) Avaliação de serviços ambientais no âmbito do projeto ServiAmbi. In ‘Serviços Ambientais em Sistemas Agrícolas e Florestais do Bioma Mata Atlântica.’ (Eds LM Parron, JR Garcia, EB Oliveira, GG Brown, RB Prado) pp. 36–46. (Embrapa, Brasília). Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1024463/avaliacao-de-servicos-ambientais-no-ambito-do-projeto-serviambi

Passioura JB (1991) Soil structure and plant growth. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 717–728.
Soil structure and plant growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plaza-Bonilla D, Cantero-Martínez C, Álvaro-Fuentes J (2014) Soil management effects on greenhouse gases production at the macroaggregate scale. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 68, 471–481.
Soil management effects on greenhouse gases production at the macroaggregate scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pulido Moncada M, Gabriels D, Lobo D, Rey JC, Cornelis WM (2014) Visual field assessment of soil structural quality in tropical soils. Soil and Tillage Research 139, 8–18.
Visual field assessment of soil structural quality in tropical soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodale R (1961) ‘The challenge of earthworm research.’ (Soil & Health Foundation: Emmaus)

Ruiz N, Lavelle P, Jiménez J (2008) ‘Soil macrofauna field manual.’ (FAO: Rome)

Salton JC, Mercante FM, Tomazi M, Zanatta JA, Concenço G, Silva WM, Retore M (2014) Integrated crop-livestock system in tropical Brazil: toward a sustainable production system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 70–79.
Integrated crop-livestock system in tropical Brazil: toward a sustainable production system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sarto MVM, Borges WLB, Sarto JRW, Rice CW, Rosolem CA (2020) Root and shoot interactions in a tropical integrated crop–livestock–forest system. Agricultural Systems 181, 102796
Root and shoot interactions in a tropical integrated crop–livestock–forest system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schofield RL, Taylor AW (1955) Measurement of the activities of bases in soils. Journal of Soil Science 6, 137–146.
Measurement of the activities of bases in soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sekaran U, Lai L, Ussiri DAN, Kumar S, Clay S (2021) Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – a review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 5, 100190
Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shepherd GT (2000) VISUAL SOIL ASSESSMENT on flat to rolling country. (horizons.mv & Landcare Research: Palmerston North) Available at https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/28676/VSA_Volume1_smaller.pdf

Shepherd G, Stagnari F, Pisante M, Benites J (2008) ‘Visual soil assessment.’ (FAO: Rome)

Silva AHd, Favaretto N, Cavalieri KMV, Dieckow J, Vezzani FM, Parron LM, Cherobim VF, Marioti J, Ferrari Neto H (2015). Atributos físicos do solo e escoamento superficial como indicadores de serviços ambientais. In ‘Serviços Ambientais em Sistemas Agrícolas e Florestais do Bioma Mata Atlântica.’ (Eds LM Parron, JR Garcia, EB Oliveira, GG Brown, RB Prado) pp. 71–83. (Embrapa, Brasília) Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1024321/atributos-fisicos-do-solo-e-escoamento-superficial-como-indicadores-de-servicos-ambientais

Taylor HM, Brar GS (1991) Effect of soil compaction on root development. Soil and Tillage Research 19, 111–119.
Effect of soil compaction on root development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tuchtenhagen IK, Lima CLRd, Bamberg AL, Guimarães RML, Mansonia P-M (2018) Visual evaluation of the soil structure under different management systems in lowlands in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 42, 1–13.
Visual evaluation of the soil structure under different management systems in lowlands in southern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valani GP, Martíni AF, da Silva LFS, Bovi RC, Cooper M (2021) Soil quality assessments in integrated crop–livestock–forest systems: a review. Soil Use and Management 37, 22–36.
Soil quality assessments in integrated crop–livestock–forest systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whalley WR, Dumitru E, Dexter AR (1995) Biological effects of soil compaction. Soil and Tillage Research 35, 53–68.
Biological effects of soil compaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zagatto MRG (2014) Fauna edáfica em sistemas de uso do solo no município de Ponta Grossa - PR. MS thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná