Molecular taxonomic clarification of Ptilotus exaltatus and Ptilotus nobilis (Amaranthaceae)
Kok K. Lee A , Dion K. Harrison A , Margaret E. Johnston A B and Richard R. Williams AA Centre for Native Floriculture, School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: M.Johnston@uq.edu.au
Australian Systematic Botany 20(1) 72-81 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB06010
Submitted: 13 April 2006 Accepted: 28 November 2006 Published: 26 February 2007
Abstract
A complete botanical key for the genus Ptilotus R.Brown (family Amarathaceae) has not yet been published. Identifying the 100 or more Ptilotus species using morphological characters has been difficult because plants often exhibit slight morphological differences and intermediate characteristics common to several species, subspecies, varieties and forms. Ptilotus exaltatus Nees and P. nobilis (Lindl) F.Muell share many morphological characteristics, but are classified as different species predominantly based on inflorescence colour. The current study involved a molecular phylogenetic analysis of 14 Ptilotus species using sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions ITS 1 and ITS 2 within the 18S–26S nuclear rDNA. Of the 39 accessions analysed, all except those identified as P. exaltatus and P. nobilis clustered according to their respective species based on their morphological taxonomy. In contrast, all 18 P. exaltatus and P. nobilis accessions formed a distinct monophyletic clade with 99% bootstrap values and a low level of sequence variation (GD = 0.002). Taking into account the lack of reliable morphological characters for separating P. exaltatus and P. nobilis, together with the ITS sequence data showing little genetic divergence or genetic structure, we propose that P. exaltatus and P. nobilis are conspecific.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Centre for Native Floriculture, The University of Queensland and State Development, Trade and Innovation. We acknowledge the Mains Roads Department for giving the permits to collect plant material from the North Western District, South Western District and Central Western District. We also acknowledge Tony Bean, Laurie Jessop and Megan Thomas of the Queensland Herbarium, Jenny Milson and David Loch from the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (Longreach) and staff of University of Queensland Gatton nursery for their kind assistance and help.
Ainouche ML, Bayer RJ
(1997) On the origins of the tetraploid Bromus species (section Bromus, Poaceae): insights from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Genome 40, 730–743.
| PubMed |
Baldwin BG,
Sanderson MJ,
Porter JM,
Wojciechowski MF,
Campbell C, Donoghue MJ
(1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82, 247–277.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Benl G
(1959) Ptilotus nobilis (Lindl.) F. Muell. Mitteilüngen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 3, 34–43.
Benl G
(1971) Ptilotus Key. Mitteilüngen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 9, 177–194.
Benl G
(1984) Five new taxa in Ptilotus R. Br. (Amaranthaceae) from the Northern Territory. Muelleria 5, 249–261.
Carroll BJ,
Klimyuk V,
Thomas CM,
Bishop GJ,
Harrison K,
Scofield SR, Jones JCD
(1995) Germinal transposition of the maize element dissociation from T-DNA loci in tomato. Genetics 139, 407–420.
| PubMed |
Cox AV,
Pridgeon AM,
Albert VA, Chase MW
(1997) Phylogenetics of slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae): nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208, 197–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Felsenstein J
(1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Konishi N,
Watanabe K, Kosuge K
(2000) Molecular systematics of Australian Podolepis (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae): Evidence from DNA sequences of the nuclear ITS region and the chloroplast matK gene. Australian Systematic Botany 13, 709–727.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murphy DJ,
Miller JT,
Bayer RJ, Ladiges PY
(2003) Molecular phylogeny of Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae (Mimosoideae:Leguminosae) based on DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region. Australian Systematic Botany 16, 19–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neyland R
(2002) A phylogeny inferred from large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA sequences suggests that the family Dasypogonaceae is closely aligned with the Restionaceae allies. Australian Systematic Botany 15, 749–754.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petersen G,
Seberg O, Larsen S
(2002) The phylogenetic and taxonomic position of Lilaeopsis (Apiaceae), with notes on the applicability of ITS sequence data for phylogenetic reconstruction. Australian Systematic Botany 15, 181–191.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saitou N, Nei M
(1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406–425.
| PubMed |
Sang T,
Crawford DJ, Stussey TF
(1995) Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies (Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: implications for biogeography and concerted evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 6813–6817.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Shepherd KA,
Macfarlane TD, Waycott M
(2005) Phylogenetic analysis of the Australian Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae) based on morphology and nuclear DNA. Australian Systematic Botany 18, 89–115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shrestha S,
Adkins SW,
Graham GC, Loch DS
(2003) Phylogeny of the Sporobolus indicus complex, based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Australian Systematic Botany 16, 165–176.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Small RL,
Cronn RC, Wendel JF
(2004) L. A. S. JOHNSON REVIEW No. 2. Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Australian Systematic Botany 17, 145–170.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smissen RD,
Garnock-Jones PJ, Chambers GK
(2003) Phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences suggests a Pliocene origin for the bipolar distribution of Scleranthus (Caryophyllaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 16, 301–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steane DA,
Nicolle D,
McKinnon GE,
Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM
(2002) Higher-level relationships among the eucalypts are resolved by ITS-sequence data. Australian Systematic Botany 15, 49–62.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stewart DA, Barlow BA
(1976) Infraspecific polyploidy and gynodioecism in Ptilotus obovatus (Amaranthaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 24, 237–248.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tamura K, Nei M
(1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 512–526.
| PubMed |
Thompson JD,
Higgins DG, Gibson TJ
(1994) CLASTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 4673–4680.
| Crossref |
PubMed |
Wright SD,
Keeling DJ,
Ashton FG,
Dawson JW, Gardner RC
(2000) Phylogenetic analyses of New Caledonian Metrosideros and Carpolepis (Myrtaceae) from nrDNA (ITS) sequences. Australian Systematic Botany 13, 919–926.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Xu F, Sun M
(2001) Comparative analysis of phylogenetic relationships of grain amaranths and their wild relatives (Amaranthus; Amaranthaceae) using internal transcribed spacer, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and double-primer fluorescent intersimple sequence repeat markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21, 372–387.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |