Carbon sequestration and selected hydraulic characteristics under conservation agriculture and traditional tillage practices in Malawi
Pacsu L. Simwaka
A B D , Eyob H. Tesfamariam B D , Amos R. Ngwira C and Paxie W. Chirwa B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Bvumbwe Agricultural Research Station, PO Box 5748, Limbe, Malawi.
B University of Pretoria, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Corner of Lynwood Road and Roper St, Hatfield 0002, South Africa.
C ICRISAT-Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station, PO Box 1096, Lilongwe, Malawi.
D Corresponding authors. Email: Eyob.Tesfamariam@up.ac.za, pacsusimwaka@yahoo.com, u15015948@tuks.co.za
Soil Research 58(8) 759-769 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20007
Submitted: 7 January 2020 Accepted: 25 August 2020 Published: 1 October 2020
Abstract
Conservation agriculture (CA) is increasingly promoted among smallholder farmers of sub-Saharan Africa in a quest to improve food security while sustaining the natural resource base of the agro-ecosystems where agriculture is based. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of CA and traditional tillage on soil organic carbon (SOC) and selected hydraulic properties in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Malawi. Six farmers hosted on-farm trials in each location, with each farmer having the following treatments: CA with continuous sole maize (CA-SM), CA with maize–legume intercrops (CA-ML), and traditional tillage with continuous sole maize (CT-SM). Soil samples were randomly collected in October 2015, from farmers’ fields located in Chipeni, Chinguluwe, Lemu, and Zidyana where CA had been implemented for 10 years (2005–2015) at six depth intervals: 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80, and 80–100 cm. Bulk density, soil water characteristics, and pore size distribution were determined using undisturbed core samples. At all sites, CA improved total SOC, carbon stocks, and the stable fraction of particulate organic carbon. Maize–legume intercropping under CA had 35%, 33%, and 73% more total SOC than CT-SM in Chipeni, Lemu, and Zidyana respectively. In Chinguluwe and Lemu, CA-ML had 0.54 and 0.50 g kg–1 respectively more stable fraction of particulate organic carbon (POMP) than CT-SM; whereas in Chipeni, CA-SM had 0.73 g kg–1 higher POMP compared with CT-SM. CA also improved soil porosity, pore size distribution, and water retention capacity by increasing the proportion of mesopores and micropores compared with CT-SM. Thus, changing management practices from CT-SM to CA has the potential to improve the soil organic matter and soil hydraulic properties across agro-ecological zones in Malawi, which is important for sustainable agriculture. Farmers should be encouraged to minimise tillage, retain residues as mulch on the soil surface, and practice crop rotation.
Keywords: agro-ecological zones, carbon sequestration, conservation agriculture, hydraulic characteristics, smallholder farmers, traditional tillage.
References
Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Jat ML, Rai M, Sutaliya JM (2016) Conservation agriculture-based wheat production better copes with extreme climate events than conventional tillage-based systems: A case of untimely excess rainfall in Haryana, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 233, 325–335.| Conservation agriculture-based wheat production better copes with extreme climate events than conventional tillage-based systems: A case of untimely excess rainfall in Haryana, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Azooz RH, Arsha MA, Franzluebbers AJ (1996) Pore size distribution and hydraulic conductivity affected by tillage in Northwestern Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 1197–1201.
| Pore size distribution and hydraulic conductivity affected by tillage in Northwestern Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell M, Lawrence D (2009) Soil carbon sequestration – myths and mysteries. Tropical Grasslands 43, 227–231.
Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Kundu S, Gupta HS (2005) Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil & Tillage Research 86, 129–140.
| Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal 54, 464–465.
| Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown B, Llewellyn R, Nuberg I (2018) Global learnings to inform the local adaptation of conservation agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa. Global Food Security 17, 213–220.
| Global learnings to inform the local adaptation of conservation agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cameron KC, Buchan GD (2006) Porosity and Pore Size Distribution. Encyclopaedia of Soil Sciences 2, 1350–1353.
Eusufzai MK, Fujii K (2012) Effect of organic matter amendment on hydraulic and pore characteristics of a clay loam soil. Open Journal of Soil Sciences 2, 372–381.
| Effect of organic matter amendment on hydraulic and pore characteristics of a clay loam soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eze S, Dougill AJ, Banwart SA, Hermans TDG, Ligowe IS, Thierfelder C (2020) Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil structure and hydraulic properties of Malawian agricultural systems. Soil & Tillage Research
| Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil structure and hydraulic properties of Malawian agricultural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAO (2005) ‘Soils Bulletin 80: The importance of soil organic matter, key to drought resistant soil and sustained food production.’ (FAO: Rome, Italy)
FAO (2015) Conservation agriculture. Available at http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html [Verified 15 July 2015].
Gonçalves DRP, De Moraes JC, Mishra U, Fornari AJ, Furlan FJF, Ferreira LA, Inagaki TM, Romaniw J, Ferreira AO, Briedis C (2019) Conservation agriculture based on diversified and high-performance production system leads to soil carbon sequestration in subtropical environments. Journal of Cleaner Production 219, 136–147.
| Conservation agriculture based on diversified and high-performance production system leads to soil carbon sequestration in subtropical environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holden ST, Fisher M, Katengeza SP, Thierfelder C (2018) Can lead farmers reveal the adoption potential of conservation agriculture? The case of Malawi. Land Use Policy 76, 113–123.
| Can lead farmers reveal the adoption potential of conservation agriculture? The case of Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huang S, Sun YN, Rui WY, Liu WR, Zhang WJ (2010) Long-term effect of no-tillage on soil organic carbon fractions in a continuous maize cropping system of Northeast China. Pedosphere 20, 285–292.
| Long-term effect of no-tillage on soil organic carbon fractions in a continuous maize cropping system of Northeast China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson ML (1973) ‘Soil chemical analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India).
Layek J, Shivakumar BG, Rana DS, Munda S, Lakshman K, Das A, Ramkrushna GI (2014) Soybean–cereal intercropping systems as influenced by nitrogen nutrition. Agronomy Journal 106, 1933–1946.
| Soybean–cereal intercropping systems as influenced by nitrogen nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 139, 224–231.
| Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Montemurro F, Diacono M (2016) Towards a better understanding of agronomic efficiency of nitrogen: assessment and improvement strategies. Agronomy (Basel) 6, 31
| Towards a better understanding of agronomic efficiency of nitrogen: assessment and improvement strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ngwira AR, Aune JB, Mkwinda S (2012) On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short-term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Research 132, 149–157.
| On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short-term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ngwira AR, Thierfelder C, Dayton M, Lambert DM (2013) Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 350–363.
| Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ogbazghi ZM, Tesfamariam EH, Annandale JG (2016) Modelling N mineralisation from sludge-amended soils across agro-ecological zones: A case study from South Africa. Journal of Ecological Modelling 322, 19–30.
| Modelling N mineralisation from sludge-amended soils across agro-ecological zones: A case study from South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ogunwole JO, Pires LF, Shehu BM (2015) Changes in the structure of a Nigerian soil under different land management practices. R. Bras. Ci. Solo 39, 830–840.
| Changes in the structure of a Nigerian soil under different land management practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palm C, Blanco-Canqui H, DeClerck F, Gatere L (2014) Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 187, 87–105.
| Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Payne R, Murray D, Harding S (2015) ‘An introduction to the Genstat command language.’ 18th edn. (VSN International: Hertfordshire, UK)
Shukla MK, Lai R, Ebinger M (2006) Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil and Tillage Research 87, 194–204.
| Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sithole NJ, Magwaza LS, Mafongoya PL (2016) Conservation agriculture and its impact on soil quality and maize yield: A South African perspective. Soil & Tillage Research 162, 55–67.
| Conservation agriculture and its impact on soil quality and maize yield: A South African perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (1999) Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 1350–1358.
| Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
TerAvest D, Carpenter-Boggs L, Thierfelder C, Reganold JP (2015) Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 212, 285–296.
| Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thien SJ (1979) A flow diagram for teaching texture by feel analysis. Journal of Agronomic Education 8, 54–5.
| A flow diagram for teaching texture by feel analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierfelder C, Wall PC (2009) Effects of conservation agricultural techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil & Tillage Research 105, 217–227.
| Effects of conservation agricultural techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierfelder C, Wall PC (2012) Effects of conservation agriculture on soil quality and productivity in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Zimbabwe. Soil Use and Management 28, 209–220.
| Effects of conservation agriculture on soil quality and productivity in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Zimbabwe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierfelder C, Cheesman S, Rusinamhodzi L (2012) A comparative analysis of conservation agriculture systems: benefits and challenges of rotations and intercropping in Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research 137, 237–250.
| A comparative analysis of conservation agriculture systems: benefits and challenges of rotations and intercropping in Zimbabwe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierfelder C, Mwila M, Rusinamhodzi L (2013) Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity. Soil & Tillage Research 126, 246–258.
| Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierfelder C, Matemba-Mutasa R, Rusinamhodzi L (2015) Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa. Soil & Tillage Research 146, 230–242.
| Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tittonell P, Scopel E, Andrieu N, Posthumus H, Mapfumo P, Corbeels M, van Halsema GE, Lahmar R, Lugandu S, Rakotoarisoa J, Mtambanengwe F, Pound B, Chikowo R, Naudin K, Triomphe B, Mkomwa S (2012) Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food security in semi-arid Africa. Field Crops Research 132, 168–174.
| Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food security in semi-arid Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
United Nations (UN) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at: http://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org. [verified 11 March 2020]
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.
| A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walkley A, Black A (1934) Estimation of soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.
| Estimation of soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wang Q, Li Y, Wang Y (2011) Optimising the weight loss-on-ignition methodology to quantify organic and carbonate carbon of sediments from diverse sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 174, 241–257.
| Optimising the weight loss-on-ignition methodology to quantify organic and carbonate carbon of sediments from diverse sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20424912PubMed |
WRB (1998) ‘World reference base for soil resources, Vol. 88.’ (FAO-ISRIC: Rome, Italy)
Yan H, Liang C, Li Z, Liu Z, Miao B, He C, Sheng L (2015) Impact of precipitation patterns on biomass and species richness of annuals in a dry steppe. PLoS One 10, e0125300
| Impact of precipitation patterns on biomass and species richness of annuals in a dry steppe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26713737PubMed |
Zachmann JE, Linden DR, Clapp CE (1987) Macro porous infiltration and redistribution as affected by earthworms, tillage and residue. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 1580–1586.
| Macro porous infiltration and redistribution as affected by earthworms, tillage and residue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
