Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR03085
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 42(6)

Upland active acid sulfate soils from construction of new Stafford County, Virginia, USA, Airport

D. S. Fanning A C , Cary Coppock A , Z. W. Orndorff B , W. L. Daniels B and M. C. Rabenhorst A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4452, USA.

B Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404, USA.

C Corresponding author; email: dsf@umd.edu, Delvindel@aol.com

Australian Journal of Soil Research 42(6) 527-536 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR03085
Submitted: 16 May 2003  Accepted: 11 February 2004   Published: 17 September 2004

Abstract

This paper reports on a situation where severe active acid sulfate soils were brought into existence by the construction of a new (opened in 2002) airport in Stafford County, VA, approximately 60 km south-west of Washington, DC. About 290 ha of new land surface was brought into existence that consisted of both scalped land surfaces on steep slopes, and spoil (fill), some of which was graded to provide level land surfaces for paved runways. Over 150 ha of ultra acidic (pH <3.5 at soil surface) post-construction acid sulfate soils remained barren for over 2 years before the acid sulfate soil situation was properly recognised. Construction took place in an originally dissected landscape with about 30 m of local relief. The construction was designed to balance the cut and fill areas so that soil materials would not need to be taken from the area or brought to it from other locations. This resulted in some deep cuts (scalped surfaces) in the higher parts of the landscapes, which retained slopes of about 25%. Great difficulty was encountered in establishing vegetation on these surfaces. The exposed sulfidic materials were dense, commonly on steep slopes, and developed low pHs, some <pH 2, after exposure. After a dry period in the autumn of 2001, sulfuric horizons crusted over with bitter hydrated sulfate salt minerals had formed in the surface of sulfidic materials originally exposed in 1999. By X-ray diffraction, halotrychite, Fe2+Al2(SO4)4.22H2O, was identified as a main white salt mineral and copiapite group minerals, e.g. Al2/3Fe3+4(SO4)6(OH)2.20H2O for aluminocopiapite, were identified as a yellow salt minerals. Information about, and photographs of, the site, soils, and drainage waters are presented, including examples of deleterious environmental impacts.

Intensive reclamation/revegetation measures were initiated in 2002. These involved the application of high rates of lime stabilised biosolids (sewage sludge) incorporated to a depth of about 0.15 m to neutralise acidity and add organic matter and nutrients to the soils. These measures permitted the establishment of acid- and salt-tolerant grasses on the acid sulfate soils and caused dramatic increases in pH and drops in Fe and Al levels in stream waters leaving the site. However, they also caused initial large increases in ammonia/ammonium-N in the waters and subsequent increases in NO3-N in the waters.

Experience with this and other similar sites demonstrates the need for engineers involved with earth-moving construction activities to be educated in the principles of acid sulfate soils so that the number of such disturbances that result in the creation of active acid sulfate soils can be lessened or, preferably, eliminated. Plans for recognition and reclamation of acid sulfate soil situations should be built into the construction plans and designs when it is necessary to disturb sulfidic materials.

Additional keywords: acid rock drainage, sulfidic materials, sulfuric horizons, salinity.


Acknowledgments

Thanks to Campbell and Paris Engineers and Mark Cross, site landscape architect, for discussions about and for access to the Stafford Airport during its construction. Thanks also to Dr Brian Needelman and the Soil and Water Geo-spatial Analysis Laboratory of the University of Maryland Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture for help with computer manipulation of images for both the poster and written versions of this paper.


References


Barnhisel, RI ,  and  Harrison, J (1976). ‘Estimating lime requirement by a modified hydrogen peroxide potential acidity method.’ (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Soil Testing Laboratory: Lexington, KY)

Daniels WL, Orndorff ZW (2003) Acid rock drainage from highway and construction activities in Virginia, USA. ‘Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage’. Cairns, Qld. (Ed. C Bell ) pp. 479–487. (Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Carlton, Vic.)


Demas SY, Hall AM, Fanning DS, Rabenhorst MC, Dzantor EK (2004) Acid sulfate soils in dredged materials from tidal Pocomoke Sound in Somerset County, MD, USA. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 537–545.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fanning DS, Burch SN (1997) Acid sulfate soils and some associated environmental problems. ‘Soils and environment’. Advances in Geoecology 30.,(Eds K Auerwald, H Stanjek, JM Bigham) pp. 145–158. (Catena Verlag: Reiskirchen, Germany)

Fanning DS, Burch SN (2000) Coastal acid sulfate soils. ‘Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands’. Agronomy Monograph No. 41.,(Eds RI Barnhisel, RG Darmody, WL Daniels) pp. 921–937. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Fanning, DS ,  and  Fanning, MCB (1989). ‘Soil: morphology, genesis, and classification.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Fanning DS, Rabenhorst MC, Bigham JM (1993) Colors of acid sulfate soils. ‘Soil color’. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 31.,(Eds JM Bigham, EJ Ciolkosz) pp. 91–108. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Fanning DS, Rabenhorst MC, Burch SN, Islam KR, Tangren SA (2002) Sulfides and sulfates. ‘Soil mineralogy with environmental applications’. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 7.,(Eds JB Dixon, DG Schulze) pp. 229–260. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Isgrig, D ,  and  Strobel, A (1974). ‘Soil survey of Stafford and King George Counties, Virginia.’ (US Govt Printing Office: Washington, DC)

Kargbo DM, Fanning DS, Inyang HI, Duell RW (1993) Environmental significance of acid sulfate ‘clays’ as landfill covers. Environmental Geology 22, 218–226. open url image1

Mixon, RB , Berquist, CR , Newell, WL , Johnson, GH , Powars, DS , Schindler, JS ,  and  Radar, EK (1989). ‘Geologic map and generalized cross sections of the Coastal Plain and adjacent parts of the Piedmont, Virginia.’ (US Geological Survey: Reston, VA;, Virginia Division of Mineral Resources: Charlottesville, VA)

Soil Survey Staff (1999). ‘Soil Taxonomy.’ 2nd edn . (US Govt Printing Office: Washington, DC)

Wagner DP, Fanning DS, Foss JE, Patterson MS, Snow PA (1982) Morphological and mineralogical features related to sulfide oxidation under natural and disturbed land surfaces in Maryland. ‘Acid sulfate weathering’. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 10.,(Eds JA Kittrick, DS Fanning, LR Hossner) pp. 109–225. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)