An analytical tool for understanding the properties and behaviour of variable charge soils
G. P. GillmanCSIRO Land and Water, Private Mail Bag PO, Aitkenvale, Qld 4814, Australia. Email: Gavin.Gillman@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(2) 83-90 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR06117
Submitted: 31 August 2006 Accepted: 15 December 2006 Published: 28 March 2007
Abstract
Routine analyses for soil cation exchange properties usually give only limited insight into the properties and management of soils containing significant amounts of variable charge. In this paper a procedure for determining a soil Charge Fingerprint is fully described, a model developed from simplified theory to underpin the methodology is discussed, and examples of the usefulness of the approach are given. Operationally defined cation and anion exchange capacities (CEC and AEC) are determined over an appropriate pH range (pH 4 to pH 6 is suggested) using Ca and Cl as the index cations. At low pH, Ca does not always fully saturate the CEC, so that it is necessary to distinguish a Basic CEC (Ca ads.) from the Total CEC (Ca + Al ads.). The graphical representation of CECT, CECB, and AEC v. pH constitutes the Charge Fingerprint. Though not intended as a routine instrument, its determination on key samples in a characterisation exercise places routinely determined basic and acidic cations in context.
Examples are given of large scale characterisation studies that link soils from different continents having similar surface charge characteristics; of the assessment of the success or otherwise of producing permanent positive charge in synthetically prepared Ti-substituted goethites; and of the evaluation of the effect of adding crushed basic rock amendment on the surface charge properties of a variable charge soil. The formulation of a Depreciation Index, which classifies soils in terms of their departure in basic cation content from an arbitrarily defined ‘ideal’ condition, is suggested for use in soil resource assessment.
Acknowledgment
The author acknowledges a long and fruitful association with Dr Goro Uehara of the University of Hawaii, and his significant contribution to the formulation of concepts contained in this article.
Bolland MDA,
Posner AM, Quirk JP
(1976) Surface charge on kaolinite in aqueous suspensions. Australian Journal of Soil Research 14, 197–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowden JW,
Posner AM, Quirk JP
(1977) Ionic adsorption on variable charge mineral surfaces. Theoretical charge development and titration curves. Australian Journal of Soil Research 15, 121–136.
Gillman GP, Bell LC
(1978) Soil solution studies on weathered soils from tropical north Queensalnd. Australian Journal of Soil Research 16, 67–77.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillman GP,
Bristow KL, Hallman MJ
(1989) Leaching of applied calcium and potassium from an Oxisol in humid tropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 27, 183–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillman GP, Sinclair D
(1987) The grouping of soils with similar charge properties as a basis for agrotechnology transfer. Australian Journal of Soil Research 25, 275–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillman GP, Sumpter EA
(1986a) Surface charge characteristics and lime requirements of soils derived from basaltic, granitic, and metamorphic rocks in high rainfall tropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 173–192.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillman GP, Sumpter EA
(1986b) Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 61–66.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillman GP, Uehara G
(1980) Charge characteristics of soils with variable and permanent charge minerals: 2. Experimental. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 252–255.
Menzies NW, Gillman GP
(1997) Chemical characterization of soils of a tropical humid forest zone: A methodology. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 1355–1363.
Parker JC,
Zelazny LW,
Sampath S, Harris WG
(1979) A critical evaluation of the extension of zero point of charge (ZPC) theory to soil systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43, 668–674.
van Raij B, Peech M
(1972) Electrochemical properties of some Oxisols and Alfisols of the tropics. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 36, 587–593.
Sposito G
(1981) The operational definition of the zero point of charge in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45, 292–297.
Tessens E, Zauyah S
(1982) Positive permanent charge in Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46, 1103–1106.
Uehara G, Gillman GP
(1980) Chemistry of soils with mixtures of variable and permanent charge minerals: 1. Theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 250–252.
