Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sensitivity of selected water retention functions to compaction and inherent soil properties

V. Rasiah and L. A. G. Aylmore

Australian Journal of Soil Research 36(2) 317 - 326
Published: 1998

Abstract

It is known that field-scale variations in subsurface hydraulic characteristics are influenced, to a large extent, by soil properties. Limited information, however, exists on the sensitivity of hydraulic functions to field-scale variations in soil properties. The sensitivity of 4 soil water retention functions, &thgr;(h), to variations in soil properties and changes in bulk density (ρ) across and within soils along a 500-m transect has been assessed in this study. The &thgr;(h) functions compared are those of van Genuchten, Brooks and Corey, Campbell, and Gardner. Water retention characteristics for 7 soils, each packed to 2 relative ρ, were established for each function. The coefficient of determination, R 2 , for the best fit of water retention ranged from 0·79 to 0· 98 for the Gardner and Campbell functions, from 0· 92 to 0·99 for the Brooks and Corey function, and from 0·83 to 0·99 for the van Genuchten function. Simple linear regression analysis indicated the nonlinear slope parameters of the 4 functions were more strongly correlated with soil properties. However, only the van Genuchten slope parameters were sensitive to changes in ρ. No consistency existed between the sensitivity of the linear parameters of the 4 functions and soil properties, and none were sensitive to changes in ρ. Except for the a parameter in the van Genuchten function, all the parameters in this function can be predicted with satisfactory confidence from soil properties and ρ. The results indicate that, of the 4 functions assessed, the van Genuchten &thgr;(h) function is the most sensitive to field-scale variations in soil properties along a transect in a landscape unit and to changes in ρ.

Keywords: soil water, bulk density, texture.

https://doi.org/10.1071/S97056

© CSIRO 1998

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions