The Eriochilus dilatatus (Orchidaceae) complex in Western Australia: subspecies taxonomy is not supported by consistent differences in morphology or distribution
Mark C. Brundrett
A B and Timothy A. Hammer A
A School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: mark.brundrett@uwa.edu.au
Australian Systematic Botany 33(4) 329-345 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB19024
Submitted: 26 March 2019 Accepted: 20 September 2019 Published: 16 April 2020
Abstract
A detailed study of taxonomic features of the Eriochilus dilatatus (Orchidaceae) complex (white bunny orchids) in Western Australia found that there were no consistent differences among most subspecies when herbarium specimens or living plants were compared. These subspecies were originally segregated primarily by differences in leaf size and shape and the number of flowers produced, but a critical examination of herbarium specimens found that these features were highly inconsistent within taxa. These features were also found to be highly variable over time and space within populations of living plants. The distribution patterns, habitat preferences and flowering times of these taxa were found to overlap, even for subspecies brevifolius and orientalis, which occupy the northern and eastern limits of the distribution of this species. Eriochilus dilatatus subsp. magnus and subsp. multiflorus were shown to be synonyms of subsp. dilatatus, whereas subsp. undulatus and subsp. orientalis are synonymised under subsp. brevifolius. As a result of this study, the two recognised subspecies are subsp. dilatatus and subsp. brevifolius, which can be readily separated by plant height, flower numbers and leaf morphology, except for a few intermediate plants where ranges overlap. New keys and descriptions to these taxa are provided. The reasons for previous taxonomic confusion in this group and in many other Western Australian orchids are discussed and research approaches to resolve these issues are suggested.
Additional keywords: intraspecific variability, nomenclature, orchid, synonymisation, typification.
References
Arditti J, Ghani AKA (2000) Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytologist 145, 367–421.| Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bentham G (1873) ‘Flora Australiensis: a Description of the Plants of the Australian Territory. Vol. 6. Thymeleae to Dioscorideae.’ (Reeve: London, UK)
Brundrett M (2014) ‘Identification and Ecology of Southwest Australian Orchids: a User-Friendly Guide.’ (Western Australian Naturalists’ Club Inc.: Perth, WA, Australia)
Brundrett MC (2019) Orchid seed production relative to pollination traits, plant density and climate in an urban nature reserve in Western Australia. Diversity 11, 123
| Orchid seed production relative to pollination traits, plant density and climate in an urban nature reserve in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) ‘Primer V6: User Manual/Tutorial.’ (Primer-E: Plymouth, UK)
Erickson R (1951) ‘Orchids of the west.’ (Paterson Brokensha: Perth, WA, Australia)
George AS (1971) A check list of the Orchidaceae of Western Australia. Nuytsia 1, 166–196.
Grundy MJ, Rossel RV, Searle RD, Wilson PL, Chen C, Gregory LJ (2015) Soil and landscape grid of Australia. Soil Research 53, 835–844.
| Soil and landscape grid of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoffman N, Brown A (2011) ‘Orchids of South-West Australia.’ (Noel Hoffman: Perth, WA, Australia)
Hopper S, Brown A (2006) Contributions to Western Australian orchidology: 3. New and reinstated taxa in Eriochilus. Nuytsia 16, 29–61.
Kuiter RH (2015) ‘Orchid Pollinators of Victoria.’ (Aquatic Photographics: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Lindley J (1840) ‘A Sketch of the vegetation of the Swan River Colony.’ Appendix to the first twenty-three volumes of Edward’s Botanical Register. (James Ridgway: London, UK)
Majeský Ľ, Krahulec F, Vašut RJ (2017) How apomictic taxa are treated in current taxonomy: a review. Taxon 66, 1017–1040.
| How apomictic taxa are treated in current taxonomy: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McArthur WM (1991) ‘Reference soils of south-western Australia.’ (Department of Agriculture, Western Australia: Perth, WA, Australia)
Nauheimer L, Schley RJ, Clements MA, Micheneau C, Nargar K (2018) Australasian orchid biogeography at continental scale: molecular phylogenetic insights from the sun orchids (Thelymitra, Orchidaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127, 304–319.
| Australasian orchid biogeography at continental scale: molecular phylogenetic insights from the sun orchids (Thelymitra, Orchidaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29870858PubMed |
Phillips RD, Barrett MD, Dalziell EL, Dixon KW, Swarts ND (2016) Geographical range and host breadth of Sebacina orchid mycorrhizal fungi associating with Caladenia in south-western Australia. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 182, 140–151.
| Geographical range and host breadth of Sebacina orchid mycorrhizal fungi associating with Caladenia in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pillon Y, Chase MW (2007) Taxonomic exaggeration and its effects on orchid conservation. Conservation Biology 21, 263–265.
| Taxonomic exaggeration and its effects on orchid conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17298532PubMed |
Riley JJ, Banks DP (2002) ‘Orchids of Australia.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA)
Rogers RS (1920) Contributions to Australian orchidology. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 44, 322–359.
Ruibal MP, Triponez Y, Smith LM, Peakall R, Linde CC (2017) Population structure of an orchid mycorrhizal fungus with genus-wide specificity. Scientific Reports 7, 5613
| Population structure of an orchid mycorrhizal fungus with genus-wide specificity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28717170PubMed |
Stern WL (2014) ‘Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. Vol. X: Orchidaceae.’ (Eds M Gregory, DF Cutler) (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)
Swarts ND, Clements MA, Bower CC, Miller JT (2014) Defining conservation units in a complex of morphologically similar, sexually deceptive, highly endangered orchids. Biological Conservation 174, 55–64.
| Defining conservation units in a complex of morphologically similar, sexually deceptive, highly endangered orchids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF (2018) ‘International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code)’, adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress, July 2017, Shenzhen, PR China. Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 159. (Koeltz Botanical Books: Glashütten, Germany)
Whitton J, Sears CJ, Baack EJ, Otto SP (2008) The dynamic nature of apomixis in the angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169, 169–182.
| The dynamic nature of apomixis in the angiosperms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
