Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Participatory soil quality assessment: The case of smallholder farmers in Ethiopian highlands

Teklu Erkossa A B , Karl Stahr A and Thomas Gaiser A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Universität Hohenheim, Institute of soil science and Land Evaluation (310), Postfach 70 05 62 D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany.

B Corresponding author. Email: erkossa@yahoo.com

Australian Journal of Soil Research 42(7) 793-797 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04021
Submitted: 3 February 2004  Accepted: 22 June 2004   Published: 12 November 2004

Abstract

The study was conducted at Caffee Doonsa (08°88′N, 39°08′E; 2400 m asl), a small watershed in the central highlands of Ethiopia, in order to identify farmers’ goals of soil management and the indicators they use in selecting soils for a certain function, and to categorise the soils in different quality groups with respect to the major functions. Thirty-six male farmers of different age and wealth groups participated in a Participatory Rural Appraisal technique. They listed and prioritised 12 soil functions in the area and itemised the soil quality indicators (characteristics). Based on the indicators, the soils in the watershed were classified into 3 soil quality (SQ) groups (Abolse, Kooticha, and Carii). The SQ groups have been evaluated and ranked for the major soil functions. For crop production, Abolse was graded best, followed by Kooticha and Carii, respectively. The grain and straw yield data of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) taken from the SQ groups confirmed the farmers claim, in that Abolse gave the highest grain yield (4573 kg/ha), followed by 4411 and 3657 kg/ha for Kooticha and Carii, respectively. Local insights should be included in systematic soil quality assessment, and in planning and implementation of various soil management interventions.

Additional keywords: Ethiopia, soil function, soil quality group, soil quality indicators, Vertisol.


References


Chambers R (1992) Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. ‘Institute of Development Studies’. IDS Discussion paper No. 311. (University of Brighton : Sussex, UK.)

Eswaran H, Beinroth FH, Reich PF, Quandt LA (1999) Guy D. Smith memorial slide collection Vertisols: Their properties, classification, distribution and management. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service website. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/worldsoils

Gregorich EG, Carter MR, Angers DA, Monreal CM, Ellert BH (1994) Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 74( ), 367–385. open url image1

Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil Quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61( ), 4–10. open url image1

Kenea Y (2000) Baseline survey of Caffee Doonsa pilot watershed site. Vertisols Project, Terminal Report (1997–2000), Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.

Mesfin, A (1998). ‘Nature and management of Ethiopian soils.’ (Alemaya University of Agriculture: Alemaya, Ethiopia)