Synopsis of the genus Atriplex (Amaranthaceae, Chenopodioideae) for South America
Nicolás F. Brignone A C , Silvia S. Denham A B and Raúl Pozner AA Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (IBODA, CONICET-ANCEFN), Labardén 200, Casilla de Correo 22, B1642HYD San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Calle 122 y 60, 1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C Corresponding author. Email: nbrignone@darwin.edu.ar
Australian Systematic Botany 29(5) 324-357 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB16026
Submitted: 16 June 2016 Accepted: 27 October 2016 Published: 22 December 2016
Abstract
This is the first integrative synopsis of the genus Atriplex L. for South America, based on the study of compared external morphology of extensive collections from South American herbaria, type material, digital images, original publications and field observations. The South American Atriplex flora includes 55 species, 45 of which are native species, mainly distributed in Argentina and Chile (a few of them growing in Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela), and 10 are adventive species. We accept two subspecies for Atriplex cordubensis Gand. & Stuck., namely, subsp. cordubensis and subsp. grandibracteata Múlgura, two varieties for A. imbricata D.Dietr., var. imbricata and var. foliolosa Rosas, proposed one new synonym for A. deserticola Phil., one nomenclatural change for A. mucronata Phil., and designate 19 lectotypes and one second-step lectotype for A. nummularia Lindl. This synopsis also includes a key to the 55 South American species, three new figures for A. asplundii Standl., A. oestophora S.F.Blake and A. rusbyi Britton, references for previous figures of the remaining species, illustrations of different positions of the radicle in the seeds, maps of distribution, taxonomic and morphological notes, and a complete list of material studied.
Additional keywords: Caryophyllales, salt bushes, salt weeds, taxonomy.
References
Aellen P (1938) Revision der australischen und neuseeländischen Chénopodiaeeen I: Theleophyton, Atriplex, Morrisiella, Blackiella, Senniella, Pachypharynx. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 68, 345–384.Aellen P (1968) Drei neue Atriplex–Arten aus Argentinien. In ‘Botanical Studies in the Atuel Valley Area, Mendoza Province, Argentina, Part II’. (Eds TW Böcher, JP Hjerting, K Rahn) Dansk Botanisk Arkiv Udgivet af Dansk Botanisk Forening 22(2), pp. 179–184. (Dansk botanisk forening: Chopenaghen, Denmark)
APG III (2009) An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 105–121.
| An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bassett IJ, Crompton CW, McNeill J, Taschereau TM (1983) ‘The genus Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) in Canada. Communications Branch.’ Monograph 31. (Agirculture Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada) Available at https://www.npss.sk.ca/docs/2_pdf/The_Genus_Atriplex__Chenopodiaceae__in_Canada.pdf [Verified 8 December 2016]
Bentham G, Hooker JD (1880) Atripliceae. In ‘Genera Plantarum, vol. 3(1).’ pp. 53–55. (Lovell Reeve: London, UK)
Bettfreund C (1898) ‘Flora Argentina: recolección y descripción de plantas vivas, vol. 1.’ (Librería alemana de Gmo. van Woerden & Cia: Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Brown R (1810) Chenopodeae. In ‘Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae’. pp. 405–412. (Typis R. Taylor et socii: London, UK).
Busso CA, Bonvissuto GL (2009) Structure of vegetation patches in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 3017–3041.
| Structure of vegetation patches in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cabrera AL (1939) Los jumes y cachiyuyos de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Anuario rural de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Dirección agricultura. Ganadería e Industria, La Plata 15, 159–172.
Cabrera AL, Willink A (1973) ‘Biogeografía de América Latina.’ Programa Regional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico. (Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos: Washington, DC, USA)
Carneiro EC (2008) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Nuevo Catálogo de la flora vascular de Venezuela’. (Eds O Hokche, PE Berry, O Huber) p. 323. (Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela Dr. Tobías Lasser: Caracas, Venezuela)
D’Arcy WG (1970) Jacquin names, some notes on their typification. Taxon 19, 554–560.
| Jacquin names, some notes on their typification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davis PH, Heywood VH (1963) ‘Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy.’ (Oliver & Boyd: London, UK)
Del Pero Martínez MA, Martínez A, Múlgura ME (2002) Biosistemática en especies Argentinas del género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae). Parodiana 12, 75–89.
Del Vitto LA, Múlgura ME, Petenatti EM (1993) Una nueva especie de Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) de la Argentina. Hickenia 2, 77–80.
Dietrich DNF (1852) ‘Synopsis Plantarum seu Enumeratio Systematica Plantarum Plerumque Adhuc Cognitarum cum Differentiis Specificis et Synonymis Selectis ad Modum Persoonii Elaborata. 5.’ pp. 532–539. (B. F. Voigtii: Weimar, Germany)
Flores Olvera H (1992) Taxonomía del grupo Atriplex pentandra (Chenopodiaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, serie Botánica 63, 155–194.
Frankton C, Bassett IJ (1968) The genus Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) in Canada I. Three introduced species: A. heterosperma, A. oblongifolia and A. hortensis. Canadian Journal of Botany 46, 1309–1313.
| The genus Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) in Canada I. Three introduced species: A. heterosperma, A. oblongifolia and A. hortensis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gaertner J (1791) ‘De Fructibus et Seminibus Plantarum, vol. 2.’ (GH Schrammii: Tübingen, Germany)
Gandoger M (1907) Enumeratio Atriplicum in Argentina hucusque cognitarum. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 54, 583–586.
| Enumeratio Atriplicum in Argentina hucusque cognitarum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Giusti L (1984) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Flora Patagónica 8 (4–a), Dicotiledóneas Dialipétalas (Salicaceae a Cruciferae)’. (Ed. MN Correa) pp. 99–137. (Colección Científica del INTA: Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Giusti L (1997) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Flora Fanerogámica Argentina 78’. (Ed. AT Hunziker) pp. 1–52. (Proflora, Conicet: Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Gustafsson M (1976) Evolutionary trends in Atriplex prostrata group of Scandinavia. IV. Taxonomy and morphological variation. Opera Botanica 39, 1–63.
Hall HM, Clements FE (1923) Genus Atriplex: history and generic limits. In ‘The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: the North American species of Artemisa, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex’. pp. 235–355. (Publications of the Carnegie Institution: Washington, DC, USA)
Hedge I (1997) Atriplex tatarica L. In ‘Flora Iranica 172’. (Ed. KH Rechinger) pp. 63–87. (Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt: Graz, Austria)
Hicken CM (1918) Plantas del río Negro, recogidas por el profesor Augusto C Scala. Physis 4, 296–311.
Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E (2001) Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA–GIS. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 127, 15–19.
Horst A (1949) ‘Flora de las Islas San Félix y San Ambrosio.’ (Universo: Valparaíso, Chile)
Jáuregui D, Castro M, Ruiz–Zapata T, Lapp M (2014) Anatomía de los órganos vegetativos de dos especies de Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) de Venezuela. Revista de Biologia Tropical 62, 1625–1636.
| Anatomía de los órganos vegetativos de dos especies de Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) de Venezuela.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jørgensen PM (1999) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador’. (Eds PM Jørgensen, S León-Yánez) Monographs in Systematic Botany, p. 394. (Missouri Botanical Garden: Saint Louis, MO, USA)
Kadereit G, Mavrodiev EV, Zacharias EH, Sukhorukov AP (2010) Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis. American Journal of Botany 97, 1664–1687.
| Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
León B, Monsalve C (2006) Chenopodiaceae endémicas del Perú. Revista Peruana de Biología 13, 256
Linnaeus C (1753) ‘Species Plantarum 2.’ (Impensis Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm, Sweden)
McArthur ED, Sanderson SC (1983) Distribution, systematic, and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In ‘Proceedings Symposium on the Biology of Atriplex and related Chenopods’. (Eds AR Tiedemann, ED McArthur, HC Stultz, R Stevens, KL Johnson) pp. 14–24. (USDA Forest Service: Provo, UT, USA)
McNeill J, Basset IJ, Crompton CW, Taschereau PM (1983) Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Atriplex L. (Chenopodiaceae). Taxon 32, 549–556.
| Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Atriplex L. (Chenopodiaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Smith GF, Wiersema JH, Turland NJ (2012) ‘International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code)’, adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress, July 2011, Melbourne, Australia. Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 154. (Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein, Germany)
Morello J (1951) El bosque de algarrobo y la estepa de jarilla en el Valle de Santa María (Provincia de Tucumán). Darwiniana 9, 340–342.
Múlgura ME, Galarza I (2014) Atriplex. In ‘Catálogo de Plantas Vasculares de Bolivia’. (Eds PM Jørgensen, MH Nee, SG Beck) Monographs in Systematic Botany, pp. 200–211. (Missouri Botanical Garden: Saint Louis, MO, USA)
Múlgura ME, Marticorena A (2008) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur de América del Sur: Argentina, Sur de Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay, Vol. 2’. (Eds FO Zuloaga, O Morrone, MJ Belgrano) Monographs in Systematic Botany, pp. 1909–1929. (Missouri Botanical Garden: Saint Louis, MO, USA)
Múlgura de Romero ME (1979) Novedades en el género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae). Hickenia 1, 199–202.
Múlgura de Romero ME (1981) Contribuciones al estudio del género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) en la Argentina I. Darwiniana 23, 119–150.
Múlgura de Romero ME (1982) Contribuciones al estudio del género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) en la Argentina II. Las especies adventicias. Darwiniana 24, 49–68.
Múlgura de Romero ME (1984) Contribuciones al estudio del género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) en la Argentina III. Darwiniana 25, 235–253.
Nelson A (1902) Contributions from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium. IV. Botanical Gazette 34, 355–371.
| Contributions from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium. IV.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Philippi RA (1860) Chenopodeae. In ‘Viage al Desierto de Atacama: hecho de orden del Gobierno de Chile en el verano 1853–54’. pp. 221–222. (Librería de Eduardo Anton: Halle, Sajonia, Germany)
Rauschert S (1974) Zur Nomenklatur der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands (IV). Feddes Repertorium 85, 641–661.
| Zur Nomenklatur der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands (IV).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reichenbach HG (1828) ‘Conspectus regni vegetabilis.’ (Carolum Cnobloch: Leipzig, Germany)
Rosas M (1989) El género Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) en Chile. Gayana Botanica 46, 3–82.
Skottsberg C (1963) Zur Naturgeschichte der Insel San Ambrosio (Islas Desventuradas, Chile). Arkiv för Botanik 4, 465–488.
Smith JE (1804) Atriplex. In ‘Flora Brittanica 3’. pp. 1090–1095. (Typis J. Davis: London, UK)
Soriano A (1947) Dos nuevas especies del género Atriplex en la Argentina. Darwiniana 7, 396–400.
Spegazzini C (1901) Plantae novae nonnullae Americae australis. Comunicaciones del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 1, 346–349.
Spegazzini C (1916) Una nueva especie de Cachiyuyo del Perú. Physis 2, 241–244.
Taschereau PM (1972) Taxonomy and distribution of Atriplex species in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Botany 50, 1571–1594.
| Taxonomy and distribution of Atriplex species in Nova Scotia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ulbrich E (1934) Chenopodiaceae. In ‘Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 16c’, edn 2. (Eds A Engler, H Harms) pp. 379–584. (Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany)
Welsh SL (2003) Atriplex. In ‘Flora of North America North Mexico, Vol. 4’. (Eds Flora of North America Editorial Committee) pp. 322–381. (Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA)
Zacharias EH, Baldwin BG (2010) A molecular phylogeny of North American Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae) with implications for floral and photosynthetic pathway evolution. Systematic Botany 35, 839–857.
| A molecular phylogeny of North American Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae) with implications for floral and photosynthetic pathway evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |