Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR09026
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(1)

Uncertainty assessment of soil organic carbon content spatial distribution using geostatistical stochastic simulation

Masoomeh Delbari A C , Willibald Loiskandl B and Peyman Afrasiab A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. Email: p_afrasiab@yahoo.com

B Institute of Hydraulics and Rural Water Management, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. Email: willibald.loiskandl@boku.ac.at

C Corresponding author. Email: mas_delbari@yahoo.com

Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(1) 27-35 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09026
Submitted: 31 January 2009  Accepted: 7 October 2009   Published: 26 February 2010

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) affects many processes in soil. The main objective of this study was the prediction and uncertainty assessment of the spatial patterns of SOC through stochastic simulation using 2 simulation algorithms, sequential Gaussian simulation (sGs) and sequential indicator simulation (sis). The dataset consisted of 158 point measurements of surface SOC taken from an 18-ha field in Lower Austria. Conditional stochastic simulation algorithms were used to generate 100 maps of equiprobable spatial distribution for SOC.

In general the simulated maps represented spatial distribution of SOC more realistically than the kriged map, i.e. overcoming the smoothing effect of kriging. Unlike sGs, sis was able to preserve the connectivity of extreme values in generated maps. The SOC simulated maps generated through sGs reproduced the sample statistics well. The reproduction of class-specific patterns of spatial continuity of SOC for the simulated model produced through sis was also reasonably good. The results highlight that when the class-specific patterns of spatial continuity of the attribute must be preserved, sis is preferred to sGs. For local uncertainty, standard deviations obtained using kriging varied much less across the study area than those obtained using simulations. This shows that the conditional standard deviations achieved through simulations depend on data values in addition to data configuration for greater reliability in reporting the estimation precision. Further, according to accuracy plots and goodness statistic, G, sis performs the modelling uncertainty better than sGs. The simulated models can provide useful information in risk assessment of SOC management in Lower Austria.

Additional keywords: prediction, kriging, sequential Gaussian simulation, sequential indicator simulation.


References


Bourennane H, King D, Couturier A, Nicoullaud B, Mary B, Richard G (2007) Uncertainty assessment of soil water content spatial patterns using geostatistical simulations: an empirical comparison of a simulation accounting for single attribute and a simulation accounting for secondary information. Ecological Modelling 205, 323–335.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Caers J (2000) Direct sequential indicator simulation. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th International Geostatistics Congress’. Cape Town, South Africa. (Eds W Kleingeld, D Krige) pp. 39–48.

Chen F, Kissel DE, West LT, Adkins W (2000) Field-scale mapping of surface soil organic carbon using remotely sensed imagery. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 746–753.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Chen F, Kissel DE, West LT, Rickman D, Luvall JC, Adkins W (2005) Mapping surface soil organic carbon for crop fields with remote sensing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60, 51–57. open url image1

Chenu C, Le Bissonnais Y, Arrouays D (2000) Organic matter influence on clay wettability and soil aggregate stability. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1479–1486.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Chilès JP , Delfiner P (1999) ‘Geostatistics modeling spatial uncertainty.’ Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. (Wiley: New York)

Deutsch CV (1997) Direct assessment of local accuracy and precision. In ‘Geostatistics Wollongong ’96’. (Eds EY Baafi, NA Schofield) pp. 115–125. (Kluwer Academic Publishing: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Deutsch CV , Journel AG (1998) ‘GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide.’ 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Englund EJ (1993) Stochastic simulation: environmental applications. In ‘Environmental modeling with GIS’. (Eds MF Goodchild, BO Parks, LT Steyaert) pp. 432–437. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Goovaerts P (1997) ‘Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Goovaerts P (1999) Impact of the simulation algorithm, magnitude of ergodic fluctuations and number of realizations on the spaces of uncertainty of flow properties. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 13, 161–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Goovaerts P (2001) Geostatistical modeling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 103, 3–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Isaaks EH , Srivastava RM (1989) ‘An introduction to applied geostatistics.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Journel AG (1983) Non-parametric estimation of spatial distributions. Mathematical Geology 15, 445–468.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Juang KW, Chen YS, Lee DY (2004) Using sequential indicator simulation to assess the uncertainty of delineating heavy-metal contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 127, 229–238.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Le Bissonnais Y, Arrouays D (1997) Aggregate stability and assessment of crustability and erodibility. 2. Application to humic loamy soils with various organic carbon content. European Journal of Soil Science 48, 39–48.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leuangthong O, McLennan JA, Deutsch CV (2004) Minimum acceptance criteria for geostatistical realizations. Natural Resources Research 13, 131–141.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mowrer HT (2000) Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation, and importance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27, 139–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mueller TG, Pierce FJ (2003) Soil carbon maps: enhancing spatial estimates with simple terrain attributes at multiple scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 258–267.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Pachepsky Y, Acock B (1998) Stochastic imaging of soil parameters to assess variability and uncertainty of crop yield responses. Geoderma 85, 213–229.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Remy N (2004) ‘S-Gems: Geostatistical earth modeling software: user’s manual.’ (Stanford University: Stanford, CA)

Rossi RE, Borth PW, Tollefson JJ (1993) Stochastic simulation for characterizing ecological spatial patterns and appraising risk. Ecological Applications 3, 719–735.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schnabel U, Tietje O, Scholz RW (2004) Uncertainty assessment for management of soil contaminants with sparse data. Environmental Management 33, 911–925.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Simbahan GC, Dobermann A, Goovaerts P, Ping J, Haddix ML (2006) Fine-resolution mapping of soil organic carbon based on multivariate secondary data. Geoderma 132, 471–489.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Journal of Soil Science 33, 141–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Van Meirvenne M, Pannier J, Hofman G, Louwagie G (1996) Regional characterization of the long-term change in soil organic carbon under intensive agriculture. Soil Use and Management 12, 86–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhao Y, Shi X, Yu D, Wang H, Sun W (2005) Uncertainty assessment of spatial patterns of soil organic carbon density using sequential indicator simulation, a case study of Hebei Province, China. Chemosphere 59, 1527–1535.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Zötl JG (1997) The spa Deutsch-Altenburg and the hydrogeology of the Vienna basin (Austria). Environmental Geology 29, 176–187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1