Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A method for soil management assessment in an unreplicated commercial field

Juhwan Lee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-2955 A * and Richard E. Plant B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Smart Agro-industry, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Gyeongsangnamdo 52725, Republic of Korea.

B Departments of Plant Sciences and Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

* Correspondence to: juhwan.lee@gnu.ac.kr

Handling Editor: Thomas Bishop

Soil Research 60(7) 743-754 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21090
Submitted: 10 April 2021  Accepted: 21 January 2022   Published: 15 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Unreplicated trials are common in agriculture. However, statistical inferences differ from those of traditional experiments based on small, replicated plots.

Aims: To present a method to assess management effects on soil carbon (C) storage from unreplicated, side-by-side field trials.

Methods: Two estimates of means with spatially correlated errors are compared using a corrected t-statistic. Then causal inference is made by analysing a significant difference between the means (P < 0.05) and its changes over time. The use of the method is described in comparing yield and organic C stocks between two large fields. Yield was measured during 1997–2005 with a commercial yield monitor, and soil organic C stocks during 2003–2005. The fields experienced the same tillage practice until autumn 2003 and then with different tillage intensity.

Key results: The results show that crop C yield did not differ between the fields when using the same tillage practice but was greater in the tilled than the no-till field. The results also suggest that total and particulate organic matter-C contents depend on tillage history. For comparative purposes, the data were also analysed using standard mixed model analysis with a semivariogram model for spatial autocorrelation among the residuals. The mixed model results were generally similar to those of the corrected t-statistic method. The mixed model was often, but not always, less conservative than the corrected t-statistic model.

Conclusions: The method allows analysis of whole-field data and improves our understanding of soil C processes in commercial fields, where agricultural assessment cannot involve replication due to agronomic and economic constraints.

Implications: The method complements observational data analyses and can offer a direction towards whole-field management.

Keywords: crop management, crop yields, observational data, particulate organic carbon, precision agriculture, soil carbon dynamics, soil management, spatial model, tillage, total carbon, unreplicated trials, yield monitor.


References

Aguilera E, Lassaletta L, Gattinger A, Gimeno BS (2013) Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: a meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 168, 25–36.
Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop TFA, Lark RM (2007) A landscape-scale experiment on the changes in available potassium over a winter wheat cropping season. Geoderma 141, 384–396.
A landscape-scale experiment on the changes in available potassium over a winter wheat cropping season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bivand R, Pebesma E, G’omez-Rubio V (2008) ‘Applied spatial data analysis with R.’ (Springer: New York, NY)

Blanco-Canqui H, Ruis SJ (2018) No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma 326, 164–200.
No-tillage and soil physical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brus DJ, de Gruijter JJ (1997) Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80, 1–44.
Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cambardella CA, Elliott ET (1992) Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 777–783.
Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campbell CA, Zentner RP, Bowren KE, Townleysmith L, Schnitzer M (1991) Effect of crop rotations and fertilization on soil organic matter and some biochemical properties of a thick black chernozem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 71, 377–387.
Effect of crop rotations and fertilization on soil organic matter and some biochemical properties of a thick black chernozem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clifford P, Richardson S, Hemon D (1989) Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 45, 123–134.
Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 2720048PubMed |

de Gruijter JJ, ter Braak CJF (1990) Model-free estimation from spatial samples: a reappraisal of classical sampling theory. Mathematical Geology 22, 407–415.
Model-free estimation from spatial samples: a reappraisal of classical sampling theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dutilleul P, Clifford P, Richardson S, Hemon D (1993) Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49, 305–314.
Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellert BH, Bettany JR (1995) Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75, 529–538.
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eve MD, Sperow M, Howerton K, Paustian K, Follet RF (2002) Predicted impact of management changes on soil carbon stocks for each agricultural region of the conterminous United States. Soil and Water Conservation 57, 196–204.

Haining R (1990) ‘Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Hobbs NT (2003) Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. Forest Ecology and Management 181, 223–238.
Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jastrow JD, Amonette JE, Bailey VL (2007) Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 80, 5–23.
Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jin H, Bakar KS, Henderson BL, Bramley RGV, Gobbett DL (2021) An efficient geostatistical analysis tool for on-farm experiments targeted at localised treatment. Biosystems Engineering 205, 121–136.
An efficient geostatistical analysis tool for on-farm experiments targeted at localised treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson JM-F, Allmaras RR, Reicosky DC (2006) Estimating source carbon from crop residues, roots and rhizodeposits using the national grain-yield database. Agronomy Journal 98, 622–636.
Estimating source carbon from crop residues, roots and rhizodeposits using the national grain-yield database.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kern JS, Johnson MG (1993) Conservation tillage impacts on national soil and atmospheric carbon levels. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57, 200–210.
Conservation tillage impacts on national soil and atmospheric carbon levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knapp S, van der Heijden MGA (2018) A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nature Communications 9, 3632
A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30194344PubMed |

Kong AYY, Six J, Bryant DC, Denison RF, van Kessel C (2005) The relationship between carbon input, aggregation, and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 1078–1085.
The relationship between carbon input, aggregation, and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lark RM, Wheeler HC (2003) A method to investigate within-field variation of the response of combinable crops to an input. Agronomy Journal 95, 1093–1104.
A method to investigate within-field variation of the response of combinable crops to an input.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee J, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE, Baer SG, Six J (2009a) Determining soil carbon stock changes: simple bulk density corrections fail. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 134, 251–256.
Determining soil carbon stock changes: simple bulk density corrections fail.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee J, Laca EA, van Kessel C, Rolston DE, Hopmans JW, Six J (2009b) Tillage effects on spatiotemporal variability of particulate organic matter. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2009, 1–14.
Tillage effects on spatiotemporal variability of particulate organic matter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lowder SK, Skoet J, Raney T (2016) The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development 87, 16–29.
The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mitchell JP, Munk DS, Prys B, Klonsky KK, Wroble JF, De Moura RL (2006) Conservation tillage production systems compared in San Joaquin Valley cotton. California Agriculture 60, 140–145.
Conservation tillage production systems compared in San Joaquin Valley cotton.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Paustian K (2005) Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry 72, 87–121.
Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ogle SM, Swan A, Paustian K (2012) No-till management impacts on crop productivity, carbon input and soil carbon sequestration. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 149, 37–49.
No-till management impacts on crop productivity, carbon input and soil carbon sequestration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oksanen L (2001) Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94, 27–38.
Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paustian K, Six J, Elliott ET, Hunt HW (2000) Management options for reducing CO2 emissions from agricultural soils. Biogeochemistry 48, 147–163.
Management options for reducing CO2 emissions from agricultural soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pennock DJ, Anderson DW, de Jong E (1994) Landscape-scale changes in indicators of soil quality due to cultivation in Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 64, 1–19.
Landscape-scale changes in indicators of soil quality due to cultivation in Saskatchewan, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Perez-Quezada JF, Pettygrove GS, Plant RE (2003) Spatial-temporal analysis of yield and soil factors in two four-crop-rotation fields in the Sacramento Valley, California. Agronomy Journal 95, 676–687.
Spatial-temporal analysis of yield and soil factors in two four-crop-rotation fields in the Sacramento Valley, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) ‘Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS.’ (Springer: New York, NY)

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models_. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

Pittelkow CM, Liang X, Linquist BA, van Groenigen KJ, Lee J, Lundy ME, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea RT, van Kessel C (2015) Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368.
Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25337882PubMed |

Plant RE (2007) Comparison of means of spatial data in unreplicated field trials. Agronomy Journal 99, 481–488.
Comparison of means of spatial data in unreplicated field trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria). https://www.R-project.org/.

Richardson S, Clifford P (1991) ‘Testing association between spatial processes. Vol. 20.’ Lecture notes – monograph series. pp 295–308. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Hayward, CA).
| Crossref |

Roel A, Plant RE (2004) Factors underlying yield variability in two California rice fields. Agronomy Journal 96, 1481–1494.
Factors underlying yield variability in two California rice fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Six J, Feller C, Denef K, Ogle SM, Sa JCD, Albrecht A (2002) Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils – effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22, 755–775.
Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils – effects of no-tillage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SSURGO (2017) Soil survey staff, natural resources conservation service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web soil survey. Available at https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

Stewart CE, Paustian K, Conant RT, Plante AF, Six J (2007) Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry 86, 19–31.
Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stewart-Oaten A, Bence JR (2001) Temporal and spatial variation in environmental impact assessment. Ecological Monographs 71, 305–339.
Temporal and spatial variation in environmental impact assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stewart-Oaten A, Murdoch WW, Parker KR (1986) Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time? Ecology 67, 929–940.
Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tate RF (1954) Correlation between a discrete and a continuous variable. Point-biserial correlation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25, 603–607.
Correlation between a discrete and a continuous variable. Point-biserial correlation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor JA, Bates TR (2013) A discussion on the significance associated with Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture studies. Precision Agriculture 14, 558–564.
A discussion on the significance associated with Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Underwood AJ (1994) On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4, 3–15.
On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Kessel C, Farrell RE, Pennock DJ (1994) Carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 natural abundance in crop residues and soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 382–389.
Carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 natural abundance in crop residues and soil organic matter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Veenstra JJ, Horwath WR, Mitchell JP (2007) Tillage and cover cropping effects on aggregate-protected carbon in cotton and tomato. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71, 362–371.
Tillage and cover cropping effects on aggregate-protected carbon in cotton and tomato.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wander MM, Yang X (2000) Influence of tillage on the dynamics of loose- and occluded-particulate and humified organic matter fractions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1151–1160.
Influence of tillage on the dynamics of loose- and occluded-particulate and humified organic matter fractions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willers JL, Milliken GA, Jenkins JN, O’Hara CG, Gerard PD, Reynolds DB, Boykin DL, Good PV, Hood KB (2008) Defining the experimental unit for the design and analysis of site-specific experiments in commercial cotton fields. Agricultural Systems 96, 237–249.
Defining the experimental unit for the design and analysis of site-specific experiments in commercial cotton fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolf J, West TO, Le Page Y, Kyle GP, Zhang X, Collatz GJ, Imhoff ML (2015) Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 29, 1617–1639.
Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |